Revision of PV² based pedestrian crossing warrants in India using clustering techniques

References

• Amini, B., and H. Ghahramani. 2004. “A Location Model for Pedestrian Crossings in Arterial Streets.” Urban Transport X, edited by C. A. Brebbia, and L. C. Wadhwa. Ashurst, UK: WIT Press. ISBN 1-85312-716-7.
   Google Scholar
• Bains, M. S., B. Ponnu, and S. S. Arkatkar. 2012. “Modeling of Traffic Flow on Indian Expressways Using Simulation Technique.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 43: 475–493.10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.04.121
   Google Scholar
• Biswas, S., B. Singh, and A. Saha. 2016. “Assessment of Level-of-Service on Urban Arterials: A Case Study in Kolkata Metropolis.” International Journal for Traffic & Transport Engineering 6 (3): 303–312.
   Google Scholar
• Boora, A., I. Ghosh, and S. Chandra. 2016. “A Novel Approach for Assessing the LOS for Two-lane Intercity Highways under Heterogeneous Traffic Conditions.” Journal of Advanced Transportation 50 (8): 2041–2059.10.1002/atr.v50.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brighton & Hove City Council. 2011. “Pedestrian Crossing Assessment Methodology.” Publication: Environment Cabinet Member Meeting, Agenda Item No. 17, Appendix1, Brighton & Hove City Council, UK. Accessed Apr 16, 2016. http://present.brighton-hove.gov.uk/Published/C00000286/M00003233/AI00020954/$Item17Appendix1.docA.ps.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brilon, W., R. Koenig, and R. J. Troutbeck. 1999. “Useful Estimation Procedures for Critical Gaps.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 33 (3): 161–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calinski, T., and J. Harabasz. 1974. “A Dendrite Method for Cluster Analysis.” Communications in Statistics 3 (1): 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Cheshire East Council. 2011. “Pedestrian Crossing Policy.” Publication: Head of Highways and Transportation, Cheshire East Council, UK. Accessed Apr 20, 2016. http://moderngov.cheshireeast.gov.uk/ecminutes/documents/s15496/04-Pedestrian%20Crossing%20Policy%20-%20report%20and%20appendices.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Davies, D., and D. Bouldin. 1979. “A Cluster Separation Measure.” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1 (2): 224–227.10.1109/TPAMI.1979.4766909
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhamaniya, A., and S. Chandra. 2014. “Midblock Capacity of Urban Arterial Roads in India.” Indian Highways, Indian Roads Congress 42 (7): 45–57.
   Google Scholar
• Dorset County Council. 2014. “Selection and Priority Assessment Procedure for the Provision of Pedestrian Crossings and Associated Facilities.” Publication: Dorset County Council, UK. Accessed Apr 20, 2016. https://www.dorsetforyou.com/media/196354/Pedestrian-crossing-policy-guidance–July-2014/pdf/Guidance_for_Crossing_Requests_July_2014_Update.rtf
   Google Scholar
• DoT. 1987. Roads and Traffic in Urban Areas. Publication of Institution of Highways and Transportation and Department of Transport, UK.
   Google Scholar
• DoT. 2006. Stats19 Road Accidents Dataset – Road Accidents and Safety Statistics. Report, Department of Transport, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, J. 1974. “Well-Separated Clusters and Optimal Fuzzy Partitions.” Journal of Cybernetics 4 (1): 95–104.10.1080/01969727408546059
   Google Scholar
• Edinburgh Council. 2012. Pedestrian Crossing Prioritisation – New Priority List. Publication Transport, Infrastructure and Environment Committee, Report No. 10, The City of Edinburgh Council, UK. Accessed April 20, 2016. http://www.edinburgh.gov.uk/download/meetings/id/35664/item_10_-_pedestrian_crossing_prioritisation_-_new_priority_list
   Google Scholar
• Halkidi, M., Y. Batistakis, and M. Vazirgiannis. 2001. “On Clustering Validation Techniques.” Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 17 (2–3): 107–145.10.1023/A:1012801612483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HCM. 2010. Highway Capacity Manual. Washington DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• IRC:103. 1998. Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities. New Delhi: Publication of Indian Road Congress.
   Google Scholar
• IRC:103. 2012. Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities. New Delhi: Publication of Indian Road Congress.
   Google Scholar
• Kadali, B. R., and P. Vedagiri. 2016a. “Proactive Pedestrian Safety Evaluation at Unprotected Mid-block Crosswalk Locations under Mixed Traffic Conditions.” Safety Science. 89: 94–105. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2016.05.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadali, B. R., and P. Vedagiri, 2016b. “Pedestrian Crossing Treatment Warrants for Midblock Crosswalks under Mixed Traffic Conditions.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. (2581): 145–153. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board. doi: 10.3141/2581-17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Z. Li, H. Xiong, X. Gao, and J. Wu 2010. “Understanding of Internal Clustering Validation Measures.” In 2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, December, 911–916. doi: 10.1109/ICDM.2010.35
   Google Scholar
• LTN-1/95. 1995. Local Transport Note 1/95 – the Assessment of Pedestrian Crossings. Publication: Department for Transport, The National Assembly for Wales, The Scottish Executive Development Department and The Department for Regional Development Northern Ireland, UK. Accessed Apr 20, 2016. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/330269/ltn-1-95_Assessment-Crossings.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Marisamynathan, S., and P. Vedagiri. 2017. “Modeling Pedestrian Level of Service at Signalized Intersection under Mixed Traffic Conditions.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2634: 86–94.10.3141/2634-13
   Google Scholar
• MathWorks. “K-Means Clustering in Statistics Toolbox.” K-Means clustering algorithm. https://in.mathworks.com/help/stats/kmeans.html?requestedDomain=www.mathworks.com
   Google Scholar
• Mohan, D., O. Tsimhoni, M. Sivak, M. J. Flannagan. 2009. Road Safety in India – Challenges and Opportunities, Report No. UMTRI-2009-1, Transportation Research Institute, University of Michigan, USA.
   Google Scholar
• MoRTH. 2015. Road Accidents in India. Publication: Transportation Research Wing, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Government of India. Accessed Apr 16, 2016. http://morth.nic.in/showfile.asp?lid=1780
   Google Scholar
• Prabhu, T. D. 2014. “Pedestrian Crossing Behavior in Urban Roads.” Post Graduate Thesis, Department of Transport Planning, School of Planning and Architecture, New Delhi, India.
   Google Scholar
• Rotherham Borough Council. 2011. Pedestrian Crossing Assessment Method and Costs. Publication: Environment & Development Services, Rotherham Borough Council, UK. Accessed Apr 20, 2016. http://moderngov.rotherham.gov.uk/mgConvert2PDF.aspx?ID=41586
   Google Scholar
• Rousseeuw, P. 1987. “Silhouettes: A Graphical Aid to the Interpretation and Validation of Cluster Analysis.” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 20 (1): 53–65.10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, S. 1996. Applied Multivariate Techniques. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Teja, T. N. 2013. “Development of Criteria for Provision of Pedestrian Crossing Facilities.” Post Graduate Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, India.
   Google Scholar
• Tiwari, G., D. Mohan, and D. P. Gupta. 2000. Evaluation of Capacity Augmentation Projects of National Highways and State Highways. Publication Ministry of Surface Transport, Government of India, New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Troutbeck, R. J.. 1992. Estimating the Critical Acceptance Gap from Traffic Movements. Physical infrastructure centre, Queensland University of Technology. Research Report 92-5.
   Google Scholar
• Troutbeck, R. J. 2014. “Estimating the Mean Critical Gap.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2461: 76–84.10.3141/2461-10
   Google Scholar
• Vedagiri, P., and B. R. Kadali. 2016. “Evaluation of Pedestrian – Vehicle Conflict Severity at Unprotected Midblock Crosswalks in India.” In Transportation Research Record 2581, 48–56. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council. doi: 10.3141/2581-06
   Google Scholar
• Velmurugan, S., M. Errampalli, K. Ravinder, K. Sitaramanjaneyulu, and S. Gangopadhyay. 2010. “Critical Evaluation of Roadway Capacity of Multi-Lane High Speed Corridors under Heterogeneous Traffic Conditions through Traditional and Microscopic Simulation Models.” Journal of Indian Roads Congress 71 (3): 235–264.
   Google Scholar
• Warwickshire City Council. 2014. Policy for the Provision of Pedestrian Crossings and Pedestrian Facility at Traffic Signals Junctions. Publication: Warwickshire City Council, UK. Accessed Apr 20, 2016. http://apps.warwickshire.gov.uk/api/documents/WCCC-770-190
   Google Scholar
• West Sussex. 2005. Policy Review of Assessment Criteria for the Installation of Pedestrian Crossing Facilities. Publication Report No. HT17(04/05), Head of Highways And Transport, West Sussex County Council, UK. Accessed Apr 20, 2016. https://www.westsussex.gov.uk/idoc.ashx?docid=66b5f755-dc4f-4461-8c8c-5855d3ff390b&version=-1
   Google Scholar
• Wu, J., H. Xiong and J. Chen 2009. “Adapting the Right Measures for K-Means Clustering.” In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 877–886. Paris.10.1145/1557019
   Google Scholar