Navigating US greenways: US political reflections in An Inconvenient Truth

REFERENCES

• AlbertsonB. 2011. Religious appeals and implicit attitudes. Pol Psychol.32(1):109–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BarryJ, EllisG, RobinsonC. 2008. Cool rationalities and hot air: a rhetorical approach to understanding debates on renewable energy. Glob Environ Polit.8(2):67–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BellA. 1991. The language of news media. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• BiernatM, VescioTK, ThenoSA. 1996. Violating American values: a “value congruence” approach to understanding outgroup attitudes. J Exp Social Psychol.32:387–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BlumenthalS. 1986. The rise of the counter-establishment: from conservative ideology to political power. New York: Times Books.
   Google Scholar
• BoykoffM, BoykoffJ. 2004. Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environ Change.142:125–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BurkeK. 1955. A rhetoric of motives. New York: George Braziller.
   Google Scholar
• CarvalhoA. 2007. Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: re-reading news on climate change. Public Underst Sci.16(2):223–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CeccarelliL. 1998. Polysemy: multiple meanings in rhetorical criticism. Q J Speech.84(4):395–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ColemanC-L, DysartEV. 2005. Framing of Kennewick man against the backdrop of a scientific and cultural controversy. Sci Commun.271:3–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ConoverPJ. 1983. The mobilization of the new right: a test of various explanations. West Pol Q.36(4):632–649.
   Google Scholar
• ConoverPJ, FeldmanS. 1981. The origins and meaning of liberal/conservative self-identifications. Am J Pol Sci.25(4):617–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CorbettJB, DurfeeJL. 2004. Testing public (un)certainty of science: media representations of global warming. Sci Commun.26(2):129–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CoxR. 2006. Environmental communication and the public sphere. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage.
   Google Scholar
• CritchlowDT. 2007. The conservative ascendancy: how the GOP right made political history. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DawsonMC. 2001. Black visions: the roots of contemporary African-American political ideologies. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Demos T. 2008 Apr 28. Entrepreneurs are risking their money to develop everything from hybrid vehicles to home solar-panel systems. Here are some of the best concepts. Fortune.
   Google Scholar
• DomkeD, CoeK. 2008. The God strategy: how religion became a political weapon in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• EaglyAH, ChaikenS. 1993. The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth (TX): Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College.
   Google Scholar
• EdwardsL. 1999. The conservative revolution: the movement that remade America. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• FiorinaMP, AbramsSJ, PopeJC. 2005. Culture war? The myth of a polarized America. New York: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Galehouse M. 2008 Apr 19. Sustainable living: green on the shelf. Environmental movement spurs a new genre of books. Houston Chronicle (TX), 8.
   Google Scholar
• Gallup. 2010. Americans' global warming concerns continue to drop. Available from: www.gallup.com/poll/126560/americans-global-warming-concerns-continue-drop.aspx (accessed April 22, 2010).
   Google Scholar
• GelbspanR. 1998. The heat is on: the climate crisis, the cover-up, the prescription. Cambridge (MA): Perseus Books.
   Google Scholar
• GoreA. 2006. An inconvenient truth: the planetary emergency of global warming and what we can do about it. Emmaus (PA): Rodale.
   Google Scholar
• GorenP. 2005. Party identification and core political values. Am J Pol Sci.49(4):881–896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GramsciA. 1985. Selections from cultural and political writings. Boelhower W, translator. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guggenheim D. An Inconvenient Truth [DVD]. In L. Bender, S. Burns and L. David (Producer). Paramount Pictures, USA, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• GunterV, Kroll-SmithS. 2007. Volatile places: a sociology of communities and environmental controversies. Thousand Oaks (CA): Pine Forge.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson-SellersA. 1998. Climate whispers: media communication about climate change. Clim Change.40(3–4):421–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HunoldC, LeitnerS. 2011. ‘Hasta la vista, baby!’ The Solar Grand Plan, environmentalism, and social constructions of the Mojave Desert. Environ Polit.20(5):687–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HunterJD. 1991. Culture wars: the struggle to define America. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• IvesP. 2009. Global English, hegemony and education: lessons from Gramsci. Educ Philos & Theory.41(6):661–683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JacobsenGD. 2011. The Al Gore effect: An Inconvenient Truth and voluntary carbon offsets. J Environ Econ Manage.61(1):67–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JohnsonL. 2009. (Environmental) rhetorics of tempered apocalypticism in An Inconvenient Truth. Rhetor Rev.28:29–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KimKS. 2011. Public understanding of the politics of global warming in the news media: the hostile media approach. Public Underst Sci.20:690–705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KinderDR, SandersLM. 1996. Divided by color: racial politics and democratic ideals. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• KirkR. 1953. The conservative mind: from Burke to Santayana. Chicago (IL): Regnery.
   Google Scholar
• LakoffG. 1996. Moral politics: what conservatives know that liberals don't. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• LaneFS. 2008. The court and the cross: the Religious Right's crusade to reshape the Supreme Court. Boston (MA): Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• LeggettJ. 2001. The carbon war: global warming and the end of the oil era. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• MaibachEW, NisbetMC, BaldwinP, AkerlofK, DiaoG. 2010. Reframing climate change as a public health issue: an exploratory study of public reactions. BMC Public Health.10:299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCloskyH, ZallerJ. 1984. The American ethos: public attitudes toward capitalism and democracy. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGirrL. 2001. Suburban warriors: the origins of the new American right. Princeton (NJ)/Oxford: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MellorF. 2009. The politics of accuracy in judging global warming films. Environ Commun.3(2):134–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MicklethwaitJ, WooldridgeA. 2004. The right nation: conservative power in America. New York: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• MurphyPD. 2011. Putting the earth into global media studies. Commun Theory.21(3):217–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NisbetMC. 2010. Knowledge into action: framing the debates over climate change and poverty. In: D'AngeloP, KuypersJA, editors. Doing news framing analysis: empirical and theoretical perspectives. New York: Routledge. p. 43–83.
   Google Scholar
• NisbetMC, MooneyC. 2007. Framing science. Science. 316:56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norwegian Nobel Committee. 2007. Oct 12, Dec 8. The Nobel Peace Prize for 2007. The Nobel Peace Prize. Retrieved from http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/2007/press.html.
   Google Scholar
• ParijsPV. 2004. Europe's linguistic challenge. Eur J Sociol.45(1):113–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peirce K. 2008 Apr 14. My five most important movies. Newsweek.
   Google Scholar
• PetrocikJR. 1996. Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. Am J Pol Sci.40(3):825–850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PetrocikJR, BenoitWL, HansenGJ. 2003/2004. Issue ownership and presidential campaigning, 1952–2000. Pol Sci Q.118(4):599–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PhillipsN, HardyC. 2002. Discourse analysis: investigating processes of social construction. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage.
   Google Scholar
• PiperJR. 1997. Ideologies and institutions: American conservative and liberal governance prescriptions since 1933. Lanham (MD): Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• RootesC. 2007. Acting locally: the character, contexts and significance of local environmental mobilisations. Environ Polit.16(5):722–741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchoenwaldJ. 2002. A time for choosing: the rise of modern American conservatism. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ScholteS, VasileiadouE, PetersenAC. 2013. Opening up the societal debate on climate engineering: how newspaper frames are changing. J Integr Environ Sci.10:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SearsDO. 1993. Symbolic politics: a socio-psychological theory. In: IyengarS, McGuireWJ, editors. Explorations in political psychology. Durham (NC): Duke University Press. p. 113–149.
   Google Scholar
• SearsDO, LaarCV, CarrilloM, KostermanR. 1997. Is it really racism?: the origins of white Americans' opposition to race-targeted policies. Public Opin Q.61(1):16–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SimSF. 2006. Obliterating the political: one-party ideological dominance and the personalization of news in Singapore 211. Journal Stud.7(4):575–592.
   Google Scholar
• SnidermanPM, PiazzaT, TetlockPE, KendrickA. 1991. The new racism. Am J Pol Sci.35(2):423–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SpoelP, GoforthD, CheuH, PearsonD. 2009. Public communication of climate change science: engaging citizens through apocalyptic narrative explanation. Tech Commun Q.18:49–81.
   Google Scholar
• WarnerM. 2002a. Publics and counterpublics. Public Cult.14(1):49–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WarnerM. 2002b. Publics and counterpublics. Q J Speech. 88(4):413–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WilcoxC. 1992. God's warriors: the Christian right in twentieth-century America. Baltimore (MD): Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• WilsonK. 2000. Drought, debate, and uncertainty: measuring reporters' knowledge and ignorance about climate change. Public Underst Sci.9:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZallerJ. 1992. The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ZehrS. 2000. Public representations of scientific uncertainty about global climate change. Public Underst Sci.9:85–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar