REFERENCES AND FURTHER READING
- Bucknell, T. (2012). Garbage in, gospel out: Twelve reasons why librarians should not accept cost-per-download figures at face value. Serials Librarian, 63(2), 192–212.
- DeGroote, S.L., Blecic, D.D., & Martin, K.E. (2013). Measures of health sciences journal use: A comparison of vendor, link-resolver, and local citation statistics. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 101(2), 110–119.
- Fleming-May, R.A., & Grogg, J.E. (2010). Practitioner responses on the collection and use of usage statistics. Library Technology Reports, 46(6), 28–34.
- Kinman, V. (2009). E-metrics and library assessment in action. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 21(1), 15–36.
- Marek, K. (2011). Using web analytics in the library: Library Technology Reports. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
- Tenopir, C., & King, D.W. (2007). Perceptions of value and value beyond perceptions: Measuring the quality and value of journal article readings. Serials, 20(3), 199–207.
- Retrieved from http://uksg.metapress.com/content/2xyevuplbrplcdmq/fulltext.pdf
- Timms, G. (2012). Gathering, evaluating, and communicating statistical usage information for electronic resources. In R. Weir (Ed.), Managing Electronic Resources: A LITA Guide (pp. 87–120). Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
- Wical, S.H., & Kishel, H.F. (2013). Strategic collection management through statistical analysis. Serials Librarian, 64(1–4), 171–187