Collective shadows on the sociodrama stage

References

• Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bion, W. R. (1961/2004). Experiences in groups and other papers. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blatner, A. (2000). Foundations of psychodrama history, theory, and practice (4th ed.). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, R. M. (2011). Un-thought out metaphysics in analytical psychology: A critique of jung’s epistemological basis for psychic reality. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 56, 492–513. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5922.2011.01925.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, R. M. (2013). The ethical dimensions of life and analytic work through a levinasian lens. International Journal of Jungian Studies, 5(1), 81–99. doi: 10.1080/19409052.2012.728146
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, R. M. (2018). Self as political possibility: Subversive neighbor love and transcendental agency amidst collective blindness. International Journal of Jungian Studies, 10(1), 48–75. doi: 10.1080/19409052.2017.1384396
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2005). Giving an account of oneself. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, A. (2018). Forward. P. Khan-Cullors & a. bandele (Eds.), when they call you a terrorist: A black lives matter memoir. Forward. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Board, R. (1978/2014). The psychoanalysis of organizations: A psychoanalytic approach to behavior in groups and organizations. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1912/1999). Totem and taboo. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1921/1990). Group psychology and the analysis of the ego. (J. Strachey, Trans.). New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. (2010). The phenomenology of religious life. (M. Fritsch & J. A. Ferencei, Trans.). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hinton, A. H., (Ed.), (2010). Transitional justice: Global mechanisms and local realities after genocide and mass violence. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hinton, L. (2009). The enigmatic signifier and the decentered subject. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 54, 637–657. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5922.2009.01811.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, C. G. (1927/1970). Women in Europe. The collected works (Vol. 10, 113–133). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, C. G. (1935). The tavistock lectures on the theory and practice of analytical psychology. The collected works (Vol. 18, 5–182). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, C. G. (1998). Nietzsche’s Zarathustra: Notes of the seminar given in 1934–1937: Vol.1. J. Jarrett (Ed.), London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kellermann, P. F. (2007). Sociodrama and collective trauma. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lacan, J. (1981). The four fundamental concepts of analysis. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• LaCapra, D. (2001). Writing history, writing trauma. London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laplanche, J. (1999). Essays on otherness. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Levinas, E. (1996). Basic philosophical writings. A. Peperzak, S, Critchley & R. Bernasconi, (Eds.). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mandavilli, A. (2016). Female scientists turn to data to fight lack of representation on panels. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/06/science/gender-bias-scientific-conferences.html/
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, J. L. (1953/1978). Who shall survive? Foundations of sociometry, group psychotherapy, and sociodrama. Boston, MA: Beacon House.
   Google Scholar
• Nietzsche, R. (2012). Thus spoke Zarathustra. San Bernardino, CA: Simon & Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Perpich, D. (2008). The ethics of Emmanuel Levinas. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rozmarin, E. (2011). To be is to betray: On the place of collective history and freedom in psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 21(3), 320–345. doi: 10.1080/10481885.2011.580675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruti, M. (2013). The other as face in post-Levinasian and post-Lacanian ethics. Proceedings from the psychology & the other conference, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Stanage, S. M. (1973). Cojectivity and the human sciences. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 4(1), 81–97.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, P., & Garcia, G. (1989). Sociodrama: Who’s in your shoes? New York, NY: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Stiegler, B. (2018). The neganthropocene. D. Ross (Ed., Trans). London: Open Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar