Making use of elicited confidence ratings of the SP survey in a joint RP-SP model: a case study of commuting mode choices for TDM evaluations

References

• Aptech System. “The GAUSSTM Mathematical and Statistical Systems”, 2015. http://www.aptech.com/products/gauss-mathematical-and-statistical-system/
   Google Scholar
• Arentze, T., A. Borgers, H. Timmermans, and D. Romano. 2003. “Transport Stated Choice Responses: Effects of Task Complexity, Presentation Format and Literacy.” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 39 (3): 229–244. doi:10.1016/S1366-5545(02)00047-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, M. J., J. M. Rose, and D. A. Hensher. 2011. “Behavioural Responses to Vehicle Emissions Charging.” Transportation 38 (3): 445–463. doi:10.1007/s11116-010-9316-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva, M., and T. Morikawa. 1990. “Estimation of Switching Models from Revealed Preferences and Stated Intentions.” Transportation Research Part A: General 24 (6): 485–495. doi:10.1016/0191-2607(90)90037-7.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva, M. E., and S. R. Lerman. 1985. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. Vol. 9. MIT press, Cambridge, Massachusett.
   Google Scholar
• Bhat, C. R. 2003. “Simulation Estimation of Mixed Discrete Choice Models Using Randomized and Scrambled Halton Sequences.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 37 (9): 837–855. doi:10.1016/S0191-2615(02)00090-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat, C. R., and S. Castelar. 2002. “A Unified Mixed Logit Framework for Modeling Revealed and Stated Preferences: Formulation and Application to Congestion Pricing Analysis in the San Francisco Bay Area.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 36 (7): 593–616. doi:10.1016/S0191-2615(01)00020-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, M. A., and A. J. Daly. 1997. “Estimation of Logit Choice Models Using Mixed Stated Preference and Revealed Preference Information.”Sixth International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Quebec, Canada. 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Brouwer, R., T. Dekker, J. Rolfe, and J. Windle. 2010. “Choice Certainty and Consistency in Repeated Choice Experiments.” Environmental and Resource Economics 46 (1): 93–109. doi:10.1007/s10640-009-9337-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantillo, V., J. D. D. Ortúzar, and H. C. W. L. Williams. 2007. “Modeling Discrete Choices in the Presence of Inertia and Serial Correlation.” Transportation Science 41 (2): 195–205. doi:10.1287/trsc.1060.0178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, R. T., and J. J. Louviere. 2011. “A Common Nomenclature for Stated Preference Elicitation Approaches.” Environmental and Resource Economics 49 (4): 539–559. doi:10.1007/s10640-010-9450-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caussade, S., J. D. D. Ortúzar, L. I. Rizzi, and D. A. Hensher. 2005. “Assessing the Influence of Design Dimensions on Stated Choice Experiment Estimates.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 39 (7): 621–640. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2004.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champ, P. A., R. Moore, and R. C. Bishop. “Hypothetical Bias: The Mitigating Effects of Certainty Questions and Cheap Talk.” In 2004 Annual meeting, Denver, CO, August 1–4. Denver, CO, no. 19951. American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association), 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Cherchi, E., and F. Manca. 2011. “Accounting for Inertia in Modal Choices: Some New Evidence Using a RP/SP Dataset.” Transportation 38 (4): 679. doi:10.1007/s11116-011-9338-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherchi, E., and J. D. D. Ortúzar. 2002. “Mixed RP/SP Models Incorporating Interaction Effects.” Transportation 29 (4): 371–395. doi:10.1023/A:1016307308723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherchi, E., and J. D. D. Ortúzar. 2006. “On Fitting Mode Specific Constants in the Presence of New Options in RP/SP Models.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 40 (1): 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Dios Ortuzar, J., and L. G. Willumsen. 2011. Modelling Transport. New Jersey: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dekker, T., S. Hess, R. Brouwer, and H. Hofkes. “Implicitly or Explicitly Uncertain.” In International choice modelling conference, Sydney. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Fifer, S., J. Rose, and S. Greaves. 2014. “Hypothetical Bias in Stated Choice Experiments: Is It a Problem? and if So, How Do We Deal with It?” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 61: 164–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habib, K. M. N., J. Swait, and S. Salem. 2014. “Using Repeated Cross-Sectional Travel Surveys to Enhance Forecasting Robustness: Accounting for Changing Mode Preferences.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 67: 110–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habib, K. M. N., Y. Tian, and H. Zaman. 2011. “Modelling Commuting Mode Choice with Explicit Consideration of Carpool in the Choice Set Formation.” Transportation 38 (4): 587–604. doi:10.1007/s11116-011-9333-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habib, K. N. “Can We Improve Choice Model Parameter Estimates by Jointly Modelling SP Choices with Corresponding Elicited Confidence Ratings?.” In Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C. no. 16–0637. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Hasnine, M. S., and K. N. Habib. 2018. “What about the Dynamics in Daily Travel Mode Choices? A Dynamic Discrete Choice Approach for Tour-Based Mode Choice Modelling.” Transport Policy 71: 70–80. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.07.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasnine, M. S., and K. N. Habib. “A Dynamic Discrete Choice Model for Tour-Based Mode Choices.” To be presented at the 98th Annual Meeting of Trans. Res. Board, Washington, D.C., January 13–17, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Hasnine, M. S., A. Weiss, and K. N. Habib. 2016. “Development of an Employer-Based Transportation Demand Management Strategy Evaluation Tool with an Advanced Discrete Choice Model in Its Core.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2542: 65–74. doi:10.3141/2542-08.
   Google Scholar
• Hensher, D., J. Louviere, and J. Swait. 1998. “Combining Sources of Preference Data.” Journal of Econometrics 89 (1–2): 197–221. doi:10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00061-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A. 1994. “Stated Preference Analysis of Travel Choices: The State of Practice.” Transportation 21 (2): 107–133. doi:10.1007/BF01098788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A. 2004. “Identifying the Influence of Stated Choice Design Dimensionality on Willingness to Pay for Travel Time Savings.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy (JTEP) 38 (3): 425–446.
   Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A. 2006. “How Do Respondents Process Stated Choice Experiments? Attribute Consideration under Varying Information Load.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 21 (6): 861–878. doi:10.1002/jae.877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A. 2010. “Hypothetical Bias, Choice Experiments and Willingness to Pay.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 44 (6): 735–752. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2009.12.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A., and M. Bradley. 1993. “Using Stated Response Choice Data to Enrich Revealed Preference Discrete Choice Models.” Marketing Letters 4 (2): 139–151. doi:10.1007/BF00994072.
   Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A., and E. Cherchi. 2015. “Stated Preference Surveys and Experimental Design: An Audit of the Journey so Far and Future Research Perspectives.” Workshop Report to appear in Transportation Research Procedia, (edited by Marcela Munizaga, Selected proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Travel Survey Methods) 11: 154–164. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2015.12.013.
   Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A., and Ho. Chinh. 2016. “Identifying a Behaviourally Relevant Choice Set from Stated Choice Data.” Transportation 43 (2): 197–217. doi:10.1007/s11116-014-9572-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A., J. M. Rose, and M. J. Beck. 2012. “Are There Specific Design Elements of Choice Experiments and Types of People that Influence Choice Response Certainty?” Journal of Choice Modelling 5 (1): 77–97. doi:10.1016/S1755-5345(13)70049-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A., J. M. Rose, and W. H. Greene. 2005. Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer. Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A., J. M. Rose, and W. H. Greene. 2008. “Combining RP and SP Data: Biases in Using the Nested Logit ‘Trick’–Contrasts with Flexible Mixed Logit Incorporating Panel and Scale Effects.” Journal of Transport Geography 16 (2): 126–133. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2007.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, L.-F. 1983. “Generalized Econometric Models with Selectivity.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 51: 507–512. doi:10.2307/1912003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomis, J. 2011. “What’s to Know about Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation Studies?” Journal of Economic Surveys 25 (2): 363–370. doi:10.1111/joes.2011.25.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louviere, J. J., T. N. Flynn, and R. T. Carson. 2010. “Discrete Choice Experiments are Not Conjoint Analysis.” Journal of Choice Modelling 3 (3): 57–72. doi:10.1016/S1755-5345(13)70014-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louviere, J. J., D. A. Hensher, and J. D. Swait. 2000. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications. Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Lundhede, T. H., S. B. Olsen, J. B. Jacobsen, and B. J. Thorsen. 2009. “Handling Respondent Uncertainty in Choice Experiments: Evaluating Recoding Approaches against Explicit Modelling of Uncertainty.” Journal of Choice Modelling 2 (2): 118–147. doi:10.1016/S1755-5345(13)70007-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morikawa, T. 1994. “Correcting State Dependence and Serial Correlation in the RP/SP Combined Estimation Method.” Transportation 21 (2): 153–165. doi:10.1007/BF01098790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, S. B., T. H. Lundhede, J. B. Jacobsen, and B. J. Thorsen. 2011. “Tough and Easy Choices: Testing the Influence of Utility Difference on Stated Certainty-In-Choice in Choice Experiments.” Environmental and Resource Economics 49 (4): 491–510. doi:10.1007/s10640-010-9443-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouwersloot, H., and P. Rietveld.1996 “Stated Choice Experiments with Repeated Observations.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 30(2): 203–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, J. M., and M. C. J. Bliemer. 2009. “Constructing Efficient Stated Choice Experimental Designs.” Transport Reviews 29 (5): 587–617. doi:10.1080/01441640902827623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, J. M., and M. C. J. Bliemer. 2013. “Sample Size Requirements for Stated Choice Experiments.” Transportation 40 (5): 1021–1041. doi:10.1007/s11116-013-9451-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schläpfer, F., and B. Fischhoff. 2012. “Task Familiarity and Contextual Cues Predict Hypothetical Bias in a Meta-Analysis of Stated Preference Studies.” Ecological Economics 81: 44–47. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.06.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon, C. E. 2001. “A Mathematical Theory of Communication. ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Comp.” Bell system technical journal 27(3): 379-423.
   Google Scholar
• Swait, J., and W. Adamowicz. 2001a. “Choice Environment, Market Complexity, and Consumer Behavior: A Theoretical and Empirical Approach for Incorporating Decision Complexity into Models of Consumer Choice.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 86 (2): 141–167. doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swait, J., and W. Adamowicz. 2001b. “The Influence of Task Complexity on Consumer Choice: A Latent Class Model of Decision Strategy Switching.” Journal of Consumer Research 28 (1): 135–148. doi:10.1086/321952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swait, J., and J. Louviere. 1993. “The Role of the Scale Parameter in the Estimation and Comparison of Multinomial Logit Models.” Journal of Marketing Research 30: 305–314. doi:10.1177/002224379303000303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Train, K., and W. W. Wilson. 2008. “Estimation on Stated-Preference Experiments Constructed from Revealed-Preference Choices.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 42 (3): 191–203. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2007.04.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Train, K. E. 2009. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge university press
   Google Scholar