Librarians in transition: Scholarly communication support as a developing core competency

References

• Allen, B. M. (2008). All hype or real change: Has the digital revolution changed scholarly communication? Journal of Library Administration, 48(1), 59–68. doi:10.1080/01930820802029391
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, M. (2014). Institutional repository management models that support faculty research dissemination. OCLC Systems & Services, 30(1), 43–51. doi:10.1108/OCLC-07-2013-0028
   Google Scholar
• Association of Research Libraries. (2013). Service trends in ARL libraries, 1991–2012 [Graph]. Washington, D.C.: Author. Retrieved from http://www.arl.org/storage/documents/service-trends.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, C. W. (2005). The role of reference librarians in institutional repositories. Reference Services Review, 33(3), 259–267. doi:10.1108/00907320510611294
   Google Scholar
• Barton, M. R., & Waters, M. M. (2004). Creating an institutional repository: LEADIRS workbook. Cambridge, MA: MIT Libraries. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/26698
   Google Scholar
• Beaubien, S., Masselink, L., & Tyron, J. (2009). Recasting the role of comprehensive university libraries: Starting points for educating librarians on the issues of scholarly communication and institutional repositories. In D. M. Mueller (Ed.), Pushing the edge: Explore, engage, extend: Proceedings of the Fourteenth National Conference of the Association of College and Research Libraries, March 12–15, 2009, Seattle, Washington. Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research Libraries. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/conferences/confsandpreconfs/national/seattle/papers/95.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Berger, M., & Cirasella, J. (2015). Beyond Beall's list: Better understanding predatory publishers. College & Research Libraries News, 76(3), 132–135. Retrieved from http://crln.acrl.org/content/76/3/132.full
   Google Scholar
• Bladek, M. (2014). Bibilometrics services and the academic library: Meeting the emerging needs of the campus community. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 21(3–4), 330–344. doi:10.1080/10691316.2014.929066
   Google Scholar
• Bonn, M. (2014). Tooling up: Scholarly communication education and training. College & Research Libraries News, 75(3), 132–135. Retrieved from http://crln.acrl.org/content/75/3/132.full
   Google Scholar
• Brantley, S., & Bruns, T. A. (2014, March). Scholarly communication coaches. Presentation at the meeting of the Illinois Association of College and Research Libraries, Oak Brook, IL. Retrieved from http://thekeep.eiu.edu/lib_fac/90/
   Google Scholar
• Bresnahan, M. M., & Johnson, A. M. (2013). Assessing scholarly communication and research data training needs. Reference Services Review, 41(3), 413–433. doi:10.1108/RSR-01-2013-0003
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. (2014). Is almetrics an acceptable replacement for citation counts and the impact factor? The Serials Librarian, 67(1), 27–30. doi:10.1080/0361526X.2014.915609
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, T. A., Knight-Davis, S., Corrigan, E. K., & Brantley, S. (2014). It takes a library: Growing a robust institutional repository in two sources. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 21(3–4), 244–262. doi:10.1080/10691316.2014.904207
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, T., Brantley, S., & Duffin, K. (2015). Scholarly communication coaching: Liaison librarians' shifting roles. In B. Eden (Ed.), Partnerships and new roles in the 21st-century academic library: Collaborating, embedding, and cross-training for the future (pp. 9–29). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Retrieved from http://thekeep.eiu.edu/lib_fac/99/
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, T., & Inefuku, H. (2015). Purposeful metrics: Matching institutional repository metrics to purpose and audience. In B. B. Callicott, D. Scherer, & A. Wesolek (Eds.), Making institutional repositories work (pp. 213–234). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press. Retrieved from https://works.bepress.com/todd_bruns/63/
   Google Scholar
• Buehler, M. A., & Boateng, A. (2005). The evolving impact of institutional repositories on reference librarians. Reference Services Review, 33(3), 291–300. doi:10.1108/00907320510611320
   Google Scholar
• Bull, J., & Eden, B. L. (2014). Successful scholarly communication at a small university: Integration of education, services, and an institutional repository at Valparaiso University. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 21(3–4), 263–278. doi:10.1080/10691316.2014.932264
   Google Scholar
• Burns, C. S., Lana, A., & Budd, J. M. (2013). Institutional repositories: Exploration of costs and value. D-Lib Magazine, 19(1–2). doi:10.1045/january2013-burns
   Google Scholar
• Busher, C., & Kamotsky, I. (2015). Stories and statistics from library-led publishing. Learned Publishing, 28(1), 64–68. doi:10.1087/20150110
   Google Scholar
• Calarco, P., Shearer, K., Schmidt, B., & Tate, D. (2016). Librarians' competencies profile for scholarly communication and open access. Retrieved from Confederation of Open Access Repositories website: https://www.coar-repositories.org/files/Competencies-for-ScholComm-and-OA_June-2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, S. (2001, November 16). The deserted library. The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A35. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, T. A., Lagace, N., & Bahnmaier, S. (2016). Developing standards for emerging forms of assessment: The NISO Altmetrics Initiative. The Serials Librarian, 70(1–4), 85–88. doi:10.1080/0361526X.2016.1157737
   Google Scholar
• Clobridge, A. (2014). Open access: Progress, possibilities, and the changing scholarly communications ecosystem. Online Searcher, 38(2), 42–52.
   Google Scholar
• Corrall, S., Kennan, M. A., & Afzal, W. (2013). Bibliometrics and research data management services: Emerging trends in library support for research. Library Trends, 61(3), 636–674. doi:10.1353/lib.2013.0005
   Google Scholar
• Cox, A., Verbaan, E., & Sen, B. (2012). Upskilling liaison librarians for research data management. Ariadne, 70. Retrieved from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue70/cox-et-al
   Google Scholar
• Creaser, C. (2010). Open access to research outputs — Institutional policies and researchers' views: Results from two complementary surveys. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 16(1), 4–25. doi:10.1080/13614530903162854
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, R., & Chawner, B. (2010). Institutional repositories: Assessing their value to the academic community. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 11(2), 131–147. doi:10.1108/14678041011064052
   Google Scholar
• Dutta, G., & Paul, D. (2014). Awareness on institutional repositories-related issues by faculty of University of Calcutta. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 34(4), 293–297. doi:10.14429/djlit.34.5138
   Google Scholar
• Finlay, C., Tsou, A., & Sugimoto, C. (2015). Scholarly communication as a core competency: Prevalence, activities, and concepts of scholarly communication librarianship as shown through job advertisements. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 3(1), eP1236. doi:10.7710/2162-3309.1236
   Google Scholar
• Foster, N. F., & Gibbons, S. (Eds.). (2007). Studying students: The Undergraduate Research Project at the University of Rochester. Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research Libraries.
   Google Scholar
• Gargouri, Y., Hajjem, C., Lariviére, V., Gingras, Y., Carr, L., Brody, T., & Harnad, S. (2010). Self-selected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research. PLoS ONE, 5(10), e13636. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013636
   Google Scholar
• Gayton, J. T. (2008). Academic libraries: “Social” or “communal?” The nature and future of academic libraries. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(1), 60–66. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2007.11.011
   Google Scholar
• Gilman, I. (2014–2015). Adjunct no more: Promoting scholarly publishing as a core service of academic libraries. Against the Grain, 26(6), 30–34. Retrieved from http://commons.pacificu.edu/libfac/25/
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, G. J. (2012). Strategic access. Legal Information Management, 12(3), 198–202. doi:10.1017/S1472669612000461
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, K. L. (2008). Talk about talking about new models of scholarly communication. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 11(1). doi:10.3998/3336451.0011.108
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, S. E., & Wyatt, A. (2014). Business faculty's attitudes: Open access, disciplinary repositories, and institutional repositories. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 19(2), 93–113. doi:10.1080/08963568.2014.883875
   Google Scholar
• Harnad, S. (2010). Gold open access publishing must not be allowed to retard the progress of green open access self-archiving. Logos, 21(3–4), 86–93. doi:10.1163/095796511X559972
   Google Scholar
• Housewright, R., Schonfeld, R. C., & Wulfson, K. (2013). Ithaka S+R US faculty survey 2012. New York, NY. doi:10.18665/sr.22502
   Google Scholar
• Jaguszewski, J. M., & Williams, K. (2013). New roles for new times: Transforming liaison roles in research libraries. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries. Retrieved from http://www.arl.org/component/content/article/6/2893
   Google Scholar
• Kennan, M. A., Corrall, S., & Afzal, W. (2014). “Making space” in practice and education: Research support services in academic libraries. Library Management, 35(8/9), 666–683. doi:10.1108/LM-03-2014-0037
   Google Scholar
• Kenney, A. R. (2014). Leveraging the liaison model: From defining 21st century research libraries to implementing 21st century research universities. New York, NY: Ithaka S+R. Retrieved from http://www.sr.ithaka.org/wp-content/mig/files/SR_BriefingPaper_Kenney_20140322.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kenney, A. R. (2015). From engaging liaison librarians to engaging communities. College & Research Libraries, 76(3), 386–391. doi:10.5860/crl.76.3.386
   Google Scholar
• Kirchner, J. (2009). Scholarly communications: Planning for the integration of liaison librarian roles. Research Library Issues, 265, 22–28.
   Google Scholar
• Koffel, J., Magarrell, K., Raber, E., & Thormodson, K. (2013). Liaison connection: Building a better community. College & Research Libraries News, 74(10), 534–536. Retrieved from http://crln.acrl.org/content/74/10/534.full
   Google Scholar
• Konkiel, S., & Scherer, D. (2013). New opportunities for repositories in the age of altmetrics. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 39(4), 22–26. doi:10.1002/bult.2013.1720390408
   Google Scholar
• Krier, L., & Strasser, C. A. (2014). Data management for libraries: A LITA guide. Chicago, IL: ALA TechSource.
   Google Scholar
• Malenfant, K. J. (2010). Leading change in the system of scholarly communication: A case study of engaging liaison librarians for outreach to faculty. College & Research Libraries, 71(1), 63–76. doi:10.5860/crl.71.1.63
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, G., Chan, J., & Gross, J. (2013). Library as scholarly publishing partner: Keys to success. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 2(1), eP1091. doi:10.7710/2162-3309.1091
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, B. (2010). Librarians and scholarly communication: Outreach, advocacy, and leadership within the academic community. In W. C. Welburn, J. Welburn, & B. McNeil (Eds.), Advocacy, outreach, and the nation's academic libraries: A call for action (pp. 55–68). Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research Libraries.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, E. T. (2013). Research support: The new mission for libraries. Journal of Web Librarianship, 7(1), 109–113. doi:10.1080/19322909.2013.757930
   Google Scholar
• Mullen, L. B. (2011, May–June). Open access and the practice of academic librarianship: Strategies and considerations for “front line” librarians. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Association of Scientific and Technological University Libraries, Warsaw, Poland. Retrieved from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul/2011/papers/34
   Google Scholar
• Neugebauer, T., & Murray, A. (2013). The critical role of institutional services in open access advocacy. International Journal of Digital Curation, 8(1), 84–106. doi:10.2218/ijdc.v8i1.238
   Google Scholar
• Newman, K. A., Blecic, D. D., & Armstrong, K. L. (2007). Scholarly communication education initiatives (SPEC Kit 299). Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries. Retrieved from http://publications.arl.org/Scholarly-Communication-SPEC-Kit-299/
   Google Scholar
• Park, J.-H., & Shim, J. (2011). Exploring how library publishing services facilitate scholarly communication. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 43(1), 76–89. doi:10.3138/jsp.43.1.76
   Google Scholar
• Patel, D. (2016). Research data management: A conceptual framework. Library Review, 65(4/5), 226–241. doi:10.1108/LR-01-2016-0001
   Google Scholar
• Pinfield, S. (2015). Making open access work: The “state-of-the-art” in providing open access to scholarly literature. Online Information Review, 39(5), 604–636. doi:10.1108/OIR-05-2015-0167
   Google Scholar
• Pinfield, S., Cox, A. M., & Smith, J. (2014). Research data management and libraries: Relationships, activities, drivers and influences. PLoS ONE, 9(12), e114734. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0114734
   Google Scholar
• Plutchak, T. S. (2012). Breaking the barriers of time and space: The dawning of the great age of librarians. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 100(1), 10–19. doi:10.3163/1536-5050.100.1.004
   Google Scholar
• Profera, E., Jefferson, R., & Hosburgh, N. (2015). Personalizing library service to improve scholarly communication. The Serials Librarian, 68(1–4), 274–281. doi:10.1080/0361526X.2015.1017710
   Google Scholar
• Prottsman, M. F. (2011). Communication and collaboration: Collection development in challenging economic times. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 8(2), 107–116. doi:10.1080/15424065.2011.576585
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, M. M. (2015). Open access in scholarly publishing: Embracing principles and avoiding pitfalls. The Serials Librarian, 69(1), 58–69. doi:10.1080/0361526X.2015.1036197
   Google Scholar
• Radom, R., Feltner-Reichert, M., & Stringer-Stanback, K. (2012). Organization of scholarly communication services (SPEC Kit 332). Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries. Retrieved from http://publications.arl.org/Organization-of-Scholarly-Communication-Services-SPEC-Kit-332/
   Google Scholar
• Reinsfelder, T. L., & Anderson, J. A. (2013). Observations and perceptions of academic administrator influence on open access initiatives. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(6), 481–487. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2013.08.014
   Google Scholar
• Rockman, I. F. (Ed.). (2005). Reference librarians and institutional repositories [Special issue]. Reference Services Review, 33(3).
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, J. E. (2015). Scholarly communications competencies: Open access training for librarians. New Library World, 116(7/8), 397–405. doi:10.1108/NLW-12-2014-0140
   Google Scholar
• Royster, P. (2014, June). The advice not taken: How one repository found its own path. Presentation at Open Repositories 2014, Helsinki, Finland. Retrieved from http://www.doria.fi/handle/10024/97543
   Google Scholar
• Scaramozzino, J. M., Ramírez, M. L., & McGaughey, K. J. (2012). A study of faculty data curation behaviors and attitudes at a teaching-centered university. College & Research Libraries, 73(4), 349–365. doi:10.5860/crl-255
   Google Scholar
• Schlangen, M. (2015). Content, credibility, and readership: Putting your institutional repository on the map. Public Services Quarterly, 11(3), 217–224. doi:10.1080/15228959.2015.1060148
   Google Scholar
• Steele, C. (2014). Scholarly communication, scholarly publishing and university libraries. Plus ça change? Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 45(4), 241–261. doi:10.1080/00048623.2014.950042
   Google Scholar
• Sterman, L. (2014). Institutional repositories: An analysis of trends and a proposed collaborative future. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 21(3–4), 360–376. doi:10.1080/10691316.2014.943919
   Google Scholar
• Suber, P. (2012). Open access. ELEC, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swoger, B. J. M., Brainard, S. A., & Hoffman, K. D. (2015). Foundations for a scholarly communications program: Interviewing faculty at a small public liberal arts college. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 3(1), eP1219. doi:10.7710/2162-3309.1219
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. (2009). Coming full circle: Scholarly communication and the role of liaison librarians. In K. L. Anderson (Ed.), Sustainability in a changing climate: Proceedings of the 34th annual conference of the International Association of Aquatic and Marine Science Libraries and Information Centers (IAMSLIC) (pp. 23–27). Newport, OR: IAMSLIC. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1912/2876
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, W. J. (2013). The structure of scholarly communications within academic libraries. Serials Review, 39(3), 167–171. doi:10.1080/00987913.2013.10766387
   Google Scholar
• Toups, M., & Hughes, M. (2013). When data curation isn't: A redefinition for liberal arts universities. Journal of Library Administration, 53(4), 223–233. doi:10.1080/01930826.2013.865386
   Google Scholar
• Turtle, E. C., & Courtois, M. P. (2007). Scholarly communication: Science librarians as advocates for change. Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship, 51. doi:10.5062/F4319SVH
   Google Scholar
• Vinopal, J., & McCormick, M. (2013). Supporting digital scholarship in research libraries: Scalability and sustainability. Journal of Library Administration, 53(1), 27–42. doi:10.1080/01930826.2013.756689
   Google Scholar
• Wiegand, S. (2013). Beginning the conversation: Discussing scholarly communication. The Serials Librarian, 65(3–4), 335–349. doi:10.1080/0361526X.2013.833883
   Google Scholar
• Wirth, A. A. (2011). Incorporating existing library partnerships into open access week events. Collaborative Librarianship, 3(4), 197–204.
   Google Scholar
• Wirth, A. A., & Chadwell, F. A. (2010). Rights Well: An authors' rights workshop for librarians. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 10(3), 337–354. doi:10.1353/pla.0.0105
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, M. (2015). Untying knots and joining dots: The role of librarians in the scholarly communication environment. Insights, 28(1), 78–82. doi:10.1629/uksg.158
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, C., Rod, A. B., & Schonfeld, R. C. (2016). Ithaka S+R US faculty survey 2015. New York, NY: Ithaka S+R. doi:10.18665/sr.277685
   Google Scholar
• Xia, J., & Li, Y. (2015). Changed responsibilities in scholarly communication services: An analysis of job descriptions. Serials Review, 41(1), 15–22. doi:10.1080/00987913.2014.998980
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. (2015). Use of library services by engineering faculty at Mississippi State University, a large land grant institution. Science & Technology Libraries, 34(3), 272–286. doi:10.1080/0194262X.2015.1090941
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., Liu, S., & Mathews, E. (2015). Convergence of digital humanities and digital libraries. Library Management, 36(4–5), 362–377. doi:10.1108/LM-09-2014-0116
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, L. (2014). Riding the wave of open access: Providing library research support for scholarly publishing literacy. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 45(1), 3–18. doi:10.1080/00048623.2014.882873
   Google Scholar