References
- American Occupational Therapy Association. (2008). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process (3rd ed.). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62(6), 625–676.
- Anderson-Inman, L., Knox-Quinn, C., & Horney, M. A. (1996). Computer-based study strategies for students with learning disabilities: Individual differences associated with adoption level. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29(5), 461–484. doi:10.1177/002221949602900502
- Beaver, J., Carter, M., Taps, K., & Williams, E. J. (2002). Developing writer’s assessment grade 3 teacher resource book. Parsippany, NJ: Celebration Press.
- Behrmann, M. (1994). Assistive technology for students with mild disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 30(2), 70–83. doi:10.1177/105345129403000203
- Bottomley, D. M., Henk, W. A., & Melnick, S. A. (1997–1998). Assessing children’s views about themselves as writers using the Writer Self-Perception Scale. Reading Teacher, 51(4), 286–296.
- Cook, A. M., & Polgar, J. M. (2008). Cook and Hussey’s assistive technologies principles and practice (3rd ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier.
- Crick Software. (2009). Clicker: Scientifically proven. Retrieved from http://www.cricksoft.com/us/products/clicker/science.htm
- Daiute, C., & Morse, F. (1994). Access to knowledge and expression: Multimedia writing tools for students with diverse needs and strengths. Journal of Special Education Technology, 7(3).
- Edyburn, D. (2006). What’s new about assistive technology outcomes in education? AOTA Technology Special Interest Section Quarterly, 16(2), 1–3.
- Gitlow, L., Meserve, M., & Michie, K. (2006). The influence of assistive technology on satisfaction in occupational performance part 1. AOTA Technology Special Interest Section Quarterly, 16(3), 1–3.
- Handley-More, D., Deitz, J., Billingsley, F. F., & Coggins, T. E. (2003). Facilitating written work using computer word processing and word prediction. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57(2), 139–151. doi:10.5014/ajot.57.2.139
- Hetzroni, O. E., & Shrieber, B. (2004). Word processing as an assistive technology tool for enhancing academic outcomes of students with writing disabilities in the general classroom. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(2), 143–154. doi:10.1177/00222194040370020501
- Kielhofner, G. (2006). Research in occupational therapy: Methods of inquiry for enhancing practice. Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.
- Letts, L., Rigby, P., & Stewart, D. (Eds.). (2003). Using environments to enable occupational performance. Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
- Martin, S. (2007). Interactive whiteboards and talking books: A new approach to teaching children to write? Literacy, 41(1), 26–34. doi:10.1111/read.2007.41.issue-1
- Outhred, L. (1989). Word processing: Its impact on children’s writing. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22(4), 262–264. doi:10.1177/002221948902200413
- Swinth, Y., & Handley-More, D. (2008). Handwriting, keyboarding, and literacy: What is the role of occupational therapy? Retrieved from http://www.aota-learning.org/library/description_uni.cfm?course=2008-SBPE_008&begin_uni=y&dcode=SBPE_008a
- Swinth, Y., & Hanft, B. (2007). School-based practice moving beyond 1:1 service delivery. Retrieved from http://www.aota.org/Pubs/OTP/1997-2007/Features/2002/f-091602_1.aspx?css=print
- Tam, C. (2005). Measuring the outcomes of word cueing technology. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 72(5), 301–308. doi:10.1177/000841740507200507
- Wanzek, J., Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Swanson, E., Edmonds, M., & Kim, A. (2006). A synthesis of spelling and reading interventions and their effects on the spelling outcomes of students with LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(6), 528–543. doi:10.1177/00222194060390060501