References
- American Institutes for Research. (2005). Strategies to improve access to the general education curriculum. Washington, DC: Author.
- American Occupational Therapy Association. (2014). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process (3rd ed.). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68(Suppl. 1), S1–S48.
- Bazyk, S., & Case-Smith, J. (2010). School-based occupational therapy. In J. Case-Smith & & J. O’Brien (Eds.), Occupational therapy for children (pp. 715–716). Maryland Heights, MO: Mosby Elsevier.
- Bowe, F. G. (2000). Universal design in education: Teaching nontraditional students. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
- Hall, T. E., Meyer, A., & Rose, D. H. (Eds.). (2012). Universal design for learning in the classroom: Practical applications (Vol. 16). New York, NY: Guildford Press.
- Handley-More, D., Hollenbeck, J., & Orentlicher, M. L. (2013). Education reform initiatives and school-based practice. Special Interest Section Quarterly: Early Intervention & School, 20, 3.
- Hanser, G. (2010). Emergent literacy for children with disabilities. OT Practice, 15(3), 16–20.
- Karger, J. (2005). Access to the general education curriculum for students with disabilities: A discussion of the interrelationship between IDEA ’04 and NCLB. Wakefield, MA: National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum. Retrieved from http://aim.cast.org/learn/historyarchive/backgroundpapers/interrelationship_idea04_nclb
- Montali, J., & Lewandowski, L. (1996). Bimodal reading: Benefits of a talking computer for average and less skilled readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29(3), 271–279.
- Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the Digital Age: Universal design for learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
- Schoonover, J. (2007). Using assistive technology to support participation in context. In L. Jackson (Ed.), Occupational therapy services for children and youth under IDEA (3rd ed.). Bethesda, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.