Tree conservation can be constrained by agents from conservation permitting and funding agencies

References

• Marler TE, Moore A. Military threats to terrestrial resources not restricted to wartime: a case study from Guam. J Environ Sci Eng. 2011;5:1198–1214.
   Google Scholar
• Djenontin INS, Meadow AM. The art of co-production of knowledge in environmental sciences and management: lessons from international practice. Environ Manage. 2018;61:885–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heywood VH. Plant conservation in the Anthropocene – challenges and future prospects. Plant Divers. 2017;39:314–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson PJ, O’Connor S, Reidhead W, et al. Using biodiversity indicators for conservation. Oryx. 2015;49:396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunderland T, Sunderland-Groves J, Shanley P, et al. Bridging the gap: how can information access and exchange between conservation biologists and field practitioners be improved for better conservation outcomes? Biotropica. 2009;41:549–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed J, Van Vianen J, Barlow J, et al. Have integrated landscape approaches reconciled societal and environmental issues in the tropics? Land Use Policy. 2017;63:481–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boedhihartono AK, Bongers F, Boot RGA, et al. Conservation science and practice must engage with the realities of complex tropical landscapes. Trop Conserv Sci. 2018;11:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklund J, Arponen A, Visconti P, et al. Governance factors in the identification of global conservation priorities for mammals. Phil Trans Soc B. 2011;366:2661–2669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habel JC, Casanova ICC, Zamora C, et al. East African coastal forest under pressure. Biodivers Conserv. 2017;26:2751–2758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelicice FM. Weak democracies, failed policies, and the demise of ecosystems in poor and developing nations. Trop Conserv Sci. 2019;12:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abeli T, Dixon K. Translocation ecology: the role of ecological sciences in plant translocation. Plant Ecol. 2016;217:123–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menzler-Hokkanen I. Ecosystem services for pollen beetle control in oilseed rape: ethical aspects of ecostacking─lost in translation? Arthropod Plant Interact. 2018;12:761–765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hokkanen H. Scientific integrity, trust in science, and the independence of research. Arthropod Plant Interact. 2019;13:157–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrill ED. Additions to the flora of Guam. Philippine J Sci. 1919;15:539–544.
   Google Scholar
• Stone BC. The flora of Guam: a manual for the identification of the vascular plants of the Island. Micronesica. 1970;6:1–695.
   Google Scholar
• United States Fish & Wildlife Service. Determination of endangered status for Serianthes nelsonii Merr (hayun Lagu or Tronkon Guafi) . Federal Regist. 1987;52(32):4907–4910.
   Google Scholar
• United States Fish & Wildlife Service. Recovery plan for Serianthes nelsonii. Portland, Oregon: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 1; 1994. p. 60. Available from: <http://www.fws.gov/pacificislands/recoveryplans.html>
   Google Scholar
• Marler TE, Cruz GN. Extreme wind events influence seed rain and seedling dynamics of Guam’s serianthes nelsonii merr. Trop Conserv Sci. 2019;12:1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marler TE. Repetitive pruning of Serianthes nursery plants improves transplant quality and post-transplant survival. Plant Signal Behav. 2019;14:e1621246–e1621252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marler TE. Asexual reproduction to propel recovery efforts of the critically endangered Håyun Lågu tree (Serianthes nelsonii Merr.). Trop Conserv Sci. 2017;10:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Fish & Wildlife Service. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; Endangered status for 16 species and threatened status for 7 species in Micronesia. Federal Regist. 2015;80:59424–59497.
   Google Scholar
• Donnegan JA, Butler SL, Grabowiecki W, et al. Guam’s forest resources, 2002. resource bulletin PNW-RB-243. Portland: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Marler TE. Cycad aulacaspis scale invades the Mariana Islands. Mem N Y Bot Gard. 2012;106:20–35.
   Google Scholar
• Marler TE, Lawrence JH. Demography of Cycas micronesica on Guam following introduction of the armoured scale Aulacaspis yasumatsui. J Trop Ecol. 2012;28:233–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marler T, Haynes J, Lindstrom A. Cycas micronesica. IUCN Red List Threatened Species. 2010. e.T61316A12462113. DOI:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2010-3.RLTS.T61316A12462113.en
   Google Scholar
• United States Fish & Wildlife Service. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; initiation of 5-year status reviews for 156 species in Oregon, Washington, Hawaii, Palau, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands. Federal Regist. 2017;83:20088–20092.
   Google Scholar
• United States Fish & Wildlife Service. Biological opinion for the department of navy’s relocation of the u.s. marine corps from Okinawa to Guam and associated activities on Guam. Service file #01EPIF00-2016-F-0185. Honolulu, HI: US Fish & Wildlife Service; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Volis S. How to conserve threatened Chinese plant species with extremely small populations? Plant Divers. 2016;38:45–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Black SA, Groombridge JJ, Jones CG. Leadership and conservation effectiveness: finding a better way to lead. Conserv Lett. 2011;4:329–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marler TE, Lindström AJ. First, do no harm. Commun Integr Biol. 2017;10:e1393593.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marler TE, Dongol N, Cruz GN. Leucaena leucocephala and adjacent native limestone forest habitats contrast in soil properties on Tinian Island. Commun Integr Biol. 2016;9:e1212792.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hopkinson P, Huber A, Saah DS, et al. A word to the wise: advice for scientists engaged in collaborative adaptive management. Environ Manage. 2017;59:752–761.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krester HE, Beckmann JP, Berger J. A retrospective assessment of a field collaborative process in conservation. Environ Manage. 2018;62:415–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahanty S, Russell D. High stakes: lessons from stakeholder groups in the biodiversity conservation network. Soc Nat Resour. 2002;15:179–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anonymous. Conserving our nation’s only native cycad species. Currents. 2014; Fall issue, p. 28–31. Available from: http://navysustainability.dodlive.mil. Downloaded on 2019 Jul 15.
   Google Scholar
• Intoh M. Pigs in Micronesia: introduction or re-introduction by the Europeans? Man Cul Oceania. 1986;2:1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Wiles GJ, Buden DW, Worthington DJ. History of introduction, population status, and management of Philippine deer (Cervus mariannus) on Micronesian islands. Mammalia. 1999;63:193–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawel AM, Rogers HS, Miller RH, et al. Contrasting ecological roles of non-native ungulates in a novel ecosystem. R Soc Open Sci. 2018;5:170151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nafus MG, Savidge JA, Adams AAY, et al. Passive restoration following ungulate removal in a highly disturbed tropical wet forest devoid of native seed dispersers. Restor Ecol. 2018;26:331–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long MS, Litton CM, Giardina CP, et al. Impact of nonnative feral pig removal on soil structure and nutrient availability in Hawaiian tropical montane wet forests. Biol Invasions. 2017;19:749–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan JG, Pourazari F, Tattersdill K, et al. Long-term deer exclosure alters soil properties, plant traits, understory plant community, and insect herbivory, but not the functional relationships among them. Oecologia. 2017;184:685–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boughton EH, Boughton RK. Modification by an invasive ecosystem engineer shifts a wet prairie to a monotypic stand. Biol Invasions. 2014;16:2105–2114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chips MJ, Magliocca MR, Hasson B, et al. Quantifying deer and turkey leaf litter disturbances in the eastern deciduous forest: have nontrophic effects of consumers been overlooked? Can J Forest Res. 2014;44:1128–1132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasahara M, Fujii S, Tanikawa T, et al. Ungulates decelerate litter decomposition by altering litter quality above and below ground. Eur J Forest Res. 2016;135:849–856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehr NH, Hess SC, Litton CM. Biology and impacts of Pacific Islands invasive species. 14 Sus scrofa, the feral pig (Artiodactyla: Suidae). Pacific Sci. 2018;72:177–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez JI, Jansen PA, Den Ouden J, et al. Long-term effects of wild ungulates on the structure, composition and succession of temperate forests. Forest Ecol Manage. 2019;432:478–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joint Region Marianas. Final integrated natural resources management plan joint region marianas guam, tinian, and farallon de medinilla. 2012. Prepared under Contract #SF1449-N40192-10-R-9915.
   Google Scholar
• Miller JS, Lowry PP, Aronson J, et al. Conserving biodiversity through ecological restoration: the potential contributions of botanical gardens and arboreta. Candollea. 2016;71:91–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machinski J, Albrecht MA. Center for Plant Conservation’s best practice guidelines for the reintroduction of rare plants. Plant Divers. 2017;39:390–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiles GJ. Decline of a population of wild seeded breadfruit (Artocarpus mariannensis) on Guam, Mariana Islands. Pacific Sci. 2005;59:509–522.
   Google Scholar
• Marler TE. Boomeranging in structural defense: Phytophagous insect uses cycad trichomes to defend against entomophagy. Plant Signal Behav. 2012;7:1484–1487.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marler TE. Increased threat of island endemic tree’s extirpation via invasion-induced decline of intrinsic resistance to recurring tropical cyclones. Commun Integr Biol. 2013;6:e22361.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marler TE. Temporal variations in leaf miner, butterfly, and stem borer infestations of Cycas micronesica in relation to Aulacaspis yasumatsui incidence. HortScience. 2013;48:1334–1338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marler TE. Axial and radial spatial patterns of non-structural carbohydrates in Cycas micronesica stems. Plants. 2018;7:49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marler TE. Elemental profiles in Cycas micronesica stems. Plants. 2018;7:94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marler TE. Stem carbohydrates and adventitious root formation of Cycas micronesica following Aulacaspis yasumatsui infestation. HortScience. 2018;53:1125–1128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marler TE, Cruz GN. Source and sink relations mediate depletion of intrinsic cycad seed carbohydrates by Aulacaspis yasumatsui infestation. HortScience 2019. in press.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marler TE, Dongol N. Do phytotoxic compounds in soils after scale-infested Cycas micronesica litter deposits explain reduced plant growth? HortScience. 2013;48:1571–1573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marler TE, Dongol N. Three invasive insects alter Cycas micronesica leaf chemistry and predict changes in biogeochemical cycling. Commun Integr Biol. 2016;9:e1208324.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marler TE, Krishnapillai MV. Cycas micronesica trees alter local soil traits. Forests. 2018;9:565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marler TE, Krishnapillai MV. Does plant size influence leaf elements in an arborescent cycad? Biology (Basel). 2018;7:51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marler TE, Krishnapillai MV. Distribution of elements along the rachis of Cycas micronesica leaves: A cautionary note for sampling design. Horticulturae. 2019;5:33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marler TE, Lawrence JH. Demography of Cycas micronesica on Guam following introduction of the armoured scale Aulacaspis yasumatsui. J Trop Ecol. 2012;28:233–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marler TE, Lawrence JH. Phytophagous insects reduce cycad resistance to tropical cyclone winds and impair storm recovery. HortScience. 2013;48:1224–1226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marler TE, Lindström AJ, Terry LI. Chilades pandava damage among 85 Cycas species in a common garden setting. HortScience. 2012;47:1832–1836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marler TE, Marler PN. Rhyzobius lophanthae behavior is influenced by cycad plant age providing odor samples in Y-tube olfactometer. Insects. 2018;9:194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marler TE, Miller R, Moore A. Vertical stratification of predation on Aulacaspis yasumatsui infesting Cycas micronesica seedlings. HortScience. 2013;48:60–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marler TE, Moore A. Cryptic scale infestations on Cycas revoluta facilitate scale invasions. HortScience. 2010;45:837–839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orth PB, Cheng AS. Organizational change in the US forest service: negotiating organizational boundaries in the collaborative process. Environ Manage. 2019;64:64–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dogley DA. government’s perspective on safeguarding biodiversity: the seychelles experience. Biotropica. 2010;42:572–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser-Bunbury CN, Fleischer-Dogley F, Dogley D, et al. Scientists’ responsibilities towards evidence-based conservation in a small island developing state. J Appl Ecol. 2015;52:7–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards PJ, Fleischer-Dogley F, Kaiser-Bunbury CN. The nutrient economy of Lodoicea maldivica, a monodominant palm producing the world’s largest seed. New Phytol. 2015;206:990–999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan EJ, Kaiser-Bunbury CN, Edwards PJ, et al. Tracing coco de mer’s reproductive history: pollen and nutrient limitations reduce fecundity. Ecol Evol. 2017;7:7765–7776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiles GJ, Schreiner IH, Nafus D, et al. The status, biology, and conservation of Serianthes nelsonii (Fabaceae), an endangered Micronesian tree. Biol Conserv. 1996;76:229–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roux DJ, Kingsford RT, McCool SF, et al. The role and value of conservation agency research. Environ Manage. 2015;55:1232–1245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettorelli NW, Barlow J, Cadotte MW, et al. Applied ecologists in a landscape of fear. J Appl Ecol. 2019;56:1034–1039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roux DJ, Kingsford RT, Cook CN, et al. The case for embedding researchers in conservation agencies. Conserv Biol. 2019;33. DOI:10.1111/cobi.13324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efroymson R, Jager H, Dale V, et al. A framework for developing management goas for species at risk with examples from military installations in the United States. Environ Manage. 2009;44:1163–1179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekroos J, Leventon J, Fischer J, et al. Embedding evidence on conservation interventions within a context of multilevel governance. Conserv Lett. 2017;10:139–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells HB, Dougill AJ, Stringer LC. The importance of long‐term social‐ecological research for the future of restoration ecology. Restor Ecol. 2019;27. DOI:10.1111/rec.13000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marler TE. Military ecology more fitting than warfare ecology. Environ Conserv. 2013;40:207–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natividad LL, Kirk G. Fortress Guam: resistance to US military mega-buildup. Asia-Pac J. 2010;8(19):1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Marler TE, Wiecko G, Moore A. Application of game theory to the interface between militarization and environmental stewardship in the Mariana Islands. Commun Integr Biol. 2012;5:193–195.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jacobs KR. Teams at their core: implementing the “All LANDS Approach to Conservation” requires focusing on relationships, teamwork process, and communications. Forests; 2017:8:246.
   Google Scholar
• Law EA, Bennett NJ, Ives CD, et al. Equity trade‐offs in conservation decision making. Conserv Biol. 2018;32:294–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy DD, Weiland PS. Guidance on the use of best available science under the U.S. endangered species act. Environ Manage. 2016;58:1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar