Reshaping relational scripts? Marriage and civil partnership proposals among same-gender couples

References

• Baker, M., & Elizabeth, V. (2013). ‘Did you just ask me to marry you?’: The gendered nature of heterosexual relationship progressions. Women’s Studies Journal, 27(2), 32–43.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, N., & Monk, D. (2015). From civil partnership to same-sex marriage: A decade in British legal history. In N. Barker & D. Monk (Eds.), From civil partnership to same-sex marriage: Interdisciplinary reflections (pp. 1–26). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, L. S. (1989). New voices, new visions: Toward a lesbian/gay paradigm for psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13(4), 445–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, V., Braun, V., & Hayfield, N. (2015). Thematic analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (3rd ed., pp. 222–248). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, V., Burgoyne, C., & Burns, M. (2005). For love or money? Comparing lesbian and gay and heterosexual relationships. The Psychologist, 18, 356–358.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, V., Burgoyne, C., & Burns, M. (2006). Just a piece of paper? A qualitative exploration of same-sex couples’ multiple conceptions of civil partnership and marriage. Lesbian & Gay Psychology Review, 7(2), 141–161.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, V., Burgoyne, C., & Burns, M. (2013). Unscripted and improvised: Public and private celebrations of same-sex relationships. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 9(4), 393–418.
   Google Scholar
• Dunne, G. A. (1997). Lesbian lifestyles: Women’s work and the politics of sexuality. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, S. J., Riggs, D. W., & Peel, E. (2020). Lesbian, Gay, bisexual, trans, intersex & queer psychology: An introduction (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gagnon, J. H., & Simon, W. (1973). Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, R. (2008). Recognizing (and resisting) regulation: Attitudes to the introduction of civil partnership. Sexualities, 11(6), 740–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, R., & Peel, E. (2006). We do? International perspectives on equality, legality and same-sex relationships. Lesbian & Gay Psychology Review, 7(2), 123–140.
   Google Scholar
• Heaphy, B. (2015). Civil partnerships and ordinary marriage. In N. Barker & D. Monk (Eds.), From civil partnership to same-sex marriage: Interdisciplinary reflections (pp. 115–131). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heaphy, B. (2017). Reflexive convention: Civil partnership, marriage and family. The British Journal of Sociology. doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heaphy, B., Smart, C., & Einarsdottir, A. (2013). Same sex marriages: New generations, new relationships. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jowett, A. (2018). Gendered accounts of managing diabetes in same-sex relationships: A discursive analysis of partner support. Health, 22(2), 147–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jowett, A., & Peel, E. (2010). Seismic cultural change?: British media representations of same-sex marriage. Women’s Studies International Forum, 33, 206–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jowett, A., & Peel, E. (2017). ‘A question of equality and choice’: Same-sex couples’ attitudes towards civil partnership after the introduction of same-sex marriage. Psychology & Sexuality, 8(1–2), 69–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimport, K. (2012). Remaking the white wedding? Same-sex wedding photographs’ challenge to symbolic heteronormativity. Gender & Society, 26(6), 874–899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinkenberg, D., & Rose, S. (1994). Dating scripts of gay men and lesbians. Journal of Homosexuality, 26(4), 23–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurdek, L. A. (2007). The allocation of household labor by partners in gay and lesbian couples. Journal of Family Issues, 28(1), 132–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin, E. (1998). Recognizing ourselves: Ceremonies of lesbian and gay commitment. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, C. A., & Land, H. (1990). Biculturality and homosexuality. Social Work, 35(2), 155–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• News, B. B. C. (2018). Civil partnership bill clears commons. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-45994406
   Google Scholar
• Office, G. E. (2018). The Future operation of civil partnership: Gathering further information. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/705768/Future-Operation-Civil-Partnership.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Peel, E., & Harding, R. (2004). Civil partnerships: A new couple’s conversation. Feminism & Psychology, 14(1), 41–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reczek, C., Elliott, S., & Umberson, D. (2009). Commitment without marriage: Union formation among long-term same-sex couples. Journal of Family Issues, 30(6), 738–756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, S. (1996). Lesbian and gay love scripts. In E. D. Rothblum & L. A. Bond (Eds.), Preventing heterosexism and homophobia (pp. 151–173). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, S., & Frieze, I. H. (1993). Young singles’ contemporary dating scripts. Sex Roles, 28(9–10), 499–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, S. M., & Zand, D. (2002). Lesbian dating and courtship from young adulthood to midlife. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 6(1), 85–109.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sassler, S., & Miller, A. J. (2011). Waiting to be asked: Gender, power, and relationship progression among cohabiting couples. Journal of Family Issues, 32(4), 482–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweingruber, D., Anahita, S., & Berns, N. (2004). “Popping the question” when the answer is known: The engagement proposal as performance. Sociological Focus, 37(2), 143–161.
   Google Scholar
• Schweingruber, D., Cast, A. D., & Anahita, S. (2008). “A story and a ring”: Audience judgments about engagement proposals. Sex Roles, 58(3–4), 165–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1986). Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15(2), 97–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart, C. (2008). ‘Can I be bridesmaid?’ Combining the personal and political in same-sex weddings. Sexualities, 11(6), 761–776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry, G., & Braun, V. (2017). Short but often sweet: The surprising potential of qualitative survey methods. In V. Braun & V. Clarke (Eds.), Collecting qualitative data: A practical guide to textual, media and virtual techniques (pp. 15–44). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiederman, M. F. (2015). Sexual script theory: Past, present, and future. In J. DeLamater & R. Plante (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of sexualities (pp. 7–22). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Willig, C. (1999). Beyond appearances: A critical realist approach to social constructionism. In D. J. Nightingale & J. Cromby (Eds.), Social constructionist psychology: A critical analysis of theory and practice (pp. 37–51). Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar