Improvisation and teacher expertise: implications for the professional development of outstanding teachers

References

• Auguste, B., Kihn, P., and Miller, M., 2010. Closing the talent gap: attracting and retaining top-third graduates to a career in teaching. McKinsey and Company. Available from: http://mckinseyonsociety.com/closing-the-talent-gap/. [Accessed 19 Jan 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M.M., 1993. Towards a philosophy of the act. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S., 2003. The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of education policy, 18 (2), 215–228.10.1080/0268093022000043065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berliner, D.C., 1986. In pursuit of the expert pedagogue. Educational researcher, 15 (7), 5–13.10.3102/0013189X015007007
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G., 2013. The beautiful risk of education. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Burr, V., 2003. Social constructionism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carmichael, J. et al. 2011. Leadership and Management Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K., 2006. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Claxton, G., 1999. Wise up: the challenge of lifelong learning. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Coffield, F. and Edward, S., 2009. Rolling out ‘good’, ‘best’ and ‘excellent’ practice. What next? “Perfect practice”? British educational research journal, 35 (3), 371–390.10.1080/01411920802044396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Zutter, S., 2010. Professional improvisation and teacher education: opening the conversation. In: R.K. Sawyer, ed. Improvisation and structure in creative teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 27–50.
   Google Scholar
• Deakin Crick, R., 2006. Learning power in practice: a guide for teachers. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.10.4135/9780857025548
   Google Scholar
• Deakin-Crick, R., Broadfoot, P., and Claxton, G., 2004. Developing an effective lifelong learning inventory: the ELLI project. Assessment in education, 11 (3), 247–272.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education., 2010. The importance of teaching. London: The Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K.A., et al., 2006. The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511816796
   Google Scholar
• Evans, L., 2015. What do we still need to know about professional development? A research agenda for the field. Keynote address at International Professional Development Association Conference, 29, November 2015. Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Gergen, K.J., 2009. An invitation to social construction. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B.G., 1978. Theoretical sensitivity: advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley C.A.: The Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwyn, A., 2011. The expert teacher of English. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gu, Q. and Day, C., 2011. Challenges to teacher resilience: conditions count. British educational research journal, 39 (1), 22–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J., 1972. Knowledge and human interests. 2nd ed. Translated by J. Shapiro. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J., 1984. The theory of communicative action, Volume 1. Reason and the rationalization of society. Translated by T. McCarthy. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J., 1987. Theory of communicative action, Volume 2. The critique of functionalist reason. Translated by T. McCarthy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A. and Fullan, M., 2000. Mentoring in the new millenium. Theory into practice, 39 (1), 56–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., 2009. Visible learning: a synthesis of over 800 meta-analysis relating to achievement. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heble, A. and Waterman, E., 2008. Sounds of hope, sounds of change: improvisation, pedagogy and social justice Critical studies in improvisation, 3 (2), 1–4. [Online] Available from www.criticalimprov.com [Accessed 15 Aug 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Hoban, G., 2002. Teacher learning for educational change. Buckingham: Open University. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Munn Giddings, C., 2012. Chapter 8: Action research. In: J. Arthur et al., eds. Research methods and methodologies in education. London: Sage, 71–75.
   Google Scholar
• Passy, R., 2013. Surviving and flourishing in a neoliberal world: primary trainees talking. British educational research journal, 39 (6), 1060–1075.10.1002/berj.3024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J., 1990. Childs conception of the world. New York, NY: Littlefield Adams.
   Google Scholar
• Savin-Baden, M. and Major, C., 2013. Qualitative research: the essential guide to theory and practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R.K., 2004. Improvised lessons: collaborative discussion in the constructivist classroom. Training education, 15 (2), 198–201.
   Google Scholar
• Seddon, T., 1997. Education: deprofessionalised? Or reregulated, reorganised and reauthorized? Australian journal of education, 41 (3), 228–246.10.1177/000494419704100303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shotter, J., 1994. ‘Now I Can Go On’: Wittgenstein and communication. University of Calgary, 30 Sept 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Shotter, J., 2008. Conversational realities revisited: life, language, body and world. Chagrin Falls, OH: Taos Institute Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, T.W. and Strahan, D., 2004. Towards a prototype of expertise in teaching: a descriptive case study. Journal of teacher education, 55 (4), 357–371.10.1177/0022487104267587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorensen, N., 2014. Improvisation and teacher expertise: a comparative case study. PhD thesis, Bath Spa University.
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen, N. and Coombs, S., 2010a. Whither postgraduate professional development? Towards a theoretical framework to guide long-term teacher development in England. Professional development in education, 35 (4), 683–689.
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen, N. and Coombs, S., 2010b. Authorized to teach? CPD Update, 126 ( May 2010), 8–9.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R., 1995. The art of case study research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R.A. and Horvath, J.A., 1995. A prototype view of expert teaching. Educational researcher, 24 (6), 9–17.10.3102/0013189X024006009
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, G., 2011. How to do your case study. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L.S., 1978. Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wegerif, R., 2008. Dialogue or dialectic? The significance of ontological assumptions in research on educational dialogue. British educational research journal, 34 (3), 347–361.10.1080/01411920701532228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitty, G., 2008. Changing modes of teacher professionalism: traditional, managerial, collaborative and democratic. In: B. Cunningham, ed. Exploring professionalism. London: Institute of Education, 28–49.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, C., 2010. Professionalism and the post-performative teacher: new teachers reflect on autonomy and accountability in the English school system. Professional development in education, 37 (3), 389–409.
   Google Scholar