References
- Christensen, A. M., C. M. Crowder, S. D. Ousley, and M. M. Houck 2014. Error and its meaning in forensic science. Journal of Forensic Sciences 59(1): 123–126.
- Collaborative Testing Services Inc. (CTS) 2017. “History of the CTS Forensics Testing Program.” Available at http://www.ctsforensics.com/about/forensic%20history.aspx (accessed 12 April 2017).
- Edmond, G., B. Found, K. Martire, K. Ballantyne, D. Hamer, R. Searston, M. Thompson, E. Cunliffe, R. Kemp, M. San Roque, and J. Tangen 2016. Model forensic science. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences 48(5): 496–537.
- European Network of Forensic Sciences Institutes (ENSFI) 2014. “Guidance on the Conduct of Proficiency Tests and Collaborative Trials.” Available at http://enfsi.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/QCC-PT-001-_-Guidance-on-PT-CE.pdf (accessed April 12, 2017).
- Gutowski, S. 2005. Error Rates in the Identification Sciences. The Forensic Bulletin 23–29.
- Kloosterman, A., M. Sjerps, and A. Quak 2014. Error rates in forensic DNA analysis: definition, numbers, impact and communication. Forensic Science International: Genetics 12: 77–85.
- Koehler, J. J. 2010. Proficiency tests to estimate error rates in the forensic sciences. Law, Probability and Risk, 12: 89–98. Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id= 1755665.
- Koehler, J., J. L. Mnookin, S. A. Cole, B. A. Fisher, I. E. Dror, M. Houck, K. Inman, D. H. Kaye, G. Langenburg, D. M. Risinger, N. Rudin, and J. Siegel. 2011. The need for a research culture in the forensic sciences. Faculty Working Papers. Paper 26. Available at http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/facultyworkingpapers/26/ (accessed April 14, 2017).
- Kolowski, J., C. Barden, C. Brown, J. Leete, and C. Czyryca 2016. Proficiency testing trends Following the 2009 National Academy of Sciences Report, ’Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward‘. Forensic Science Policy & Management: An International Journal 7(3–4): 98–105.
- Kozinski, A. 1997. In praise of moot court–not! Columbia Law Review 97(1): 178–197.
- Moenssens, A. 2009. “Discovery in the United States: Criminal Cases.” In Wiley Encyclopedia of Forensic Science, edited by A. Jamieson and A. A. Moenssens, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Available at https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470061589.fsa015 (accessed April 14, 2017).
- Murphy, D. 2010. “CTS Error Rates, 1992–2005 Firearms/Toolmarks.” Presented at the 41 st Association of Firearm and Tool Mark Examiners (AFTE) Training Seminar, Henderson, NV, May 5, 2010. Available at https://afte.org/uploads/documents/swggun-cts-1992-2005.pdf (accessed 12 April 2017).
- National Research Council (NRC). 2009. Strengthening forensic science in the United States: a path forward. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Available at http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12589.
- National Institute of Forensic Science Australia New Zealand (NIFS). 2017. “After the Fact.” Available at http://www.anzpaa.org.au/forensic-science/resources/atf (accessed April 12, 2017).
- Peterson, J. L. and P. N. Markham 1995a. Crime laboratory proficiency testing results, 1978–1991, I: identification and classification of physical evidence. Journal of Forensic Science 40(6): 994–1008.
- Peterson, J. L. and P. N. Markham, 1995b. Crime laboratory proficiency testing results, 1978–1991, II: Resolving questions of common origin. Journal of Forensic Science 40(6): 1009–1029.
- Presidents Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST). 2016. Forensic Science in Criminal Courts: Ensuring Scientific Validity of Feature-Comparison Methods.” Available at https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/PCAST/pcast_forensic_science_report_final.pdf and https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/PCAST/pcast_forensics_addendum_finalv2.pdf (accessed April 11, 2017).