(Re)producing the ‘natural man’ in men’s online advice media: achieving masculinity through embodied and mental mastery

References

• Almog, R., & Kaplan, D. (2017). The nerd and his discontent: The seduction community and the logic of the game as a geeky solution to the challenges of young masculinity. Men and Masculinities., 20(1), 27–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, E., & McCormack, M. (2016). Inclusive masculinity theory: Overview, reflection and refinement. Journal of Gender Studies, 1–15. doi:10.1080/09589236.2016.1245605
   Google Scholar
• Brannon, L. (2011). Gender: Psychological perspectives (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• British Psychological Society. (2013). Ethics guidelines for internet-mediated research. Leicester: Author. Retrieved from http://www.bps.org.uk/system/files/Public%20files/inf206-guidelines-for-internet-mediated-research.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Burr, V. (2003). Social constructionism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of sex. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W. (2005). Masculinities. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19(6), 829–859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortese, D. K., & Ling, P. M. (2011). Enticing the new lad: Masculinity as a product of consumption in tobacco industry-developed lifestyle magazines. Men and Masculinities, 14(1), 4–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosma, S. & Gurevich, M. (2018). Strategies and scripts: Online pick-up artist advice and the militarized pursuit of casual sex with women. Feminism & Psychology. Manuscript under review.
   Google Scholar
• Coston, B. M., & Kimmel, M. (2012). Seeing privilege where it isn’t: Marginalized masculinities and the intersectionality of privilege. Journal of Social Issues, 68(1), 97–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currier, D. (2013). Strategic ambiguity: Protecting emphasized femininity and hegemonic masculinity in the hookup culture. Gender & Society, 27(5), 704–727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahs, B. (2011). Sexuality on the market. In M. Rawlinson, S. Hom, & S. Khader (Eds.), Thinking with Irigaray (pp. 179–201). New York: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farvid, P., & Braun, V. (2013a). Casual sex as ‘not a natural act’ and other regimes of truth about heterosexuality. Feminism & Psychology, 23(3), 359–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farvid, P., & Braun, V. (2013b). The ‘sassy woman’ and the ‘performing man’: Heterosexual casual sex advice and the (re)constitution of gendered subjectivities. Feminist Media Studies, 1(14), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality, volume 1: An introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York: Vintage. doi:10.2307/2065177
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 16–49). Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, J. R., Reiber, C., Massey, S. G., Merriwether, A. M., Garcia, J. R., Reiber, C., & Merriwether, A. M. (2012). Sexual hookup culture: A review. Review of General Psychology, 16(2), 161–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, R. (2008). Culture and subjectivity in neoliberal and postfeminist times. Subjectivity, 25(1), 432–445.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, R. (2009). Mediated intimacy and postfeminism: A discourse analytic examination of sex and relationships advice in a women’s magazine. Discourse & Communication, 3(4), 345–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, R. (2003). Power and the production of subjects: A genealogy of the new man and the new lad. In B. Benwell (Ed.), Masculinity and men’s lifestyle magazines. Blackwell: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, R., Henwood, K., & McLean, C. (2005). Body projects and the regulation of normative masculinity. Body & Society, 11(1), 37–62.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, B. (2001). ‘Biting your tongue’: Negotiating masculinities in contemporary Britain. Journal of Gender Studies, 10(2), 169–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, L., & Gill, R. (2011). The sex inspectors: Self-help, makeover, and mediated sex. In K. Ross (Ed.), Handbook on gender, sexualities and media (pp. 487–501). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde, J. (2014). Gender similarities and differences. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 373–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love Systems (2017). Coaching: live training [upcoming events list and prices]. Retrieved December 27, 2017, from https://www.lovesystems.com/collections/live-training
   Google Scholar
• Marwah, I. S. (2013). What nature makes of her: Kant’s gendered metaphysics. Hypatia, 28(3), 551–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messerschmidt, J. (2012). Engendering gendered knowledge: Assessing the academic appropriation of hegemonic masculinity. Men and Masculinities, 15(1), 56–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moller, M. (2007). Exploiting patterns: A critique of hegemonic masculinity. Journal of Gender Studies, 16(3), 263–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myrttinen, H. (2004). ‘Pack your heat and work the streets’—Weapons and the active construction of violent masculinities. Women & Language, 27(2), 29–34.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, C. A., Rogalin, C. L., & Gee, C. A. (2016). Masculinities through a cross‐disciplinary lens: lessons from sociology and psychology. Sociology Compass, 10(8), 652–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potts, A. (2002). The science/fiction of sex: Feminist deconstruction and the vocabularies of heterosex. London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, R. (2010). Good mothers, bad mothers and mommy bloggers: Rhetorical resistance and fluid subjectivities. MP: An Online Feminist Journal, 2(5), 37–50. Retrieved from http://academinist.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/03_Powell_Bloggers.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Regan, Á., Shan, L., McConnon, Á., Marcu, A., Raats, M., Wall, P., & Barnett, J. (2014). Strategies for dismissing dietary risks: Insights from user-generated comments online. Health, Risk & Society, 16(4), 308–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, J. (Ed.). (2003). Early modern civil discourses. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, A. (2005). Chaos to control: Men’s magazines and the mastering of intimacy. Men and Masculinities, 8(2), 175–194.
   Google Scholar
• Salter, M. (2016). Men’s rights or men’s needs? Anti-feminism in Australian men’s health promotion. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 28(1), 69–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, E. (1996). Establishing embodiment in psychology. Theory & Psychology, 6(4), 601–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrock, D., & Schwalbe, M. (2009). Men, masculinity, and manhood acts. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 277–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuurmans, J., & Monaghan, L. (2015). The Casanova-myth: Legend and anxiety in the seduction community. Sociological Research Online, 20(1). Retrieved from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/20/1/1/1.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solebello, N., & Elliott, S. (2011). “We want them to be as heterosexual as possible:” Fathers talk about their teen children’s sexuality. Gender & Society, 25(3), 293–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparks, M. (Producer) (2011). Dating interviews, season 1 [‘Cajun’—Building attraction and picking up]. Men’s Room and Lifeforce Entertainment Inc. Retrieved from http://www.mensroom.tv/season-1/cajun-building-attraction-and-picking-up
   Google Scholar
• Stinson, R. D., Levy, L. B., & Alt, M. (2014). “They’re just a good time and move on”: Fraternity men reflect on their hookup experiences. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 28(1), 59–73.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, N. (2006). The game: Penetrating the secret society of pick up artists. New York, NY: Regan Books.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, M. (2004). Managing between the sheets: Lifestyle magazines and the management of sexuality in everyday life. Sexualities, 7(1), 81–106.
   Google Scholar
• Von Markovik, E. (2014, August 18). The Venusian arts; experts in social and dating sciences. Retrieved from: http://www.venusianarts.com/
   Google Scholar
• Weedon, C. (1987). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (2009). Accounting for doing gender. Gender & Society, 23(1), 112–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and poststructuralism in dialogue. Discourse and Society, 9(3), 387–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M., & Edley, N. (1999). Negotiating hegemonic masculinity: Imaginary positions and psycho-discursive practices. Feminism & Psychology, 9(3), 335–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M., & Edley, N. (2014). A discursive psychological framework for analyzing men and masculinities. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 15(4), 355–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar