An expert integrative approach for sediment load simulation in a tropical watershed

REFERENCES

• AbbaspourKC. 2011. User manual for SWAT-CUP4, SWAT calibration and uncertainty analysis programs. Dübendorf (Switzerland): Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• AdibA, JahanbakhshanH. 2013. Stochastic approach to determination of suspended sediment concentration in tidal rivers by artificial neural network and genetic algorithm. Can J Civil Eng.40(4):299–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AdibA, TagavifarA. 2010. Evaluation and comparison different methods of preparation of sediment rating curve in Telezang station of the Dez River. Aust J Basic Appl Sci.4(5):717–723.
   Google Scholar
• AlbaradeyiaI, HaniA, ShahrourI. 2011. WEPP and ANN models for simulating soil loss and runoff in a semi-arid Mediterranean region. Environ Monit Assess.108:537–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ArnoldJG, SrinivasanR, MuttiahRS, WilliamsJR. 1998. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment, part I: model development. J Am Water Resour Assoc.34(1):73–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AsnaashariA, McBeanEA, GharabaghiB, TuttD. 2013. Forecasting watermain failure using artificial neural network modeling. Can Water Resour J.38(1):24–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BaldiP. 1995. Gradient descent learning algorithm overview: a general dynamical systems perspective. IEEE Trans Neural Networ. 6(1):182–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cha D, Jeng DS, Blumenstein M, Zhang H. 2006. Evaluation of wave-induced liquefaction in a porous seabed: using an artificial neural network and a genetic algorithm-based model. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference; San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• ChutachindakateC, SumiT. 2008. Sediment yield and transportation analysis: case study on Managawa river basin. Ann J Hydraul Eng, JSCE.52:157–162.
   Google Scholar
• CigizogluHK. 2004. Estimation and forecasting of daily suspended sediment data by multi-layer perceptrons. Adv Water Res. 27(2):185–195. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2003.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CigizogluK, AlpM. 2004. Rainfall-runoff modelling using three neural network methods. In: RutkowskiL, SiekmannJ, TadeusiewiczR, ZadehLA, editors. Artificial intelligence and soft computing. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing. 3070. Berlin: Springer. p. 166–171.
   Google Scholar
• CigizogluHK, KisiO. 2006. Methods to improve the neural network performance in suspended sediment estimation. J Hydrol. 317(3–4):221–238. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.05.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EbrahimpourM, BalasundramSK, TalibJ, AnuarAR, MemarianH. 2011. Accuracy of GeoWEPP in estimating sediment load and runoff from a tropical watershed. Malays J Soil Sci.15:25–33.
   Google Scholar
• EslamianSS, GohariSA, BiabanakiM, MalekianR. 2008. Estimation of monthly pan evaporation using artificial neural networks and support vector machines. J Appl Sci.8(19):3497–3502.
   Google Scholar
• FarokhniaA, MoridS. 2010. Uncertainty analysis of artificial neural networks and neuro-fuzzy models in river flow forecasting [in Persian]. Iran-Water Resour Res.5(3):14–27.
   Google Scholar
• GhoseDK, SwainPC, PandaSS. 2012. Sedimentation load analysis using ANN and GA. Appl Mech Mater.110–116:2693–2698.
   Google Scholar
• GoldbergDE. 1989. Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Boston, (MA): Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• GraupeD. 2007. Principles of artificial neural networks. 2nd ed. Singapore: (Advanced series on circuits and systems; vol. 6)World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• HeuvelmansG, MuysB, FeyenJ. 2006. Regionalisation of the parameters of a hydrological model: comparison of linear regression models with artificial neural nets. J Hydrol.319:245–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HsuKL, GuptaH, SorooshianS. 1995. Artificial neural network modeling of the rainfall runoff process. Water Resour Res.31(10):2517–2530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JonesC, SultanM, YanE, MilewskiA, HusseinM, Al-DousariA, Al-KaisyS, BeckerR. 2008. Hydrologic impacts of engineering projects on the Tigris-Euphrates system and its marshlands. J  Hydrol.353(1–2):59–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JothiprakashV, GargV. 2009. Reservoir sedimentation estimation using artificial neural network. J Hydrol Eng, ASCE.14:1035–1040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakaei LafdaniE, MoghaddamNia A, AhmadiA. 2013. Daily suspended sediment load prediction using artificial neural networks and support vector machines. J Hydrol. 478:50–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KimM, GilleyJE. 2008. Artificial neural network estimation of soil erosion and nutrient concentrations in runoff from land application areas. Comput Electron Agr.64(2):268–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KisiO, GuvenA. 2010. A machine code-based genetic programming for suspended sediment concentration estimation. Adv Eng Softw.41:939–945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KisiO, HosseinzadehDalir A, CimenM, ShiriJ. 2012a. Suspended sediment modeling using genetic programming and soft computing techniques. J Hydrol.450–451:48–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KisiO, OzkunC, AkayB. 2012b. Modeling discharge-sediment relationship using neural networks with artificial bee colony algorithm. J Hydrol.428-429:94–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KisiO, ShiriJ. 2012. River suspended sediment estimation by climatic variables implication: comparative study among soft computing techniques. Comput Geosci.43:73–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KuoJT, HsiehMH, LungWS, SheN. 2007. Using artificial neural network for reservoir eutrophication prediction. Ecol Modell.200(1–2):171–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KuoJT, WangYY, LungWS. 2006. A hybrid neural-genetic algorithm for reservoir water quality management. Water Res.40:1367–1376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LekkasDF, OnofC, LeeMJ, BaltasEA. 2004. Application of artificial neural networks for flood forecasting. Global Nest: Int J.6(3):205–211.
   Google Scholar
• Li BX, Zhou F, Lodewyk S. 2010. Applications of artificial neural networks in urban water system. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the Watershed Management Conference, ASCE, Madison, WI, 508–519.
   Google Scholar
• LiuQJ, ShiZH, FangNF, ZhuHD, AiL. 2013. Modeling the daily suspended sediment concentration in a hyperconcentrated river on the Loess Plateau, China, using the wavelet-ANN approach. Geomorphology.186:181–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MemarianH, BalasundramSK. 2012. Comparison between multi-layer perceptron and radial basis function networks for sediment load estimation in a tropical watershed. J Water Resour Prot.10:870–876.
   Google Scholar
• MemarianH, BalasundramSK, TalibJ, AliasMS, AbbaspourKC. 2012a. Trend analysis of water discharge and sediment load during the past three decades of development in the Langat Basin, Malaysia. Hydrol Sci J.57(6):1207–1222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MemarianH, BalasundramSK, TalibJ, TehCBS, AliasMS, AbbaspourKC, HaghizadehA. 2012b. Hydrologic analysis of a tropical watershed using KINEROS2. EnvironmentAsia.5(1):84–93.
   Google Scholar
• MemarianH, FeizniaS, ZakikhaniS. 2009. Estimating river suspended sediment yield using MLP neural network in arid and semi-arid basins, case study: Bar river, Neyshaboor, Iran. DESERT.14:43–52.
   Google Scholar
• MoridS, GosainAK, KeshariAK. 2002. Solar radiation estimation using temperature-based, stochastic and artificial neural networks approaches. Nord Hydrol.3(4):291–304.
   Google Scholar
• MustafaMR, IsaMH, RezaurRB. 2011. A comparison of artificial neural networks for prediction of suspended sediment discharge in river - a case study in Malaysia. World Acad Sci Eng Technol.81:372–376.
   Google Scholar
• MustafaMR, RezaurRB, SaiediS, IsaMH. 2012. River suspended sediment prediction using various multilayer perceptron neural network training algorithms - a case study in Malaysia. Water Resour Manag.26(7):1879–1897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NashJE, SutcliffeJV. 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models, part I — a discussion of principles. J Hydrol.10(3):282–290.
   Google Scholar
• NasseriM, AsghariK, AbediniMJ. 2008. Optimized scenario for rainfall forecasting using genetic algorithm coupled with artificial neural network. Expert Syst Appl.35:1415–1421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PrincipeJC, EulianoNR, LefebvreWC. 2000. Neural and adaptive systems: fundamentals through simulations. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Principe JC, Lefebvre WC, Lynn G, Fancourt C, Wooten D. 2007. NeuroSolutions – documentation, the manual and on-line help. Version 5.05. NeuroDimension, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• RajaeeT, MirbagheriSA, Zounemat-KermaniM, NouraniV. 2009. Daily suspended sediment concentration simulation using ANN and neuro-fuzzy models. Sci Total Environ.407(17):4916–4927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RumelhartE, McClellandJL, the PDP research group. 1986. Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Vol. 1. Foundations. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• SahooGB, RayC. 2008. Permeate flux estimations of crossflow membrane filtration systems using genetic algorithms optimized artificial neural networks. J Environ Hydrol.16:31.
   Google Scholar
• SinghA, ImtiyazM, IsaaccRK, DeniscDM. 2012. Comparison of soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) and multilayer perceptron (MLP) artificial neural network for predicting sediment yield in the Nagwa agricultural watershed in Jharkhand. India. Agr Water Manage.104:113–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SinghG, PandaRK. 2011. Daily sediment yield modeling with artificial neural network using 10-fold cross validation method: a small agricultural watershed, Kapgari, India. Int J Earth Sci Eng.4(6):443–450.
   Google Scholar
• SivanandamSN, DeepaSN. 2008. Introduction to genetic algorithms. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• TabariH, MarofiS, Zare AbyanehH, SharifiMR. 2010. Comparison of artificial neural network and combined models in estimating spatial distribution of snow depth and snow water equivalent in Samsami basin of Iran. Neural Comput Appl.19(4):625–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TalebizadehM, MoridS, AyyoubzadehSA, GhasemzadehM. 2010. Uncertainty analysis in sediment load modeling using ANN and SWAT model. Water Resour Manage.24(9):1747–1761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TungCP, HsuSY, LiuCM, LiJS. 2003. Application of the genetic algorithm for optimizing operation rules of the LiYuTan Reservoir in Taiwan. J Am Water Resour Assoc.39(3):649–657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VeithTL, WolfeML, HeatwoleCD. 2003. Optimization procedure for cost effective BMP placement at a watershed scale. J Am Water Resour Assoc.39(6):1331–1343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YoonHD, CoxDT, KimM. 2013. Prediction of time-dependent sediment suspension in the surf zone using artificial neural network. Coast Eng.71:78–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZealandCM, BurnDH, SimonovicSP. 1999. Short term streamflow forecasting using artificial neural network. J Hydrol.214:32–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZhangB, GovindarajuRS. 2003. Geomorphology-based artificial neural networks (GANNs) for estimation of direct runoff over watersheds. J Hydrol.273(1–4):18–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar