Sexual consent: Exploring the perceptions of heterosexual and non-heterosexual men

References

• Abbey, A. (1982). Sex differences in attributions for friendly behavior: Do males misperceive females' friendliness?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(5), 830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbey, A. (1987). Misperceptions of friendly behavior as sexual interest: A survey of naturally occurring incidents. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11(2), 173–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1987.tb00782.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adam, P. C., Murphy, D. A., & de Wit, J. B. (2011). When do online sexual fantasies become reality? The contribution of erotic chatting via the Internet to sexual risk-taking in gay and other men who have sex with men. Health Education Research, 26(3), 506–515. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyq085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, L. (1996). The moral magic of consent (II) Special issue: Sex and consent, Part II. Legal Theory, 2(3), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325200000471
   Google Scholar
• Barrios, R. J., & Lundquist, J. H. (2012). Boys just want to have fun? Masculinity, sexual behaviors, and romantic intentions of gay and straight males in college. Journal of LGBT Youth, 9(4), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361653.2012.716749
   Google Scholar
• Beres, M. A. (2007). ‘Spontaneous’ Sexual Consent: An Analysis of Sexual Consent Literature. Feminism & Psychology, 17(1), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353507072914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beres, M. A. (2014). Rethinking the concept of consent for anti-sexual violence activism and education. Feminism & Psychology, 24(3), 373–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353514539652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beres, M. A., Herold, E., & Maitland, S. B. (2004). Sexual consent behaviors in same-sex relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33(5), 475–486. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ASEB.0000037428.41757.10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, M. (2004). Consent. In M. D. Smith (Ed.), Encyclopedia of rape (pp. pp. 51–52). Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bosson, J. K., Vandello, J. A., Burnaford, R. M., Weaver, J. R., & Arzu Wasti, S. (2009). Precarious manhood and displays of physical aggression. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(5), 623–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208331161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosson, J. K., Weaver, J. R., Caswell, T. A., & Burnaford, R. M. (2012). Gender threats and men’s antigay behaviors: The harmful effects of asserting heterosexuality. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15(4), 471–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430211432893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, G., Lowe, P., Brown, G., Osmond, J., & Newman, M. (2018). ‘All in all it is just a judgement call’: Issues surrounding sexual consent in young people’s heterosexual encounters. Journal of Youth Studies, 21(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2017.1343461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., Schmidt, J., Gavey, N., & Fenaughty, J. (2009). Sexual coercion among gay and bisexual men in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Journal of Homosexuality, 56(3), 336–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918360902728764
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., Terry, G., Gavey, N., & Fenaughty, J. (2009). ‘Risk’ and sexual coercion among gay and bisexual men in Aotearoa/New Zealand–key informant accounts. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 11(2), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691050802398208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, C. (2008). Gender-role implications on same-sex intimate partner abuse. Journal of Family Violence, 23(6), 457–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-008-9172-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., Maycock, B., & Burns, S. (2005). Your picture is your bait: Use and meaning of cyberspace among gay men. Journal of Sex Research, 42(1), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490509552258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce, D., & Harper, G. W. (2011). Operating without a safety net: Gay male adolescents and emerging adults’ experiences of marginalization and migration, and implications for theory of syndemic production of health disparities. Health Education & Behavior, 38(4), 367–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198110375911
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Byers, E. S. (1996). How well does the traditional sexual script explain sexual coercion? Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 8(1–2), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v08n01_02
   Google Scholar
• Cantrell, M. A., & Lupinacci, P. (2007). Methodological issues in online data collection. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 60(5), 544–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04448.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffelt, T. A. (2018). Sexual goals, plans, and actions: Toward a sexual script emerging adults use to delay or abstain from sexual intercourse. Western Journal of Communication, 82(4), 416–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2017.1400095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courtenay, W. H. (2000). Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men’s well-being: A theory of gender and health. Social Science & Medicine, 50(10), 1385–1401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00390-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cupach, W. R., & Metts, S. (2014). Sexuality and communication in close relationships. In K. McKinney & S. Spear (Eds.), Sexuality in close relationships (pp. 109–126). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, J., Vescio, T., & Weaver, K. (2015). How threats to masculinity sequentially cause public discomfort, anger, and ideological dominance over women. Social Psychology, 46(4), 242. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, D. S., & Brannon, R. (1976). The forty-nine percent majority: The male sex role. Addison Wesley Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• de la Ossa, A. C. (2016). ‘Talk, listen, think’: Discourses of agency and unintentional violence in consent guidance for gay, bisexual and, trans men. Discourse & Society, 27(4), 365–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516634549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. M. (2016). Sexual fluidity in male and females. Current Sexual Health Reports, 8(4), 249–256.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, B., & Tewksbury, R. (2007). Theaters and sex: An examination of anonymous sexual encounters in an erotic oasis. Deviant Behavior, 29(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/08900520701382880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dripps, D. (1996). For a negative, normative model of consent, with a comment on preference-skepticism special issue: Sex and consent, part I. Legal Theory, 2(2), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325200000422
   Google Scholar
• Edgar, T., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1993). Expectations for sexual interaction: A cognitive test of the sequencing of sexual communication behaviors. Health Communication, 5(4), 239–261. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327027hc0504_1
   Google Scholar
• Fields, E. L., Bogart, L. M., Smith, K. C., Malebranche, D. J., Ellen, J., & Schuster, M. A. (2015). “I always felt I had to prove my manhood”: Homosexuality, masculinity, gender role strain, and HIV risk among young black men who have sex with men. American Journal of Public Health, 105(1), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, J. V., & Becker, A. (2020). “A Situation Where There Aren’t Rules”: Unwanted Sex for Gay, Bisexual, and Questioning Men. Sociological Science, 7(3), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.15195/v7.a3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnon, J. H. (1990). The explicit and implicit use of the scripting perspective in sex research. Annual Review of Sex Research, 1(1), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/10532528.1990.10559854
   Google Scholar
• Gaissad, L., & Velter, A. (2019). “Getting high to get laid.” Drugs and gay sex under influence. Sexologies, 28(3), e48–e53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sexol.2019.06.007
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, J. R., Reiber, C., Massey, S. G., & Merriwether, A. M. (2012). Sexual hookup culture: A review. Review of General Psychology, 16(2), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027911
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilfoyle, J., Wilson, J., & Own, B. (1992). Sex, organs and audiotape: A discourse analytic approach to talking about heterosexual sex and relationships. Feminism & Psychology, 2(2), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/095935359222010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmore, D. D. (1990). Manhood in the Making: Cultural Concepts of Masculinity. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glick, P., Gangl, C., Gibb, S., Klumpner, S., & Weinberg, E. (2007). Defensive reactions to masculinity threat: More negative affect toward effeminate (but not masculine) gay men. Sex Roles, 57(1–2), 55–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9195-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goedel, W. C., Safren, S. A., Mayer, K. H., & Duncan, D. T. (2017). Community-level norms and condomless anal intercourse among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men who use geosocial-networking smartphone applications in the Deep South. Journal of HIV/AIDS & Social Services, 16(4), 382–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/15381501.2017.1344599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grov, C., Hirshfield, S., Remien, R. H., Humberstone, M., & Chiasson, M. A. (2013). Exploring the Venue’s Role in Risky Sexual Behavior Among Gay and Bisexual Men: An Event-Level Analysis from a National Online Survey in the U.Sx. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(2), 291–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9854-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallal, D. M. (2004). Sexual consent in a gay, lesbian, and bisexual population: An exploratory study. [Masters dissertation, Wilfrid Laurier University]: ScholarsCommons@Laurier.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, C. J., & Mahalik, J. R. (2009). Minority stress, masculinity, and social norms predicting gay men’s health risk behaviors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56(1), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, J. (1995). Roles, identities, and sexual orientation: Homosexuality, heterosexuality, and bisexuality. In R. F. Levant & W. S. Pollack (Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp. 359–382). Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hermann, C., Liang, C. T. H., & DeSipio, B. E. (2018). Exploring sexual consent and hostile masculine norms using the theory of planned behavior Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 19(4), 491–499. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickman, S. E., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (1999). “By the semi-mystical appearance of a condom”: How young women and men communicate sexual consent in heterosexual situations. Journal of Sex Research, 36(3), 258–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499909551996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hills, P. J., Seib, E., Pleva, M., Smythe, J., Gosling, M.-R., & Cole, T. (2019). Consent, wantedness, and pleasure: Three dimensions affecting the perceived stress of and judgements of rape in sexual encounters. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 26(1), 171. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000221
   Google Scholar
• Hoppe, T. (2011). Circuits of power, circuits of pleasure: Sexual scripting in gay men’s bottom narratives. Sexualities, 14(2), 193–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460711399033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvath, K. J., Rosser, B. R. S., & Remafedi, G. (2008). Sexual risk taking among young internet-using men who have sex with men. American Journal of Public Health, 98(6), 1059–1067. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.111070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, E. C., Etchells, P. J., & Penton-Voak, I. S. (2012). The sexual overperception bias is associated with sociosexuality. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(8), 1012–1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.07.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, L. (1975). Tearoom trade, enlarged edition: Impersonal sex in public places. Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys, T. P. (2004). Understanding sexual consent: An empirical investigation of the normative script for young heterosexual adults. In M. Cowling & P. Reynolds (Eds.), Making sense of sexual consent (pp. 209–225). Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys, T. P. (2007). Perceptions of sexual consent: The impact of relationship history and gender. Journal of Sex Research, 44(4), 307–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490701586706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurd, H. M. (1996). The moral magic of consent special issue: Sex and consent, Part I. Legal Theory, 2(2), 121–146. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325200000434
   Google Scholar
• Hust, S. J., Marett, E. G., Ren, C., Adams, P. M., Willoughby, J. F., Lei, M., Ran, W., & Norman, C. (2014). Establishing and adhering to sexual consent: The association between reading magazines and college students’ sexual consent negotiation. The Journal of Sex Research, 51(3), 280–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.727914
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hust, S. J., Rodgers, K. B., & Bayly, B. (2017). Scripting sexual consent: Internalized traditional sexual scripts and sexual consent expectancies among college students. Family Relations, 66(1), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Impett, E. A., & Peplau, L. A. (2003). Sexual compliance: Gender, motivational, and relationship perspectives. Journal of Sex Research, 40(1), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490309552169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. M., & Cram, F. (2003). Disrupting the sexual double standard: Young women’s talk about heterosexuality. The British Journal of Social Psychology/the British Psychological Society, 42(1), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466603763276153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, M. M., Pingel, E., Eisenberg, A., Santana, M. L., & Bauermeister, J. (2012). Butch tops and femme bottoms? Sexual positioning, sexual decision making, and gender roles among young gay men. American Journal of Men’s Health, 6(6), 505–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988312455214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozkowski, K. N. (2011). Measuring internal and external conceptualizations of sexual consent: A mixed-methods exploration of sexual consent (Order No. 3466353). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://search.proquest.com/openview/4b913c8dc57f517a6d8f73b40a3bbf39/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
   Google Scholar
• Jozkowski, K. N., Manning, J., & Hunt, M. (2018). Sexual consent in and out of the bedroom: Disjunctive views of heterosexual college students. Women’s Studies in Communication, 41(2), 117–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2018.1470121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozkowski, K. N., & Peterson, Z. D. (2013). College students and sexual consent: Unique insights. Journal of Sex Research, 50(6), 517–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.700739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozkowski, K. N., Peterson, Z. D., Sanders, S. A., Dennis, B., & Reece, M. (2014). Gender Differences in Heterosexual College Students‘ Conceptualizations and Indicators of Sexual Consent: Implications for Contemporary Sexual Assault Prevention Education. The Journal of Sex Research, 51(8), 904–916. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.792326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz-Wise, S. L. (2015). Sexual fluidity in young adult women and men: Associations with sexual orientation and sexual identity development. Psychology & Sexuality, 6(2), 189–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. (2015). Kurt and Blaine: New sexual scripts for gay youth. In Brian C. Johnson & Daniel K. Faill (Eds.), Glee and new directions for social change (pp. 81–93). Brill Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Kimmel, S. B., & Mahalik, J. R. (2005). Body Image Concerns of Gay Men: The Roles of Minority Stress and Conformity to Masculine Norms. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(6), 1185–1190. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kippax, S., & Smith, G. (2001). Anal intercourse and power in sex between men. Sexualities, 4(4), 413–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/136346001004004002
   Google Scholar
• Klein, V., Imhoff, R., Reininger, K. M., & Briken, P. (2019). Perceptions of sexual script deviation in women and men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(2), 631–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1280-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinkenberg, D., & Rose, S. (1994). Dating scripts of gay men and lesbians. Journal of Homosexuality, 26(4), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v26n04_02
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krugman, S. (1995). Male development and the transformation of shame. In R. F. Levant & W. S. Pollack (Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp. 91–126). Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kurdek, L. A. (1987). Sex role self schema and psychological adjustment in coupled homosexual and heterosexual men and women. Sex Roles, 17(9–10), 549–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La France, B. H. (2010). What verbal and nonverbal communication cues lead to sex?: An analysis of the traditional sexual script. Communication Quarterly, 58(3), 297–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2010.503161
   Google Scholar
• Lamont, E. (2017). “We can write the scripts ourselves”: Queer challenges to heteronormative courtship practices. Gender & Society, 31(5), 624–646. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243217723883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C., & Owens, R. G. (2002). The psychology of men’s health. Buckingham; Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levant, R. F. (1992). Toward the reconstruction of masculinity. Journal of Family Psychology: JFP: Journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association, 5(3–4), 379. https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/1993-01325-001
   Google Scholar
• Levant, R. F. (2011). Research in the psychology of men and masculinity using the gender role strain paradigm as a framework. The American Psychologist, 66(8), 765–776. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levant, R. F., Smalley, K. B., Aupont, M., House, A., Richmond, K., & Noronha, D. (2007). Initial Validation of the Male Role Norms Inventory-Revised (MRNI-R). The Journal of Men’s Studies, 15(1), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.3149/jms.1501.83
   Google Scholar
• Lick, D. J., & Johnson, K. L. (2015). Intersecting race and gender cues are associated with perceptions of gay men’s preferred sexual roles. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(5), 1471–1481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0472-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindegger, G., & Quayle, M. (2009). Masculinity and HIV/AIDS. In P. Rohleder, L. Swartz, S. C. Kalichman, & L. C. Simbayi (Eds.), HIV/AIDS in South Africa 25 years on: Psychosocial perspectives (pp. 41–54). Springer New York.
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren, K. P., Parkhill, M. R., George, W. H., & Hendershot, C. S. (2008). Gender differences in perceptions of sexual intent: A qualitative review and integration. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(4), 423–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00456.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, A., LeBlanc, A. J., & Frost, D. M. (2019). Masculinity and minority stress among men in same-sex relationships. Society and Mental Health, 9(2), 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156869318773425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malm, H. M. (1996). The ontological status of consent and its implications for the law on rape. Legal Theory, 2(2), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325200000446
   Google Scholar
• Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2012). Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 44(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochemia medica, 22(3), 276–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKie, R. M., Lachowsky, N. J., & Milhausen, R. R. (2015). The Positive Impact of Technology on Young Gay Men’s Dating and Sexual Relationships in Canada: Results From a Focus Group Study. Journal of LGBT Youth, 12(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361653.2014.935552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKie, R. M., Skakoon-Sparling, S., Levere, D., Sezlik, S., & Humphreys, T. P. (2020). Is There Space for Our Stories? An Examination of North American and Western European Gay, Bi, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men’s Non-consensual Sexual Experiences. The Journal of Sex Research, 57(8), 1014–1025. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2020.1767023
   Google Scholar
• McWhirter, D. P., & Mattison, A. M. (1984). The male couple: How relationships develop. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Mellman, W. L. (2017). Beyond the Gender Binary in Sexual Scripts?: Dating and Relationships among Transgender Men and their Non-Transgender Partners. Doctoral dissertation, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, I. H. (1995). Minority stress and mental health in gay men. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36(1), 38–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mongeau, P. A., Serewicz, M. C. M., Henningsen, M. L. M., & Davis, K. L. (2006). Sex differences in the transition to a heterosexual romantic relationship. In K. Dindia & D. J. Canary (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication (pp. 337–358). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Moskowitz, D. A., & Hart, T. A. (2011). The influence of physical body traits and masculinity on anal sex roles in gay and bisexual men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(4), 835–841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9754-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muehlenhard, C. L., Humphreys, T. P., Jozkowski, K. N., & Peterson, Z. D. (2016). The complexities of sexual consent among college students: A conceptual and empirical review. The Journal of Sex Research, 53(4–5), 457–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1146651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muehlenhard, C. L., & Peterson, Z. D. (2005). III. Wanting and not wanting sex: The missing discourse of ambivalence. Feminism & Psychology, 15(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353505049698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz-Laboy, M. A., & Dodge, B. (2005). Bisexual practices: Patterns, meanings, and implications for HIV/STI prevention among bisexually active Latino men and their partners. Journal of Bisexuality, 5(1), 79–101. https://doi.org/10.1300/J159v05n01_06
   Google Scholar
• Murray, S. H. (2018). Heterosexual men’s sexual desire: Supported by, or deviating from, traditional masculinity norms and sexual scripts? Sex Roles, 78(1–2), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0766-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, S. H. (2019). Not Always in the Mood: The New Science of Men, Sex, and Relationships. Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Mutchler, M. G., McDavitt, B., & Gordon, K. K. (2014). “Becoming bold”: Alcohol use and sexual exploration among Black and Latino young men who have sex with men (YMSM). The Journal of Sex Research, 51(6), 696–710. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.772086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, L. F., & Allgeier, E. R. (1998). Feigning sexual desire: Consenting to unwanted sexual activity in heterosexual dating relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 35(3), 234–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499809551938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostler, T. A. (2003). Verbal and nonverbal dating behaviors and sexual consent: Implications for miscommunication between men and women (Order No. 3099680). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing (288073201). https://search-proquest-com.proxy.bib.uottawa.ca/docview/288073201?accountid=14701
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, Z. D., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (2004). Was It Rape? The Function of Women’s Rape Myth Acceptance and Definitions of Sex in Labeling Their Own Experiences. Sex Roles, 51(3/4), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000037758.95376.00
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, Z. D., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (2007). Conceptualizing the “wantedness” of women’s consensual and nonconsensual sexual experiences: Implications for how women label their experiences with rape. Journal of Sex Research, 44(1), 72–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490709336794
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope, H., Pope, H. G., Phillips, K. A., & Olivardia, R. (2000). The Adonis Complex: The Secret Crisis of Male Body Obsession. Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Power, J., McNair, R., & Carr, S. (2009). Absent sexual scripts: Lesbian and bisexual women’s knowledge, attitudes and action regarding safer sex and sexual health information. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 11(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691050802541674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quackenbush, R. L. (1987). Sex roles and social perception. Human Relations, 40(10), 659–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678704001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reece, M., & Dodge, B. (2004). Exploring the physical, mental and social well-being of gay and bisexual men who cruise for sex on a college campus. Journal of Homosexuality, 46(1–2), 111–136. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v46n01_03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reneau, S. E. (2006). The function of unwanted consensual sexual activity in dating relationships (Order No. 3294437). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing (305320903). https://search.proquest.com/docview/305320903?accountid=14701
   Google Scholar
• Rich, A. (1980). Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 5(4), 631–660. https://doi.org/10.1086/493756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, M. W., Rosser, B. R. S., McCurdy, S., & Feldman, J. (2007). The advantages and limitations of seeking sex online: A comparison of reasons given for online and offline sexual liaisons by men who have sex with men. The Journal of Sex Research, 44(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15598519jsr4401_7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosser, B. R. S., Wilkerson, J. M., Smolenski, D. J., Oakes, J. M., Konstan, J., Horvath, K. J., Kilian, G. R., Novak, D. S., Danilenko, G. P., & Morgan, R. (2011). The Future of Internet-Based HIV Prevention: A Report on Key Findings from the Men’s INTernet (MINTS-I, II) Sex Studies. Sex Studies. AIDS and Behavior, 15(S1), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-011-9910-5
   Google Scholar
• Sakaluk, J. K., Todd, L. M., Milhausen, R., Lachowsky, N. J., & Research Group in Sex, U. (2014). Undergraduate Research Group in Sexuality. Dominant heterosexual sexual scripts in emerging adulthood: Conceptualization and measurement. The Journal of Sex Research, 51(5), 516–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.745473
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez, F. J., Westefeld, J. S., Liu, W. M., & Vilain, E. (2010). Masculine gender role conflict and negative feelings about being gay. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 41(2), 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savin-Williams, R. C. (2017). Mostly straight: Sexual fluidity among men. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. G., Pinciaro, P. J., & Jessell, J. K. (1998). Effects of coercion and verbal consent on university students’ perception of date rape. American Journal of Health Behavior, 22(1), 46–53. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1997-38720-005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, D. P. (2007). “Sexual strategies across sexual orientations: How personality traits and culture relate to sociosexuality among gays, lesbians, bisexuals, and heterosexuals”. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 18(2–3), 183–214. https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v18n02_06
   Google Scholar
• Segovia, A. N., Maxwell, J. A., DiLorenzo, M. G., & MacDonald, G. (2019). No strings attached? How attachment orientation relates to the varieties of casual sexual relationships. Personality and Individual Differences, 151, 109455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.05.061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidman, S. (2005). From the polluted homosexual to the normal gay: Changing patterns of sexual regulation in America. In C. Ingraham (Eds.), Thinking straight: The power, the promise, and the paradox of heterosexuality (pp. 39–61). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, G. K., Tatar, O., Sutton, A., Fisher, W., Naz, A., Perez, S., & Rosberger, Z. (2017). Correlates of Tinder use and risky sexual behaviors in young adults. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 20(12), 727–734. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1986). Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of sexual behavior, 15(2), 97–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (2003). Sexual scripts: Origins, influences and changes. Qualitative Sociology, 26(4), 491–497. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QUAS.0000005053.99846.e5
   Google Scholar
• Starks, T. J., Pawson, M., Stephenson, R., Sullivan, P., & Parsons, J. T. (2018). Dyadic qualitative analysis of condom use scripts among emerging adult gay male couples. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 44(3), 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2017.1359713
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stergiou-Kita, M., Mansfield, E., Bezo, R., Colantonio, A., Garritano, E., Lafrance, M., Lewko, J., Mantis, S., Moody, J., Power, N., Theberge, N., Westwood, E., & Travers, K. (2015). Danger zone: Men, masculinity and occupational health and safety in high risk occupations. Safety Science, 80, 213–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.07.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swift-Gallant, A., Coome, L. A., Monks, D. A., & VanderLaan, D. P. (2018). Gender nonconformity and birth order in relation to anal sex role among gay men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(4), 1041–1052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-0980-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, R. (2010). Men and erotic oases. Sociology Compass, 4(12), 1011–1019. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2010.00343.x
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, E. H., Jr., & Pleck, J. H. (1995). Masculinity ideologies: A review of research instrumentation on men and masculinities. In R. F. Levant (Ed.), A new psychology of men (Vol. 402, pp. pp. 129–163). Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, E. H., & Pleck, J. H. (1986). The structure of male role norms. The American Behavioral Scientist, 29(5), 531–543. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276486029005003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolman, D. L., & Szalacha, L. A. (1999). Dimensions of desire: Bridging qualitative and quantitative methods in a study of female adolescent sexuality. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23(1), 7–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00338.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandello, J. A., Bosson, J. K., Cohen, D., Burnaford, R. M., & Weaver, J. R. (2008). Precarious manhood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(6), 1325–1339. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vannier, S. A., & O’Sullivan, L. F. (2011). Communicating interest in sex: Verbal and nonverbal initiation of sexual activity in young adults’ romantic dating relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(5), 961–969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9663-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegesin, D. J., & Meyer-Bahlburg, H. F. L. (2000). Top/bottom self-label, anal sex practices, HIV risk and gender role identity in gay men in New York City. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 12(3), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v12n03_03
   Google Scholar
• Wei, C., & Raymond, H. F. (2011). Preference for and maintenance of anal sex roles among men who have sex with men: Sociodemographic and behavioral correlates. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(4), 829–834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9623-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertheimer, A. (2003). Consent to sexual relations. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiederman, M. W. (2005). The gendered nature of sexual scripts. The Family Journal, 13(4), 496–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480705278729
   Google Scholar
• Willer, R., Rogalin, C. L., Conlon, B., & Wojnowicz, M. T. (2013). Overdoing gender: A test of the masculine overcompensation thesis. The American Journal of Sociology, 118(4), 980–1022. https://doi.org/10.1086/668417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, L., Hart, T. A., & Zheng, Y. (2012). The relationship between intercourse preference positions and personality traits among gay men in China. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(3), 683–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9819-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar