His, Hers, and Ours: Gendered Roles and Resources in Academic Departments

References

• Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acker, S., & Armenti, C. (2004). Sleepless in academia. Gender and Education, 16(1), 3–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Association of University Professors. (2015). Survey report table 5: Average salary for men and women faculty, by category, affiliation, and academic rank, 2014–15 (dollars). Retrieved from http://www.aaup.org/sites/default/files/files/2015salarysurvey/2015tab5.pdf
   Google Scholar
• American Association of University Women. (2015). The simple truth about the gender pay gap, fall 2015 edition. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Bagilhole, B., & Goode, J. (2001). The contradiction of the myth of individual merit, and the reality of a patriarchal support system in academic careers: A feminist investigation. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 8(2), 161–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P. (2002). NetDraw: Graph visualization software. Cambridge, MA: Analytic Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Cain Miller, C. (2015, February 6). Is the professor bossy or brilliant? Much depends on gender. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/07/upshot/is-the-professor-bossy-or-brilliant-much-depends-on-gender.html
   Google Scholar
• Callister, R. R. (2006). The impact of gender and department climate on job satisfaction and intentions to quit for faculty in science and engineering fields. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(3), 367–375.
   Google Scholar
• Cress, C. M., & Hart, J. (2009). Playing soccer on the football field: The persistence of gender inequities for women faculty. Equity & Excellence in Education, 42(4), 473–488.
   Google Scholar
• DiRamio, D., Theroux, R., & Guarino, A. J. (2009). Faculty hiring at top-ranked higher education administration programs: An examination using social network analysis. Innovative Higher Education, 34(3), 149–159.
   Google Scholar
• Easton, S. (2012). On being special. In G. Gutiérrez Y Muhs, Y. F. Niemann, C. G. González, & A. P. Harris (Eds.), Presumed incompetent: The intersections of race and class for women in academia (pp. 152–163). Boulder, CO: University Press of Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, M. J. (1982, April). Faculty colleagueship patterns and research productivity. Paper presented at annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Gersick, C. J., Bartunek, J. M., & Dutton, J. E. (2000). Learning from academia: The importance of relationships in professional life. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1026–1044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, J., & Fellabaum, J. (2008). Analyzing campus climate studies: Seeking to define and understand. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 1(4), 222–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitchcock, M. A., Bland, C. J., Hekelman, F. P., & Blumenthal, M. G. (1995, December). Professional networks: The influence of colleagues on the academic success of faculty. Academic Medicine, 70(12), 1108–1116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 422–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibarra, H. (1993). Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review, 18(1), 56–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogler Hill, S. E., Bahniuk, M. H., & Dobos, J. (1989). The impact of mentoring and collegial support on faculty success: An analysis of support behavior, information adequacy, and communication apprehension. Communication Education, 38(1), 15–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, J. M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, J. M. (1987). The association of the oldboy network with productivity and career satisfaction of women academicians, and antecedents to the oldboy network. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of California, Los Angeles, CA., 1987.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2013a). Digest of education statistics 2013, table 315.10, number of instructional faculty in degree-granting postsecondary institutions, by employment status, sex, control, and level of institution: Selected years, fall 1970 through fall 2011. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2013b). Digest of education statistics 2013, table 315.20, full-time instructional faculty in degree-granting postsecondary institutions, by race/ethnicity, sex, and academic rank: Fall 2007, fall 2009, and fall 2011. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation [NSF]. (n.d.). ADVANCE at a glance. Retrieved fromhttp://www.nsf.gov/crssprgm/advance/index.jsp
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, A. (2009). Professing to learn: Creating tenured lives and careers in the American research university. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, V. E., & Mitchell, J. M. (1990). Women connecting with women: Networks and mentors. In S. S. Lie & V. E. O’Leary (Eds.), Storming the tower: Women in the academic world (pp. 58–73). New York, NY: Nichols/GP.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, D., Maple, S. A., & Stage, F. K. (1995). Women and minority faculty job satisfaction: Professional role interests, professional satisfactions, and institutional fit. The Journal of Higher Education, 66(3), 267–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Meara, K., Kuvaeva, A., Nyunt, G., Waugaman, C., & Jackson, R. (2017). Asked more often: Gender differences in faculty workload in research universities and the work interactions that shape them. American Educational Research Journal, 54(6), 1154–1186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Meara, K., & Stromquist, N. P. (2015). Faculty peer networks: Role and relevance in advancing agency and gender equity. Gender and Education, 27(3), 338–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, M., & Welch, E. W. (2013). Professional networks, science ability, and gender determinants of three types of leadership in academic science and engineering. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(2), 332–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Pifer, M. J. (2010). Such a dirty word: Networks and networking in academic departments. (Doctoral dissertation). ProQuest UMI: 3420263.
   Google Scholar
• Pifer, M. J. (2011). Intersectionality in context: A mixed-methods approach to researching the faculty experience. In K. A. Griffin & S. D. Museus (Eds.), Using mixed-methods approaches to study intersectionality in higher education (pp. 27–44). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Ponjuan, L., Conley, V. M., & Trower, C. (2011). Career stage differences in pre-tenure track faculty perceptions of professional and personal relationships with colleagues. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(3), 319–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QSR International Pty Ltd. (2008). NVivo qualitative data analysis software, version 8.
   Google Scholar
• Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1940). On social structure. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 70(1), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, S. M. (1985). Professional networks of junior faculty in psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9(4), 533–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sallee, M. W. (2011). Performing masculinity: Considering gender in doctoral student socialization. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(2), 187–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scantlebury, K. (2002). A snake in the nest or in a snake’s nest: What counts as peer review for a female science educator in a chemistry department? Research in Science Education, 32(2), 157–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (2017). Social network analysis (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Seifert, T. A., & Umbach, P. D. (2008). The effects of faculty demographic characteristics and disciplinary context on dimensions of job satisfaction. Research in Higher Education, 49(4), 357–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Examples and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar