Development and validation of the Attitudes Towards Asexuals (ATA) scale

References

• Aicken, C. R. H., Mercer, C. H., & Cassell, J. A. (2013). Who reports absence of sexual attraction in Britain? Evidence from national probability surveys. Psychology and Sexuality, 4, 121–135. doi:10.1080/19419899.2013.774161
   Google Scholar
• Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amaro, H. (1995). Love, sex, and power: Considering women’s realities in HIV prevention. American Psychologist, 50, 437–447. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.50.6.437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Asexual Visibility and Education Network. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.asexuality.org/home/
   Google Scholar
• Bogaert, A. F. (2004). Asexuality: Prevalence and associated factors in a national probability sample. The Journal of Sex Research, 41, 279–287. doi:10.1080/00224490409552235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogaert, A. F. (2012). Understanding asexuality. Plymouth: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Bogaert, A. F. (2013). The demography of asexuality. In A. K. Baumle. (Ed.), International handbook on the demography of sexuality, international handbook of populations (Vol. 5, pp. 275‒288). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brotto, L. A., Knudson, G., Inskip, J., Rhodes, K., & Erskine, Y. (2010). Asexuality: A mixed-methods approach. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 599–618. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9434-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrigan, M. (2011). There’s more to life than sex? Difference and commonality within the asexual community. Sexualities, 14, 462–478. doi:10.1177/1363460711406462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrigan, M., Gupta, K., & Morrison, T. G. (2013). Asexuality special theme issue editorial. Psychology and Sexuality, 4, 111–120. doi:10.1080/19419899.2013.774160
   Google Scholar
• CBC. (2014). Asexy pride: Asexual rights at world pride. Retrieved from: http://www.cbc.ca/news/asexy-pride-asexual-rights-at-world-pride-1.2689872
   Google Scholar
• Chasin, C. D. (2015). Making sense in and of the asexual community: Navigating relationships and identities in a context of resistance. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 25, 167–180. doi:10.1002/casp.v25.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crandall, C. S., & Warner, R. H. (2005). How a prejudice is recognized. Psychological Inquiry, 16, 137–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depaulo, B. M., & Morris, W. L. (2005). Target article: Singles in society and in science. Psychological Inquiry, 16, 57–83. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2005.9682918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Emens, E. F. (2014). Compulsory sexuality. Stanford Law Review, 66, 305–385.
   Google Scholar
• Flore, J. (2013). HSDD and asexuality: A question of instruments. Psychology and Sexuality, 4, 152–166. doi:10.1080/19419899.2013.774163
   Google Scholar
• Gazzola, S. B., & Morrison, M. A. (2012). Asexuality: An emergent sexual orientation. In T. G. Morrison, M. A. Morrison, M. A. Carrigan, & D. T. McDermott (Eds.), Sexual minority research in the new millennium (pp. 21–44). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gressgård, R. (2013). Asexuality: From pathology to identity and beyond. Psychology and Sexuality, 4, 179–192. doi:10.1080/19419899.2013.774166
   Google Scholar
• Herek, G. M. (1988). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: Correlates and gender differences. The Journal of Sex Research, 25, 451–477. doi:10.1080/00224498809551476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herek, G. M. (2004). Beyond “Homophobia”: Thinking about sexual prejudice and stigma in the twenty-first century. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 1, 6–24. doi:10.1525/srsp.2004.1.2.6
   Google Scholar
• Herek, G. M. (2010). Sexual orientation differences as deficits: Science and stigma in the history of American psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 693–699. doi:10.1177/1745691610388770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinderliter, A. (2013). How is asexuality different from hypoactive sexual desire disorder? Psychology and Sexuality, 4, 167–178. doi:10.1080/19419899.2013.774165
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, G. Harry, H. & Mitchell, A. (2009). Independent benefits of contact and friendship on attitudes toward homosexuals among authoritarians and highly identified heterosexuals. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 509–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, G., & Hewstone, M. (Eds.). (2013). Advances in intergroup contact. London: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Husnu, S., & Crisp, R. J. (2010). Imagined intergroup contact: A new technique for encouraging greater inter-ethnic contact in Cyprus. Peace & Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 16, 97–108. doi:10.1080/10781910903484776
   Google Scholar
• Levant, R., Richmond, K., Cook, S., House, A., & Aupont, M. (2007). The femininity ideology scale: Factor structure, reliability, convergent and discriminant validity, and social contextual variation. Sex Roles, 57, 373–383. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9258-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacInnis, C. C., & Hodson, G. (2012). Intergroup bias toward “Group X”: Evidence of prejudice, dehumanization, avoidance, and discrimination against asexuals. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15, 725–743. doi:10.1177/1368430212442419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacInnis, C. C., & Hodson, G. (in press). Why are heterosexual men (vs. women) particularly prejudiced toward gay men? A social dominance theory explanation. Psychology and Sexuality.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClave, C. (2013). Asexuality as a spectrum: A national probability sample comparison to the sexual community in the UK ( Unpublished master’s thesis). Columbia University, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J. (2014). Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 184–188. doi:10.1177/0963721414531598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pignotti, M., & Abell, N. (2009). The negative stereotyping of single persons scale: Initial psychometric development. Research on Social Work Practice, 19, 639–652. doi:10.1177/1049731508329402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poston, D. L., & Baumle, A. K. (2010). Patterns of asexuality in the United States. Demographic Research, 23, 509–530. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2010.23.18
   Google Scholar
• Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prause, N., & Graham, C. A. (2007). Asexuality: Classification and characterization. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 341–356. doi:10.1007/s10508-006-9142-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przybylo, E. (2013). Afterword: Some thoughts on asexuality as an interdisciplinary method. Psychology & Sexuality, 4, 193–194. doi:10.1080/19419899.2013.774167
   Google Scholar
• Scherrer, K. S. (2008). Coming to an asexual identity: Negotiating identity, negotiating desire. Sexualities, 11, 621–641. doi:10.1177/1363460708094269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, E. H., & Pleck, J. H. (1986). The structure of male role norms. American Behavioral Scientist, 29, 531–543. doi:10.1177/000276486029005003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Houdenhove, E., Gijs, L., T’sjoen, G., & Enzlin, P. (2014). Asexuality: Few facts, many questions. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 40, 175–192. doi:10.1080/0092623X.2012.751073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Houdenhove, E., Gijs, L., T’sjoen, G., & Enzlin, P. (2015). Stories about asexuality: A qualitative study on asexual women. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 41, 262–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitley, B. E. (2009). Religiosity and attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: A meta-analysis. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 19, 21–38. doi:10.1080/10508610802471104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitley, B. E., & Lee, S. E. (2000). The relationship of authoritarianism and related constructs to attitudes toward homosexuality. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 144–170. doi:10.1111/jasp.2000.30.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitley, Jr., B. E. (2001). Gender-role variables and attitudes toward homosexuality. Sex Roles, 45, 691–721. doi:10.1023/A:1015640318045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yule, M. A., Brotto, L. A., & Gorzalka, B. B. (2014). Biological markers of asexuality: Handedness, birth order, and finger length ratios in self-identified asexual men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 299–310. doi:10.1007/s10508-013-0175-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar