Hybrid Organizational Culture: The Case of Social Enterprises

References

• Barker, J. 1993. “Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams.” Administrative Science Quarterly 38 (3): 408–431. doi:10.2307/2393374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battilana, J. 2018. “Cracking the Organizational Challenge of Pursuing Joint Social and Financial Goals: Social Enterprise as a Laboratory to Understand Hybrid Organizing.” Management 21 (4): 1278–1305. doi:10.3917/mana.214.1278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., and S. Dorado. 2010. “Building Sustainable Hybrid Organizations: The Case of Commercial Microfinance Organizations.” Academy of Management Journal 53 (6): 1419–1440. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.57318391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., and M. Lee. 2014. “Advancing Research on Hybrid Organizing.” The Academy of Management Annals 8 (1): 397–441. doi:10.1080/19416520.2014.893615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., M. Lee, J. Walker, and C. Dorsey. 2012. “In Search of the Hybrid Ideal.” Stanford Social Innovation Review 10 (3): 51–55.
   Google Scholar
• Besharov, M. L., and W. K. Smith. 2014. “Multiple Institutional Logics in Organizations: Explaining Their Varied Nature and Implications.” Academy of Management Review 39 (3): 364–381. doi:10.5465/amr.2011.0431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridgstock, R., F. M. Lettice, M. F. Özbilgin, and A. Tatli. 2010. “Diversity Management for Innovation in Social Enterprises in the UK.” Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 22: 557–574. doi:10.1080/08985626.2010.488404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canales, R. 2014. “Weaving Straw into Gold: Managing Organizational Tensions between Standardization and Flexibility in Microfinance.” Organization Science 25 (1): 1–28. doi:10.1287/orsc.2013.0831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, J. A., T. Wry, and E. Y. Zhao. 2016. “Funding Financial Inclusion: Institutional Logics and the Contextual Contingency of Funding for Microfinance Organizations.” Academy of Management Journal 59 (6): 2103–2131. doi:10.5465/amj.2015.0715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dees, J. G. 1998. “The meaning of social entrepreneurship.” Duke, Revised May 30 2001. http://www.caseatduke.org/
   Google Scholar
• Doherty, B., H. Haugh, and F. Lyon. 2014. “Social Enterprises as Hybrid Organizations: A Review and Research Agenda.” International Journal of Management Reviews 16 (4): 417–436. doi:10.1111/ijmr.12028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drucker, P. F. 1990. Managing the Nonprofit Organization. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Ebrahim, A., J. Battilana, and J. Mair. 2014. “The Governance of Social Enterprises: Mission Drift and Accountability Challenges in Hybrid Organizations.” Research in Organizational Behavior 34: 81–100. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2014.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiol, C. M., M. G. Pratt, and E. J. O’Connor. 2009. “Managing Intractable Identity Conflicts.” Academy of Management Review 34 (1): 32–55. doi:10.5465/amr.2009.35713276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flannery, D., and K. Deiglmeier. 1999. “Managing the Social Purpose Enterprise.” In Roberts Enterprise Development Fund, the REDF Box Set, Vol. 1, 11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York, NY: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Friedland, R., and R. R. Alford. 1991. “Bringing Society Back in: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions.” In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by W. Powell and P. J. DiMaggio, 232–263. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garrow, E., and Y. Hasenfeld. 2012. “Managing Conflicting Institutional Logics: Social Service versus Market.” In Social Enterprises, edited by B. Gidron and Y. Hasenfeld, 121–144. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Glynn, M. A. 2000. “When Cymbals Become Symbols: Conflict over Organizational Identity within a Symphony Orchestra.” Organization Science 11 (3): 285–298. doi:10.1287/orsc.11.3.285.12496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., M. Raynard, F. Kodeih, E. R. Micelotta, and M. Lounsbury. 2011. “Institutional Complexity and Organizational Responses.” Academy of Management Annals 5 (1): 317–371. doi:10.5465/19416520.2011.590299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslam, S. A. 2001. Psychology in Organizations: The Social Identity Approach. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, Y.-C., J. Weng, and T. Lin. 2017. “How Social Enterprises Manage Their Organizational Identification: A Theoretical Framework of Identity Management Approach through Attraction, Selection, and Socialization.” The International Journal of Human Resource Management 29 (20): 2880–2904. doi:10.1080/09585192.2017.1328610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, G., Ö. Koçak, and M. T. Hannan. 2009. “Multiple Category Memberships in Markets: An Integrative Theory and Two Empirical Tests.” American Sociological Review 74 (1): 150–169. doi:10.1177/000312240907400108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraatz, M. S., and E. S. Block. 2008. “Organizational Implications of Institutional Pluralism.” In The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, and R. Suddaby, 243–275. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M. 2014. “Mission and Markets? the Viability of Hybrid Social Ventures.” Academy of Management Proceedings 2014 (1): 13958. doi:10.5465/ambpp.2014.13958abstract.
   Google Scholar
• Levi, A. 2008. Nihul Vemanhigut: Shinui Vehadshanut [Management and Leadership: Change and Innovation]. Ramat Gan, Israel: Rimonim.
   Google Scholar
• Margolis, J. D., and J. Walsh. 2003. “Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business.” Administrative Science Quarterly 48 (2): 268–305. doi:10.2307/3556659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. 1992. Cultures in Organizations: Three Perspectives. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J., P. J. Frost, and O. A. O’Neill. 2006. “Organisational Culture: Beyond Struggles for Intellectual Dominance.” In The Sage Handbook of Organisation Studies, edited by S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, and W. R. Nord, 725–755. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mullins, D., D. Czischke, and G. van Bortel. 2012. “Exploring the Meaning of Hybridity and Social Enterprise in Housing Organisations.” Housing Studies 27 (4): 405–417. doi:10.1080/02673037.2012.689171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pache, A.-C., and F. Santos. 2010. “When Worlds Collide: The Internal Dynamics of Organizational Responses to Conflicting Institutional Demands.” Academy of Management Review 35: 455–476. doi:10.5465/amr.35.3.zok455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pache, A.-C., and F. Santos. 2013. “Inside the Hybrid Organization: Selective Coupling as a Response to Conflicting Institutional Logics.” Academy of Management Journal 56 (4): 972–1001. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, M., A. Gillett, and B. Doherty. 2018. “Sustainability in Social Enterprise: Hybrid Organizing in Public Services.” Public Management Review 21 (2): 159–186. doi:10.1080/14719037.2018.1438504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, M. G, and P. O. Foreman. 2000. “Classifying Managerial Responses to Multiple Organizational Identities.” Academy of Management Review 25 (1): 18–42. doi:10.5465/amr.2000.2791601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raz, A. 2004. Tarbut Irgunit [Organizational Culture]. Raanana, Israel: The Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Ruef, M., and K. Patterson. 2009. “Credit and Classification: The Impact of Industry Boundaries in Nineteenth-Century America.” Administrative Science Quarterly 54 (3): 486–520. doi:10.2189/asqu.2009.54.3.486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schein, E. 1985. Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Schein, E. 1990. “Organizational Culture.” American Psychologist 45 (2): 109–119. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.45.2.109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schein, E. 2004. Organizational Culture and Leadership (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Schein, E. 2010. Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Senge, P. M. 1994. The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook: Strategies and Tools for Building a Learning Organization. New York, NY: Currency, Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Teasdale, S. 2010. “Explaining the Multifaceted Nature of Social Enterprise: Impression Management as (Social) Entrepreneurial Behaviour.” Voluntary Sector Review 1 (3): 271–292. doi:10.1332/204080510X538257.
   Google Scholar
• Tracey, P., N. Phillips, and O. Jarvis. 2011. “Bridging Institutional Entrepreneurship and Creation of New Organizational Forms: A Multilevel Model.” Organization Science 225 (1): 60–80.
   Google Scholar
• Trice, H., and D. Morand. 1991. “Organisational Subculture and Countercultures.” In Studies in Organisational Sociology, edited by G. Miller, 45–69. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Maanen, J., and E. Schein. 1979. “Toward a Theory of Organizational Socialization.” In Research in Organizational Behavior, edited by B. Staw and L. Cummings, Vol. 1, 204–264. New York, NY: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Voss, Z. G., D. M. Cable, and G. B. Voss. 2006. “Organizational Identity and Firm Performance: What Happens When Leaders Disagree about “Who we Are?” Organization Science 17 (6): 741–755. doi:10.1287/orsc.1060.0218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, D. 2012. “The State of Theory and Research on Social Enterprises.” In Social Enterprises: An Organizational Perspective, edited by B. Gidron & Y. Hasenfeld, 19–46. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar