Publication Cover
Transportation Letters
The International Journal of Transportation Research
Volume 11, 2019 - Issue 3
239
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

Towards a compact macroform: commuter line optimization in Istanbul

&

References

  • Alaylı, B. 2006. Land Use Optimization for Improved Transportation System Performance Case Study: Ankara. MSc, Middle East Technical University.
  • Alpkökin, P., Y. Hayashi, J. Black, and H. Gerçek. 2005. “Polycentric Employment Growth and Impacts on Urban Commuting Patterns: Case Study of Istanbul.” Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies 6: 3835–3850.
  • Anas, A., and H. J. Rhee. 2006. “Curbing Excess Sprawl with Congestion Tolls and Urban Boundaries.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 36: 510–541.10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2006.03.003
  • Badoe, D. A., and E. J. Miller. 2000. “Transportation-land-use Interaction: Empirical Findings in North America, and Their Implications for Modeling.” Transportation Research Part D-Transport and Environment 5: 235–263.10.1016/S1361-9209(99)00036-X
  • Barnes, G., and G. Davis. 2001. Land Use and Travel Choices in the Twin Cities, 1958–1990. Transportation and Regional Growth Study Series. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
  • BİMTAŞ. 2016. Istanbul Transportation Master Plan Household Survey. Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality, Directorate of Transportation Planning, Istanbul.
  • Boarnet, M., and R. Crane. 2001. “The Influence of Land Use on Travel Behavior: Specification and Estimation Strategies.” Transportation Research Part a: Policy and Practice 35: 823–845.10.1016/S0965-8564(00)00019-7
  • Buchanan, N., R. Barnett, S. Kingham, and D. Johnston. 2006. “The Effect of Urban Growth on Commuting Patterns in Christchurch, New Zealand.” Journal of Transport Geography 14: 342–354.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2005.10.008
  • Cervero, R. 1996. “Mixed Land-uses and Commuting: Evidence from the American Housing Survey.” Transportation Research Part a: Policy and Practice 30: 361–377.10.1016/0965-8564(95)00033-X
  • Ceylan, Hüseyin, Özgür Başkan, Soner Haldenbilen, and Halim Ceylan. 2007. “Urban public transport problems and solutions: Case of Denizli.” 5. National Symposium on Urban Infrastructure, Hatay. TMMOB, Chamber of Civil Engineers. (in Turkish).
  • Çelik, H. M. 2009. “The Work Stages of Istanbul Transportation Master Plan.” 8th Congress of Transportation. Chamber of Civil Engineers, Istanbul (in Turkish).
  • Dissanayake, D., and T. Morikawa. 2008. “Impact Assessment of Satellite Centre-based Telecommuting on Travel and Air Quality in Developing Countries by Exploring the Link between Travel Behaviour and Urban Form.” Transportation Research Part a: Policy and Practice 42: 883–894.10.1016/j.tra.2007.12.006
  • Dökmeci, V., and L. Berköz. 2000. “Residential-location Preferences According to Demographic Characteristics in Istanbul.” Landscape and Urban Planning 48: 45–55.10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00080-8
  • Eliasson, J., and L. G. Mattsson. 2000. “A Model for Integrated Analysis of Household Location and Travel Choices.” Transportation Research Part a: Policy and Practice 34: 375–394.10.1016/S0965-8564(99)00038-5
  • Gerçek, H., and O. Demir. 2005. “Eskişehir Transportation Master Plan.” 6th Congress of Transportation. Chamber of Civil Engineers, Istanbul (in Turkish).
  • Gerçek, H., and S. Şengül. 2007. “An Evaluation of the Mobility Patterns in Istanbul in the Last 10 Years with a Special Focus on Land-Use Transportation Interaction.” 7th Congress of Transportation, Chamber of Civil Engineers, Istanbul (in Turkish).
  • Habib, M. A. 2009. Microsimulating Residential Mobility and Location Choice Processes within an Integrated Land Use and Transportation Modelling System. Toronto: University of Toronto.
  • IBB. 2014. Istanbul Transportation Master Plan Summary Report (in Turkish). Accessed December 24. http://www.ibb.gov.tr/tr/TR/kurumsal/Birimler/ulasimPlanlama/Documents/iUAP_ozet_Raporu.pdf.
  • İBB. 2016. Fare Structure for Service Vehicles (in Turkish). http://www.ibb.istanbul/sites/TopluUlasimHizmetleri/Documents/TopluUlasimDocs/ucrettarife/PersonelServisTaşımacılığıÜcretTarifeleri.pdf.
  • IETT. 2016. Accessed May 16. http://istanbulkart.iett.gov.tr/tr
  • Ilıcalı, M., N. Camkesen, and S. Dündar. 2009. “The Importance of Public Transportation and an example for Istanbul.” İzmir Transportation Symposium, Izmir (in Turkish).
  • Inoa, I. A., N. Picard, and A. De Palma. 2013. “Commuting Time and Accessibility in a Joint Residential Location, Workplace, and Job Type Choice Model.” Thema Working Paper No 2013-02, Université de Cergy Pontoise, France.
  • ISTAB. Accessed December 24 2014. http://www.istab.org.tr/pg/hakkimizda.
  • ITU. 2013. ITU in Numbers, 2013. Istanbul Technical University Directorate of Strategy Development, Istanbul (in Turkish).
  • Kocatürk, F., and F. Bölen. 2005. “Kayseri’de konut alanı yer seçimi ve hanehalkı hareketliliği [Residential location and household mobility in Kayseri].” İtüdergisi/a 4 (2), 17–24. (in Turkish).
  • Lee, B. H., and P. Waddell. 2010. “Residential Mobility and Location Choice: A Nested Logit Model with Sampling of Alternatives.” Transportation 37: 587–601.10.1007/s11116-010-9270-4
  • Limtanakool, N., M. Dijst, and T. Schwanen. 2006. “The Influence of Socioeconomic Characteristics, Land Use and Travel Time Considerations on Mode Choice for Medium-and Longer-distance Trips.” Journal of Transport Geography 14: 327–341.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2005.06.004
  • Lundqvist, L., and L.-G. Mattsson. 1983. “Transportation Systems and Residential Location.” European Journal of Operational Research 12: 279–294.10.1016/0377-2217(83)90198-4
  • Maat, K., and H. J. P. Timmermans. 2009. “Influence of the Residential and Work Environment on Car Use in Dual-earner Households.” Transportation Research Part a: Policy and Practice 43: 654–664.10.1016/j.tra.2009.06.003
  • Mcnally, M. G., and A. Kulkarni. 1996. An Assessment of the Interaction of the Land Use-transportation System and Travel Behavior. Center for Activity Systems Analysis, University of California, Irvine.
  • Miller, E. J., and A. Haroun. 2000. “A Microsimulation Model of Residential Housing Markets.” 9th International Association for Travel Behaviour Research Conference, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia, July 2–5.
  • O’Kelly, M. E., and M. A. Niedzielski. 2008. “Efficient Spatial Interaction: Attainable Reductions in Metropolitan Average Trip Length.” Journal of Transport Geography 16: 313–323.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2007.11.003
  • Rotaban. 2016. Accessed May 16. http://www.rotaban.com/
  • Scheiner, J. 2006. “Housing Mobility and Travel Behaviour: A Process-oriented Approach to Spatial Mobility – Evidence from a New Research Field in Germany.” Journal of Transport Geography 14: 287–298.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2005.06.007
  • Schuitema, G., L. Steg, and S. Forward. 2010. “Explaining Differences in Acceptability before and Acceptance after the Implementation of a Congestion Charge in Stockholm.” Transportation Research Part a: Policy and Practice 44: 99–109.10.1016/j.tra.2009.11.005
  • Shannon, T., B. Giles-Corti, T. Pikora, M. Bulsara, T. Shilton, and F. Bull. 2006. “Active Commuting in a University Setting: Assessing Commuting Habits and Potential for Modal Change.” Transport Policy 13: 240–253.10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.11.002
  • Tezcan, H. O., and M. Tanış. 2011. “Does the Academic Rank Matter? Study on the Trip Preferences of Academicians from Different Ranks Employed at Istanbul Technical University.” Journal of Urban Planning and Development 137: 272–280.10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000075
  • Van Wee, B. 2002. “Land Use and Transport: Research and Policy Challenges.” Journal of Transport Geography 10: 259–271.10.1016/S0966-6923(02)00041-8
  • Vold, A. 2005. “Optimal Land Use and Transport Planning for the Greater Oslo Area.” Transportation Research Part a: Policy and Practice 39: 548–565.10.1016/j.tra.2005.02.007
  • Vorel, J. 2014. Residential Location Choice Modelling: A Micro-simulation Approach. AUC Geographıca 49: 83–97.
  • Wardrop, J. G. 1952. “Road Paper. Some Theoretical Aspects of Road Traffic Research.” ICE Proceedings: Engineering Divisions. Thomas Telford, pp. 325–362.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.