A binary logit-based incident detection model for urban traffic networks

References

• Abdulhai, B. and Ritchie, S. G. 1999. Enhancing the universality and transferability of freeway incident detection using a Bayesian-based neural network, Transp. Res. Part C, 7, (5), 261–280.10.1016/S0968-090X(99)00022-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adeli, H. and Samant, A. 2000. An adaptive conjugate gradient neural network-wavelet model for traffic incident detection. Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 15(4), 251–260.10.1111/mice.2000.15.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, M. S. and Cook, A. R. 1982. Application of time-series analysis techniques to freeway incident detection. Transportation Research Board, No. 841, TRB, National Research Council, 19–21.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, F. and Hawas, Y. E., 2012. A threshold-based real-time incident detection system for urban traffic networks, Proc. – Social Behav. Sci., 48, 1713–1722. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference: Transport Research Arena (TRA) Europe, Athens, Greece, April 23–26.10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.1146
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, F. and Hawas, Y. E. 2013. A fuzzy logic model for real-time incident detection in urban road network, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence (ICAART 2013), Barcelona, Spain, February 15–18, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, F. and Hawas, Y. E. 2015. An integrated real-time traffic signal system for transit signal priority, incident detection and congestion management, Transp. Res. Part C, 60, 52–76.10.1016/j.trc.2015.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balke, K. N. 1993. An evaluation of existing incident detection algorithms ( Research Report, FHWA/TX-93/1232-20). College Station, TX: Texas Transportation Institute, the Texas A&M University System, November 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Balke, K., Chaudhary, N., Chu, C-L., Kuchangi, S., Nelson, P., Songchitruksa, P., Swaroop, D. and Tyagi, V. 2005. Dynamic traffic flow modeling for incident detection and short term prediction ( Research Progress Report. FHWA/TX-06/0-4946-1). College Station, TX: Texas Transportation Institute, the Texas A&M University System, September 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Brydia, R. E., Johnson, J. D., and Balke, K. N. 2005. An investigation into the evaluation and optimization of the automatic incident detection algorithm used in TXDOT traffic management systems ( Research Report, FHWA/TX-06/0-4770-1). College Station, TX: Texas Transportation Institute, the Texas A&M University System, October 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, E. C.-P. and Wang, S.-H. 1994. Improved freeway incident detection using fuzzy set theory. Transportation Research Record, No. 1453, TRB, National Research Council, 75–82.
   Google Scholar
• Chassiakos, A. P. and Stephanedes, Y. J. 1993. Smoothing algorithms for incident detection. Transportation Research Record, No. 1394, TRB, National Research Council, 8–16.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, J. F., Hopkins, C. M. and Martin, J. A. 1979. Automatic incident detection—TRRL algorithms HIOCC and PATREG ( TRRL Supplementary Report, No. 526). Crowthorne, Berkshire, U.K.
   Google Scholar
• Dia, H. and Thomas, K. 2011. Development and evaluation of arterial incident detection models using fusion of simulated probe vehicle and loop detector data, Information Fusion, 12, (1), 20–27.10.1016/j.inffus.2010.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudek, C. L., Messer, C. J. and Nuckles, N.B. 1974. Incident detection on urban freeway. Transportation Research Record, No. 495, TRB, National Research Council, 12–24.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, G. J. and Hall, F. L. 1990. The applicability of Catastrophe theory in modeling freeway traffic operations, Transp. Res. Part A, 24, (5), 335–344.10.1016/0191-2607(90)90046-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, L. D. and May, A. D. 1989. Automatic detection of traffic operational problems on urban arterials, Research Report UCB-ITS-RR-89-15, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Hawas, Y. E. 2007. A fuzzy-based system for incident detection in urban street networks, Transp. Res. Part C, 15, (2), 69–95.10.1016/j.trc.2007.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellinga, B. and Knapp, G. 2000. Automatic vehicle identification technology-based freeway incident detection. Transportation Research Record, No. 1727, TRB, National Research Council, 142–153.
   Google Scholar
• Ishak, S. S. and Al-Deek, H. M. 1998. Fuzzy ART neural network model for automated detection of freeway incidents. Transportation Research Record, No. 1634, TRB, National Research Council, 56–63.
   Google Scholar
• Ivan, J. N., Schofer, J. L., Koppelman, F. S. and Massone, L. L. E. 1995. Real-time data fusion for arterial street incident detection using neural networks. Transportation Research Record, No. 1497, TRB, National Research Council, 27–35.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, S. I. and Ritchie, S. G. 1998. Statistical and neural classifiers to detect traffic operational problems on urban arterials, Transp. Res. C, 6, (5), 291–314.10.1016/S0968-090X(99)00005-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., Krammes, R. A. and Yen, J. 1998. Arterial fuzzy-logic-based incident detection for signalized diamond interchanges, Transp. Res. C, 6, 359–377.10.1016/S0968-090X(99)00004-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, M. and Krause, G. M. 1978. Incident detection: a Bayesian approach. Transportation Research Record, No. 682, TRB, National Research Council, 52–58.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Lei, Y., Yi, Q., Jianquan, W. and Huimin, W. 2007. Traffic incident detection algorithm for urban expressways based on probe vehicle data, Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 8, (4), 36–41.
   Google Scholar
• Masters, P. H., Lam, J. K. and Wong, K. 1991. Incident detection algorithms of COMPASS—an advanced traffic management system, Proceedings of Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conference, Part 1, SAE, Warrendale, PA, October 1991, 295–310.
   Google Scholar
• Michalopoulos, P. G. 1991. Vehicle detection video through image processing: the Autoscope system, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 40, (1), 21–29.10.1109/25.69968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalopoulos, P. G., Jacobson, R. D., Anderson, C. A. and DeBruycker, T. B. 1993. Automatic incident detection through video image processing, Traffic Engineering and Control, 34, (2), 66–75.
   Google Scholar
• Parkany, E. and Xie, C. 2005. A complete review of incident detection technologies, algorithms and their deployments: What works and what doesn’t. Technical report, University of Massachusetts, Transportation Center, New England Transportation Consortium, Report No. NETCR37. Available: http://www.uvm.edu/~transctr/pdf/netc/netcr37_00-7.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sermons, M. W. and Koppelman, F. S. 1996. Use of vehicle positioning data for arterial incident detection, Transp. Res. Part C, 4, (2), 87–96.10.1016/0968-090X(96)00003-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Songchitruksa, P. and Balke, K. N. 2006. Assessing weather, environment, and loop data for real-time freeway incident prediction ( Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1959). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, 105–113.
   Google Scholar
• Thirukkonda, S. 1999. Design and evaluation of freeway incident detection algorithms. Master Dissertation MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, N. E. 1998. Multi-state and multi-sensor incident detection systems for arterial streets, Transp. Res. C, 6, (5–6), 337–357.10.1016/S0968-090X(99)00003-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, K., Dia, H., Cottman, N. 2001. Simulation of arterial incident detection using neural networks, in 8th World Congress on ITS, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, J. and Case, E. R. 1979. Development of freeway incident detection algorithms by using pattern recognition techniques. Transportation Research Record, No. 722, TRB, National Research Council, 113–116.
   Google Scholar
• Walters, C. H., Wiles, P. B. and Cooner, S. A. 1999. Incident detection primarily by cellular phones—an evaluation of a system for Dallas, Texas. Preprint CD-ROM, the 78th TRB Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, January 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, F. and Cheu, R. L. 2003. Incident detection using support vector machines, Transp. Research Part C, 11, (3), 309–328.10.1016/S0968-090X(03)00020-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, K. and Taylor, M. A. P. 2006. Effective arterial road incident detection: A Bayesian network based algorithm, Transp. Res. Part C, 14, (6), 403–417.10.1016/j.trc.2006.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar