2,299
Views
30
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

When intergroup contact is uncommon and bias is strong: the case of anti-transgender bias

&
Pages 237-250 | Received 31 Jan 2018, Accepted 20 Apr 2018, Published online: 07 May 2018

References

  • Aboud, F. E., & Brown, C. S. (2013). Positive and negative intergroup contact among children and its effects on attitudes. In G. Hodson & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Advances in intergroup contact (pp. 176–199). London, UK: Psychology Press.
  • Adams, K. A., Nagoshi, C. T., Filip-Crawford, G., Terrell, H. K., & Nagoshi, J. L. (2016). Components of gender-nonconformity prejudice. Journal of Transgenderism, 17, 1–14.
  • Alderson, K. G. (2003). The ecological model of gay male identity. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 12, 75–85.
  • Alderson, K. G. (2013). Counseling LGBTI clients. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Oxford, England: Addison-Wesley.
  • Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality”. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology,(Vol. 30 pp. 47–92). San Diego: Academic Press.
  • American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association, 6th ed. Washington, DC: Author.
  • Batson, C. D., Polycarpou, M. P., Harmon-Jones, E., Imhoff, H. J., Mitchener, E. C., Bednar, L., et al. (1997). Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 105–118.
  • Billard, T. J. (in press). “’Passing’ and the politics of deception: Transgender bodies, cisgender aesthetics, and the politicking of inconspicuous marginal identities. In T. Docan-Morgan (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of deceptive communication. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s mechanical turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.
  • Crisp, R. J., Miles, E., & Husnu, S. (2014). Support for the replicability of imagined contact effects. Social Psychology, 45, 303–304.
  • Da Silva, C. (March 9, 2018). Alaska ‘anti-transgender bathroom bill’ proposed by Christian non-profit narrowly defeated. Newsweek, U.S. Edition. Retrieved from: http://www.newsweek.com/alaska-transgender-bathroom-bill-proposed-christian-nonprofit-narrowly-876676
  • Diamond, L. M. (2006). What we got wrong about sexual identity development: Unexpected findings from a longitudinal study of young women. In A. M. Omoto & H. S. Kurtzman (Eds.), Sexual orientation and mental health: Examining identity and development in lesbian, gay, and bisexual people. Contemporary perspectives on lesbian, gay, and bisexual psychology (pp. 73–94). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Diamond, L. M. (2014). Gender and same-sex sexuality. In D. L. Tolman & L. M. Diamond (Eds.), APA handbook of sexuality and psychology, Vol 1: Person-based approaches (pp. 629–652). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Flores, A. R. (2015). Attitudes toward transgender rights: Perceived knowledge and secondary interpersonal contact. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 3, 398–416.
  • Flores, A. R., Haider-Markel, D. P., Lewis, D. C., Miller, P. R., Tadlock, B. L., & Taylor, J. K. (2018). Challenged expectations: Mere exposure effects on attitudes about transgender people and rights. Political Psychology, 39, 197–216.
  • Flores, A. R., Herman, J. L., Gates, G. J., & Brown, T. N. T. (2016). How many adults identify as transgender in the United States? The Williams Institute. Retrieved from http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/How-Many-Adults-Identify-as-Transgender-in-the-United-States.pdf
  • Galinec, M., & Korajlija, A. L. (2017). The effect of different ways of providing information about transsexualism on student attitudes. Psychology & Sexuality, 8, 280–290.
  • Gates, G. J. (2011). How many people are lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender? The Williams Institute. Retrieved from https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Gates-How-Many-People-LGBT-Apr-2011.pdf
  • Griffith, K. H., & Hebl, K. H. (2002). The disclosure dilemma for gay men and lesbians: “Coming out” at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 1191–1199.
  • Harwood, J. (2011). Secondary transfer effects from imagined contact: Group similarity affects the generalization gradient. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 180–189.
  • Herek, G. M., & Capitanio, J. P. (1996). “Some of my best friends”: Intergroup contact, concealable stigma, and heterosexuals’ attitudes toward gay men and lesbians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 412–424.
  • Herek, G. M., & Glunt, E. K. (1993). Interpersonal contact and heterosexuals’ attitudes toward gay men: Results from a national survey. The Journal of Sex Research, 30, 239–244.
  • Hill, D. B., & Willoughby, B. L. B. (2005). The development and validation of the genderism and transphobia scale. Sex Roles, 53, 531–544.
  • Hodson, G. (2011). Do ideologically intolerant people benefit from intergroup contact? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 154–159.
  • Hodson, G., Choma, B. L., Boisvert, J., Hafer, C. L., MacInnis, C. C., & Costello, K. (2013). The role of intergroup disgust in predicting negative outgroup evaluations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 195–205.
  • Hodson, G., Choma, B. L., & Costello, K. (2009). Experiencing alien-nation: Effects of a simulation intervention on attitudes toward homosexuals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 974–978.
  • Hodson, G., Costello, K., & MacInnis, C. C. (2013). Is intergroup contact beneficial among intolerant people? Exploring individual differences in the benefits of contact on attitudes. In G. Hodson & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Advances in intergroup contact (pp. 49–80). London, UK: Psychology Press.
  • Hodson, G., Harry, H., & Mitchell, A. (2009). Independent benefits of contact and friendship on attitudes toward homosexuals among authoritarians and highly identified heterosexuals. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 509–525.
  • Hodson, G., & Hewstone, M. (Eds.). (2013). Advances in intergroup contact. London, UK: Psychology Press.
  • Hoffarth, M. R., & Bogaert, A. (2017). Opening the closet door: Openness to experience, masculinity, religiosity, and coming out among same-sex attracted men. Personality and Individual Differences, 109, 215-219. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.011
  • Hoffarth, M. R., Drolet, C. E., Hodson, G., & Hafer, C. L. (2016). Development and validation of the Attitudes Towards Asexuals (ATA) scale. Psychology & Sexuality, 7, 88–100.
  • Hoffarth, M. R., & Hodson, G. (2016). Who needs imagined contact? Replication attempts examining previous contact as a potential moderator. Social Psychology, 47, 118–124.
  • James, S. E., Herman, J. L., Rankin, S., Keisling, M., Mottet, L., & Anafi, M. (2016). The report of the 2015 US Transgender Survey. Washington, DC: National Center for Transgender Equality.
  • Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375.
  • King, M. E., Winter, S., & Webster, B. (2009). Contact reduces transprejudice: A study on attitudes towards transgenderism and transgender civil rights in Hong Kong. International Journal of Sexual Health, 21, 17–34.
  • Levitt, H. M., & Ippolito, M. R. (2014). Being transgender: The experience of transgender identity development. Journal of Homosexuality, 61, 1727–1758.
  • Lolliot, S., Schmid, K., Hewstone, M., Al Ramiah, A., Tausch, N., & Swart, H. (2013). Generalized effects of intergroup contact: The secondary transfer effect. In G. Hodson & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Advances in intergroup contact (pp. 81–112). London, UK: Psychology Press.
  • Lytle, A., Dyar, C., Levy, S. R., & London, B. (2017). Contact with bisexual individuals reduces binegativity among heterosexuals and lesbian women and gay men. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 580–599.
  • MacInnis, C. C., & Page-Gould, E. (2015). How can intergroup interaction be bad if intergroup contact is good? Exploring and reconciling an apparent paradox in the science of intergroup relations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 307–327.
  • MacInnis, C. C., Page-Gould, E., & Hodson, G. (2017). Multilevel intergroup contact and anti-gay prejudice (explicit and implicit): Evidence of contextual contact benefits in a less visible group domain. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 243–251.
  • Madhani, A. (2016, February 27). Battle brewing over transgender bathroom laws in state capitals. USA Today. Retrieved from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2016/02/27/battle-brewing-over-transgender-bathroom-laws-state-capitals/81006894/
  • Makwana, A. P., Dhont, K., De Keersmaecker, J., Akhlaghi-Ghaffarokh, P., Masure, M., & Roets, A. (in press). The motivated cognitive basis of transphobia: The roles of right-wing ideologies and gender role beliefs. Sex Roles. doi:10.1007/s11199-017-0860-x
  • McDermott, D. T., Brooks, A. S., Rohleder, P., Blair, K., Hoskin, R. A., & McDonagh, L. K. (2018). Ameliorating transnegativity: Assessing the immediate and extended efficacy of a pedagogic prejudice reduction intervention. Psychology & Sexuality, 9, 69–85.
  • McLean, K. (2007). Hiding in the closet? Bisexuals, coming out and the disclosure imperative. Journal of Sociology, 43, 151–166.
  • Mohr, J. J., & Rochlen, A. B. (1999). Measuring attitudes regarding bisexuality in lesbian, gay male, and heterosexual populations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46, 353–369.
  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide, 7th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
  • Norton, A. T., & Herek, G. M. (2013). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward transgender people: Findings from a national probability sample of U.S. adults. Sex Roles, 68, 738–753.
  • Ortiz, M., & Harwood, J. (2007). A social cognitive theory approach to the effects of mediated intergroup contact on intergroup attitudes. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 51, 615–631.
  • Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85.
  • Pettigrew, T. F. (2009). Secondary transfer effect of contact: Do intergroup contact effects spread to noncontacted outgroups? Social Psychology, 40, 55–65.
  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.
  • Pratto, F., Sidanus, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763.
  • Richard, F., Bond, C., & Stokes-Zoota, J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7, 331–363.
  • Sandfort, T. G. M., Bos, H., & Vet, R. (2006). Lesbian and gay men at work: Consequences of being out. In A. M. Omoto & H. S. Kurtzman (Eds.), Sexual orientation and mental health: Examining identity and development in lesbian, gay, and bisexual people (pp. 225–244). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Schippa, E., Gregg, P. B., & Hewes, D. E. (2005). The parasocial contact hypothesis. Communication Monographs, 72, 92–115.
  • Sharples, A. (2013). Daily experiences of direct contact and media contact (Unpublished master’s thesis). Retrieved from University of Toronto TSpace Repository. http://hdl.handle.net/1807/42921
  • Solomon, H. E., & Kurtz-Costes, B. (2018). Media’s influence on perceptions of trans women. Sex Research and Social Policy, 15, 34–47.
  • Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (1985). Intergroup anxiety. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 157–175.
  • Tate, C. C. (2014). Gender identity as a personality process. In B. L. Miller (Ed.), Gender identity: Disorders, developmental processes, and social implications (pp. 1–22). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
  • Tate, C. C., Youssef, C. P., & Bettergarcia, J. N. (2014). Integrating the study of transgender spectrum and cisgender experiences of self-categorization from a personality perspective. Review of General Psychology, 18, 302–312.
  • Tatum, S. (March 24, 2018). White House announces policy to ban most transgender people from serving in the military. CNN Politics. Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/23/politics/transgender-white-house/index.html
  • Tebbe, E. A., Morandi, B., & Ege, E. (2014). Revised and abbreviated forms of the genderism and transphobia scale: Tools for assessing anti-trans* prejudice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 61, 581–592.
  • Tee, N., & Hegarty, P. (2006). Predicting opposition to civil rights of trans persons in the United Kingdom. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 16, 70–80.
  • Transgender Law Center. (February, 2017). Mapping transgender equality in the United States. Retrieved from https://transgenderlawcenter.org/equalitymap
  • Turner, R. N., Crisp, R. J., & Lambert, E. (2007). Imagining intergroup contact can improve intergroup attitudes. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 10, 427–441.
  • Turner, R. N., West, W., & Christie, Z. (2013). Out-group trust, intergroup anxiety, and out-group attitude as mediators of the effect of imagined intergroup contact on intergroup behavioral tendencies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, E196–E205.
  • Voci, A., & Hewstone, M. (2003). Intergroup contact and prejudice toward immigrants in Italy: The mediational role of anxiety and the moderational role of group salience. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6, 37–54.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.