References
- Bjola, C., & Holmes, M. (Eds.). (2015). Digital diplomacy: Theory and practice. Routledge.
- Chebankova, E. (2017). Russia’s idea of the multipolar world order: Origins and main dimensions. Post-Soviet Affairs, 33(3), 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2017.1293394
- Cull, N. (2008). The Cold War and the United States information agency: American propaganda and public diplomacy, 1945–1989. Cambridge University Press.
- De Waele, A., Claeys, A.-S., Cauberghe, V., & Fannes, G. (2018). Spokespersons’ nonverbal behavior in times of crisis: The relative importance of visual and vocal cues. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 42(4), 441–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-018-0284-5
- Foreign Policy Concept of the Russian Federation. (2016). https://www.mid.ru/da/foreign_policy/official_documents/-/asset_publisher/CptICkB6BZ29/content/id/2542248?p_p_id=101_INSTANCE_CptICkB6BZ29&_101_INSTANCE_CptICkB6BZ29_languageId=en_GB
- Golan, G. J., & Viatchaninova, E. (2013). Government social responsibility in public diplomacy: Russia’s strategic use of advertorials. Public Relations Review, 39(4), 403–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.09.011
- Hayden, C. (2013). Logics of narrative and networks in US public diplomacy: Communication power and US strategic engagement. The Journal of International Communication, 19(2), 196–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/13216597.2013.775070
- Hocking, B., & Melissen, J. (2015). Diplomacy in the digital age. Clingendael Institute.
- Holmes, M. (2015). Digital diplomacy and international change management. In C. Bjola & M. Holmes (Eds.), Digital diplomacy: Theory and practice (pp. 13–32). Routledge.
- Hong, S., Lee, H., & Johnson, E. (2019). The face tells all: Testing the impact of physical attractiveness and social media information of spokesperson on message effectiveness during a crisis. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 27(3), 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12250
- Ilicic, J., Baxter, S. M., & Kulczynski, A. (2018). Spot the difference: Examining facial characteristics that enhance spokesperson effectiveness. European Journal of Marketing, 52(1/2), 348–366. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-03-2017-0226
- Krasnyak, O. (2018). National styles in science, diplomacy, and Science diplomacy. Brill.
- Krasnyak, O. (2019, October 22). Review – Russia’s public diplomacy: Evolution and practice. E-International Relations. https://www.e-ir.info/2019/10/22/review-russias-public-diplomacy-evolution-and-practice/
- Lee, M. (2001). The agency spokesperson: Connecting public administration and the media. Public Administration Quarterly, 25(1), 101–130. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40861830
- Leparda, M. (2012). Aspect of the organizational communication within the Romanian institution of the spokesperson. International Journal of Communication Research, 2(2), 123–129. https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/21854848/aspects-of-the-organizational-communication-within-the-romanian-
- Lo, B. (2019, August 20). Once more with feeling: Russia and the Asia-Pacific. Lowy Institute.
- Manor, I. (2016). Are we there yet: Have MFAs realized the potential of digital diplomacy? Brill.
- Manor, I. (2019). The digitalization of public diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Matlock, J. (2005). Reagan and Gorbachev: How the Cold War ended. Random House Trade Paperbacks.
- McConnell, F. (2019). Rethinking the geographies of diplomacy. Diplomatica, 1(1), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1163/25891774-00101008
- Mearsheimer, J. J. (2018). Great delusion: Liberal dreams and international realities. Yale University Press.
- Melissen, J. (Ed.). (2005). The new public diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Migliori, S., Di Cimbrini, T., & Consorti, A. (2018). Who is the spokesperson for whom? Intendants, budgets and action at a distance in the Kingdom of Naples during the French decade (1806–1815). Accounting History. https://doi.org/10.1177/1032373218781351
- Nicolson, H. (1961, October). Diplomacy then and now. Foreign Affairs.
- Novikova, A. (2010). Myths about Soviet values and contemporary Russian television. Russian Journal of Communication, 3(3-4), 280–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/19409419.2010.10756778
- Pagallo, U. (2014). The legal challenges of the information revolution and the principle of ‘privacy by design’. In L. Rocci (Ed.), Evolving issues surrounding technoethics and society in the digital Age (pp. 128–148). IGI Global.
- Potter, E. H. (2019). Russia’s strategy for perception management through public diplomacy and influence operations: The Canadian case. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 14(4), 402–425. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-14401070
- Robertson, J. (2018). The ‘stock market of diplomatic reputation’: Reputation on diplomacy’s frontline. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 13(3), 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-13020021
- Rofe, J. S. (2016). Sport and diplomacy: A global diplomacy framework. Diplomacy & Statecraft, 27(2), 212–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592296.2016.1169785
- Rutland, P., & Kazantsev, A. (2016). The limits of Russia’s ‘soft power’. Journal of Political Power, 9(3), 395–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2016.1232287
- Sandre, A. (2013). Twitter for diplomats. DiploFoundation.
- Sell, L. (2016). From Washington to Moscow: US-Soviet relations and the collapse of the USSR. Duke University Press.
- Simons, G. (2011). Attempting to re-brand the branded: Russia’s international image in the 21st century. Russian Journal of Communication, 4(3-4), 322–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/19409419.2011.10756816
- Spence, P. R., Lachlan, K. A., Spates, S. A., Shelton, A. K., Lin, X., & Gentile, C. J. (2013). Exploring the impact of ethnic identity through other-generated cues on perceptions of spokesperson credibility. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5), A3–A11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.026
- The Soft Power 30. (2019). https://softpower30.com
- Toncar, M., Reid, J. S., & Anderson, S. E. (2007). Effective spokespersons in a public service announcement: National celebrities, local celebrities and victims. Journal of Communication Management, 11(3), 258–275. https://doi.org/10.1108/13632540710780247
- Tsvetkova, N. (2020). Russian digital diplomacy: A rising cyber soft-power? In A. Velikaya & G. Simons (Eds.), Russia’s public diplomacy: Evolution and practice (pp. 103–117). Palgrave Macmillan.
- Tsygankov, A. (2018). Russkaya Mezhdunarodnaya Teoriya: Tri Traditsii [The Russian international theory: The three traditions]. RuScience.
- Velikaya, A. (2019). Russian–U.S. Public diplomacy dialogue: A view from Moscow. Place Brand Public Diplomacy, 15(1), 60–63. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-018-0102-1
- Velikaya, A., & Simons, G. (Eds.). (2020). Russia’s public diplomacy: Evolution and practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Verhoeven, J. W. M., Van Hoof, J. J., Keurs, H. T., & Vuuren, M. V. (2012). Effects of apologies and crisis responsibility on corporate and spokesperson reputation. Public Relations Review, 38(3), 501–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.02.002
- Warburton, T. L., & Troester, R. (1997). Three perspectives of the media-organisation relationship: Media personnel, corporate spokespersons and CEOs look at the role of the corporate spokesperson. Journal of Communication Management, 1(4), 335–349. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb023436
- Wolfe, A. J. (2018). Freedom’s Laboratory: The Cold War struggle for the soul of science. John Hopkins University Press.
- Wu, P. (2019). Confrontational maneuvering by dissociation in spokespersons’ argumentative replies at the press conferences of China’s ministry of foreign affairs. Argumentation, 33(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-018-09477-5
- Yablokov, I. (2015). Conspiracy theories as a Russian public diplomacy tool: The case of Russia Today (RT). Politics, 35(3-4), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.12097
- Zonova, T. (2007). Diplomatic cultures: Comparing Russia and the West in terms of a ‘modern model of diplomacy’. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 2(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1163/187119007X180458
- Zuniga, H. G. d., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 319–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x