2,065
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Short Communication

Effects of spatial confinement on migratory properties of Dictyostelium discoideum cells

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 5-14 | Received 03 Dec 2020, Accepted 03 Jan 2021, Published online: 28 Jan 2021

References

  • Ridley AJ, Schwartz MA, Burridge K, et al. Cell Migration: Integrating Signals from Front to Back. Science. 2003; 302(5651):1704–1709 doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1092053
  • Friedl P, Wolf K. Tumour-cell invasion and migration: diversity and escape mechanisms. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003 May;3(5):362–374.
  • Wolf K, Friedl P. Extracellular matrix determinants of proteolytic and non-proteolytic cell migration. Trends Cell Biol. 2011 Dec 1;21(12):736–744. Elsevier Current Trends doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2011.09.006
  • Wolf K, Müller R, Borgmann S, et al. Amoeboid shape change and contact guidance: T-lymphocyte crawling through fibrillar collagen is independent of matrix remodeling by MMPs and other proteases. Blood. 2003;102(9):3262–3269
  • Petrie RJ, Doyle AD, Yamada KM. Random versus directionally persistent cell migration. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009 Aug;10(8):538–549. Nature Publishing Group.
  • Dormann D, Weijer CJ. Imaging of cell migration. EMBO J. 2006;25(15):3480–3493.
  • Huang D, Huang C-H, Devreotes PN, et al. Eukaryotic Chemotaxis: a Network of Signaling Pathways Controls Motility, Directional Sensing, and Polarity. Annu Rev Biophys. 2010;39:265–289.
  • Cai H, Devreotes PN. Moving in the right direction: how eukaryotic cells migrate along chemical gradients. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2011;22(8):834–841. Elsevier Ltd.
  • Ma L, Janetopoulos C, Yang L, et al. Two complementary, local excitation, global inhibition mechanisms acting in parallel can explain the chemoattractant-induced regulation of PI(3,4,5)P3 response in dictyostelium cells. Biophys J. 2004 Dec;87(6):3764–3774.
  • Van Haastert PJMM, Devreotes PN, Van Haastert PJM. Chemotaxis: signalling the way forward. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004 Aug;5(8):626–634.
  • Kay RR, Langridge P, Traynor D, et al. Changing directions in the study of chemotaxis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008 June;9(6):455–463.
  • Manahan CL, Iglesias PA, Long Y, et al. Chemoattractant signaling in Dictyostelium discoideum. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2004;20(1):223–253.
  • Uchida KSK, Kitanishi-Yumura T, Yumura S. Myosin II contributes to the posterior contraction and the anterior extension during the retraction phase in migrating Dictyostelium cells. J Cell Sci. 2003 Jan 1;116(1):51–60.
  • Andrew N, Insall RH. Chemotaxis in shallow gradients is mediated independently of PtdIns 3-kinase by biased choices between random protrusions. Nat Cell Bio. 2007 Feb;9(2):193–200.
  • Wirtz D, Konstantopoulos K, Searson PC. The physics of cancer: the role of physical interactions and mechanical forces in metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11(7):512–522. Nature Publishing Group.
  • Doyle AD, Wang FW, Matsumoto K, et al. One-dimensional topography underlies three-dimensional fi brillar cell migration. J Cell Biol. 2009 Feb;184(4):481–490.
  • Rolli CG, Seufferlein T, Kemkemer R, et al. Impact of tumor cell cytoskeleton organization on invasiveness and migration: a microchannel-based approach. PLoS One. 2010 Jan;5(1):e8726.
  • Tong ZQ, Balzer EM, Dallas MR, et al. Chemotaxis of cell populations through confined spaces at Single-Cell resolution. PLoS One. 2012 Jan;7(1):e29211.
  • Pathak A, Kumar S. Independent regulation of tumor cell migration by matrix stiffness and confinement. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 June;109(26):10334–10339.
  • Manstein DJ, Titus MA, De Lozanne A, et al. Gene replacement in Dictyostelium: generation of myosin null mutants. EMBO J. 1989 Mar;8(3):923–932.
  • McCann CP, Kriebel PW, Parent CA, et al. Cell speed, persistence and information transmission during signal relay and collective migration. J Cell Sci. 2010 May;123(10):1724–1731.
  • Maugis B, Brugués J, Nassoy P, et al. Dynamic instability of the intracellular pressure drives bleb-based motility. J Cell Sci. 2010;123(22):3884–3892.
  • Belotti Y, McGloin D, Weijer CJ. Analysis of barotactic and chemotactic guidance cues on directional decision-making of Dictyostelium discoideum cells in confined environments. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2020 Oct 13;117(41):25553–9
  • Yumura S, Yumura T, 2. Fluorescence-Mediated Visualization of Actin and Myosin Filaments in the Contractile Membrane-Cytoskeleton Complex of Dictyostelium discoideum. Cell Struct Funct. 1990;15(6):355–364.
  • Uchida KSK, Yumura S. Dynamics of novel feet of Dictyostelium cells during migration. J Cell Sci. 2004 Mar;117(8):1443–1455.
  • Yumura S, Itoh G, Kikuta Y, et al. Cell-scale dynamic recycling and cortical flow of the actin-myosin cytoskeleton for rapid cell migration. Biol Open. 2013;2(2):200–209.
  • Dormann D, Weijer CJ. Propagating chemoattractant waves coordinate periodic cell movement in Dictyostelium slugs. Development. 2001 Nov;128(22):4535–4543.
  • Jacobelli J, Friedman RS, Conti MA, et al. Confinement-optimized three-dimensional T cell amoeboid motility is modulated via myosin IIA-regulated adhesions. Nat. Immunol. 2010 Oct;11(10):953–961.
  • Giannone G, Dubin-Thaler BJ, Döbereiner H-G, et al. Periodic lamellipodial contractions correlate with rearward actin waves. Cell. 2004 Feb;116(3):431–443.
  • Vicker MG, Grutsch JF. Dual chemotaxis signalling regulates Dictyostelium development: intercellular cyclic AMP pulses and intracellular F-actin disassembly waves induce each other. Eur J Cell Biol. 2008 Oct;87(10):845–861.
  • Stevense M, Chubb JR, Muramoto T. Nuclear organization and transcriptional dynamics in Dictyostelium. Dev Growth Differ. 2011;53(4):576–586.
  • Mak M, Reinhart-King CA, Erickson D. Microfabricated physical spatial gradients for investigating cell migration and invasion dynamics. PLoS One. 2011;6(6). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020825
  • Guilak F, Tedrow JR, Burgkart R. Viscoelastic properties of the cell nucleus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;269(3):781–786.
  • Hu S, Chen J, Butler JP, et al. Prestress mediates force propagation into the nucleus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005 Apr;329(2):423–428.
  • Dahl KN, Ribeiro AJS, Lammerding J. Nuclear shape, mechanics, and mechanotransduction. Circ Res. 2008;102(11):1307–1318.
  • Etienne-Manneville S. Microtubules in cell migration. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2013;29:471–499.
  • Jay PY, Pham PA, Wong SA, et al. A mechanical function of myosin II in cell motility. J Cell Sci. 1995;108(1):387–393.
  • Ibo M, Srivastava V, Robinson DN, et al. Cell blebbing in confined microfluidic environments. PLoS One. 2016;11(10):1–18.
  • Srivastava N, Kay RR, Kabla AJ. Method to study cell migration under uniaxial compression. Mol Biol Cell. 2017 Mar;28(6):809–816.
  • Langridge PD, Kay RR. Blebbing of Dictyostelium cells in response to chemoattractant. Exp Cell Res. 2006 July;312(11):2009–2017.
  • Traynor D, Kay RR. Possible roles of the endocytic cycle in cell motility. J Cell Sci. 2007 July;120(14):2318–2327.
  • Charras GT, Yarrow JC, Horton MA, et al. Non-equilibration of hydrostatic pressure in blebbing cells. Nature. 2005 May;435(7040):365–369.
  • Yoshida K, Soldati T. Dissection of amoeboid movement into two mechanically distinct modes. J Cell Sci. 2006 Sept;119(18):3833–3844.
  • Lämmermann T, Sixt M. Mechanical modes of ‘amoeboid’ cell migration. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2009 Oct;21(5):636–644.
  • Goudarzi M, Banisch TU, Mobin MB, et al. Identification and Regulation of a Molecular Module for Bleb-Based Cell Motility. Dev Cell. 2012;23(1):210–218
  • Tyson RA, Zatulovskiy E, Kay RR, et al. How blebs and pseudopods cooperate during chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(32):11703–11708.
  • Charras G, Paluch E. Blebs lead the way: how to migrate without lamellipodia. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008 Sept;9(9):730–736.
  • Lombardi ML, Knecht DA, Dembo M, et al. Traction force microscopy in Dictyostelium reveals distinct roles for myosin II motor and actin-crosslinking activity in polarized cell movement. J Cell Sci. 2007;120(9):1624–1634.
  • Nagel O, Guven C, Theves M, et al. Geometry-driven polarity in motile amoeboid cells. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):113382.
  • Taylor AM, Rhee SW, Tu CH, et al. Microfluidic multicompartment device for neuroscience research. Langmuir. 2003 Mar;19(5):1551–1556.
  • Abhyankar VV, Lokuta MA, Huttenlocher A, et al. Characterization of a membrane-based gradient generator for use in cell-signaling studies. Lab Chip. 2006 Mar;6(3):389–393.