Planning for Congestion Pricing Policies in the Middle East: Public Acceptability and Revenue Distribution

References

• Abulibdeh, A. (2013). “Equity Implications of Cordon Pricing in Downtown Toronto.” A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geography Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Abulibdeh, A. 2017. “Chapter 11: Congestion Pricing: Methodologies and Equity Implications.” In Urban Transport Systems, InTech, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Abulibdeh, A. 2018. “Implementing Congestion Pricing Policies in a MENA Region City: Analysis of the Impact on Travel Behaviour and Equity.” Cities 74 (3): 196–207. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abulibdeh, A., and E. Zaidan. 2018. “High-occupancy Toll (HOT) Lanes on the Main Highways of the City of Abu Dhabi: The Public’s Willingness to Pay.” Journal of Transport Geography 66: 91–105. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.11.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abulibdeh, A., E. Zaidan, and K. Alkaabi. 2018. “Empirical Analysis of the Implementation of Cordon Pricing: Potential Impacts on Travel Behaviour and Policy Implications.” Transportation Research Part F. Psychology and Behaviour 53 (3): 130–142. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abulibdeh, A., J. Andrey, and M. Melnik. 2015. “Insights into the Fairness of Cordon Pricing Based on Origin-Destination Data.” Journal of Transport Geography 49: 61–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.10.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albalate, D., and G. Bel. 2009. “What Local Policy Makers Should Know about Urban Road Charging: Lessons from World Wide Experience.” Public Administration Review 69: 962–975. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02045.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anas, A., and R. Lindsey. 2011. “Reducing Urban Road Transportation Externalities: Road Pricing in Theory and in Practice.” The Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 5: 66–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/req019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardic, O., J. A. Annema, and B. Van Wee. 2013. “Has the Dutch News Media Acted as a Policy Actor in the Road Pricing Policy Debate?” Transport Research Part A 57: 47–63.
   Google Scholar
• Borjesson, M., and I. Kristoffersson (2012). “Estimating Welfare Effects of Congestion Charges in Real World Settings.” CTS Working paper 2012: 13. Available at: http://swopec.hhs.se/ctswps/abs/ctswps2012_013.htm
   Google Scholar
• Burris, M., and W. Stockton. 2004. “HOT Lanes in Houston—Six Years of Experience.” Journal of Public Transportation 7 (3): 1–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.7.3.1.
   Google Scholar
• Cain, A. 2005. “Achieving Majority Public Support to Urban Road Pricing: Preserving the Driver’s Right to Choose.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1932: 119–128. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198105193200114.
   Google Scholar
• Chorus, G. G., J. A. Annema, N. Mouter, and B. Van Wee. 2011. “Modelling Politicians’ Preferences for Road Pricing Policies: A Regret-based and Utilitarian Perspective.” Transport Policy 18: 856–861. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cools, M., K. Brijs, H. Tormans, E. Moons, D. Janssens, and G. Wets. 2011. “The Socio- Cognitive Links between Road Pricing Acceptability and Changes in Travel Behaviour.” Transport Research Part A 45: 779–788.
   Google Scholar
• Davis III, R. W., K. Sinha, and F. Mannering (2009). “Factors Affecting Willingness to Pay for High-occupancy-toll Lanes.” DVD: Transportation Research Board 88th Annual Meeting, 22.
   Google Scholar
• De Palma, A., R. Lindsey, and S. Proost. 2007. “Synthesis of Case Study Results and Future Prospects in Investment and the Use of Tax and Toll Revenues in the Transport Sector.” Research in Transportation Economics 19: 269–297. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0739-8859(07)19012-0.
   Google Scholar
• Eliasson, J., and L. Jonsson. 2011. “The Unexpected “Yes”: Explanatory Factors behind the Positive Attitudes to Congestion Charges in Stockholm.” Transport Policy 18: 636–647. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, D. W. 2017. “Social Welfare Maximization by Optimal Toll Design for Congestion Management: Models and Comprehensive Numerical Results.” Transportation Letters 9: 2,81–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2016.1175165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkleman, J., J. Casello, and L. Fu. 2011. “Empirical Evidence from the Greater Toronto Area on the Acceptability and Impacts of HOT Lanes.” Transport Policy 18 (6): 814–824. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franz, L. M. 2020. “Decision Support Model for Variable Speed Limit Control in Recurrent Congestion.” Transportation Letters 12 (1): 37–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2018.1502915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaunt, M., T. Rye, and S. Allen. 2007. “Public Acceptability of Road User Charging: The Case of Edinburgh and the 2005 Referendum.” Transport Reviews 27 (1): 85–102. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640600831299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehlert, T., C. Kramer, O. A. Nielsen, and B. Schlag. 2011. “Socioeconomic Differences in Public Acceptability and Car Use Adaptation Towards Urban Road Pricing.” Transport Policy 18: 685–694. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grisolía, M. J., F. López, and J. D. Ortúzar. 2015. “Increasing the Acceptability of a Congestion Charging Scheme.” Transport Policy 39: 37–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halse, H. A., V. Østli, and M. Killi. 2020. “Revealed and Stated Preferences for Reliable Commuter Rail in Norway.” Transportation Letters 12 (4): 288–292. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2019.1586088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasnine, S. M. D., Z. Rashedi, and N. K. Habib. 2020. “Making Use of Elicited Confidence Ratings of the SP Survey in A Joint RP-SP Model: A Case Study of Commuting Mode Choices for TDM Evaluations.” Transportation Letters 12: 4,274–287. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2019.1585687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawas, E. Y., N. M. Hassan, and O., . A. Abulibdeh. 2016. “A Multi-criteria Approach of Assessing Public Transport Accessibility.” Journal of Transport Geography 57: 19–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.09.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A. 1994. “State Preference Analysis of Travel Choices: The State of Practice.” Transportation 21: 107–133. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01098788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A. 2013. “Exploring the Relationship between Perceived Acceptability and Referendum Voting Support for Alternative Road Pricing Schemes.” Transportation 40: 935–959. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-013-9459-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A., and M. C. J. Bliemer. 2014. “What Type of Road Pricing Scheme Might Appeal to Politicians? View Points on the Challenge in Gaining the Citizen and Public Servant Vote by Staging Reform.” Transportation Research A 61: 227–237.
   Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A., and Z. Li. 2013. “Referendum Voting in Road Pricing Reform: A Review of the Evidence.” Transport Policy 25: 186–197. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.11.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, S., and M. Börjesson. 2019. “Understanding Attitudes Towards Congestion Pricing: A Latent Variable Investigation with Data from Four Cities.” Transportation Letters 11 (2): 63–77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2016.1271762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., J. D. Schmöcker, S. Fuji, and R. B. Noland. 2013. “Attitudes Towards Road Pricing and Environmental Taxation among US and UK Students.” Transportation Research A 48: 50–62.
   Google Scholar
• King, D., M. Manville, and D. Shoup. 2007. “The Political Calculus of Congestion Pricing.” Transport Policy 14: 111–123. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2006.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kockelman, K. M., and S. Kalmanje. 2005. “Credit-based Congestion Pricing: A Policy Proposal and the Public’s Response.” Transportation Research A 39: 671–690.
   Google Scholar
• Kottenhoff, K., and K. B. Brundell-Freig. 2009. “The Role of Public Transport for Feasibility and Acceptability of Congestion Charging- the Case of Stockholm.” Transportation Research A 43: 297–305.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, D. 2010. “Equity Effects of Road Pricing: A Review.” Transport Reviews 30: 33–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640903189304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., Yuan, Y., Wang, H., and Hu, J. (2020). “Understanding Public Acceptability of Congestion Charging in Beijing”. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems 146 (8): 04020080 doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z., A. D. Hensher, and C. Ho. 2020. “An Empirical Investigation of Values of Travel Time Savings from Stated Preference Data and Revealed Preference Data.” Transportation Letters 12 (3): 166–171. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2018.1546806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z., and D. A. Hensher. 2012. “Congestion Charging and Car Use: A Review of Stated Preference and Opinion Studies and Market Monitoring Evidence.” Transport Policy 20: 47–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden, D. (1974). “The measurement of urban travel demand”. Journal of Public Economics 3(4), November 1974, Pages 303–328 doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(74)90003-6
   Google Scholar
• Milenković, M., Glavić, D., and Maričić, M. (2019). Determining factors affecting congestion pricing acceptability. Transport Policy 82, pp 58 – 74 doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noordegraaf, D. V., J. A. Annema, and B. van Wee. 2014. “Policy Implementation Lessons from Six Road Pricing Cases.” Transportation Research A 59: 172–191.
   Google Scholar
• Odeck, J., and A. Kjerkreit. 2010. “Evidence on Users’ Attitudes Towards Road User Charges-across-sectional Survey of Six Norwegian Toll Schemes.” Transport Policy 17: 349–358. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozbay, K., O. Yanmaz-Tuzel, and J. Holguin-Veras. 2006. “Theoretical Derivation of Value of Travel Time and Demand Elasticity: Evidence from New Jersey Turn- Pike Toll Road.” In Transportation Research Record, 248–256.
   Google Scholar
• Patila, S., M. Burrisb, W. D. Shawc, and S. Concas. 2011. “Variation in the Value of Travel Time Savings and Its Impact on the Benefits of Managed Lanes.” Transportation Planning and Technology 34: 6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrik, O., J. de Abreu E Silva, and F. Moura. 2016. “Stated Preference Surveys in Transport Demand Modeling: Disengagement of Respondents.” Transportation Letters 8: 1, 13–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1179/1942787515Y.0000000003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rentziou, A., C. Milioti, K. Gkritza, and M. Karlaftis. 2011. “Urban Road Pricing: Modelling Public Acceptance.” Journal of Urban Planning and Development 137: 56–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryley, T., and N. Gjersoe. 2006. “News Paper Response to the Edinburgh Congestion Charging Proposals.” Transport Policy 13: 66–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schade, J., and B. Schlag. 2003. “Acceptability of Urban Transport Pricing Strategies.” Transportation Research. Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 6 (1): 45–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8478(02)00046-3.
   Google Scholar
• Schaller, B. 2010. “New York City’s Congestion Pricing Experience and Mplications for Road Pricing Acceptance in the United States.” Transport Policy 17: 266–273. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.01.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuitema, G., L. Steg, and J., . A. Rothengatter. 2010. “The Acceptability, Personal Outcome Expectations, and Expected Effects of Transport Pricing Policies.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 30: 587–593. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuitema, G., L. Steg, and M. van Kruining. 2001. “When are transport pricing policies fair and acceptable?” Social Justice Research 24: 66–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senbil, M., and R. Kitamura. 2006. “Valuing Expressways under Time Pressures.” In CD- ROM: Transportation Research Board 85th Annual Meeting, 19.
   Google Scholar
• Sikow-Magny, C. 2003. “Efficient Pricing in Transport: Overview of European Commission’s Transport Research Program.” In Acceptability of Transport Pricing Strategies, edited by J. Schade and B. Schlag, 13–26. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Steg, L. 2003. “Factors Influencing Acceptability and Effectiveness of Transport Pricing.” In Acceptability of Transport Pricing Strategies, edited by J. Schade and B. Schlag, 187–202. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, X., Feng, S., and Lu, J. (2016). “Psychological factors influencing the public acceptability of congestion pricing in China”. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 41 (2016) 104–112 doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.06.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanriverdia, C. S., S. Shakibaeib, and O. H. Tezcan (2012). “A Stated Preference (SP) Study on Individuals’ Transportation Decisions, Focused on Marmaray Project in Istanbul. Energy Efficient Transportation Network.” 15th Edition of the Euro Working Group on Transportation. International Scientific Conference, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Verhoef, E. T., and K. A. Small. 2004. “Product Differentiation on Roads.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 38 (1): 127–156.
   Google Scholar
• Zaidan, E., and A. Abulibdeh. 2018. “Modeling Ground Access Mode Choice Behavior for Hamad International Airport in the 2022 FIFA World Cup City, Doha, Qatar.” Journal of Air Transport Management 73: 32–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2018.08.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zefreh, M. M., Esztergar-Kiss, D., and Torok A. (2020). Implications of different road pricing schemes in urban areas: a case study for Budapest https://www.icevirtuallibrary.com/doi/abs/10.1680/jtran.19.00094
   Google Scholar