Advanced search
Publication Cover
Journal of the California Dental Association Volume 51, 2023 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
6,387
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Artificial Intelligence Applications in Orthodontics

Felicia Mirandaa Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA;b Department of Orthodontics, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, Bauru, São Paulo, BrazilCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
, DDS, MS, PhD,
Selene Baronea Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA;c Department of Health Science, School of Dentistry, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, ItalyView further author information
, DDS, MS,
Maxime Gillota Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA;d Department of Imaging, Modeling and Computing, CPE Lyon, Lyon, FranceView further author information
, BS,
Baptiste Baqueroa Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA;d Department of Imaging, Modeling and Computing, CPE Lyon, Lyon, FranceView further author information
, BS,
Luc Anchlinga Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA;d Department of Imaging, Modeling and Computing, CPE Lyon, Lyon, FranceView further author information
, BS,
Nathan Hutina Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA;d Department of Imaging, Modeling and Computing, CPE Lyon, Lyon, FranceView further author information
, BS,
Marcela Gurgela Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAView further author information
, DDS, MS, PhD,
Najla Al Turkestania Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA;e Department of Restorative and Aesthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi ArabiaView further author information
, DDS, MS,
Yanjie Huanga Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAView further author information
, MS,
Camila Massarof Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilView further author information
, DDS, MS, PhD,
Daniela Garibb Department of Orthodontics, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, Bauru, São Paulo, BrazilView further author information
, DDS, MS, PhD,
Antonio Ruellasg Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, BrazilView further author information
, DDS, MS, PhD,
Karine Evangelistaf Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilView further author information
, DDS, MS, PhD,
Aron Aliaga-Del Castilloa Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAView further author information
, DDS, MS, PhD,
Marilia Yatabea Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAView further author information
, DDS, MS, PhD,
Hina Shahh Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USAView further author information
, MS,
Jonas Bianchii Department of Orthodontics, University of the Pacific, San Francisco, California, USAORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3749-0918View further author information
, DDS, MS, PhDORCID Icon,
Juan Carlos Prietoh Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USAView further author information
, MS, PhD &
Lucia Cevidanesa Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAView further author information
, DDS, MS, PhD show all
Article: 2195585 | Received 23 Nov 2022, Accepted 16 Mar 2023, Published online: 13 Apr 2023

References

  • Jacox LA, Mihas P, Cho C, Lin FC, Ko CC. Understanding technology adoption by orthodontists: a qualitative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019;155(3):432–14. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.08.018.
  • Alyass A, Turcotte M, Meyre D. From big data analysis to personalized medicine for all: challenges and opportunities. BMC Med Genomics. 2015;8(1):33. doi:10.1186/s12920-015-0108-y.
  • Cai L, Zhu Y. The challenges of data quality and data quality assessment in the big data era. Data Sci J. 2015;14:2. doi:10.5334/dsj-2015-002.
  • Li P, Kong D, Tang T, et al. Orthodontic treatment planning based on artificial neural networks. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):2037. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-38439-w.
  • University of Michigan School of Dentistry Podcast Series. Chin cup therapy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQFa_S9iss&list=PL824FB49D6CECCC25&index=45. Accessed November 19, 2022.
  • Subramanian AK, Chen Y, Almalki A, Sivamurthy G, Kafle D. Cephalometric analysis in orthodontics using artificial intelligence-A comprehensive review. Biomed Res Int. 2022;2022:1880113. doi:10.1155/2022/1880113.
  • Monill-Gonzalez A, Rovira-Calatayud L, d’Oliveira NG, Ustrell-Torrent JM. Artificial intelligence in orthodontics: where are we now? A scoping review. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021;24(Suppl 2):6–15. doi:10.1111/ocr.12517.
  • Schwendicke F, Golla T, Dreher M, Krois J. Convolutional neural networks for dental image diagnostics: a scoping review. J Dent. 2019;91:103226. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2019.103226.
  • Kunz F, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A, Zeman F, Boldt J. Artificial intelligence in orthodontics: evaluation of a fully automated cephalometric analysis using a customized convolutional neural network. J Orofac Orthop. 2020;81(1):52–68. doi:10.1007/s00056-019-00203-8.
  • Arik SO, Ibragimov B, Xing L. Fully automated quantitative cephalometry using convolutional neural networks. J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2017;4(1):014501. doi:10.1117/1.JMI.4.1.014501.
  • Kim H, Shim E, Park J, Kim Y-J, Lee U, Kim Y. Web-based fully automated cephalometric analysis by deep learning. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020;194:105513. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105513.
  • Yu HJ, Cho SR, Kim MJ, Kim WH, Kim JW, Choi J. Automated skeletal classification with lateral cephalometry based on artificial intelligence. J Dent Res. 2020;99(3):249–256. doi:10.1177/0022034520901715.
  • Yassir YA, Salman AR, Nabbat SA. The accuracy and reliability of WebCeph for cephalometric analysis. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2022;17(1):57–66. doi:10.1016/j.jtumed.2021.08.010.
  • Meric P, Naoumova J. Web-based fully automated cephalometric analysis: comparisons between app-aided, computerized, and manual tracings. Turk J Orthod. 2020;33(3):142–149. doi:10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.20062.
  • Juneja M, Garg P, Kaur R, et al. A review on cephalometric landmark detection techniques. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2021;66:102486. doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2021.102486.
  • Park JH, Hwang HW, Moon JH, et al. Automated identification of cephalometric landmarks: part 1—comparisons between the latest deep-learning methods YOLOV3 and SSD. Angle Orthod. 2019;89(6):903–909. doi:10.2319/022019-127.1.
  • Nishimoto S, Sotsuka Y, Kawai K, Ishise H, Kakibuchi M. Personal computer-based cephalometric landmark detection with deep learning, using cephalograms on the internet. J Craniofac Surg. 2019;30(1):91–95. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000004901.
  • Lee JH, Yu HJ, Kim MJ, Kim JW, Choi J. Automated cephalometric landmark detection with confidence regions using Bayesian convolutional neural networks. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):270. doi:10.1186/s12903-020-01256-7.
  • Hwang HW, Park JH, Moon JH, et al. Automated identification of cephalometric landmarks: part 2-Might it be better than human? Angle Orthod. 2020;90(1):69–76. doi:10.2319/022019-129.1.
  • Bulatova G, Kusnoto B, Grace V, Tsay TP, Avenetti DM, Sanchez FJC. Assessment of automatic cephalometric landmark identification using artificial intelligence. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021;24(Suppl 2):37–42. doi:10.1111/ocr.12542.
  • Hwang JJ, Lee JH, Han SS, et al. Strut analysis for osteoporosis detection model using dental panoramic radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017;46(7):20170006. doi:10.1259/dmfr.20170006.
  • Chandrashekar G, AlQarni S, Bumann EE, Lee Y. Collaborative deep learning model for tooth segmentation and identification using panoramic radiographs. Comput Biol Med. 2022;148:105829. doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105829.
  • Lee JH, Han SS, Kim YH, Lee C, Kim I. Application of a fully deep convolutional neural network to the automation of tooth segmentation on panoramic radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2020;129(6):635–642. doi:10.1016/j.oooo.2019.11.007.
  • Krois J, Ekert T, Meinhold L, et al. Deep learning for the radiographic detection of periodontal bone loss. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):8495. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-44839-3.
  • Zhou T, Hou S, Liu Y, Dang P, Lu H, Shi H. Teeth U-Net: a segmentation model of dental panoramic X-ray images for context semantics and contrast enhancement. Comput Biol Med. 2022;152:106296. doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106296.
  • Wirtz A, Mirashi SG, Wesarg S. Automatic teeth segmentation in panoramic X-Ray images using a coupled shape model in combination with a neural network. Paper presented at: Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2018; 2018; Cham.
  • Krois J, Garcia Cantu A, Chaurasia A, et al. Generalizability of deep learning models for dental image analysis. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):6102. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-85454-5.
  • Wang L, Gao Y, Shi F, et al. Automated segmentation of dental CBCT image with prior-guided sequential random forests. Med Phys. 2016;43(1):336. doi:10.1118/1.4938267.
  • Kim YH, Shin JY, Lee A, Park S, Han S-S, Hwang HJ. Automated cortical thickness measurement of the mandibular condyle head on CBCT images using a deep learning method. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):14852. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-94362-7.
  • Preda F, Morgan N, Van Gerven A, et al. Deep convolutional neural network-based automated segmentation of the maxillofacial complex from cone-beam computed tomography: a validation study. J Dent. 2022;124:104238. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104238.
  • Wang H, Minnema J, Batenburg KJ, Forouzanfar T, Hu FJ, Wu G. Multiclass CBCT image segmentation for orthodontics with deep learning. J Dent Res. 2021;100(9):943–949. doi:10.1177/00220345211005338.
  • Gillot M, Baquero B, Le C, et al. Automatic multi-anatomical skull structure segmentation of cone-beam computed tomography scans using 3D UNETR. PLoS One. 2022;17(10):e0275033. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0275033.
  • Shaheen E, Leite A, Alqahtani KA, et al. A novel deep learning system for multi-class tooth segmentation and classification on cone beam computed tomography. A validation study. J Dent. 2021;115:103865. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103865.
  • Mimics. https://www.materialise.com/en/medical/mimics-innovation-suite. Accessed February 27, 2023.
  • Relu. https://relu.eu. Accessed February 27, 2023.
  • Ezhov M, Gusarev M, Golitsyna M, et al. Clinically applicable artificial intelligence system for dental diagnosis with CBCT. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):15006. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-94093-9.
  • Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJ, et al. The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data. 2016;3(1):160018. doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.18.
  • Lagravere MO, Low C, Flores-Mir C, et al. Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliabilities of landmark identification on digitized lateral cephalograms and formatted 3-dimensional cone-beam computerized tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137(5):598–604. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.07.018.
  • Ghowsi A, Hatcher D, Suh H, et al. Automated landmark identification on cone-beam computed tomography: accuracy and reliability. Angle Orthod. 2022;92(5):642–654. doi:10.2319/122121-928.1.
  • Gillot MB, Ruellas A, Gurgel M, et al. Automatic landmark identification in cone beam computed tomography scans. J Dent Res. 2022; #Spec Iss_:0098. doi10.1111/ocr.12642.
  • Im J, Kim JY, Yu HS, et al. Accuracy and efficiency of automatic tooth segmentation in digital dental models using deep learning. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):9429. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-13595-2.
  • Wu TH, Lian C, Lee S, et al. Two-stage mesh deep learning for automated tooth segmentation and landmark localization on 3D intraoral scans. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2022;41(11):3158–3166. doi:10.1109/TMI.2022.3180343.
  • Woodsend B, Koufoudaki E, Lin P, et al. Development of intra-oral automated landmark recognition (ALR) for dental and occlusal outcome measurements. Eur J Orthod. 2022;44(1):43–50. doi:10.1093/ejo/cjab012.
  • Tian S, Dai N, Zhang B, Yuan F, Yu Q, Cheng X. Automatic classification and segmentation of teeth on 3D dental model using hierarchical deep learning networks. IEEE Access. 2019;7:84817–84828. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2924262.
  • Lian C, Wang L, Wu T-H, et al. Deep multi-scale mesh feature learning for automated labeling of raw dental surfaces from 3D intraoral scanners. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2020;39(7):2440–2450. doi:10.1109/TMI.2020.2971730.
  • Chen Q, Huang J, Salehi HS, et al. Hierarchical CNN-based occlusal surface morphology analysis for classifying posterior tooth type using augmented images from 3D dental surface models. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021;208:106295. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106295.
  • Baquero BP, Rey D, Aristizabal J, et al. ALIDDM: automatic landmark identification in digital dental models. J Dent Res. 2022; #Spec Iss_:0847. https://iadr.abstractarchives.com/abstract/51am-3668353/aliddm-automatic-landmark-identification-in-digital-dental-models:1-1.
  • Jeong SH, Yun JP, Yeom HG, Lim HJ, Lee J, Kim BC. Deep learning based discrimination of soft tissue profiles requiring orthognathic surgery by facial photographs. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):16235. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-73287-7.
  • Obwegeser D, Timofte R, Mayer C, et al. Using artificial intelligence to determine the influence of dental aesthetics on facial attractiveness in comparison to other facial modifications. Eur J Orthod. 2022;44(4):445–451. doi:10.1093/ejo/cjac016.
  • Patcas R, Bernini DAJ, Volokitin A, Agustsson E, Rothe R, Timofte R. Applying artificial intelligence to assess the impact of orthognathic treatment on facial attractiveness and estimated age. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;48(1):77–83. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2018.07.010.
  • Ryu J, Lee YS, Mo SP, Lim K, Jung S-K, Kim T-W. Application of deep learning artificial intelligence technique to the classification of clinical orthodontic photos. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22(1):454. doi:10.1186/s12903-022-02466-x.
  • Sangalli L, Savoldi F, Dalessandri D, Visconti L, Massetti F, Bonetti S. Remote digital monitoring during the retention phase of orthodontic treatment: a prospective feasibility study. Korean J Orthod. 2022;52(2):123–130. doi:10.4041/kjod.2022.52.2.123.
  • Kuriakose P, Greenlee GM, Heaton LJ, Khosravi R, Tressel W, Bollen A-M. The assessment of rapid palatal expansion using a remote monitoring software. Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists. 2019;8(4):165–170. doi:10.1016/j.ejwf.2019.11.001.
  • Giudice A, Barone S, Muraca D, et al. Can teledentistry improve the monitoring of patients during the covid-19 dissemination? a descriptive pilot study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(10):3399. doi:10.3390/ijerph17103399.
  • Hansa I, Semaan SJ, Vaid NR. Clinical outcomes and patient perspectives of Dental Monitoring(R) GoLive(R) with Invisalign(R)-a retrospective cohort study. Prog Orthod. 2020;21(1):16. doi:10.1186/s40510-020-00316-6.
  • Hansa I, Katyal V, Ferguson DJ, Vaid N. Outcomes of clear aligner treatment with and without Dental Monitoring: a retrospective cohort study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021;159(4):453–459. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.02.010.
  • Vaid NR. Artificial Intelligence (AI) driven orthodontic care: a quest toward utopia? Semin Orthod. 2021;27(2):57–61. doi:10.1053/j.sodo.2021.05.001.
  • Morris RS, Hoye LN, Elnagar MH, et al. Accuracy of Dental Monitoring 3D digital dental models using photograph and video mode. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019;156(3):420–428. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.02.014.
  • Hansa I, Katyal V, Semaan SJ, Coyne R, Vaid NR. Artificial intelligence Driven Remote Monitoring of orthodontic patients: clinical applicability and rationale. Semin Orthod. 2021;27(2):138–156. doi:10.1053/j.sodo.2021.05.010.
  • Sangalli L, Savoldi F, Dalessandri D, et al. Effects of remote digital monitoring on oral hygiene of orthodontic patients: a prospective study. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1):435. doi:10.1186/s12903-021-01793-9.
  • Minervini G, Russo D, Herford AS, et al. Teledentistry in the management of patients with dental and temporomandibular disorders. Biomed Res Int. 2022;2022:7091153. doi:10.1155/2022/7091153.
  • Hannequin R, Ouadi E, Racy E, Moreau N. Clinical follow-up of corticotomy-accelerated Invisalign orthodontic treatment with Dental Monitoring. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020;158(6):878–888. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.06.025.
  • Moylan HB, Carrico CK, Lindauer SJ, Tufekci E. Accuracy of a smartphone-based orthodontic treatment-monitoring application: a pilot study. Angle Orthod. 2019;89(5):727–733. doi:10.2319/100218-710.1.
  • Al-Moghrabi D, Pandis N, McLaughlin K, Johal A, Donos N, Fleming PS. Evaluation of the effectiveness of a tailored mobile application in increasing the duration of wear of thermoplastic retainers: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2020;42(5):571–579. doi:10.1093/ejo/cjz088.
  • Bianchi J, Paniagua B, De Oliveira Ruellas AC, et al. 3D slicer craniomaxillofacial modules support patient-specific decision-making for personalized healthcare in dental research. Multimodal Learn Clin Decis Support Clin Image Based Proc 2020;12445:44–53. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-60946-7_5
  • FAIR Principles. https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles. Accessed November 20, 2022.
  • American Academy of O, Maxillofacial R. Clinical recommendations regarding use of cone beam computed tomography in orthodontics. [corrected]. Position statement by the American Academy of oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013;116(2):238–257. doi:10.1016/j.oooo.2013.06.002.
  • Fayed MM, Pazera P, Katsaros C. Optimal sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement assessed by cone beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod. 2010;80(5):939–951. doi:10.2319/121009-709.1.
  • Brosset S, Dumont M, Bianchi J, et al. 3D auto-segmentation of mandibular condyles. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2020;2020:1270–1273. doi:10.1109/EMBC44109.2020.9175692.
  • Chen S, Wang L, Li G, et al. Machine learning in orthodontics: introducing a 3D auto-segmentation and auto-landmark finder of CBCT images to assess maxillary constriction in unilateral impacted canine patients. Angle Orthod. 2020;90(1):77–84. doi:10.2319/012919-59.1.
  • Dumont M, Prieto JC, Brosset S, et al. Patient specific classification of dental root canal and crown shape. Shape Med Imaging. 2020;12474:145–153. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-61056-2_12.
  • Fan Y, Beare R, Matthews H, et al. Marker-based watershed transform method for fully automatic mandibular segmentation from CBCT images. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019;48(2):20180261. doi:10.1259/dmfr.20180261.
  • Lie WN. Automatic target segmentation by locally adaptive image thresholding. IEEE Trans Image Process. 1995;4(7):1036–1041. doi:10.1109/83.392347.
  • Ma WY, Manjunath BS. EdgeFlow: a technique for boundary detection and image segmentation. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2000;9(8):1375–1388. doi:10.1109/83.855433.
  • Ruellas AC, Tonello C, Gomes LR, et al. Common 3-dimensional coordinate system for assessment of directional changes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016;149(5):645–656. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.10.021.
  • Cevidanes LH, Heymann G, Cornelis MA, DeClerck HJ, Tulloch JF. Superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models of growing patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136(1):94–99. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.01.018.
  • Cevidanes LH, Styner MA, Proffit WR. Image analysis and superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129(5):611–618. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.12.008.
  • Ruellas AC, Huanca Ghislanzoni LT, Gomes MR, et al. Comparison and reproducibility of 2 regions of reference for maxillary regional registration with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016;149(4):533–542. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.09.026.
  • Ruellas AC, Yatabe MS, Souki BQ, et al. 3D mandibular superimposition: comparison of regions of reference for voxel-based registration. PLoS One. 2016;11(6):e0157625. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157625.
  • Moyers RE, Bookstein FL. The inappropriateness of conventional cephalometrics. Am J Orthod. 1979;75(6):599–617. doi:10.1016/0002-9416(79)90093-9.
  • Gunz P, Mitteroecker P, Bookstein FL. Semilandmarks in Three Dimensions. Modern Morphometrics in Physical Anthropology. New York, NY: Springer; 2005. 73–98.
  • Kenyhercz MW, Klales AR, Kenyhercz WE. Molar size and shape in the estimation of biological ancestry: a comparison of relative cusp location using geometric morphometrics and interlandmark distances. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2014;153(2):269–279. doi:10.1002/ajpa.22429.
  • Paniagua B, Alhadidi A, Cevidanes L, Styner M, Oguz I. Mandibular asymmetry characterization using generalized tensor-based morphometry. Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging. 2011;2011:1175–1178. doi:10.1109/ISBI.2011.5872611.
  • Thompson PM, MacDonald D, Mega MS, Holmes CJ, Evans AC, Toga AW. Detection and mapping of abnormal brain structure with a probabilistic atlas of cortical surfaces. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1997;21(4):567–581. doi:10.1097/00004728-199707000-00008.
  • Andresen PR, Bookstein FL, Conradsen K, Ersboll BK, Marsh JL, Kreiborg S. Surface-bounded growth modeling applied to human mandibles. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2000;19(11):1053–1063. doi:10.1109/42.896780.
  • Dean D, Hans MG, Bookstein FL, Subramanyan K. Three-dimensional bolton–brush growth study landmark data: ontogeny and sexual dimorphism of the bolton standards cohort. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2000;37(2):145–156. doi:10.1597/1545-1569(2000)037<0145:TDBBGS>2.3.CO;2.
  • Subsol G, Thirion JP, Ayache N. A scheme for automatically building three-dimensional morphometric anatomical atlases: application to a skull atlas. Med Image Anal. 1998;2(1):37–60. doi:10.1016/s1361-8415(01)80027-x.
  • Gerig G, Jomier M, Chakos M. Valmet: a new validation tool for assessing and improving 3D object segmentation. Paper presented at: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. 4th International Conference Utrecht; 2001; The Netherlands.
  • Styner M, Oguz I, Xu S, et al. Framework for the statistical shape analysis of brain structures using SPHARM-PDM. Insight J. 2006;1071:242–250. doi:10.54294/owxzil.
  • 3D Slicer hwso. Accessed November 22, 2022.
  • Face Base hwfo. Accessed November 22, 2022.
  • Imaging Data Commons hidcg. Accessed November 22, 2022.
  • Mildenberger P, Eichelberg M, Martin E. Introduction to the DICOM standard. Eur Radiol. 2002;12(4):920–927. doi:10.1007/s003300101100.
  • Theyers AE, Zamyadi M, O’Reilly M, et al. Multisite comparison of MRI defacing software across multiple cohorts. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:617997. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.617997.
  • Diaz O, Kushibar K, Osuala R, et al. Data preparation for artificial intelligence in medical imaging: a comprehensive guide to open-access platforms and tools. Phys Med. 2021;83:25–37. doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.02.007.
  • Deleat-Besson R, Le C, Zhang W, et al. Merging and annotating teeth and roots from automated segmentation of multimodal images. Paper presented at: Multimodal Learning for Clinical Decision Support; 2021; Cham.
  • Model to model distance and ShapePopulationViewer video tutorials. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qen8ou5QsAw&list=PLl4LKTeqIlaeBYEHGp1E-0xc510B_bC2Z&index=15. Accessed November 23, 2022.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.