Understanding risky choice behaviour with travel time variability: a review of recent empirical contributions of alternative behavioural theories

References

• Andersen, S., G. Harrison, A. Hole, M. Lau, and E. Rutstrom. 2012. “Non-linear Mixed Logit.” Theory and Decision 73 (1): 77–96. doi:10.1007/s11238-011-9277-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avineri, E., and J. N. Prashker. 2003. “Sensitivity to Uncertainty: The Need for a Paradigm Shift.” Transportation Research Record 1854: 90–98. doi:10.3141/1854-10.
   Google Scholar
• Bain, R. 2009. “Error and Optimism Bias in Toll Road Traffic Forecasts.” Transportation 36 (5): 469–482. doi:10.1007/s11116-009-9199-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balbontin, C., D. A. Hensher, and A. Collins. 2017. “Integrating Attribute Non-attendance and Value Learning with Risk Attitudes and Perceptual Conditioning.” Transportation Research Part E 91 (1): 172–191. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2016.11.002.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Elia, E., G. Lyons, and P. L. Mokhtarian. 2018. “Epilogue: The New Frontiers of Behavioral Research on the Interrelationships between ICT, Activities, Time Use and Mobility.” Transportation 1–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchard, O., and S. Fischer. 1989. Lectures on Macroeconomics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carrion, C., and D. Levinson. 2012. “Value of Travel Time Reliability: A Review of Current Evidence.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 46 (4): 720–741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirillo, C., M. Maness, and N. U. Serulle. 2014. “Measuring Value of Travel Time and Travel Time Variability in the Presence of Managed Lanes: Results from a Pilot Stated Preference Survey on the Capital Beltway.” Transportation Letters 6 (1): 23–35. doi:10.1179/1942787513Y.0000000008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connors, R. D., and A. Sumalee. 2009. “A Network Equilibrium Model with Travellers’ Perception of Stochastic Travel Times.” Transportation Research Part B 43 (6): 614–624. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2008.12.002.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, J. C., and V. Sadiraj. 2006. “Small- and Large-Stakes Risk Aversion: Implications of Concavity Calibration for Decision Theory.” Games and Economic Behavior 56 (1): 45–60. doi:10.1016/j.geb.2005.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, A. J., S. Hess, B. Patruni, and D. Potoglou. 2012. “Using Ordered Attitudinal Indicators in a Latent Variable Choice Model: A Study of the Impact of Security on Rail Travel Behaviour.” Transportation 39 (2): 267–297. doi:10.1007/s11116-011-9351-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, G. B. 2006. “Rethinking Risk Attitude: Aspiration as Pure Risk.” Theory and Decision 61 (2): 159–190. doi:10.1007/s11238-006-0007-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixit, V. V., R. C. Harb, J. Martinez-Correa, and E. Rutström. 2015. “Measuring Risk Aversion to Guide Transportation Policy: Contexts, Incentives, and Respondents.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 80 (3): 15–34.
   Google Scholar
• Fennema, H., and P. Wakker. 1996. “A Test of Rank-dependent Utility in the Context of Ambiguity.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 13 (1): 19–35. doi:10.1007/BF00055336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, S., E. Frejinger, and M. Ben-Akiva. 2010. “Adaptive Route Choices in Risky Traffic Networks: A Prospect Theory Approach.” Transportation Research Part C 18 (5): 727–740. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2009.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, W. M., and H. J. Einhorn. 1987. “Expression Theory and The Preference Reversal Phenomena.” Psychological Review 94 (2): 236–254. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.94.2.236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, G. W., and E. E. Rutström. 2009. “Expected Utility Theory and Prospect Theory: One Wedding and a Decent Funeral.” Journal of Experimental Economics 12 (2): 133–158. doi:10.1007/s10683-008-9203-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A. 2018. “Tackling Road Congestion – What Might It Look like in the Future under a Collaborative and Connected Mobility Model?” Transport Policy 66: A1–A8. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A., C. Balbontin, and A. T. Collins. 2018. “Heterogeneity in Decision Processes: Embedding Extremeness Aversion, Risk Attitude and Perceptual Conditioning in Multiple Process Rules Choice Making.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 111: 316–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A., J. M. Rose, W. Leung, A. Tirachini, and Z. Li. 2013a. “Choosing Public Transport – Some Behavioural Challenges.” Transport Reviews 33 (1): 92–106. doi:10.1080/01441647.2012.760671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A., W. H. Greene, and Z. Li. 2011. “Embedding Risk Attitude and Decision Weights in Non-linear Logit to Accommodate Time Variability in the Value of Expected Travel Time Savings.” Transportation Research Part B 45 (7): 954–972. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2011.05.023.
   Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A., and Z. Li. 2012. “Valuing Travel Time Variability within a Rank-Dependent Utility Framework and an Investigation of Unobserved Taste Heterogeneity.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 46 (2): 293–312.
   Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A., Z. Li, and J. M. Rose. 2013. “Accommodating Risk in the Valuation of Expected Travel Time Savings.” Journal of Advanced Transportation 47 (1): 206–224. doi:10.1002/atr.160.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, C. A., and S. K. Laury. 2002. “Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects.” American Economic Review 92 (5): 1644–1655. doi:10.1257/000282802762024700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, G., A. Sivakumar, and J. W. Polak. 2012. “Modeling Travelers’ Risky Choice in a Revealed Preference Context: A Comparison of EUT and non-EUT Approaches.” Transportation 39: 825–841. doi:10.1007/s11116-012-9408-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C., M. Burris, and W. D. Shaw. 2017. “Models of Transportation Choice with Risk: An Application to Managed Lanes.” Transportation Letters 9 (5): 276–295. doi:10.1080/19427867.2016.1204811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jou, R., and K. Chen. 2013. “An Application of Cumulative Prospect Theory to Freeway Drivers’ Route Choice Behaviours.” Transportation Research Part A 49: 123–131.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.” Econometrica 47 (2): 263–291. doi:10.2307/1914185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khani, A., and S. D. Boyles. 2015. “An Exact Algorithm for the Mean-standard Deviation Shortest Path Problem.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 81: 252–266. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2015.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z. 2018. “Unobserved and Observed Heterogeneity in Risk Attitudes: Implications for Valuing Travel Time Savings and Travel Time Variability.” Transportation Research E: Logistics and Transportation Review 112: 12–18. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2018.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z., A. Tirachini, and D. A. Hensher. 2012. “Embedding Risk Attitudes in a Scheduling Model: Application to the Study of Commuting Departure Time.” Transportation Science 46 (2): 170–188. doi:10.1287/trsc.1110.0389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z., and D. A. Hensher. 2010. “Toll Roads in Australia: An Overview of Characteristics and Accuracy of Demand Forecasts.” Transport Reviews 30 (5): 541–569. doi:10.1080/01441640903211173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z., and D. A. Hensher. 2011. “Prospect Theoretic Contributions in Traveller Behaviour Studies: A Review and Some Comments.” Transport Reviews 31 (1): 97–115. doi:10.1080/01441647.2010.498589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z., and D. A. Hensher. 2012. “Estimating Values of Travel Time Savings for Toll Roads: Avoiding a Common Error.” Transport Policy 24 (4): 60–66. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.06.015.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Z., and D. A. Hensher. 2013. “Behavioural Implications of Preferences, Risk Attitudes and Beliefs in Modelling Risky Travel Choices with Travel Time Variability.” Transportation 40 (3): 505–523. doi:10.1007/s11116-012-9445-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z., D. A. Hensher, and J. M. Rose. 2010. “Willingness to Pay for Travel Time Reliability in Passenger Transport: A Review and Some New Empirical Evidence.” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 46 (3): 384–403. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2009.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, E. M. 1977. “Risk, Uncertainty, and Divergence of Opinion.” Journal of Finance XXXII (4): 1151–1168. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1977.tb03317.x.
   Google Scholar
• Mongin, P. 1997. “Expected Utility Theory.” In Handbook of Economic Methodology, edited by J. Davis, W. Hands, and U. Maki, 342–350. London: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Prelec, D. 1998. “The Probability Weighting Function.” Econometrica 66 (3): 497–527. doi:10.2307/2998573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polak, J., S. Hess, and X. Liu. 2008. “Characterising heterogeneity in attitudes to risk in expected utility models of mode and departure time choice.” Transportation Research Board 87th Annual Meeting, Washington DC, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Quiggin, J. 1982. “A Theory of Anticipated Utility.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 3 (4): 323–343. doi:10.1016/0167-2681(82)90008-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos, G. M., W. Daamen, and S. Hoogendoorn. 2014. “A State-of-the-Art Review: Developments in Utility Theory, Prospect Theory and Regret Theory to Investigate Travellers’ Behaviour in Situations Involving Travel Time Uncertainty.” Transport Reviews 34 (1): 46–67. doi:10.1080/01441647.2013.856356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasouli, S., and H. Timmermans. 2014. “Applications of Theories and Models of Choice and Decision-making under Conditions of Uncertainty in Travel Behavior Research.” Travel Behaviour and Society 3 (1): 79–90. doi:10.1016/j.tbs.2013.12.001.
   Google Scholar
• Razo, M., and S. Gao. 2013. “A Rank-dependent Expected Utility Model for Strategic Route Choice with Stated Preference Data.” Transportation Research Part C 27: 117–130. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2011.08.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schechter, L. 2007. “Risk Aversion and Expected-Utility Theory: A Calibration Exercise.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 35 (1): 67–76. doi:10.1007/s11166-007-9017-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senna, L. A. D. S. 1994. “The Influence of Travel Time Variability on the Value of Time.” Transportation 21 (2): 203–228. doi:10.1007/BF01098793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steck, F., V. Kolarova, F. Bahamonde-Birke, S. Trommer, and B. Lenz. 2018. “How Autonomous Driving May Affect the Value of Travel Time Savings for Commuting.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2672 (46): 11–20. doi:10.1177/0361198118757980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stott, H. 2006. “Cumulative Prospect Theory’s Functional Menagerie.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 32 (2): 101–130. doi:10.1007/s11166-006-8289-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. 2013. “Travel through Time: The Story of Research on Travel Time Reliability.” Transportmetrica B: Transport Dynamics 1 (3): 174–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H., A. Tversky, D. Kahneman, and A. Schwartz. 1997. “The Effect of Myopia and Loss Aversion on Risk Taking: An Experimental Test.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (2): 647–661. doi:10.1162/003355397555226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1992. “Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representations of Uncertainty.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5 (4): 297–323. doi:10.1007/BF00122574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verschoor, A., B. D’Exelle, and B. Perez-Viana. 2016. “Lab and Life: Does Risky Choice Behaviour Observed in Experiments Reflect that in the Real World?” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 128: 134–148. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2016.05.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickrey, W. S. 1969. “Congestion Theory and Transport Investment.” The American Economic Review 59 (2): 251–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakker, P. P. 2008. “Explaining the Characteristics of the Power (CRRA) Utility Family.” Health Economics 17 (12): 1329–1344. doi:10.1002/hec.1331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, J. L., and M. E. Ben-Akiva. 2002. “Generalized Random Utility Model.” Mathematical Social Sciences 43 (3): 303–343. doi:10.1016/S0165-4896(02)00023-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Q., A. Karlström, and M. Sundberg. 2014. “Scheduling Choices under Rank Dependent Utility Maximization.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 111: 301–310. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.063.
   Google Scholar
• Wen, C., W. Wu, and C. Fu. 2017. “Preferences for Alternative Travel Arrangements in case of Major Flight Delays: Evidence from Choice Experiments with Prospect Theory.” Transport Policy (In Press). doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijayaratna, K. P., and V. V. Dixit. 2016. “Impact of Information on Risk Attitudes: Implications on Valuation of Reliability and Information.” Journal of Choice Modelling 20 (3): 16–34. doi:10.1016/j.jocm.2016.09.004.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, L. Z., S. Q. Zhong, S. F. Ma, and N. Jia. 2014. “Prospect Theory Based Estimation of Drivers’ Risk Attitudes in Route Choice Behaviors.” Accident Analysis and Prevention 73: 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2014.08.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar