Macrophages and vimentin in tissues adjacent to megaprostheses and mesh in reconstructive surgeries

References

• Stojadinovic A, Leung DH, Hoos A, et al. Analysis of the prognostic significance of microscopic margins in 2,084 localized primary adult soft tissue sarcomas. Ann Surg. 2002;235(3):424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blay J-Y, Honore C, Stoeckle E, et al. Surgery in reference centers improves survival of sarcoma patients: a nationwide study. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(7):1143–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chest wall reconstruction after tumor resection. Seminars in pediatric surgery: Elsevier; date. 200–206.
   Google Scholar
• Yezhelyev MV, Deigni O, Losken A. Management of full-thickness abdominal wall defects following tumor resection. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;69(2):186–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gkavardina A, Tsagozis P. The use of megaprostheses for reconstruction of large skeletal defects in the extremities: a critical review. Open Orthop J. 2014;8:384–389.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sevelda F, Schuh R, Hofstaetter JG, et al. Total femur replacement after tumor resection: limb salvage usually achieved but complications and failures are common. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(6):2079–2087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heisel C, Kinkel S, Bernd L, et al. Megaprostheses for the treatment of malignant bone tumours of the lower limbs. Int Orthop. 2006;30(6):452–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggieri P, Mavrogenis AF, Pala E, et al. Long term results of fixed-hinge megaprostheses in limb salvage for malignancy. Knee. 2012;19(5):543–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pala E, Trovarelli G, Calabrò T, et al. Survival of modern knee tumor megaprostheses: failures, functional results, and a comparative statistical analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(3):891–899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Hu J, Zhu K, et al. Survival, complications and functional outcomes of cemented megaprostheses for high-grade osteosarcoma around the knee. Int Orthop. 2018;42(4):927–938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogura K, Yakoub MA, Boland PJ, et al. Finn/orthopaedic salvage system distal femoral rotating-hinge megaprostheses in oncologic patients: long-term complications, reoperations, and amputations. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021;103(8):705–714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinkel S, Nadorf J, Graage JD, et al. Primary rotational stability of various megaprostheses in a biomechanical sawbone model with proximal femoral defects extending to the isthmus. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0129149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu B, Tan JC, Wang HL, et al. The role of mesh technology with tumor prosthesis reconstruction to reconstruct the extensor mechanism of knee joint after resection of proximal tibial tumors. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14(1):64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ichikawa J, Matsumoto S, Shimoji T, et al. A new technique using mesh for extensor reconstruction after proximal tibial resection. Knee. 2015;22(6):659–663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobusch GM, Funovics PT, Hourscht C, et al. Lars® band and tube for extensor mechanism reconstructions in proximal tibial modular endoprostheses after bone tumors. Knee. 2016;23(5):905–910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimose S, Sugita T, Kubo T, et al. Reconstructed patellar tendon length after proximal tibia prosthetic replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;439:176–180.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Puerta-GarciaSandoval P, Lizaur-Utrilla A, Trigueros-Rentero MA, et al. Successful mid- to long-term outcome after reconstruction of the extensor apparatus using proximal tibia-patellar tendon composite allograft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29(3):982–987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavrogenis AF, Pala E, Angelini A, et al. Proximal tibial resections and reconstructions: clinical outcome of 225 patients. J Surg Oncol. 2013;107(4):335–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groundland J, Brown J, Jones K, et al. Is osseous reattachment of the greater trochanter necessary compared to soft-tissue-only abductor repair in proximal femoral megaprosthesis reconstruction? J Surg Oncol. 2021;124(1):115–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pala E, Mavrogenis AF, Angelini A, et al. Cemented versus cementless endoprostheses for lower limb salvage surgery. J buon. 2013;18(2):496–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosheger G, Hillmann A, Lindner N, et al. Soft tissue reconstruction of megaprostheses using a trevira tube. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;393:264–271.
   Google Scholar
• Fujikawa K, Ohtani T, Matsumoto H, et al. Reconstruction of the extensor apparatus of the knee with the Leeds-Keio ligament. J Bone Joint Surg. British volume 1994;76(2):200–203.
   Google Scholar
• Geelhoed WJ, Moroni L, Rotmans JI. Utilizing the foreign body response to grow tissue engineered blood vessels in vivo. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2017;10(2):167–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Chen Q, and Shi C, et al. Dealing with the foreign‐body response to implanted biomaterials: strategies and applications of new materials. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;31(6):1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Major MR, Wong VW, Nelson ER, et al. The foreign body response: at the interface of surgery and bioengineering. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135(5):1489–1498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veiseh O, Vegas AJ. Domesticating the foreign body response: recent advances and applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2019;144:148–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamashiro S, Kamohara H, Wang JM, et al. Phenotypic and functional change of cytokine‐activated neutrophils: inflammatory neutrophils are heterogeneous and enhance adaptive immune responses. J Leukoc Biol. 2001;69(5):698–704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou G, Groth T. Host responses to biomaterials and anti‐inflammatory design—a brief review. Macromol Biosci. 2018;18(8):1800112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinaro F, Sánchez-Margallo F, and Álvarez V, et al. Meshes in a mess: Mesenchymal stem cell-based therapies for soft tissue reinforcement. In: Acta Biomaterialia. 2019. Vol. 85. p. 60–74. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Shah FA, Thomsen P, and Palmquist A. Osseointegration and current interpretations of the bone-implant interface. In: Acta Biomater. 2019. Vol. 84. p. 1–15. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Khanuja HS, Vakil JJ, Goddard MS, et al. Cementless femoral fixation in total Hip arthroplasty. Jbjs. 2011;93(5):500–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain S, and Rautray TR. Effect of surface roughness on titanium medical implants. In: Effect of surface roughness on titanium medical implants. Nanostructured materials and their applications: Springer; 2021. p-55–80.
   Google Scholar
• Ungersböck A, Pohler O, Perren S. Evaluation of the soft tissue interface at titanium implants with different surface treatments: experimental study on rabbits. Biomed Mater Eng. 1994;4(4):317–325.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mor-Vaknin N, Punturieri A, Sitwala K, et al. Vimentin is secreted by activated macrophages. Nat Cell Biol. 2003;5:59–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng F, Shen Y, Mohanasundaram P, et al. Vimentin coordinates fibroblast proliferation and keratinocyte differentiation in wound healing via tgf-β-slug signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(30):E4320–4327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrowska-Podhorodecka Z, McCulloch CA. Vimentin regulates the assembly and function of matrix adhesions. Wound Repair Regen. 2021;29(4):602–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker JL, Bleaken BM, Romisher AR, et al. In wound repair vimentin mediates the transition of mesenchymal leader cells to a myofibroblast phenotype. Mol Biol Cell. 2018;29(13):1555–1570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynn TA, Barron L. Macrophages: master regulators of inflammation and fibrosis. Semin Liver Dis. 2010;30(3):245–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flier SN, Tanjore H, Kokkotou EG, et al. Identification of epithelial to mesenchymal transition as a novel source of fibroblasts in intestinal fibrosis. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(26):20202–20212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariganello MB, Guadarrama Bello D, Rodriguez-Contreras A, et al. Surface nanocavitation of titanium modulates macrophage activity. Int J Nanomedicine. 2018;13:8297–8308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Wang X, Lu R, et al. Responses of human gingival fibroblasts to superhydrophilic hydrogenated titanium dioxide nanotubes. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2021;198:111489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith GC, Chamberlain L, Faxius L, et al. Soft tissue response to titanium dioxide nanotube modified implants. Acta Biomater. 2011;7(8):3209–3215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobyn JD, Wilson GJ, MacGregor DC, et al. Effect of pore size on the peel strength of attachment of fibrous tissue to porous-surfaced implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 1982;16(5):571–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tikhilov R, Shubnyakov I, and Denisov A, et al. The experimental study of tissue integration into porous titanium implants. HIP Int. 2022;32(3): 386–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foroulis CN, Kleontas AD, Tagarakis G, et al. Massive chest wall resection and reconstruction for malignant disease. Onco Targets Ther. 2016;9:2349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf MT, Dearth CL, Ranallo CA, et al. Macrophage polarization in response to ecm coated polypropylene mesh. Biomaterials. 2014;35(25):6838–6849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen PT, Asarias JR, Pierce LM. Influence of a new monofilament polyester mesh on inflammation and matrix remodeling. J Invest Surg. 2012;25(5):330–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osanai T, Tsuchiya T, Sugawara M. Histologic examination of Leeds-Keio artificial ligament implanted on the surface of a tumor endoprosthesis. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24(1):159.e155–157.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf MT, Carruthers CA, Dearth CL, et al. Polypropylene surgical mesh coated with extracellular matrix mitigates the host foreign body response. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014;102(1):234–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar