T(w)een sexting and sexual behaviour: (d)evaluating the feminine other

References

• Albury, K., & Crawford, K. (2012). Sexting, consent and young peoples ethics: BeyondMegan’s STORY. Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 26(3), 463–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attwood, F. & Smith. C. (2014). Porn.Studies: An introduction. Porn Studies, 1 (1–2), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, K. L., & Hoskin, R. A. (2015). Experiences of femme identity: Coming out, invisibility and femmephobia. Psychology and Sexuality, 6(3), 229–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, B. B. (2004). Adolescents’ relationships with peers. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 363–394). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, J. C. (Ed). (2009). Visible: A femmethology (Vol. 1& 2). Ypsilanti, MI: Homofactus Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble. Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, G. V. (2017). Black Americans and transgender identity. In K. L. Nadal (Ed.), The sage publication of psychology and gender (pp. 458-457). Thousand Oaks, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (2006). Cambridge grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coffey, J. (2019). Creating distance from body issues: Exploring new materialist feminist possibilities for renegotiating gendered embodiment. Leisure Sciences, 41(1–2), 72–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, U. (2017). Femmebodiments: Notes on queer feminine shapes of vulnerability. Feminist Theory, 18(1), 35–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, J. (2014). Sexting: Gender and teens. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Dobson, A. (2015). Postfeminist digital cultures: Femininity, social media, and self-representation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dobson, A., & Ringrose, J. (2016). Sext education: Pedagogies of sex, gender and shame in the schoolyard of tagged and exposed. Sex Education: Sexuality, Society and Learning, 16(1), 8–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (2003). Language and gender. Cambridge: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, T. (2006). Cultures of masculinity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Egan, R. D. (2013). Becoming sexual: A critical appraisal of the sexualization of girl. Malden, MA: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, A. D., Carr, G., & Snitman, A. (2014). Intersections of race-ethnicity, gender, and sexual minority communities. In M. L. Miville & A. D. Ferguson (Eds.), Handbook of race-ethnicity and gender in psychology (pp. 45–63). New York, NY, US: Springer Science and Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• García-Gómez, A. (2017). Teen girls and sexual agency: Exploring the intrapersonal and intergroup dimensions of sexting. Media, Culture and Society, 39(3), 391–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Gómez, A. (2018). From selfies to sexting: Tween girls, intimacy, and subjectivities. Girlhood Studies, 11(1), 43–58.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, R. (2008). Empowerment/sexism: Figuring female sexual agency in contemporary advertising. Feminism & Psychology, 18(1), 35–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, R. (2012). Media, empowerment and the ‘Sexualisation of Culture’ debates. Sex Roles, 66(11), 736–745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonick, M., Renold, E., Ringrose, J., & Weems, L. (2009). Rethinking agency and resistance: What comes after girl power? Girlhood Studies, Special Issue: What Comes after Girl Power? 2(2), guest editors, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, C. (2004). Good girls bad girls: anglocentrism and diversity in the construction of contemporary girlhood. In A. Harris (Ed (Ed), All about the girl: culture, power and identity (pp. pp.29–43). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, M. (2017). Being naked on the internet: Young people’s selfies as intimate edgework. Journal of Youth Studies, 20(3), 301–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasinoff, A. A. (2014). Blaming sexualization for sexting. Girlhood Studies, 7(1), 102–120.
   Google Scholar
• Hasinoff, A. A. (2015). Sexting panic: Rethinking criminalization, privacy, and consent. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoskin, R. A. (2013). Femme theory: Femininity’s challenge to western feminist pedagogies. (Master’s thesis). QSpace at Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Hoskin, R. A. (2017). Femme theory: Refocusing the intersectional lens. Atlantis, 38(1), 95–109.
   Google Scholar
• Hoskin, R. A. (2019). Femmephobia: The role of anti-femininity and gender policing in LGTBQ+ people’s experiences of discrimination. In Sex Roles
   Google Scholar
• Hoskin, R. A., & Hirschfeld, K. L. (2018). Beyond aesthetics: A femme manifesto. Atlantis: Critical Studies in Gender, Culture & Social Justice, 39(1), 85–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde, J. (2007). New directions in the study of gender similarities and differences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 259–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S., & Vares, T. (2015). `Too many bad role models for us girls’: Girls, female pop celebrities and ‘sexualization’. Sexualities, 18(4), 480–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karaian, L. (2012). Lolita speaks: ‘Sexting’, teenage girls and the law. Crime Media Culture, 8(1), 57–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzer, C., Fetchenhauer, D., & Belschak, F. (2009). Cyberbullying: Who are the victims? A comparison of victimization in internet chat rooms and victimization at school. Journal of Media Psychology, 21(1), 25–36.
   Google Scholar
• Katzman, D. K. (2010). Sexting: Keeping teens safe and responsible in a technologically savvy world. Paediatrics & Child Health, 15(1), 41–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb, S. (2010). Feminist ideals for a healthy female adolescent sexuality: A critique. Sex Roles, 62, 294–306. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9698-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M., Crofts, T., Salter, M., Milivojevic, S., & McGovern, A. (2013). Let’s get sexting’: Risk, power, sex and criminalisation in the Moral Domain. International Journal for Crime and Justice, 2, 35–49.
   Google Scholar
• Levitt, H. M., Gerrish, E. A., & Hiestand, K. R. (2003). The misunderstood gender: A model of modern femme identity. Sex Roles, 48, 99–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. (2011). Internet, children and youth. In M. Consalvo & C. Ess (Eds.), Handbook of internet studies (pp. 348–368). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2016). Digital risk society. In A. Burguess, A. Alemanno, & J. Zinn (Eds.), The routledge handbook of risk studies (pp. 301–309). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Naezer, M. (2018). From risky bheaviour to sexy adventures: Reconceptualising young people’s online sexual activities. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 20(6), 715–729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renold, E., & Ringrose, J. (2011). Schizoid subjectivities? Retheorising teen-girls’ sexual cultures in an era of ‘sexualisation’. Journal of Sociology, 47(4), 389–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringrose, J., & Eriksson Barajas, K. (2011). Gendered risks and opportunities? Exploting teen girls’ digitized sexual identities in postfeminist media contexts. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics, 7(2), 121–138.
   Google Scholar
• Ringrose, J., Harvey, L., Gill, R., & Livingstone, S. (2013). Teen girls, sexual double standards and ‘sexting’: Gendered value in digital image exchange. Feminist Theory, 14(3), 305–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, J. M., Drouin, M., & Coupe, A. (2019). Sexting coercion as a component of intimate partner polyvictimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(11), 2269–2291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schippers, M. (2007). Recovering the feminine other: masculinity, femininity, and gender hegemony. Theory and Society, 36(1), 85-102. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-007-9022-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schloms-Madlener, K. C. (2013). The prevalence and characteristics of sexting behaviours among adolescents and adults in Cape Town, South Africa. MA dissertation. University of Cape Town. http://core.ac.uk/display/29057008
   Google Scholar
• Serano, J. (2007). Whipping girl: A transsexual woman on sexism and the scapegoating of femininity. Emeryville, CA: Seal Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shelton, P. (2018). Reconsidering femme identity: On centering transcounterculture and conceptualizing trans femm theory. Journal of Black Sexuality and Relationship, 5(1), 21–41.
   Google Scholar
• Skeggs, B. (1997). Formations of class and gender: Becoming respectable. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Stardust, Z. (2015). Critical femininities, fluid sexualities and queer temporalities. In M. Laing, K. Pilcher, & N. Smith (Eds.), Queer sex work (pp. 67–78). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tannen, D. (1990). You just don’t understand. Women and men in conversation. New York: William and Morrow Company.
   Google Scholar
• Thurlow, C. (2014). Disciplining youth: Language ideologies and new technologies. In A. Jaworski & A. Coupland (Eds.), The Discourse Reader (3rd ed., pp. 481–496). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vares, T., Jackson, S., & Gill, R. (2011). Preteen girls read 'tween' popular culture: diversity, complexity and contradiction. International Journal Of Media & Cultural Politics, 7(2), 139–154. doi:https://doi.org/10.1386/macp.7.2.139_1
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, D., & West, C. (1975). Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation. In B. Thorne & N. Henley (Eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance (pp. 105–122). Rowley: Newbury House.
   Google Scholar