Esthetic Therapy with Standard and Scalloped Implant Designs: The Five Biologic Elements for Success

References

• Adell R, Eriksson B, et al, Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 5(4):347-59, 1990.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gelb DA, Immediate implant surgery: three-year retrospective evaluation of 50 consecutive cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 8(4):388-99, 1993.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salama H, Salama MA, et al, Treatment planning 2000: an esthetically oriented revision of the original implant protocol. J Esthet Dent 9(2):55-67, 1997.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grunder U, Polizzi G, et al, A three-year prospective multicenter follow-up report on the immediate and delayed immediate placement of implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 14(2):210-6, 1999.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jovanovic SA, Paul SJ, Nishimura RD, Anterior implant-supported reconstructions: a surgical challenge. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 11(5):551-8; quiz 560, 1999.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paul SJ, Jovanovic SA, Anterior implant-supported reconstruction: a prosthetic challenge. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 11(5):585-90, 1999.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prestipino V, Ingber A, All-ceramic implant abutments: esthetic indications. J Esthet Dent 8(6):255-62, 1996.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jemt T, Regeneration of gingival papillae after single-implant treatment. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 17(4):327-33, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Gargiulo AW, Wentz FM, Orban B, Dimensions and relationships of the dentogingival junction in humans. J Periodontol 32:261-7, 1961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, et al, Dimensions of peri-implant mucosa: an evaluation of maxillary anterior single implants in humans. J Periodontol 74(4):557-62, 2003.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cochran DL, Hermann JS, et al, Biologic width around titanium implants. A histometric analysis of the implanto-gingival junction around unloaded and loaded nonsubmerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 68(2):186-98, 1997.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hermann JS, Buser D, et al, Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 71(9):1412-24, 2000.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malevez C, Hermans M, Daelemans P, Marginal bone levels at Branemark system implants used for single tooth restoration. The influence of implant design and anatomical region. Clin Oral Implants Res 7(2):162-9, 1996.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hermann JS, Schoolfield JD, et al, Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded nonsubmerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 72(10):1372-83, 2001.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Lindhe J, The mucosal barrier following abutment dis/reconnection. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 24(8):568-72, 1997.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, et al, The mucosal attachment at different abutments. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 25(9):721-7, 1998.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carlsson GE, Thilander H, Hedegard B, Histologic changes in the upper alveolar process after extractions with or without insertion of an immediate full denture. Acta Odontol Scand 25(1):21-43, 1967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson M, Lindhe J, Periodontal characteristics in individuals with varying form of the upper central incisors. J Clin Periodontol 18(1):78-82, 1991.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olsson M, Lindhe J, Marinello CP, On the relationship between crown form and clinical features of the gingiva in adolescents. J Clin Periodontol 20(8):570-7, 1993.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glauser R, Lundgren AK, et al, Immediate occlusal loading of Brånemark TiUnite implants placed predominantly in soft bone: one-year results of a prospective, clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 5(suppl 1):47-56, 2003.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tarnow DP, Magner AW, Fletcher P, The effect of the distance from the contact point to the crest of bone on the presence or absence of the interproximal dental papilla. J Periodontol 63(12):995-6, 1992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarnow DP, Cho SC, Wallace SS, The effect of inter-implant distance on the height of interimplant bone crest. J Periodontol 71(4):546-9, April 2000.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jovanovic SA, Bone rehabilitation to achieve optimal esthetics. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 9(1):41-52, 1997.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simion M, Jovanovic SA, et al, Long-term evaluation of osseointegrated implants inserted at the time or after vertical ridge augmentation. A retrospective study on 123 implants with one- to five-year follow-up. Clin Oral Impl Res 12:35-45, 2001.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buser D, Hoffmann B, et al, Evaluation of filling materials in membrane-protected bone defects. A comparative histomorphometric study in the mandible of miniature pigs. Clin Oral Implants Res 9(3):137-50, 1998.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hunt, DR, Jovanovic SA, Autogenous bone harvesting: a chin graft technique for particulate and monocortical bone blocks. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 19(2):165-73, 1999.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jovanovic SA, A scalloped implant/abutment design for interproximal bone and soft-tissue support. A five-year follow-up. Int. J Perio Rest Dent, in press.
   Google Scholar
• Wöhrle PS, NobelPerfect esthetic scalloped implant: rationale for a new design. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 5(suppl 1):64-73, 2003.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grunder U, Stability of the mucosal topography around single-tooth implants and adjacent teeth: one-year results. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 20(1):11-7, February 2000.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Small PN, Tarnow DP, Gingival recession around implants: a one-year longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 15(4):527-32, July-August 2000.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, et al, Tissue reactions to abutment shift: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 5(2):82-8, 2003.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar