Valuations on quality of service for intercity travels using high-speed rail

References

• Basu, D., and J. D. Hunt. 2012. “Valuing of Attributes Influencing the Attractiveness of Suburban Train Service in Mumbai City: A Stated Preference Approach.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 46: 1465–1476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, R. T., and T. Groves. 2007. “Incentive and Informational Properties of Preference Questions.” Environmental and Resource Economics 37: 181–210.10.1007/s10640-007-9124-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, J. S., and J.-H. Lee. 2008. “Accessibility Analysis of Korean High‐speed Rail: A Case Study of the Seoul Metropolitan Area.” Transport Reviews 28: 87–103.10.1080/01441640701421495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, J. S. 2010. “Assessing Travel Time Reliability in Transport Appraisal.” Journal of Transport Geography 18: 419–425.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, J. S., S. Lee, H. Kim, and D. Jung. 2011. “Review on Quality of Service Factors for Rail Travels.” Journal of Environmental Studies 50: 141–157 (in Korean).
   Google Scholar
• Hanemann, M., and B. Kanninen. 1999. “The Statistical Analysis of Discrete-response CV Data.” In Valuing Environmental Preferences, edited by I. Bateman and W. Kenneth, 302–441. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A., J. M. Rose, and A. T. Collins. 2011. “Identifying Commuter Preferences for Existing Modes and a Proposed Metro in Sydney, Australia with Special Reference to Crowding.” Public Transport 3: 109–147.10.1007/s12469-010-0035-4
   Google Scholar
• Kittelson & Associates, Inc., Parsons Brinckerhoff, KFH Group, Inc., and Texas A&M Transportation Institute. 2013. Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual. 3rd ed, Transit Cooperative Research Program Report 165. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Korea Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. 2013. National Guidance on Transport Appraisal. 5th ed. Gwacheon: Korea Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. (in Korean).
   Google Scholar
• Korea Transport Institute. 2014. Ten-year Anniversary of Korea Train Express: Changes and Challenges. Press release. Ilsan: Korea Transport Institute. (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Li, Z., and D. A. Hensher. 2011. “Crowding and Public Transport: A Review of Willingness to Pay Evidence and its Relevance in Project Appraisal.” Transport Policy 18: 880–887.10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, H., T. Fowkes, and M. Wardman. 2008. “Amending the Incentive for Strategic Bias in Stated Preference Studies: Case Study in Users’ Valuation of Rolling Stock.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2049: 128–135.10.3141/2049-15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathanail, E. 2008. “Measuring the Quality of Service for Passengers on the Hellenic Railways.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 42: 48–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pepper, J., G. Spitz, and T. Adler. 2003. “Customer Perspectives on Multilevel Coaches for Increasing Rail System Capacity.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1838: 19–29.10.3141/1838-03
   Google Scholar
• Polydoropoulou, A., and M. Ben-Akiva. 2001. “Combined Revealed and Stated Preference Nested Logit Access and Mode Choice Model for Multiple Mass Transit Technologies.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1771: 38–45.10.3141/1771-05
   Google Scholar
• Rose, J., and M. Bliemer. 2009. “Constructing Efficient Stated Choice Experimental Designs.” Transport Reviews 29: 587–617.10.1080/01441640902827623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steer Davies Gleave. 2000. Rail Passenger Quality of Service Valuations. London: Shadow Strategic Rail Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Train, K. E. 2009. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511805271
   Google Scholar
• Wardman, M., and G. Whelan. 2001. “Valuation of Improved Railway Rolling Stock: A Review of the Literature and New Evidence.” Transport Reviews 21: 415–447.10.1080/01441640010020115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardman, M., and G. Whelan. 2011. “Twenty Years of Rail Crowding Valuation Studies: Evidence and Lessons from British Experience.” Transport Reviews 31: 379–398.10.1080/01441647.2010.519127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardman, M., and P. Murphy. 2015. “Passengers’ Valuations of Train Seating Layout, Position and Occupancy.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 74: 222–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiley, K., H. Maoh, and P. Kanaroglou. 2011. “Exploring and Modeling the Level of Service of Urban Public Transit: The Case of the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area, Canada.” Transportation Letters 3: 77–89.10.3328/TL.2011.03.02.77-89
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar