Balancing Competing Logics in For-Profit Social Enterprises: A Need for Hybrid Governance

References

• Alegre, I. 2015. “Social and Economic Tension in Social Enterprises: Does it Exist?” Social Business 5 (1): 17–32.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, J., H. Stevenson, and J. Wei-Skillern. 2006. “Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship: Same, Different, or Both?” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 30 (1): 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., and S. Dorado. 2010. “Building Sustainable Hybrid Organizations: The Case of Commercial Microfinance Organizations.” Academy of Management Journal 53 (6): 1419–1440.
   Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., M. Lee, J. Walker, and C. Dorsey. 2012. In search of the hybrid ideal. Stanford Social Innovation Review. Summer 2012: 51–55.
   Google Scholar
• Berglund, K., and B. Schwartz. 2013. “Holding on to the Anomaly of Social Entrepreneurship Dilemmas in Starting Up and Running a Fair-Trade Enterprise.” Journal of Social Entrepreneurship 4 (3): 237–255
   Google Scholar
• Bromley, P., and W. Powell. 2012. “From Smoke and Mirrors to Walking the Talk: Decoupling in the Contemporary World.” The Academy of Management Annals 6 (1): 1–48. doi:10.1080/19416520.2012.684462.
   Google Scholar
• Costanzo, L., C. Vurro, D. Foster, F. Servato, and F. Perrini. 2014. “Dual-Mission Management in Social Entrepreneurship: Qualitative Evidence from Social Firms in UK.” Journal of Small Business Management 52 (4): 655–677.
   Google Scholar
• Dacin, T., P. Dacin, and P. Tracey. 2011. “Social Entrepreneurship: A Critique and Future Directions.” Organization Science 22 (5): 1203–1213.
   Google Scholar
• Daily, C. M., and D. R. Dalton. 1994. “Bankruptcy and Corporate Governance: The Impact of Board Composition and Structure.” Academy of Management Journal 37: 1603–1617.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, D. R., C. M. Daily, A. E. Ellstrand, and J. L. Johnson. 1998. “Meta-Analytic Reviews of Board Composition, Leadership Structure, and Performance.” Strategic Management Journal 19: 269–290
   Google Scholar
• Dart, R. 2004. “The Legitimacy of Social Enterprise.” Nonprofit Management & Leadership 14 (4): 411–424.
   Google Scholar
• De Clercq, D., and M. Voronov. 2011. “Sustainability in Entrepreneurship: A Tale of Two Logics.” International Small Business Journal 29 (4): 322—344.
   Google Scholar
• Dorado, S., and D. Shaffer. 2011. “Governance Among Confounding Logics: The Case of DePaul Industries.” Journal of Social Entrepreneurship 11 (4): 319–343.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. “Building Theories from Case-Study Research.” Academy of Management Review 14 (4): 532–550.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M., and M. E. Graebner. 2007. “Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges.” Academy of Management Journal 50(1): 25–32.
   Google Scholar
• Elsayed, K. 2007. “Does CEO Duality Really Affect Corporate Performance?” Corporate Governance: An International Review 15 (6), 1203–1224.
   Google Scholar
• Fiegener, M. K. 2005. “Determinants of Board Participation in the Strategic Decisions of Small Corporations.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 29 (5): 627–650.
   Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, S., and R. A. Daveni. 1994. “CEO Duality as a Double-Edged-Sword – How Boards of Directors Balance Entrenchment Avoidance and Unity of Command.” Academy of Management Journal 37 (5): 1079–1108.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., M. Raynard, F. Kodeih, E. Micelotta, and M. Lounsbury. 2011. “Institutional Complexity and Organizational Responses.” Academy of Management Annals 5 (1): 317–371.
   Google Scholar
• Haigh, N., and A. Hoffman. 2012. “Hybrid Organizations: The Next Chapter of Sustainable Business.” Organizational Dynamics 41 (2): 126–134.
   Google Scholar
• Jay, J. 2013. “Process Studies of Change: Navigating Paradox as a Mechanism of Change and Innovation in Hybrid Organizations.” Academy of Management Journal 56 (1):137–159.
   Google Scholar
• Jick, T. D. 1979. “Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods – Triangulation in Action.” Administrative Science Quarterly 24 (4): 602–611.
   Google Scholar
• Judd, C., E. Smith, and L. Kidder. 1991. Research Methods in Social Relations. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Judge, W. Q., and C. P. Zeithaml. 1992. “Institutional and Strategic Choice Perspectives on Board Involvement in the Strategic Decision-Process.” Academy of Management Journal 35 (4): 766–794.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. Y., and A. S. Miner. 2007. “Vicarious Learning from the Failures and Near-Failures of Others: Evidence from the US Commercial Banking Industry.” Academy of Management Journal 50 (3): 687–714.
   Google Scholar
• Kraatz, M., and E. Block. 2008. “Organizational Implications of Institutional Plurism.” In Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, and K. Sahlin-Andersson, 243–275. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Langley, A. 1999. “Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data.” Academy of Management Review 24 (4): 691–710.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., and E. G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Luke, B., and V. Chu. 2013. “Social Enterprise Versus Social Entrepreneurship: An Examination of the “Why” and “How” in Pursuing Social Change.” International Small Business Journal 31 (7): 764–784.
   Google Scholar
• Luoma, P., and J. Goodstein. 1999. “Stakeholders and Corporate Boards: Institutional Influences on Board Composition and Structure.” Academy of Management Journal 42 (5): 553—563.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M., and A. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Moizer, J., and P. Tracey. 2010. “Strategy Making in Social Enterprise: The Role of Resource Allocation and Its Effects on Organizational Sustainability.” Systems Research and Behavioral Science 27 (3): 252–266.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, A. M., and J. C. Casillas. 2007. “High-Growth SMEs versus Non-High-Growth SMEs: A Discriminant Analysis.” Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 19 (1): 69–88.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, T. W., J. C. Short, G. T. Payne, and G. T. Lumpkin. 2011. “Dual Identities in Social Ventures: An Exploratory Study.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 35 (4): 805–830.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. J., and S. M. Coombes. 2009. “A Model of Social Entrepreneurial Discovery.” Journal of Business Ethics 87 (3): 325–336.
   Google Scholar
• Pache, A. C., and F. Santos. 2010. “When Worlds Collide: The Internal Dynamics of Organizational Responses to Conflicting Institutional Demands.” Academy of Management Review 35 (3): 455–476.
   Google Scholar
• Pache, A. C., and F. Santos. 2013. “Inside the Hybrid Organization: Selective Coupling as a Response to Competing Institutional Logics.” Academy of Management Journal 35 (3): 455–476.
   Google Scholar
• Pentland, B. T. 1999. “Building Process Theory with Narrative: From Description to Explanation.” Academy of Management Review 24 (4): 711–724.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, J. L., and H. G. Rainey. 1988. “The Public-Private Distinction in Organization Theory: A Critique and Research Strategy Source.” Academy of Management Review 13 (2): 182–201.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, S. C. 2001. “The Relationship Between Written Business Plans and the Failure of Small Businesses in the U.S.” Journal of Small Business Management 39 (3): 201—208.
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, A. M. 1990. “Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice.” Organization Science 1 (3): 267–292.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, M. G. 2000. “The Good, the Bad, and the Ambivalent: Managing Identification Among Amway distributors.” Administrative Science Quarterly 45 (3): 456–493.
   Google Scholar
• Reay, T., and C. R. Hinings. 2009. “Managing the Rivalry of Competing Institutional Logics.” Organization Studies 30 (6): 629–652.
   Google Scholar
• Ruvio, A. A., and A. Shoham. 2010. “A Multilevel Study of Nascent Social Ventures.” International Small Business Journal 29 (5): 562–579.
   Google Scholar
• Siggelkow, N. 2007. “Persuasion with Case Studies.” Academy of Management Journal 50 (1): 20–24.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, J. V., D. J. Tucker, and A. G. Meinhard. 1991. “Institutional Change and Ecological Dynamics.” In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, W. W. Powell and P. J. Dimaggio, 361–389. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L., and C. Woods. 2014. “Stakeholder Engagement in the Social Entrepreneurship Process: Identity, Governance and Legitimacy.” Journal of Social Entrepreneurship 6 (2): 186–217.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, W. K., M. Gonin, and M. L. Besharov. 2013. “Managing Social-Business Tensions: A Review and Research Agenda for Social Enterprise.” Business Ethics Quarterly 23 (3):407–442.
   Google Scholar
• Steier, L., and R. Greenwood. 1995. “Venture Capitalist Relationships in the Deal Structuring and Post-Investment Stages of New Firm Creation.” Journal of Management Studies 32 (3): 337–357.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, R., N. Moray, and J. Bruneel. 2015. “The Social and Economic Mission of Social Enterprises: Dimensions, Measurement, Validation, and Relation.” Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice 39 (5): 1051–1082.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. C. 1995. “Managing Legitimacy – Strategic and Institutional Approaches.” Academy of Management Review 20 (3): 571–610.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., and W. Ocasio. 1999. “Institutional Logics and the Historical Contingency of Power in Organizations: Executive Succession in the Higher Education Publishing Industry, 1958-1990.” American Journal of Sociology 105 (3): 801–843.
   Google Scholar
• Tilcsik, A. 2010. “From Ritual to Reality: Demography, Ideology, and Decoupling in a Post-Communist Government Agency.” Academy of Management Journal 53: 1474—1498.
   Google Scholar
• Tracey, P., N. Phillips, and O. Jarvis. 2011. “Bridging Institutional Entrepreneurship and the Creation of New Organizational Forms: A Multilevel Model.” Organization Science 22 (1): 60–80
   Google Scholar
• Tuggle, C. S., D. G. Sirmon, C. R. Reutzel, and L. Bierman. 2010. “Commanding Board of Director Attention: Investigating How Organizational Performance and CEO Duality Affect Board Members' Attention to Monitoring.” Strategic Management Journal 31 (9): 946–968.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Walt, N., C. Ingley, C.Shergill, and A. Townsend. 2006. “Board Configuration: Are Diverse Boards Better Boards?” Corporate Governance: The International Board of Effective Board Performance 6: 129–147.
   Google Scholar
• Vidal, I. 2005. “Social Enterprise and Social Inclusion: Social Enterprises in the Sphere of Work Integration.” International Journal of Public Administration 28: 807–825.
   Google Scholar
• Westphal, J. D. 1999. “Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavioral and Performance Consequences of CEO-Board Social Ties.” Academy of Management Journal 42 (1): 7–24.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2003. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, M. A., and G. J. Zeitz. 2002. “Beyond Survival: Achieving New Venture Growth by Building Legitimacy.” Academy of Management Review 27 (3): 414–431.
   Google Scholar