Common mycorrhizal networks and their effect on the bargaining power of the fungal partner in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis

References

• Wang B, Qiu YL. Phylogenetic distribution and evolution of mycorrhizae in land plants. Mycorrhiza 2006; 16:299-363; PMID:16845554
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith SE, Read DJ. Mycorrhizal symbiosis. New York: Academic Press, 2008
   Google Scholar
• Cameron DD. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as (agro)ecosystem engineers. Plant Soil 2010; 333:1-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redecker D, Raab P. Phylogeny of the Glomeromycota (arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi): recent developments and new gene markers. Mycologia 2006; 98:885-95; PMID:17486965
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith SE, Smith FA. Fresh perspectives on the roles of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in plant nutrition and growth. Mycologia 2012; 104:1-13; PMID:21933929
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiers ET, Duhamel M, Beesetty Y, Mensah JA, Franken O, Verbruggen E, Fellbaum CR, Kowalchuk GA, Hart MM, Bago A, et al. Reciprocal rewards stabilize cooperation in the mycorrhizal symbiosis. Science 2011; 333:880-2; PMID:21836016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fellbaum CR, Mensah JA, Cloos AJ, Strahan GD, Pfeffer PE, Kiers ET, Bücking H. Fungal nutrient allocation in common mycelia networks is regulated by the carbon source strength of individual host plants. New Phytologist 2014; 203:645-56
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fellbaum CR, Gachomo EW, Beesetty Y, Choudhari S, Strahan GD, Pfeffer PE, Kiers ET, Bücking H. Carbon availability triggers fungal nitrogen uptake and transport in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012; 109:2666-71; PMID:22308426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babikova Z, Gilbert L, Bruce TJA, Birkett M, Caulfield JC, Woodcock C, Pickett JA, Johnson D. Underground signals carried through common mycelial networks warn neighbouring plants of aphid attack. Ecology Letters 2013; 16:835-43; PMID:23656527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babikova Z, Johnson D, Bruce TJA, Pickett J, Gilbert L. Underground allies: How and why do mycelial networks help plants defend themselves? Bioassays 2013; 36:21-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teste FP, Veneklaas EJ, Dixon KW, Lambers H. Is nitrogen transfer among plants enhanced by contrasting nutrient-acquisition strategies? Plant, Cell Environ 2015; 38:50-60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorzelak MA, Asay AK, Pickles BJ, Simard SW. Inter-plant communication through mycorrhizal networks mediates complex adaptive behaviour in plant communities. AOB Plants 2015; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plv050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barto EK, Hilker M, Muller F, Mohney BK, Weidenhamer JD, Rillig MC. The Fungal Fast Lane: Common Mycorrhizal Networks Extend Bioactive Zones of Allelochemicals in Soils. PLoS One 2011; 6:7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voets L, Goubau I, Olsson PA, Merckx R, Declerck S. Absence of carbon transfer between Medicago truncatula plants linked by a mycorrhizal network, demonstrated in an experimental microcosm. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2008; 65:350-60; PMID:18557940
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weremijewicz J, Janos DP. Common mycorrhizal networks amplify size inequality in Andropogon gerardii monocultures. New Phytologist 2013; 198:203-13; PMID:23356215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyatt GAK, Kiers ET, Gardner A, West SA. A biological market analysis of the plant-mycorrhizal symbiosis. Evolution 2014; 68:2603-18; PMID:24909843
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knegt B, Jansa J, Franken O, Engelmoer DJP, Werner GDA, Bücking H, Kiers T. Host plant quality mediates competition between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Fungal Ecol 2014; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2014.09.011
   Google Scholar
• Selosse MA, Richard F, He S, Simard SW. Mycorrhizal networks: des liaisons dangereuses? Trends Ecol Evol 2006; 21:621-8; PMID:16843567; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walder F, Niemann H, Natarajan M, Lehmann MF, Boller T, Wiemken A. Mycorrhizal networks: common goods of plants shared under unequal terms of trade. Plant Physiol 2012; 159:789-97; PMID:22517410; http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.195727
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth MG, Hoeksema JD. Mycorrhizal networks counteract competitive effects of canopy trees on seedling survival. Ecology 2010; 91:2294-302; PMID:20836451; http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/09-1139.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Heijden MGA, Horton TR. Socialism in soil? The importance of mycorrhizal fungal networks for facilitation in natural ecosystems. J Ecol 2009; 97:1139-50; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01570.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietikäinen A, Kytöviita M-M. Defoliation changes mycorrhizal benefit and competitive interactions between seedlings and adult plants. J Ecol 2007; 95:639-47; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01257.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrild MP, Ambus P, Rosendahl S, Jakobsen I. Common arbuscular mycorrhizal networks amplify competition for phosphorus between seedlings and established plants. New Phytologist 2013; 200:229-40; PMID:23738787; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.12351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kytöviita M-M, Vestberg M, Tuomi J. A test of mutual aid in common mycorrhizal networks: established vegetation negates benefit in seedlings. Ecology 2003; 84:898-906; http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0898:ATOMAI]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barto EK, Weidenhamer JD, Cipollini D, Rillig MC. Fungal superhighways: do common mycorrhizal networks enhance below ground communication? Trends Plant Sci 2012; 17:633-7; PMID:22818769; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2012.06.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinson KA, Campbell SA, Powell JR, Wolfe BE, Callaway RM, Thelen GC, Hallett SG, Prati D, Kliromonos JN. Invasive plant suppresses the growth of native tree seedlings by disrupting belowground mutualisms. Plos Biol 2006; 4:e140; PMID:16623597; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040140
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Song YY, Ye ML, C., He X, Zhu-Salzman K, Wang RL, Su YJ, Luo SM, Zeng RS. Hijacking common mycorrhizal networks for herbivore-induced defence signal transfer between tomato plants. Sci Rep 2014; 4:3915; PMID:24468912
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland JN, Cheng W, Crossley DA, Jr. Herbivore-induced changes in plant carbon allocation: assessement of below-ground C fluxes using carbon-14. Oecologia 1996; 107:87-94; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00582238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derelle D, Declerck S, Genet P, Dajoz I, van Aarle I. Association of highly and weakly mycorrhizal seedlings can promote the extra- and intraradical development of a common mycorrhizal network. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2012; 79:251-9; PMID:22029624; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01214.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelmoer DJP, Kiers ET. Host diversity affects the abundance of the extraradical arbuscular mycorrhizal network. New Phytologist 2015; 205:1485-91; PMID:25297948; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.13086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar