Beyond the non/monogamy system: fluidity, hybridity, and transcendence in intimate relationships

References

• Adam, B. D. (2010). Relationship innovation in male couples. In M. Barker & D. Langdridge (Eds.), Understanding non-monogamies (pp. 55–69). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Anapol, D. (1992). Polyamory: The new love without limits. Secrets of sustainable intimate relationships. New York, NY: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Anapol, D. (2010). Polyamory in the 21st century: Love and intimacy with multiple partners. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Anapol, D. (2011, July). Beyond polyamory. Psychology Today. Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/love-without-limits/201107/beyond-polyamory
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, E. (2012). The monogamy gap: Men, love, and the reality of cheating. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ashkam, J. (1984). Identity and stability in marriage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, M. (2005). This is my partner, and this is my … partner’s partner: Constructing a polyamorous identity in a monogamous world. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 18(1), 75–88. doi:10.1080/10720530590523107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, M., & Langdridge, D. (Eds.). (2010a). Understanding non-monogamies. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, M., & Langdridge, D. (2010b). Whatever happened to non-monogamies? Critical reflections on recent research and practice. Sexualities, 13(6), 748–772. doi:10.1177/1363460710384645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1995). The normal chaos of love. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Ze’ev, A., & Goussinsky, R. (2008). In the name of love: Romantic ideology and its victims. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benhabib, S. (2002). The claims of culture: Equality and diversity in the global era. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benson, P. J. (2008). The polyamory handbook. Bloomington, IN: Author House.
   Google Scholar
• Bergstrand, C. R., & Sinski, J. B. (2010). Swinging in America: Love, sex, and marriage in the 21st century. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein, K., & Bergman, S. B. (Eds.). (2010). Gender outlaws: The next generation. Berkeley, CA: Seal Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bramly, S. (1977/1994). Macumba: The teachings of Maria-José, mother of the gods (M. Bogin, Trans.). San Francisco, CA: City Lights Books.
   Google Scholar
• Brandon, M. (2010). Monogamy: The untold story. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Brubaker, R. (2016). Trans: Gender and race in an age of unsettled identities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cantor, S. (2014). Between monogamy and polyamory. Retrieved from https://betweenandbeyondblog.wordpress.com/2014/08/14/between-monogamy-polyamory-2/
   Google Scholar
• Carnes, P., Delmonico, D. L., & Griffin, E. (2007). In the shadows of the net: Breaking free of compulsive online sexual behavior. Center City, MN: Hazelden.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, L. (1999). Emotional adultery: Cybersex and commitment. Social Theory and Practice, 25(2), 243–270. doi:10.5840/soctheorpract199925215
   Google Scholar
• Conley, T. D., Moors, A. C., Matsick, J. L., & Ziegler, A. (2012). The fewer the merrier? Assessing stigma surrounding consensually non-monogamous romantic relationships. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 13(1), 1–30. doi:10.1111/j.1530-2415.2012.01286.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, T. D., Ziegler, A., Moors, A. C., Matsick, J. L., & Valentine, B. A. (2012). A critical examination of popular assumptions about the benefits and outcomes of monogamous relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17(2), 124–141. doi:10.1177/1088868312467087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, A., & Sportolari, L. (1997). Romance and cyberspace: Understanding online attraction. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 22(1), 7–14.
   Google Scholar
• Dabhoiwala, F. (2012). The origins of sex: A history of the first sexual revolution. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deri, J. (2015). Love’s refraction: Jealousy and compersión in queer women’s polyamorous relationships. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. (1981). Positions (A. Bass, Trans.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dow, C. L. (1997). Sarava!: Afro-Brazilian magick. St. Paul, MN: Llewellyn.
   Google Scholar
• Duncombe, J., Harrison, K., Allen, G., & Marsden, D. (Eds.). (2004). The state of affairs: Explorations in infidelity and commitment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Eagleshadow, P. P. (2016). The fourteen love relationships of the Awansa-Ta’pish. Retrieved from https://freelovecommunity.wordpress.com/2016/03/
   Google Scholar
• Eda, H. (2012). Intimate agency: A radical sexual revolution. Retrieved from http://www.inter-disciplinary.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/edagpaper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eliade, M. (1964). Shamanism: Archaic techniques of ecstasy (W. R. Trask, Trans.). New York, NY: Bollingen.
   Google Scholar
• Emens, E. (2004). Monogamy’s law: Compulsory monogamy and polyamorous existence.. New York University School of Law Review of Law and Social Change, 29(2), 277–376.
   Google Scholar
• Feeney, J. A., & Noller, P. (1990). Attachment style as a predictor of adult romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 281–291. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.2.281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feeney, J. A., & Noller, P. (2004). Attachment and sexuality in close relationships. In J. H. Harvey, A. Wenzel, & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 183–201). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrer, J. N. (2000). Transpersonal knowledge: A participatory approach to transpersonal phenomena. In T. Hart, P. Nelson, & K. Puhakka (Eds.), Transpersonal knowing: Exploring the horizon of consciousness (pp. 213–252). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrer, J. N. (2003). Integral transformative practice: A participatory perspective. The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 35(1), 21–42.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrer, J. N. (2007). Monogamy, polyamory, and beyond. Tikkun: Culture, Spirituality, Politics, 22(1), 37–43.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrer, J. N. (2008). Spiritual knowing as participatory enaction: An answer to the question of religious pluralism. In J. N. Ferrer & J. H. Sherman (Eds.), The participatory turn: Spirituality, mysticism, religious studies (pp. 135–169). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrer, J. N. (2014). Transpersonal psychology, science and the supernatural. The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 46(2), 152–186.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrer, J. N. (2017a). Mononormativity, polypride, and the “mono-poly wars. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrer, J. N. (2017b). Participation and the mystery: Transpersonal essays on psychology, education, and religion. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrer, J. N. (in press). From romantic jealousy to sympathetic joy: Monogamy, polyamory, and beyond. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Finn, M. (2010). Conditions of freedom in practices of non-monogamous commitment. In M. Barker & D. Langdridge (Eds.), Understanding non-monogamies (pp. 225–236). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Finn, M., & Malson, H. (2008). Speaking of home truth: (re)productions of dyadic-containment in non-monogamous relationships. British Journal of Sociology, 47, 519–533.
   Google Scholar
• Firestein, B. A. (Ed.). (1996). Bisexuality: The psychology and politics of an invisible minority. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, B. M., & Foster, M. (1997). Three in love: Ménages à trois from ancient to modern times. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Foxwood, O. (2007). The faery teachings. Arcata, CA: Stewart Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (2000). Adult romantic attachment: Theoretical developments, emerging controversies, and unanswered questions. Review of General Psychology, 4(2), 132–154. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.4.2.132
   Google Scholar
• Franceschi, G. J. (2006). Women maintaining a consensually non-monogamous relationship: A qualitative investigation ( Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. (Order No. 3199398)
   Google Scholar
• Frank, K., & DeLamater, J. (2010). Deconstructing monogamy: Boundaries, identities, and fluidities across relationships. In M. Barker & D. Langdridge (Eds.), Understanding non-monogamies (pp. 9–22). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Garber, M. (1992). Vested interests: Cross-dressing and cultural anxiety. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1983/1993). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York, NY: Basic.
   Google Scholar
• Gergen, K. (1991). The saturated self: Dilemmas of identity in contemporary life. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gerrold, D. (1997). Zen and the art of whatever. Retrieved from http://www.taoism.net/articles/zenart.htm
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green, A. I., Valleriani, J., & Adam, B. (2016). Marital monogamy as ideal and practice: The detraditionalization thesis in contemporary marriages. Journal of Marriage and Family, 78, 416–430. 10.1111/jomf.12277
   Google Scholar
• Greenway, C. (2007). Spirit. In O. Espin & J. B. Nickoloff (Eds.), An introductory dictionary to theology and religious studies (pp. 1315–1316). Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grunt-Mejer, K., & Campbell, C. (2016). Around consensual nonmonogamies: Assessing attitudes toward nonexclusive relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 53(1), 45–53. doi:10.1080/00224499.2015.1010193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haag, P. (2011). Marriage confidential: Love in the post-romantic age. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. (1986). Making up people. In T. C. Heller & C. Brooke-Rose (Eds.), Reconstructing individualism: Autonomy, individuality, and the self in Western thought (pp. 222–236). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haritaworn, J., Lin, C. J., & Klesse, C. (2006). Poly/logue: A critical introduction to polyamory. Sexualities, 9(5), 515–529. doi:10.1177/1363460706069963
   Google Scholar
• Hart, T., Nelson, P., & Puhakka, K. (Eds.). (2000). Transpersonal knowing: Exploring the horizon of consciousness. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. M. (2000). The place of attachment in human mating. Review of General Psychology, 4, 186–204. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.4.2.186
   Google Scholar
• Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heaphy, B., Donovan, C., & Weeks, J. (2004). A different affair? Openness and nonmonogamy in same sex relationships. In J. Duncombe, K. Harrison, G. Allen, & D. Marsden (Eds.), The state of affairs: Explorations in infidelity and commitment (pp. 167–186). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Heckert, J. (2010). Love without borders? Intimacy, identity, and the state of compulsory monogamy. In M. Barker & D. Langdridge (Eds.), Understanding non-monogamies (pp. 255–266). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heine, S. (2002). Opening a mountain: Koans of the Zen masters. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hillman, J. (1992). Revisioning psychology. New York, NY: HarperPerennial.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, P. S. Y. (2006). The (charmed) circle game: Reflections on sexual hierarchy through multiple sexual relationships. Sexualities, 9(5), 547–564. doi:10.1177/1363460706069966
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S., & Scott, S. (2004). The personal is still political: Heterosexuality, feminism, and monogamy. Feminism and Psychology, 14(1), 151–157. doi:10.1177/0959353504040317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson, L. (2004). Intimacy, negotiated nonmonogamy, and the limits of the couple. In J. Duncombe, K. Harrison, G. Allen, & D. Marsden (Eds.), The state of affairs: Explorations in infidelity and commitment (pp. 35–57). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, C. S. I. (2015). Modal monogamy. Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy, 2(8), 175–194.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. (1991). The ship that sailed into the living room: Sex and intimacy reconsidered. Estancia, NM: Wildfire Books.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, S. (1971). Two forms of spirit marriage in rural Taiwan. Anthropologica, 13, 181–189.
   Google Scholar
• Kingma, R. D. (1998). The future of love: The power of the soul in intimate relationships. New York, NY: Broadway Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kipnis, L. (2003). Against love: A polemic. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Klesse, C. (2006). Polyamory and its ‘others’: Contesting the terms of non-monogamy. Sexualities, 9(5), 565–583. doi:10.1177/1363460706069986
   Google Scholar
• Klesse, C. (2007). The spectrum of promiscuity: Gay male bisexual non-monogamies and polyamories. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Klesse, C. (2014). Polyamory: Intimate practice, identity or sexual orientation? Sexualities, 17(1/2), 81–99. doi:10.1177/1363460713511096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolesar, A. E. A. (2010). Spiritual identities of multiply partnered people ( Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. (Order No. AAI3419247).
   Google Scholar
• Krippner, S., Bogzaran, F., & de Carvalho, A. P. (2002). Extraordinary dreams and how to work with them. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• LaBerge, S., & Rheingold, H. (1991). Exploring the world of lucid dreaming. New York, NY: Ballantine.
   Google Scholar
• Labriola, K. (1999). Models of open relationships. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 3(1/2), 217–225. doi:10.1300/J155v03n01_25
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lano, K. (1995). Friends can’t be lovers: The paradox of monogamy. In K. Lano & P. Claire (Eds.), Breaking the barriers of desire: New approaches to multiple relationships (pp. 107–112). Nottingham, UK: Five Leaves Publications.
   Google Scholar
• LaSala, M. C. (2004). Monogamy of the heart: Extradyadic sex and gay male couples. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 17(3), 1–24. doi:10.1300/J041v17n03_01
   Google Scholar
• Lessin, J. K. (2006). Polyamory many loves: The poly tantric lifestyle—A personal account. Bloomington, IN: AuthorHouse.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, S., & Levine, A. (1995). Embracing the beloved: Relationship as a path of awakening. New York, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, D., Prause, N., & Finn, P. (2014). The emperor has no clothes: A review of the ‘pornography addiction’ model. Current Sexual Health Reports, 6(2), 94–105. doi:10.1007/s11930-014-0016-8
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, I. M. (2003). Ecstatic religion: A study shamanism and spirit possession (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Loy, D. (1987). The clôture of deconstruction: A Mahāyāna critique of Derrida. International Philosophical Quarterly, 27(1), 59–80. doi:10.5840/ipq198727142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maheu, M., & Subotnik, R. (2001). Infidelity on the internet: Virtual relationships and real betrayal. Naperville, IL: Sourcebooks.
   Google Scholar
• Masters, R. A. (2007). Transformation through intimacy: The journey toward mature monogamy. Ashland, OR: Tehmenos Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mazur, R. (1973). The new intimacy: Open-ended marriage and alternative lifestyles. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGrane, B. (1989). Beyond anthropology: Society and the other. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKeever, N. (2015). Is the requirement of sexual exclusivity consistent with romantic love? Journal of Applied Philosophy. doi:10.1111/japp.12157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaels, M. A., & Johnson, P. (2015). Designer relationships: A guide to happy monogamy, positive polyamory, and optimistic open relationships. Jersey City, NJ: Cleis Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mint, P. (2004). The power dynamics of cheating: Effects on polyamory and bisexuality. Journal of Bisexuality, 4(3–4), 55–76. doi:10.1300/J159v04n03_04
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, N., & O’Neill, G. (1972). Open marriage: A new lifestyle for couples. London, UK: Owen.
   Google Scholar
• Pallotta-Chiarolli, M. (1995). Choosing not to choose: Beyond monogamy, beyond duality. In K. Lano & C. Perry (Eds.), Breaking the barriers of desire: New approaches to multiple relationships (pp. 41–67). Nottingham, UK: Five Leaves Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Pallotta-Chiarolli, M. (2010). Border sexualities, border families in schools. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Perel, E. (2006). Mating in captivity: Unlocking erotic intelligence. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Petrella, S. (2005). Only with you--may be--if you make me happy: A genealogy of serial monogamy as governance and self-governance. In M. Sönser Breed & F. Peters (Eds.), Genealogies of identity: Interdisciplinary readings on sex and sexuality (pp. 162-182). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Rambukkana, N. (2015). Fraught intimacies: Non/monogamy in the public sphere. Vancouver, Canada: The University of British Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Rigoglioso, M. (2009). The cult of divine birth in ancient Greece. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, A., & Barker, M. (2006). ‘There aren’t words for what we do or how we feel so we have to make them up’: Constructing polyamorous languages in a culture of compulsory monogamy. Sexualities, 9(5), 584–601. doi:10.1177/1363460706069987
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, M. (2013). Monogamy and polyamory as strategies identities. Journal of Bisexuality, 13, 21–38. doi:10.1080/15299716.2013.755731
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, R. (2001). Alternative family styles revisited, or whatever happened to swingers, group marriages and communes? Journal of Family Issues, 7(6), 711–726. doi:10.1177/019251301022006003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rust, P. C. (1996). Monogamy and polyamory: Relationship issues for bisexuals. In B. A. Firestein (Ed.), Bisexuality: The psychology and politics of an invisible minority (pp. 127–148). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, C., & Jethá, C. (2010). Sex at dawn: How we mate, how we stray, and what it means for modern sexuality. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Sartorius, A. (2004). Three and more in love: Group marriage or integrating commitment and sexual freedom. In S. Anderlini-D’Onofrio (Ed.), Plural loves: Designs for bi and poly living (pp. 79–98). Binghamton, NY: Harrington Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schippers, M. (2016). Beyond monogamy: Polyamory and the future of polyqueer sexualities. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, R. C. (1995). Internal family systems therapy. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sheff, E. (2005). Polyamorous women, sexual subjectivity, and power. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 34(3), 251–283. doi:10.1177/0891241604274263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheff, E. (2006). Poly-hegemonic masculinities. Sexualities, 9(5), 621–642. doi:10.1177/1363460706070004
   Google Scholar
• Sheff, E. (2014). The polyamorists next door: Inside multi-partner relationships and families. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Somé, M. (1999). The healing wisdom of Africa: Finding life purpose through nature, ritual, and community. New York, NY: J. P. Tarcher/Putnam.
   Google Scholar
• Spears, B., & Lowen, L. (2016). Choices: Perspectives of gay men on monogamy, non-monogamy, and marriage. San Bernardino, CA: CreateSpace.
   Google Scholar
• Stacey, J. (1996). In the name of the family: Rethinking family values in the postmodern age. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stacey, J. (2011). Unhitched: Love, marriage, and family values from West Hollywood to Western China. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stryker, S. (2008). Transgender history. Berkeley, CA: Seal Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swan, D. J., & Thompson, S. C. (2016). Monogamy, the protective fallacy: Sexual versus emotional exclusivity and the implication for sexual health risk. The Journal of Sex Research, 53(1), 64–73. doi:10.1080/00224499.2014.1003771
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taormino, T. (2008). Opening up: A guide to creating and sustaining open relationships. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thurer, S. L. (2005). The end of gender: A psychological autopsy. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Veaux, F., & Rickert, F. (2014). More than two: A practical guide to ethical polyamory. Portland, OR: Thorntree Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weeks, J. (2007). The world we have won: The remaking of erotic and intimate life. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Welwood, J. (1996). Love and awakening: Discovering the sacred path of intimate relationship. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Whitman, W. (1855/2007). Leaves of grass: The original 1855 edition (Dover Thrifts ed.). Mineola, NY: Dover.
   Google Scholar
• Wilde, J. (2014). Dimensional sexuality: Exploring new frameworks for bisexual desires. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 29(4), 320–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willey, A. (2006). ‘Christian nations,’ ‘polygamic races’ and women’s rights: Toward a genealogy of non/monogamy and whiteness. Sexualities, 9(5), 530–546. doi:10.1177/1363460706069964
   Google Scholar
• Willey, A. (2016). Undoing monogamy: The politics of science and the possibilities of biology. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Witt, E. (2016). Future sex. New York, NY: Ferrar, Straus, and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, L. (2003). Jealousy and transformation in polyamorous relationships. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Institute for Advanced Study of Human Sexuality, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Woolever, M. (2010). When God had sex: The practice of spirit marriage in ecstatic spirituality. Unpublished manuscript, California Institute of Integral Studies, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Wosick, K. R. (2012). Sex, love, and fidelity: A study of contemporary romantic relationships. Amherst, NY: Cambria Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ziff, B. H., & Rao, P. V. (Eds.). (1997). Borrowed power: Essays on cultural appropriation. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar