Price optimization for transportation service procurement with fuzzy random shipments: from shipper’s perspective

References

• Ai, T. J., and V. Kachitvichyanukul. 2009. “A Particle Swarm Optimization for the Vehicle Routing Problem with Simultaneous Pickup and Delivery.” Computers & Operations Research 36 (5): 1693–1702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiyoshi, E., and K. Shimizu. 1981. “Hierarchical Decentralized Systems and Its New Solution by a Barrier Method.” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 11: 144–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An, N., W. Elmaghraby, and P. Keskinocak. 2005. “Bidding Strategies and their Impact on Revenues in Combinatorial Auctions.” Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management 3 (4): 337–357.10.1057/palgrave.rpm.5170119
   Google Scholar
• Anandalingam, G., and T. Friesz. 1992. “Hierarchical Optimization: An Introduction.” Annals of Operations Research 34: 1–11.10.1007/BF02098169
   Google Scholar
• Bard, J., 1982. “A Grid Search Algorithm for the Linear Bilevel Programming Problem.” In Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of the American Institute for Decision Science, 256–258, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Bard, J., and J. Falk. 1982. “An Explicit Solution to the Multi-Level Programming Problem.” Computers and Operations Research 9: 77–100.10.1016/0305-0548(82)90007-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bialas, W., M. Karwan. 1978. Multilevel Linear Programming. Buffalo, NY: State University of New York at Buffalo.
   Google Scholar
• Bialas, W., and M. Karwan. 1982. “On Two-Level Optimization.” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 27 (1): 211–214.10.1109/TAC.1982.1102880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bialas, W., M. Karwan, and J. Shaw. 1980. A Parametric Complementary Pivot Approach for Two-Level Linear Programming. Technical Report 80-2. Operations Research Program, State University of New York at Buffalo.
   Google Scholar
• Candler, W., R. Norton. 1977. Multilevel Programming. Technical Report 20. Washington, DC: World Bank Development Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Caplice, C. G., 1996. “An Optimization Based Bidding Process: A New Framework for Shipper-Carrier Relationships.” PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Caplice, C., and Y. Sheffi. 2003. “Optimization-Based Procurement for Transportation Services.” Journal of Business Logistics 24 (2): 109–128.10.1002/jbl.2003.24.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Coello, C. A. C., G. T. Pulido, and M. S. Lechuga. 2004. “Handling Multiple Objectives with Particle Swarm Optimization.” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 8 (3): 256–279.10.1109/TEVC.2004.826067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crainic, T., M. Gendreau. 2003. “Advanced Fleet Management Systems and Advisors: Converging Decision Technologies for its and e-Business.” CD-ROM 10th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, Madrid, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Crainic, T. G., M. Gendreau, and J. Y. Potvin. 2009. “Intelligent Freight-Transportation Systems: Assessment and the Contribution of Operations Research.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 17 (6): 541–557.10.1016/j.trc.2008.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmaghraby, W., and P. Keskinocak. 2003. “Combinatorial Auctions in Procurement.” In The Practice of Supply Chain Management: Where Theory and Application Converge, edited by C. Billington, T. Harrison, H. Lee, and J. Neale245–258. New York, NY: Springer. Available at: http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2Fb138860
   Google Scholar
• Geoffrion, A. M., and W. W. Hogan. 1972. “Coordination of Two-level Organizations with Multiple Objectives.” Techniques of Optimization 455: 466–466.
   Google Scholar
• Goh, C. K., K. C. Tan, D. Liu, and S. C. Chiam. 2010. “A Competitive and Cooperative Co-evolutionary Approach to Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm Design.” European Journal of Operational Research 202 (1): 42–54.10.1016/j.ejor.2009.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handfield, R., D. Warsing, and X. Wu. 2009. “Inventory Policies in a Fuzzy Uncertain Supply Chain Environment.” European Journal of Operational Research 197 (2): 609–619.10.1016/j.ejor.2008.07.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilpern, S. 1992. “The Expected Value of a Fuzzy Number.” Fuzzy sets and Systems 47: 81–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiao, M., X. Hong, P. Yan, and L. Ren. 2011. “Research of Supplier Fuzzy Evaluation Based on Customer Satisfaction.” In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), 1770–1774. Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, J., and D. Corne. 2000. “Approximating the Nondominated Front Using the Pareto Archived Evolution Strategy.” Evolutionary Computation 8 (2): 149–172.10.1162/106365600568167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolstad, C. 1985. A Review of the Literature on Bi-level Mathematical Programming. Technical Report LA-10284-MS, US-32. New Mexico: Los Alamos National Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Kuyzu, G., C. G. Akyol, Ö. Ergun, and M. Savelsbergh. 2015. “Bid Price Optimization for Truckload Carriers in Simultaneous Transportation Procurement Auctions.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 73: 34–58.10.1016/j.trb.2014.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakernaak, H. 1979. “Fuzzy Random Variables – II. Algorithms and Examples for the Discrete Case.” Information Sciences 17: 253–278.10.1016/0020-0255(79)90020-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C., R. Kwon, and Z. Ma. 2007. “A Carrier’s Optimal Bid Generation Problem in Combinatorial Auctions for Transportation Procurement.” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 43 (2): 173–191.10.1016/j.tre.2005.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann, D., R. Müller, and T. Sandholm. 2006. “The Winner Determination Problem.” In Combinatorial Auctions, edited by Peter Cramton, Yoav Shoham, and Richard Steinberg, 297–318. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, Z., R. H. Kwon, and C.-G. Lee. 2010. “A Stochastic Programming Winner Determination Model for Truckload Procurement Under Shipment Uncertainty.” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 46 (1): 49–60.10.1016/j.tre.2009.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J., and R. Chapman. 1999. Application of Particle Swarm to Multiobjective Optimization. Auburn: Auburn University.
   Google Scholar
• Mostaghim, S., and J. Teich. 2003. “Strategies for Finding Good Local Guides in Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization (MOPSO).” In Swarm Intelligence Symposium, 2003. SIS’03. Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE, 26–33. Indianapolis, IN: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Nishi, T., M. Konishi, and M. Ago. 2007. “A Distributed Decision Making System for Integrated Optimization of Production Scheduling and Distribution for Aluminum Production Line.” Computers & chemical engineering 31 (10): 1205–1221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remli, N., and M. Rekik. 2012. A Robust Winner Determination Problem for Combinatorial Transportation Auctions under Uncertain Shipment Volumes. Technical Report. Quebec: Laval University.
   Google Scholar
• Remli, N., and M. Rekik. 2013. “A Robust Winner Determination Problem for Combinatorial Transportation Auctions under Uncertain Shipment Volumes.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 35: 204–217.10.1016/j.trc.2013.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandholm, T. 2000. “Approaches to Winner Determination in Combinatorial Auctions.” Decision Support Systems 28 (1): 165–176.10.1016/S0167-9236(99)00066-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandholm, T. 2002. “Algorithm for Optimal Winner Determination in Combinatorial Auctions.” Artificial Intelligence 135 (1–2): 1–54.10.1016/S0004-3702(01)00159-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheffi, Y. 2004. “Combinatorial Auctions in the Procurement of Transportation Services.” Interfaces: 245–252.10.1287/inte.1040.0075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimizu, K., and E. Aiyoshi. 1981. “A New Computational Method for Stackelberg and Min–Max Problems by Use of a Penalty Method.” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 26 (2): 460–466.10.1109/TAC.1981.1102607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, J., and A. Regan. 2003. “Combinatorial Auctions for Transportation Service Procurement: The Carrier Perspective.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1833 (1): 40–46.10.3141/1833-06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, J., and A. Regan. 2005. “Approximation Algorithms for the Bid Construction Problem in Combinatorial Auctions for the Procurement of Freight Transportation Contracts.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 39 (10): 914–933.10.1016/j.trb.2004.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stackelberg, H. 1952. The Theory of the Market Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torfi, F., R. Z. Farahani, and I. Mahdavi. 2016. “Fuzzy MCDM for Weight of Object’s Phrase in Location Routing Problem.” Applied Mathematical Modelling 40 (1): 526–541.10.1016/j.apm.2015.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triki, C., S. Oprea, P. Beraldi, and T. G. Crainic. 2014. “The Stochastic Bid Generation Problem in Combinatorial Transportation Auctions.” European Journal of Operational Research 236 (3): 991–999.10.1016/j.ejor.2013.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., C. Li, and Y. Zuo. 2009. “A Selection Model for Optimal Fuzzy Clustering Algorithm and Number of Clusters Based on Competitive Comprehensive Fuzzy Evaluation.” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 17 (3): 568–577.10.1109/TFUZZ.2008.928601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, U. P., and S. T. Hsu. 1991. “Linear Bi-Level Programming Problems—A Review.” Journal of the Operational Research Society 42 (2): 125–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J., and F. Chiclana. 2014. “Visual Information Feedback Mechanism and Attitudinal Prioritisation Method for Group Decision Making with Triangular Fuzzy Complementary Preference Relations.” Information Sciences 279: 716–734.10.1016/j.ins.2014.04.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J., and X. Zhou. 2010. Fuzzy-Like Multiple Objective Decision Making. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Yeh, C.-H., and Y.-H. Chang. 2009. “Modeling Subjective Evaluation for Fuzzy Group Multicriteria Decision Making.” European Journal of Operational Research 194 (2): 464–473.10.1016/j.ejor.2007.12.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahiri, B., R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, M. Mohammadi, and P. Jula. 2014. “Multi-Objective Design of an Organ Transplant Network under Uncertainty.” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 72 (101–124): 23.
   Google Scholar