Identification of intelligence-related proteins through a robust two-layer predictor

References

• Legg S, Hutter M. A collection of definitions of intelligence. Front Artif Intell Appl. 2007a;157:17.
   Google Scholar
• Legg S, Hutter M. Universal intelligence: a definition of machine intelligence. Minds Machines. 2007b;17:391–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trewavas A. Green plants as intelligent organisms. Trends Plant Sci. 2005;10:413–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witzany G. Memory and Learning as Key Competences of Living Organisms. Memory and Learning in Plants. Springer; 2018. p. 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne JH, Hawkins RD. Nonassociative learning in invertebrates. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015;7:a021675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vargas LDS, Sevenster D, Lima KR, et al. Novelty exposure hinders aversive memory generalization and depends on hippocampal protein synthesis. Behav Brain Res. 2019;359:89–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamprecht R, Farb CR, LeDoux JE. Fear memory formation involves p190 RhoGAP and ROCK proteins through a GRB2-mediated complex. Neuron. 2002;36:727–738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang YY, Liu MY, Liu Z, et al. GPR30‐mediated estrogenic regulation of actin polymerization and spatial memory involves SRC‐1 and PI3K‐mTORC2 in the hippocampus of female mice. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2019;25:714–733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day JJ, Sweatt JD. Cognitive neuroepigenetics: a role for epigenetic mechanisms in learning and memory. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2011;96:2–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvo P, Baluška F, Trewavas A. Integrated information as a possible basis for plant consciousness. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhtiarizadeh MR, Moradi-Shahrbabak M, Ebrahimi M, et al. Neural network and SVM classifiers accurately predict lipid binding proteins, irrespective of sequence homology. J Theor Biol. 2014;356:213–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldfield CJ, Uversky VN, Kurgan L. Predicting functions of disordered proteins with MoRFpred Computational methods in protein evolution. Springer; 2019. p. 337–352.
   Google Scholar
• Qin Y, Zheng X, Wang J, et al. Prediction of protein structural class based on Linear Predictive Coding of PSI-BLAST profiles. Open Life Sci. 2015;10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao Y, Li M, Xu H, et al. Protein Subcellular localization prediction based on PSI-BLAST profile and principal component analysis. Curr Proteomics. 2019;16:402–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong J. Essential bioinformatics. Cambridge University Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Zheng H, Wang C, et al. Predicting apoptosis protein subcellular locations based on the protein overlapping property matrix and tri-gram encoding. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:2344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhtiarizadeh MR, Rahimi M, Mohammadi-Sangcheshmeh A, et al. PrESOgenesis: a two-layer multi-label predictor for identifying fertility-related proteins using support vector machine and pseudo amino acid composition approach. Sci Rep. 2018b;8:9025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg A, Raghava GP. A machine learning based method for the prediction of secretory proteins using amino acid composition, their order and similarity-search. In: silico biology. Vol. 8. 2008. p. 129–140.
   Google Scholar
• Gromiha MM, Ahmad S, Suwa M, 2008. Neural network based prediction of protein structure and Function: comparison with other machine learning methods. 2008 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence). IEEE, pp. 1739–1744.
   Google Scholar
• Jamali AA, Ferdousi R, Razzaghi S, et al. DrugMiner: comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for prediction of potential druggable proteins. Drug Discov Today. 2016;21:718–724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahimi M, Bakhtiarizadeh MR, Mohammadi-Sangcheshmeh A. OOgenesis_Pred: a sequence-based method for predicting oogenesis proteins by six different modes of Chou’s pseudo amino acid composition. J Theor Biol. 2017;414:128–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortes C, Vapnik V. Support-vector networks. Mach Learn. 1995;20:273–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhtiarizadeh MR, Rahimi M, Mohammadi-Sangcheshmeh A, et al. PrESOgenesis: a two-layer multi-label predictor for identifying fertility-related proteins using support vector machine and pseudo amino acid composition approach. Sci Rep. 2018a;8:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui G, Fang C, Han K. Prediction of protein-protein interactions between viruses and human by an SVM model. In: BMC Bioinformatics. Vol. 13. Springer; 2012. p. S5.
   Google Scholar
• Romero‐Molina S, Ruiz‐Blanco YB, Harms M, et al. PPI‐Detect: a support vector machine model for sequence‐based prediction of protein–protein interactions. J Comput Chem. 2019;40:1233–1242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You Z, Ming Z, Niu B, et al., 2013. A SVM-based system for predicting protein-protein interactions using a novel representation of protein sequences. International Conference on Intelligent Computing. Springer, pp. 629–637.
   Google Scholar
• Houssein EH, Hosney ME, Oliva D, et al. A novel hybrid Harris hawks optimization and support vector machines for drug design and discovery. Comput Chem Eng. 2020;133:106656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Kapoor P, Chaudhary K, et al. In silico approach for predicting toxicity of peptides and proteins. PloS one. 2013;8:e73957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam SA, Sajed T, Kearney CM, et al. PredSTP: a highly accurate SVM based model to predict sequential cystine stabilized peptides. BMC Bioinformatics. 2015;16:210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gubbi J, Lai DT, Palaniswami M, et al. Protein secondary structure prediction using support vector machines and a new feature representation. Int J Comput Intell Appl. 2006;6:551–567.
   Google Scholar
• Patel M, Shah H, 2013. Protein secondary structure prediction using support vector machines (SVMs). 2013 International Conference on Machine Intelligence and Research Advancement, Katra, India. IEEE, pp. 594–598.
   Google Scholar
• Meng C, Jin S, Wang L, et al. AOPs-SVM: a sequence-based classifier of antioxidant proteins using a support vector machine. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019;7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aruna S, Rajagopalan S. A novel SVM based CSSFFS feature selection algorithm for detecting breast cancer. Int J Comput Appl. 2011;31.
   Google Scholar
• Cinelli M, Sun Y, Best K, et al. Feature selection using a one dimensional naïve Bayes’ classifier increases the accuracy of support vector machine classification of CDR3 repertoires. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:951–955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo H, Liu B, Cai D, et al. Predicting protein–protein interaction sites using modified support vector machine. Int J Mach Learn Cybern. 2018;9:393–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Ding H, Feng P, et al. iACP: a sequence-based tool for identifying anticancer peptides. Oncotarget. 2016;7:16895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu B, Liu F, Wang X, et al. Pse-in-One: a web server for generating various modes of pseudo components of DNA, RNA, and protein sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015a;43:W65–W71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao X, Wang P, Lin W-Z, et al. iAMP-2L: a two-level multi-label classifier for identifying antimicrobial peptides and their functional types. Anal Biochem. 2013;436:168–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou K-C. Some remarks on protein attribute prediction and pseudo amino acid composition. J Theor Biol. 2011;273:236–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou K-C. Proposing 5-steps rule is a notable milestone for studying molecular biology. Nat Sci. 2020;12:74.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng X, Xiao X, Chou K-C. pLoc-mPlant: predict subcellular localization of multi-location plant proteins by incorporating the optimal GO information into general PseAAC. Mol Biosyst. 2017;13:1722–1727.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu B, Yang F, Chou K-C. 2L-piRNA: a two-layer ensemble classifier for identifying piwi-interacting RNAs and their function. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2017;7:267–277.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eitrich T, Lang B. Efficient optimization of support vector machine learning parameters for unbalanced datasets. J Comput Appl Math. 2006;196:425–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, et al. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:235–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Liu B. A Review on the Recent Developments of Sequence-based Protein Feature Extraction Methods. Curr Bioinf. 2019;14:190–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad J, Hayat M. MFSC: multi-voting based feature selection for classification of Golgi proteins by adopting the general form of Chou’s PseAAC components. J Theor Biol. 2019;463:99–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butt AH, Rasool N, Khan YD. Prediction of antioxidant proteins by incorporating statistical moments based features into Chou’s PseAAC. J Theor Biol. 2019;473:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Zhao P, Li F, et al., 2019. iLearn: an integrated platform and meta-learner for feature engineering, machine-learning analysis and modeling of DNA, RNA and protein sequence data. Briefings in bioinformatics.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad K, Waris M, Hayat M. Prediction of protein submitochondrial locations by incorporating dipeptide composition into Chou’s general pseudo amino acid composition. J Membr Biol. 2016;249:293–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou K-C, Shen H-B. Recent advances in developing web-servers for predicting protein attributes. Nat Sci. 2009;1:63.
   Google Scholar
• Dehzangi A, Heffernan R, Sharma A, et al. Gram-positive and Gram-negative protein subcellular localization by incorporating evolutionary-based descriptors into Chou׳ s general PseAAC. J Theor Biol. 2015;364:284–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabir M, Hayat M. iRSpot-GAEnsC: identifing recombination spots via ensemble classifier and extending the concept of Chou’s PseAAC to formulate DNA samples. Mol Genet Genomics. 2016;291:285–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang H, Chen W, Lin H. Identification of immunoglobulins using Chou’s pseudo amino acid composition with feature selection technique. Mol Biosyst. 2016;12:1269–1275.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen W, Lin H, Chou K-C. Pseudo nucleotide composition or PseKNC: an effective formulation for analyzing genomic sequences. Mol Biosyst. 2015;11:2620–2634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu B, Fang L, Wang S, et al. Identification of microRNA precursor with the degenerate K-tuple or Kmer strategy. J Theor Biol. 2015b;385:153–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai C, Wang W, Sun L, et al. Protein function classification via support vector machine approach. Math Biosci. 2003a;185:111–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin H, Chen W, Ding H. AcalPred: a sequence-based tool for discriminating between acidic and alkaline enzymes. PloS one. 2013;8:e75726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondal S, Pai PP. Chou׳ s pseudo amino acid composition improves sequence-based antifreeze protein prediction. J Theor Biol. 2014;356:30–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu -P-P, Li W-C, Zhong Z-J, et al. Predicting the subcellular localization of mycobacterial proteins by incorporating the optimal tripeptides into the general form of pseudo amino acid composition. Mol Biosyst. 2015;11:558–563.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cai Y-D, Zhou G-P, Chou K-C. Support vector machines for predicting membrane protein types by using functional domain composition. Biophys J. 2003c;84:3257–3263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou K-C, Cai Y-D. Using functional domain composition and support vector machines for prediction of protein subcellular location. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:45765–45769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhasin M, Raghava GP. Classification of nuclear receptors based on amino acid composition and dipeptide composition. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:23262–23266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen K, Jiang Y, Du L, et al. Prediction of integral membrane protein type by collocated hydrophobic amino acid pairs. J Comput Chem. 2009;30:163–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee T-Y, Lin Z-Q, Hsieh S-J, et al. Exploiting maximal dependence decomposition to identify conserved motifs from a group of aligned signal sequences. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:1780–1787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Zhao P, Li F, et al. iFeature: a python package and web server for features extraction and selection from protein and peptide sequences. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:2499–2502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng Z-P, Zhang C-T. Prediction of membrane protein types based on the hydrophobic index of amino acids. J Protein Chem. 2000;19:269–275.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Horne DS. Prediction of protein helix content from an autocorrelation analysis of sequence hydrophobicities. Biopolymers. 1988;27:451–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokal RR, Thomson BA. Population structure inferred by local spatial autocorrelation: an example from an Amerindian tribal population. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2006;129:121–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai C, Han L, Ji Z, et al. Enzyme family classification by support vector machines. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinf. 2004;55:66–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai C, Han L, Ji ZL, et al. SVM-Prot: web-based support vector machine software for functional classification of a protein from its primary sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003b;31:3692–3697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubchak I, Muchnik I, Holbrook SR, et al., 1995. Prediction of protein folding class using global description of amino acid sequence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 92, 8700–8704.
   Google Scholar
• Dubchak I, Muchnik I, Mayor C, et al. Recognition of a protein fold in the context of the SCOP classification. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinf. 1999;35:401–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen J, Zhang J, Luo X, et al., 2007. Predicting protein–protein interactions based only on sequences information. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104, 4337–4341.
   Google Scholar
• Chou K-C. Prediction of protein cellular attributes using pseudo-amino acid composition. Proteins: structure. Funct Bioinf. 2001a;43:246–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou K-C. Using amphiphilic pseudo amino acid composition to predict enzyme subfamily classes. Bioinformatics. 2004;21:10–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou K-C. Using subsite coupling to predict signal peptides. Protein Eng Des Sel. 2001b;14:75–79.
   Google Scholar
• Lin S-W, Lee Z-J, Chen S-C, et al. Parameter determination of support vector machine and feature selection using simulated annealing approach. Appl Soft Comput. 2008;8:1505–1512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lata S, Sharma B, Raghava G. Analysis and prediction of antibacterial peptides. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007;8:263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng XY, Rosdi BA, Shahrudin S. Prediction of antimicrobial peptides based on sequence alignment and support vector machine-pairwise algorithm utilizing LZ-complexity. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thakur N, Qureshi A, Kumar M. AVPpred: collection and prediction of highly effective antiviral peptides. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:W199–W204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Feng P-M, Lin H, et al. iRSpot-PseDNC: identify recombination spots with pseudo dinucleotide composition. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:e68–e68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauria M, Rossi V. Origin of Epigenetic Variation in Plants: relationship with Genetic Variation and Potential Contribution to Plant Memory. Memory and Learning in Plants. Springer; 2018. p. 111–130.
   Google Scholar
• Zovkic IB, Guzman-Karlsson MC, Sweatt JD. Epigenetic regulation of memory formation and maintenance. Learn Memory. 2013;20:61–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkov AG, Foster JC, Baker KD, et al. Mechanical and electrical anisotropy in Mimosa pudica pulvini. Plant Signal Behav. 2010;5:1211–1221.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Markel K. Lack of evidence for associative learning in pea plants. Elife. 2020a;9:e57614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markel K. Response to comment on’Lack of evidence for associative learning in pea plants’. ELife. 2020b;9:e61689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagliano M, Vyazovskiy VV, Borbély AA, et al. Comment on’Lack of evidence for associative learning in pea plants’. Elife. 2020;9:e61141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhandawat A, Jayaswall K, Sharma H, et al. Sound as a stimulus in associative learning for heat stress in Arabidopsis. Commun Integr Biol. 2020;13:1–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gagliano M, Vyazovskiy VV, Borbély AA, et al. Learning by association in plants. Sci Rep. 2016;6:38427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvo P. The philosophy of plant neurobiology: a manifesto. Synthese. 2016;193:1323–1343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar