From Black and White to Yin and Yang: Exploring the Management of Tensions in Social Enterprises

References

• Aldrich, Howard E., and C. Marlene Fiol. 1994. “Fools Rush in? The Institutional Context of Industry Creation.” Academy of Management Review 19 (4): 645–670. doi:10.2307/258740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashforth, Blake E., and Peter H. Reingen. 2014. “Functions of Dysfunction.” Administrative Science Quarterly 59 (3): 474–516. doi:10.1177/0001839214537811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battilana, Julie, Marya Besharov, and Bjoern Mitzinneck. 2017. “On Hybrids and Hybrid Organizing: A Review and Roadmap for Future Research.” The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism 2: 133–169. doi:10.4135/9781446280669.n6.
   Google Scholar
• Battilana, Julie, and Tiziana Casciaro. 2012. “Change Agents, Networks, and Institutions: A Contingency Theory of Organizational Change.” Academy of Management Journal 55 (2): 381–398. doi:10.5465/amj.2009.0891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battilana, Julie, and Silvia Dorado. 2010. “Building Sustainable Hybrid Organizations: The Case of Commercial Microfinance Organizations.” Academy of Management Journal 53 (6): 1419–1440. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.57318391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battilana, Julie, and Matthew Lee. 2014. “Advancing Research on Hybrid Organizing–Insights from the Study of Social Enterprises.” The Academy of Management Annals 8 (1): 397–441. doi:10.1080/19416520.2014.893615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battilana, Julie, Metin Sengul, Anne-Claire Pache, and Jacob Model. 2015. “Harnessing Productive Tensions in Hybrid Organizations: The Case of Work Integration Social Enterprises.” Academy of Management Journal 58 (6): 1658–1685. doi:10.5465/amj.2013.0903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berglund, Karin, and Birgitta Schwartz. 2013. “Holding on to the Anomaly of Social Entrepreneurship Dilemmas in Starting up and Running a Fair-Trade Enterprise.” Journal of Social Entrepreneurship 4 (3): 237–255. doi:10.1080/19420676.2013.777362.
   Google Scholar
• Besharov, Marya L. 2014. “The Relational Ecology of Identification: How Organizational Identification Emerges When Individuals Hold Divergent Values.” Academy of Management Journal 57 (5): 1485–1512. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezrukova, Katerina, Sherry M. B. Thatcher, Karen A. Jehn, and Chester S. Spell. 2012. “The Effects of Alignments: Examining Group Faultlines, Organizational Cultures, and Performance.” The Journal of Applied Psychology 97 (1): 77–92. doi:10.1037/a0023684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Castellas, Erin I., Wendy Stubbs, and Véronique Ambrosini. 2019. “Responding to Value Pluralism in Hybrid Organizations.” Journal of Business Ethics 159 (3): 635–650. doi:10.1007/s10551-018-3809-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, Kathy. 2014. Constructing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Katherine K., and Siobhan O’Mahony. 2006. “The Selective Synthesis of Competing Logics.” Academy of Management Proceedings 2006 (1): L1–L6. doi:10.5465/ambpp.2006.27176323.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Vicki L. Plano, and John W. Creswell. 2014. Understanding Research: A Consumer's Guide. Boston, MA: Pearson Higher Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Cooney, Kate. 2012. “Mission Control: Examining the Institutionalization of New Legal Forms of Social Enterprise in Different Strategic Action Fields.” In Social Enterprises, edited by B. Gidron and Y. Hasenfeld, 198–221. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cornforth, Christopher. 2014. “Understanding and Combating Mission Drift in Social Enterprises.” Social Enterprise Journal 10 (1): 3–20. doi:10.1108/SEJ-09-2013-0036.
   Google Scholar
• Crucke, Saskia, and Mirjam Knockaert. 2016. “When Stakeholder Representation Leads to Faultlines. A Study of Board Service Performance in Social Enterprises.” Journal of Management Studies 53 (5): 768–793. doi:10.1111/joms.12197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyert, Richard M., and James G. March. 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Ebrahim, Alnoor, Julie Battilana, and Johanna Mair. 2014. “The Governance of Social Enterprises: Mission Drift and Accountability Challenges in Hybrid Organizations.” Research in Organizational Behavior 34: 81–100. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2014.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edström, Anders, and Jay R. Galbraith. 1977. “Transfer of Managers as a Coordination and Control Strategy in Multinational Organizations.” Administrative Science Quarterly 22 (2): 248–263. doi:10.2307/2391959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. 1989. “Building Theories from Case Study Research.” The Academy of Management Review 14 (4): 532–550. doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4308385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiol, C. Marlene, Michael G. Pratt, and Edward J. O'Connor. 2009. “Managing Intractable Identity Conflicts.” Academy of Management Review 34 (1): 32–55. doi:10.5465/amr.2009.35713276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furusten, Staffan, and Susanna Alexius. 2019. “Managing Hybrid Organizations.” In Managing Hybrid Organizations, 333–360. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, Barney G., Anselm L. Strauss, and Elizabeth Strutzel. 1968. “The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research.” Nursing Research 17 (4): 364. doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grady, Michael P. 1998. Qualitative and Action Research: A Practitioner Handbook. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa International.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, Royston, Mia Raynard, Farah Kodeih, Evelyn R. Micelotta, and Michael Lounsbury. 2011. “Institutional Complexity and Organizational Responses.” The Academy of Management Annals 5 (1): 317–371. doi:10.1080/19416520.2011.590299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haigh, Nardia, and Andrew J. Hoffman. 2012. “Hybrid Organizations: The Next Chapter in Sustainable Business.” Organizational Dynamics 41 (2): 126–134. doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2012.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houghton, Catherine, Dympna Casey, David Shaw, and Kathy Murphy. 2013. “Rigour in Qualitative Case-Study Research.” Nurse Researcher 20 (4): 12–17. doi:10.7748/nr2013.03.20.4.12.e326.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jay, Jason. 2013. “Navigating Paradox as a Mechanism of Change and Innovation in Hybrid Organizations.” Academy of Management Journal 56 (1): 137–159. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellett, Janet B., Ronald H. Humphrey, and Randall G. Sleeth. 2006. “Empathy and the Emergence of Task and Relations Leaders.” The Leadership Quarterly 17 (2): 146–162. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellogg, Katherine C. 2009. “Operating Room: Relational Spaces and Microinstitutional Change in Surgery.” American Journal of Sociology 115 (3): 657–711. doi:10.1086/603535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, Dora C., and J. Keith Murnighan. 1998. “Demographic Diversity and Faultlines: The Compositional Dynamics of Organizational Groups.” The Academy of Management Review 23 (2): 325–340. doi:10.2307/259377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, Paul R., and Jay W. Lorsch. 1967. “Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations.” Administrative Science Quarterly 12 (1): 1–47. doi:10.2307/2391211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Yvonna S., and Egon G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, Johanna, Judith Mayer, and Eva Lutz. 2015. “Navigating Institutional Plurality: Organizational Governance in Hybrid Organizations.” Organization Studies 36 (6): 713–739. doi:10.1177/0170840615580007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez, Jon I., and J. Carlos Jarillo. 1989. “The Evolution of Research on Coordination Mechanisms in Multinational Corporations.” Journal of International Business Studies 20 (3): 489–514. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, Roger C., James H. Davis, and F. David Schoorman. 1995. “An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust.” The Academy of Management Review 20 (3): 709–734. doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Toyah L., Matthew G. Grimes, Jeffery S. McMullen, and Timothy J. Vogus. 2012. “Venturing for Others with Heart and Head: How Compassion Encourages Social Entrepreneurship.” Academy of Management Review 37 (4): 616–640. doi:10.5465/amr.2010.0456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, Henry. 1987. Crafting Strategy. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press,
   Google Scholar
• Mitzinneck, Björn C., and Marya L. Besharov. 2019. “Managing Value Tensions in Collective Social Entrepreneurship: The Role of Temporal, Structural, and Collaborative Compromise.” Journal of Business Ethics 159 (2): 381–400. doi:10.1007/s10551-018-4048-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mongelli, Luca, Francesco Rullani, Tommaso Ramus, and Tomislav Rimac. 2019. “The Bright Side of Hybridity: Exploring How Social Enterprises Manage and Leverage Their Hybrid Nature.” Journal of Business Ethics 159 (2): 301–305. doi:10.1007/s10551-018-4050-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, Janice M. 2015. "Data Were Saturated…" Qualitative Health Research 25 (5):587–588. doi:10.1177/1049732315576699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, Todd, Jeremy Short, Gregory Payne, and G. T. Lumpkin. 2011. “Dual Identities in Social Ventures. An Empirical Analysis.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 35 (4): 805–830. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00372.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholls, Alex. 2010. “The Legitimacy of Social Entrepreneurship: Reflexive Isomorphism in a Pre–Paradigmatic Field.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 34 (4): 611–633. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00397.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J., and Nancy L. Leech. 2007. “Sampling Designs in Qualitative Research: Making the Sampling Process More Public.” Qualitative Report 12 (2): 238–254. doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2007.1636.
   Google Scholar
• Ott, Timothy E., Kathleen M. Eisenhardt, and Christopher B. Bingham. 2017. “Strategy Formation in Entrepreneurial Settings: Past Insights and Future Directions.” Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 11 (3): 306–325. doi:10.1002/sej.1257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pache, Anne-Claire, and Filipe Santos. 2010. “When Worlds Collide: The Internal Dynamics of Organizational Responses to Conflicting Institutional Demands.” Academy of Management Review 35 (3): 455–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pache, Anne-Claire, and Filipe Santos. 2013. “Inside the Hybrid Organization: Selective Coupling as a Response to Competing Institutional Logics.” Academy of Management Journal 56 (4): 972–1001. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 2002. “Two Decades of Developments in Qualitative Inquiry: A Personal, Experiential Perspective.” Qualitative Social Work 1 (3): 261–283. doi:10.1177/1473325002001003636.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, K. Andrew R., and Michael A. Hemphill. 2018. “A Practical Guide to Collaborative Qualitative Data Analysis.” Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 37 (2): 225–231. doi:10.1123/jtpe.2017-0084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, Filipe, Anne-Claire Pache, and Christoph Birkholz. 2015. “Making Hybrids Work: Aligning Business Models and Organizational Design for Social Enterprises.” California Management Review 57 (3): 36–58. doi:10.1525/cmr.2015.57.3.36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegner, Meike, Jonatan Pinkse, and Rajat Panwar. 2018. “Managing Tensions in a Social Enterprise: The Complex Balancing Act to Deliver a Multi-Faceted but Coherent Social Mission.” Journal of Cleaner Production 174: 1314–1324. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Wendy K., Marya L. Besharov, Anke K. Wessels, and Michael Chertok. 2012. “A Paradoxical Leadership Model for Social Entrepreneurs: Challenges, Leadership Skills, and Pedagogical Tools for Managing Social and Commercial Demands.” Academy of Management Learning & Education 11 (3): 463–478. doi:10.5465/amle.2011.0021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staessens, Matthias, Pieter Jan Kerstens, Johan Bruneel, and Laurens Cherchye. 2019. “Data Envelopment Analysis and Social Enterprises: Analysing Performance, Strategic Orientation and Mission Drift.” Journal of Business Ethics 159 (2): 325–341. doi:10.1007/s10551-018-4046-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, Anselm, and Juliet Corbin. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research Techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Thatcher, Sherry M. B., and Pankaj C. Patel. 2012. “Group Faultlines: A Review, Integration, and Guide to Future Research.” Journal of Management 38 (4): 969–1009. doi:10.1177/0149206311426187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, Patricia H., and William Ocasio. 2008. “Institutional Logics.” The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism 840 (2008): 99–128. doi:10.4135/9781849200387.n4.
   Google Scholar
• Tracey, Paul, Nelson Phillips, and Owen Jarvis. 2011. “Bridging Institutional Entrepreneurship and the Creation of New Organizational Forms: A Multilevel Model.” Organization Science 22 (1): 60–80. doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, Miriam, and Johanna Mair. 2019. “Purpose, Commitment and Coordination around Small Wins: A Proactive Approach to Governance in Integrated Hybrid Organizations.” VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 30 (3): 535–548. doi:10.1007/s11266-019-00116-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar