430
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Some social benefits of English Catholic schools

References

  • Allen, R., and A. West. 2009. “Religious Schools in London: School Admissions, Religious Composition and Selectivity.” Oxford Review of Education 35 (4): 471–494. doi:10.1080/03054980903072611.
  • Association of Teachers and Lecturers. 2007. “Faith Schools.” Accessed March 14, 2007. http://www.atl.org.uk//images/Faithschools/PS202007.pdf.
  • Berkeley, Rob, and Savita Vij. 2008. The Right to Divide? Faith Schools and Community Cohesion. London: Runnymede Trust.
  • Bourdeiu, P. 1966. “Systems of Education and Systems of Thought.” International Social Science Journal 19 (3): 338–358.
  • Bourdeiu, Pierre. 1998. Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Cantle, Ted. 2003. Community Cohesion: A Report of the Independent Review. London: Home Office.
  • Catholic Education Service. 2008. Digest of 2007 Census Data for Schools and Colleges. London: Catholic Education Service.
  • Catholic Education Service. 2009. Digest of 2008 Census Data for Schools and Colleges. London: Catholic Education Service.
  • Commission on Integration and Cohesion (CIC). 2007. “Our Shared Future.” Accessed February 10, 2008. http://www.integrationandcohesion.org.uk/Our-final-report.aspx.
  • Demack, Sean, Deborah Platts-Fowler, David Robinson, Anna Stevens, and Ian Wilson. 2010. Young People and Community Cohesion: Analysis from the Longitudinal Study of Young People in England (LSYPE), Research Report DfE-RR033. Sheffield: Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research and the Centre for Educational and Inclusion Research, Sheffield Hallam University.
  • Department for Education and Skills. 2003. “Decision makers’ guide.” Accessed August 8, 2005. http://www.dfes.gov.uk/Guidancepara. 39.
  • Department for Children, Schools and Families. 2007. Guidance on the Duty to Promote Community Cohesion. Nottingham: Department for Children, Schools and Families.
  • Department for Children, Schools and Families. 2008. The Composition of Schools in England. London: Department for Children, Schools and Families.
  • Francis, L. J. 2001. “Religion & Values: A Quantitative Perspective.” In The Fourth R for the Third Millennium, edited by L. J. Francis, J. Astley and M. Robbins, 47–78. Dublin: Lindisfarne Books.
  • Francis, L. J. 2002. “Catholic Schools and Catholic Values? A Study of Moral and Religious Values Among 13–15 Year Old Pupils Attending Non-denominational and Catholic Schools in England and Wales.” International Journal of Education and Religion 3 (1): 69–84. doi:10.1163/157006202760182445.
  • Francis, Leslie J., and Mandy Robbins. 2005. Urban Hope and Spiritual Health. Peterborough: Epworth.
  • Gilbert, C. 2008. “Community Cohesion and Inspection.” Paper presented by the Her Majesty's Chief Inspector to Westminster diocesan headteachers, 15 July London.
  • Gilroy, P., and B. Wilcox. 1997. “OFSTED, Criteria and the Nature of Social Understanding: A Wittgensteinian Critique of the Practice of Educational Judgement.” British Journal of Educational Studies 45 (1): 22–38. doi:10.1111/1467-8527.00034.
  • Godfrey, R., and A. B. Morris. 2008. “Explaining High Attainment in Faith Schools: the Impact of Religious Education and Other Examinations on Pupils’ GCSE Points Scores.” British Journal of Religious Education 30 (3): 211–222. doi:10.1080/01416200802170136.
  • Grace, G., 2009. “Reflections on Allen and West's Paper: ‘Religious Schools in London: School Admissions, Religious Composition and Social Selectivity’.” Oxford Review of Education 35 (4): 495–503. doi:10.1080/03054980903128025.
  • Hansard. 2002. Education Bill 2002, New Clause 18 – No Requirements of Attendance at a Place of Religious Worship, Commons Amendment No. 78 Considered. HC 6th February 2002: Columns 868–957.
  • Hansard. 2006a. Education and Inspections Bill, Invitation for Proposals for Establishment of New Schools, Lords’ Amendment No. 3 Considered. House of Lords. 30 October 2006, Columns 19–42.
  • Hansard. 2006b. Education and Inspections Bill, General Duties of Governing Bodies of Maintained Schools, Lords Amendment No. 30 Considered. House of Commons. 2 November 2006, Columns 480–493.
  • Hansard. 2010. Children, Schools and Families Select Committee: School Accountability. First Report of Session 200910, Volume 1, HC 88(1). London: The Stationery Office.
  • Hansard. 2011. Education Bill, Clause 40: School Inspections: Matters to Be Covered in Chief Inspector's Report, Lords Amendment No. 116 Considered. House of Lords. 20th July 2011, Columns 484–494.
  • Hyde, K. 1992. Religion in Childhood and Adolescence, 278–292, 350–360. Birmingham, AL: Religious Education Press.
  • Jesson, D. 2009. “A Study of Recent Ofsted Data Assessing Schools’ Progress on the Duty to Promote Community Cohesion and Tackle Inequality.” In Strong Schools for Strong Communities: Reviewing the Impact of Church of England Schools in Promoting Community Cohesion, Church of England Archbishops’ Council. Accessed December 4, 2009. www.cofe.anglican.org/info/education.
  • Johnson, H. 2002. “Three Contrasting Approaches in English Church/Faith Schools: Perspectives from Headteachers.” International Journal of Children's Spirituality 7 (2): 209–219. doi:10.1080/1364436022000009118.
  • Johnson, H., and M. Castelli. 2000. “Catholic Headteachers: The Importance of Culture Building in Approaches to Spiritual and Moral Development and the Transmission of Faith Tradition.” International Journal of Children's Spirituality 5 (1): 75–90. doi:10.1080/713670898.
  • Laurence, J., and A. Heath. 2008. Predictors of Community Cohesion: Multi-level Modelling of the 2005 Citizenship Survey. London: Department of Communities and Local Government.
  • Leicester City Council. 2010. Equality Diversity & Cohesion. Guidance to Schools, Community Cohesion, Ofsted and SEF. Leicester: Learning Services, Children and Young People's Services.
  • Letki, N. 2008. “Does Diversity Erode Social Cohesion? Social Capital and Race in British Neighbourhoods.” Political Studies 56 (1): 99–126. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00692.x.
  • Local Government Association. 2002. Guidance on Community Cohesion. London: Local Government Association.
  • Mason, M. 2001. Faith based schools: the Humanist view. Debate at the Royal Society of Arts, 18 October accessed December 14, 2006. http://www.humanism.org.uk/site/cms/contentarticle = 1272.
  • Morris, A. B. 2010a. “Leadership, Management and Pupils’ Academic Attainment: Reviewing the Association within the Catholic Sector 1993–2007.” Educational Management Administration and Leadership 38 (6): 679–693. doi:10.1177/1741143210380537.
  • Morris, A. B. 2010b. “Parents, Pupils and Their Catholic Schools: Evidence from School Inspections 2000–2005.” International Studies in Catholic Education 2 (1): 80–94. doi:10.1080/19422530903494868.
  • National College for School Leadership. 2011. A Succession Planning Strategy for Schools With a Religious Character, Annual Report 201011. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.
  • National Secular Society. 2007. “The Public Don't Want More Faith Schools, and They Will Be Divisive.” Accessed September 14. http://www.secularism.org.uk/thepublicdontwantmorefaithschool3.html.
  • Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. 2004. Government Response to the ODPM Select Committee Report on Social Cohesion, July 24th. London: The Stationery Office.
  • Office for Standards in Education. 2006. “Percentage Ethnic Minority Pupils in Primary and Secondary Schools by Ethnicity Type 2005.” In Quality and Performance: A Survey of Education in Catholic Schools, 9, 11. London: Catholic Education Service.
  • Office for Standards in Education. 2007. Making Sense of Religion – A Report on Religious Education in Schools and the Impact of Locally Agreed Syllabuses, Report No. 070045. London: Office for Standards in Education.
  • Office for Standards in Education. 2008. Schools and Inspection: Information for Inspectors of Maintained Schools, Independent Schools and Teacher Education, Issue 5, July 2008. London: Office for Standards in Education.
  • Office for Standards in Education. 2009. Inspecting Maintained Schools’ Duty to Promote Community Cohesion: Guidance for Inspectors, February 2009. London: Office for Standards in Education.
  • Office for Standards in Education. 2010a. Transforming Religious Education – Religious Education in Schools 2006–09, Report No. 090215. London: Office for Standards in Education.
  • Office for Standards in Education. 2010b. The Annual Report of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills 2009–10. London: Ofsted.
  • O'Keefe, B., and R. Zipfel. 2003. Ethnicity, Identity and Achievement in Catholic Education. London: Catholic Education Service.
  • Osler, A. 2007. Faith Schools and Community Cohesion: Observations on Community Consultations. London: Runnymede Trust.
  • Ouseley, H. 2001. Community Pride Not Prejudice: Making Diversity Work in Bradford (The Ouseley Report). Bradford: Bradford City Council.
  • Phillips, T. 2005. “After 7/7: Sleepwalking to Segregation. Speech Given at the Manchester Council for Community Relations, 22 September 2005.” Accessed March 28, 2006. http://www.cre.gov.uk.
  • Porteus-Wood, K. 2004. “Scale Down Religious Schools or Face a Disaster for Race Relations.” Accessed June 9, 2004. http://www.seculararism.org.uk.
  • Saunders, L. 1999. “‘Value Added’ Measurement of School Effectiveness: A Critical Review. Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.
  • Smithers, A., and P. Robinson. 2010. Worlds Apart: Social Variation Amongst Schools. London: Sutton Trust.
  • Strike, K. 1999. “Can Schools Be Communities? The Tension between Shared Values and Inclusion.” Education Administrative Quarterly 35 (1): 46–70. doi:10.1177/00131619921968464.
  • Strike, K. 2000. “Schools as Communities: Four Metaphors, Three Models and a Dilemma or Two.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 34 (4): 617–642. doi:10.1111/1467-9752.00198.
  • West, A. 2006. “School Choice, Equity and Social Justice: The Case for More Control.” British Journal of Educational Studies 54 (1): 15–33. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8527.2006.00334.x.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.