A Social Enterprise’s Hybridising Journey to Reconcile Goals and Structure with Identity

References

• Alexander, F. 2017. Benefit Corporation Law and Governance: Pursuing Profit with Purpose. Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., M. Besharov, and B. Mitzeneck. 2017. “On Hybrids and Hybrid Organizing: A Review and Roadmap for Future Research.” In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. 2nd ed., edited by R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. B. Lawrence, and R. E. Meyer, 128–162. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., and S. Dorado. 2010. “Building Sustainable Hybrid Organizations: The Case of Commercial Microfinance Organizations.” Academy of Management Journal 53 (6): 1419–1440. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.57318391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., and M. Lee. 2014. “Advancing Research on Hybrid Organizing–Insights from the Study of Social Enterprises.” Academy of Management Annals 8 (1): 397–441. doi:10.5465/19416520.2014.893615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besharov, M. L., and W. K. Smith. 2014. “Multiple Institutional Logics in Organizations: Explaining Their Varied Nature and Implications.” Academy of Management Review 39 (3): 364–381. doi:10.5465/amr.2011.0431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billis, D. 2010. “Towards a Theory of Hybrid Organizations.” In Hybrid Organizations and the Third Sector: Challenges for Practice, Theory and Policy, edited by David Billis, 46–69. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Blasi, J., D. Kruse, and R. B. Freeman. 2018. “Broad-Based Employee Stock Ownership and Profit Sharing: History, Evidence, and Policy Implications.” Journal of Participation and Employee Ownership 1 (1): 38–60. doi:10.1108/JPEO-02-2018-0001.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, A. B., K. J. Lipartito, J. E. Post, and P. H. Werhane. 2012. Corporate Responsibility: The American Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, W. H. Jr., and E. K. Babson. 2012. “How Benefit Corporations Are Redefining the Purpose of Business Corporations.” William Mitchell Law Review 38 (2): 818–851.
   Google Scholar
• Conger, M., J. S. McMullen, B. J. Bergman Jr., and J. G. York. 2018. “Category Membership, Identity Control, and the Reevaluation of Prosocial Opportunities.” Journal of Business Venturing 33 (2): 179–206. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 1998. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, G. G. 2016. The Vanishing American Corporation: Navigating the Hazards of a New Economy. Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, P. M. 1994. Organizational Change: A Processual Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Paul Chapman Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty, B., H. Haugh, and F. Lyon. 2014. “Social Enterprises as Hybrid Organizations: A Review and Research Agenda.” International Journal of Management Reviews 16 (4): 417–436. doi:10.1111/ijmr.12028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahim, A., J. Battilana, and J. Mair. 2014. “The Governance of Social Enterprises: Mission Drift and Accountability Challenges in Hybrid Organizations.” Research in Organizational Behavior 34: 81–100. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2014.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Tahch, A., and J. J. Coen Gilbert. 2012. “‘B’ a Better ESOP: Why the Marriage of B Corps and ESOPs Makes Sense.” SRR Global Financial Advisory Services. https://www.stoutadvisory.com/insights/article/better-esop-why-marriage-b-corps-and-esops-makes-sense
   Google Scholar
• Fereday, J., and E. Muir-Cochrane. 2006. “Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5 (1): 80–92. doi:10.1177/160940690600500107.
   Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, S., D. C. Hambrick, and A. A. Canella. 2009. Strategic Leadership: Theory and Research on Executives, Top Management Teams and Boards. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gagliardi, P. 1986. “The Creation and Change of Organizational Cultures: A Conceptual Framework.” Organization Studies 7 (2): 117–134. doi:10.1177/017084068600700203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., S. D. Patvardhan, A. Hamilton, and K. G. Corley. 2013. “Organizational Identity Formation and Change.” Academy of Management Annals 7 (1): 123–193. doi:10.5465/19416520.2013.762225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glynn, M. A., and C. Navis. 2013. “Categories, Identities, and Cultural Classification: Moving beyond a Model of Categorical Constraint.” Journal of Management Studies 50 (6): 1124–1137. doi:10.1111/joms.12023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haigh, N., J. Walker, S. Bacq, and J. Kickul. 2015. “Hybrid Organizations: Origins, Strategies, Impacts, and Implications.” California Management Review 57 (3): 5–12. doi:10.1525/cmr.2015.57.3.5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansmann, H. 1996. The Ownership of the Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helin, J., Hernes, T., Hjorth, D., & Holt, R., eds. 2014. The Oxford Handbook of Process Philosophy and Organization Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hurst, J. W. 1970. The Legitimacy of the Business Corporation in the Law of the United States, 1780–1970. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
   Google Scholar
• King, B. G., T. Felin, and D. A. Whetten. 2010. “Finding the Organization in Organizational Theory: A Meta-Theory of the Organization as a Social Actor.” Organization Science 21 (1): 290–305. doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopaneva, I. M., and G. Cheney. 2019. “Organizational Identity Formation in Alternative Organizations: A Study of Three Benefit Corporations.” Management Communication Quarterly 33 (4): 484–511. doi:10.1177/0893318919858684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurland, N. B. 2017. “Accountability and the Public Benefit Corporation.” Business Horizons 60 (4): 519–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurland, N. 2018. “ESOP Plus Benefit Corporation: Ownership Culture with Benefit Accountability.” California Management Review 60 (4): 51–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurland, N. 2021. Mission alignment in the hybrid organisation: the role of indirect support activities and an activity ecosystem. Manuscript under peer review.
   Google Scholar
• Langley, A. 1999. “Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data.” Academy of Management Review 24 (4): 691–710. doi:10.5465/amr.1999.2553248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, A. N. N., C. Smallman, H. Tsoukas, and A. H. Van de Ven. 2013. “Process Studies of Change in Organization and Management: Unveiling Temporality, Activity, and Flow.” Academy of Management Journal 56 (1): 1–13. doi:10.5465/amj.2013.4001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mair, J., J. Mayer, and E. Lutz. 2015. “Navigating Institutional Plurality: Organizational Governance in Hybrid Organizations.” Organization Studies 36 (6): 713–739. doi:10.1177/0170840615580007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquis, C. 2020. Better Business: How the B Corp Movement is Remaking Capitalism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maslow, A. 1954. Motivation and Personality. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, Henry, and James A. Waters. 1985. “Of Strategies, Deliberate and Emergent.” Strategic Management Journal 6 (3): 257–272. doi:10.1002/smj.4250060306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, K. 2012. “Searching for Causality in the Wrong Places.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 15 (1): 15–30. doi:10.1080/13645579.2011.594293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pache, A. C., and F. Santos. 2010. “When Worlds Collide: The Internal Dynamics of Organizational Responses to Conflicting Institutional Demands.” Academy of Management Review 35 (3): 455–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pache, A. C., and F. Santos. 2013. “Inside the Hybrid Organization: Selective Coupling as a Response to Competing Institutional Logics.” Academy of Management Journal 56 (4): 972–1001. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, K. C. 2018. “B the Change: Social Change, B Corps, and Benefit Corporations.” Doctoral diss., Princeton University.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, J. L., S. A. Rubenfeld, and S. Morgan. 1991. “Employee Ownership: A Conceptual Model of Process and Effects.” Academy of Management Review 16/1 (1): 121–144. doi:10.5465/amr.1991.4279000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plerhoples, A. 2015. “Social Enterprise as Commitment: A Roadmap.” Washington University Journal of Law & Policy 48: 89–137.
   Google Scholar
• Queirós, A., D. Faria, and F. Almeida. 2017. “Strengths and Limitations of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods.” European Journal of Education Studies 3 (9): 369–387.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, Charles C. 2014. The Comparative Method: Moving beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reay, T., and C. Jones. 2016. “Qualitatively Capturing Institutional Logics.” Strategic Organization 14 (4): 441–454. doi:10.1177/1476127015589981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson, R. 2016. “Organizational Horcruxes: Benefit Corporations as a Container for Entity Identity.” Business and Professional Ethics Journal 35 (2): 129–164. doi:10.5840/bpej2016122048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, W. K., and M. L. Besharov. 2019. “Bowing before Dual Gods: How Structured Flexibility Sustains Organizational Hybridity.” Administrative Science Quarterly 64 (1): 1–44. doi:10.1177/0001839217750826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soleimani, A., W. D. Schneper, and W. Newburry. 2014. “The Impact of Stakeholder Power on Corporate Reputation: A Cross-Country Corporate Governance Perspective.” Organisation Science 25 (4), 991–1008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spicer, J., and C. R. Lee-Chuvala. 2021. “Ownership and Mission Drift in Alternative Enterprises: The Case of a Social Banking Network.” In Organizational Imaginaries: Tempering Capitalism and Tending to Communities through Cooperatives and Collectivist Democracy. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Stranahan, S., and M. Kelly. 2019. Mission-Led Employee-Owned Firms: The Best of the Best. Fifty by Fifty at The Democracy Collaborative. Available for free download: http://dev.democracycollaborative.org/content/mission-led-employee-owned-firms-best-best
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H. 2001. “Personal versus Market Logics of Control: A Historically Contingent Theory of the Risk of Acquisition.” Organization Science 12 (3): 294–311. doi:10.1287/orsc.12.3.294.10100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., W. Ocasio, and M. Lounsbury. 2012. The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• VanSandt, C. V., M. Sud, and C. Marmé. 2009. “Enabling the Original Intent: Catalysts for Social Entrepreneurship.” Journal of Business Ethics 90 (S3): 419–428. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0419-z.
   Google Scholar
• Waddock, S. A., and E. Steckler. 2016. “Visionaries and Wayfinders: Deliberate and Emergent Pathways to Vision in Social Entrepreneurship.” Journal of Business Ethics 133 (4): 719–734. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2451-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whetten, D. A. 2006. “Albert and Whetten Revisited: Strengthening the Concept of Organizational Identity.” Journal of Management Inquiry 15 (3): 219–234. doi:10.1177/1056492606291200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xavier, M. L. P. D. G. L. 2020. “The Process of Hybridization in a for-Profit Company: The Case of Symington Family Estates.” Doctoral diss., Católica Lisbon School of Business & Economics. https://repositorio.ucp.pt/bitstream/10400.14/29743/1/152118282_Maria%20Leonor%20Lobo%20Xavier_DPDFA.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Applied Social Research Methods, Vol. 5. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Young, D. R. 2001. “Organizational Identity and the Structure of Nonprofit Umbrella Associations.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership 11 (3): 289–304. doi:10.1002/nml.11304.
   Google Scholar