Analysing the interactions of energy and climate policies in a broad policy ‘optimality’ framework: the Italian case study

References

• AghionP, VeugelersR, SerreC. 2009. Cold start for the green innovation machine. Bruegel Policy Contribution; 2009/12. Brussels: Bruegel.
   Google Scholar
• ArnellNW, TompkinsEL, AdgerWN. 2005. Eliciting information from experts on the likelihood of rapid climate change. Risk Anal.25:1419–1431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BaumolWJ, OatesWE. 1988. The theory of environmental policy. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• BorghesiS. 2011. The European emission trading scheme and renewable energy policies: credible targets for incredible results?Int J Sustainable Econ.3(3):312–327.
   Google Scholar
• BorghesiS, CainelliG, MazzantiM. 2012. European emission trading scheme and environmental innovation: an empirical analysis using CIS data for Italy. G Econ Ann Econ.71(1):71–97.
   Google Scholar
• BosettiV, FrankelJ. 2012. Sustainable cooperation in global climate policy: Specific formulas and emission targets. HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series RWP12-012, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Clò S. 2012. Apr. Certificati Bianchi: Funzionamento e Risultati Del Mercato Nazionale. Energia.
   Google Scholar
• Convery F, Ellerman D, Kelly A. 2014 Jan. Future climate policies – challenges and choices: a European perspective. Dublin Workshop Synthesis.
   Google Scholar
• D'AmatoA, MazzantiM, MontiniA. 2013. Waste management in spatial environments. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Del RioP. 2007. The interaction between emissions trading and renewable electricity support schemes: an overview of the literature. Mitigation Adapt Strateg Glob Change. 12:1363–1390.
   Google Scholar
• Del RioP. 2009. Interactions between climate and energy policies: The case of Spain. Clim Policy. 9:119–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del RioP. 2010. Analysing the interactions between renewable energy promotion and energy efficiency support schemes: the impact of different instruments and design elements. Energy Policy.38:4978–4989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del RioP, BledaM. 2013. Theoretical approaches to dynamic efficiency in policy contexts: the case of renewable electricity. In: CostantiniV, MazzantiM, editors. The dynamics of economic and environmental systems. London: Springer; p. 45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Del RioP, RagwitzM, SteinhilberS, ReschG, BuschS, KlessmannC, de LovinfosseI, Nysten JanaV, FouquetD, JohnstonA. 2012. Assessment criteria for identifying the main alternatives – advantages and drawbacks, synergies and conflicts. A report compiled within the project beyond2020 (work package 2), supported by the EACI of the European Commission within the ‘Intelligent Energy Europe’ programMadrid (Spain): CSIC.
   Google Scholar
• [DIW] Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung. 2012. Die Auswirkungen des Atomausstiegs in Deutschland auf Strompreise und Klimaschutz in Deutschland und Europa. Studie im Auftrag von Greenpeace e.V. Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• [EC] European Commission. 2011a. Directive on energy efficiency and repealing Directives 2004/8/EC and 2006/32/EC, COM(2011) 370. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2011b. Impact Assessment Accompanying the document Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on energy efficiency and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2004/8/EC and 2006/32/EC. Commission Staff Working Paper. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• [EEA]. European Environment Agency. 2009. Diverting Waste from Landfill, EEA Report 7. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• EEA. 2010. Annual European Union greenhouse gas inventory 1990-2008 and inventory report 2010. Copenhagen (Denmark): European Environment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• EEA. 2013a. Towards a green economy in Europe. Copenhagen: EEA.
   Google Scholar
• EEA. 2013b. Trends and projections in Europe 2013. Copenhagen: EEA.
   Google Scholar
• EEA. 2014. Resource efficient green economy and EU policies. Copenhagen: EEA.
   Google Scholar
• EllermanAD, JoskowPL. 2008. The European Union's emissions trading system in perspective. Arlington (VA): Pew Center on Global Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• [ETC/SCP] European Topic Center on Sustainable Consumption and Production. 2012. EU environmental and resource policies: strategic objectives and binding targets, version June 2012. Copenhagen: European Topic Center on Sustainable Consumption and Production.
   Google Scholar
• ETC/SCP. 2013. Achieving a green economy in the EU through policy coherence and implementation. Copenhagen: European Topic Center on Sustainable Consumption and Production.
   Google Scholar
• Fridolfsson SO, Tangerås T. 2012. A reexamination of Renewable Electricity Policy in Sweden. Stockholm: Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN). Working Paper No. 921.
   Google Scholar
• GilliM, MazzantiM, NicolliF. 2013. Sustainability and competitiveness in evolutionary perspective: Environmental innovation, structural change and economics dynamics in the EU. J Behav Exp Econ. 45:204–215.
   Google Scholar
• GrubbM. 2012. Strengthening the EU-ETS. Creating a stable platform for EU energy investment. London: Climate Strategies.
   Google Scholar
• GrubbM. 2014. Planetary economics: energy, climate change and the three domains of sustainable development. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• HoffmannVH. 2007. EU ETS and investment decisions: the case of the German electricity industry. Europ Manag J.25(6):464–474.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett M, Del Rio P. 2013 Jun 28. Policy portfolios and their design: a meta-analysis. Paper presented at: 1st International Conference on Public Policy; Grenoble, France.
   Google Scholar
• [IEA] International Energy Agency. 2011. Complementing carbon pricing with energy efficiency policy. Paris: International Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• [IPCC] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Synthesis report on climate change2007.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2014. Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Working Group III Contribution to the IPCC 5th Assessment Report.
   Google Scholar
• [IRENA] International Renewable Energy Agency. 2014. Evaluating renewable energy policy: a review of criteria and indicators for assessment. Abu Dhabi (UAE): IRENA.
   Google Scholar
• [Istat] Italian National Institute of Statistics. 2012. La Tassazione ambientale in Italia – tavole (Environmental taxation in Italy – tables). Available from: www.istat.itRome: Istat.
   Google Scholar
• KlempererP. 2002. How (not) to run auctions: the European 3G telecom auctions. Eur Econ Rev.46:829–845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KnopfB, ChenY-HH, De CianE, FörsterH, KanudiaA, KarkatsouliI, KeppoI, KoljonenT, SchumacherK, van VuurenDP. 2013. Beyond 2020—strategies and costs for transforming the European energy system. Clim Change Econ.4(Suppl. 1):1–38.
   Google Scholar
• KolevA, RiessA. 2009. Europe's carbon emissions-trading scheme and its energy and industrial policy implications: heretical insights from basic economics. New York: MIMEO.
   Google Scholar
• LehmannP, GawelE. 2013. Why should support schemes for renewable electricity complement the EU emissions trading scheme?Energy Policy.52:597–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MarinG, MazzantiM. 2013. The evolution of environmental and labour productivity dynamics. J Evol Econ. 23(2):357–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MazzantiM, MontiniA. 2014. Waste management beyond the Italian North–South divide: spatial analyses of geographical, economic and institutional dimensions. In: KinnamanTCTakeuchiK, editors. Handbook on waste management. Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• MazzantiM, MontiniA, NicolliF. 2011. Embedding landfill diversion in economic, geographical and policy settings. Appl Econ.43:3299–3311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MazzantiM, ZoboliR. 2006. Economic instruments and induced innovation: the European policies on end-of-life vehicles. Ecol Econ.58(2):318–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MazzantiM, ZoboliR. 2013. Jul. Resource taxation and regional planning. J Environ Plan Manag.56(6):893–916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MitchellC, SawinJL, PokharelGR, KammenD, WangZ, FifitaS, JaccardM, LangnissO, LucasH, NadaiA, et al. 2011. Policy, financing and implementation. IPCC special report on renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. Available from: http://srren.ipcc-wg3.de/report/IPCC_SRREN_Ch11.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• MorganMG, KeithDW. 1995. Subjective judgments by climate experts. Environ Policy Anal.29:468–476.
   Google Scholar
• MundacaL. 2007. Transaction costs of Tradable White Certificate schemes: the Energy Efficiency Commitment as case study. Energy Policy.35(8):4340–4354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NappTA, GambhirA, HillsTP, FlorinN, FennellPS. 2014 Feb.A review of the technologies, economics and policy instruments for decarbonising energy-intensive manufacturing industries. Renew Sust Energ Rev.30:616–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NicolliF, MazzantiM. 2013. Landfill diversion in a decentralized setting: a dynamic assessment of landfill tax. Resour Conserv Recy.81:17–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NordhausWD. 1994. Expert opinion on climate change. Am Sci.82:45–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2013. Environmental performance review: Italy. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• ÖkoInstitut. 2012. Strengthening the European Union Emission Trading Scheme and raising climate ambition. Freiburg (Germany): ÖkoInstitut, WWF and Greenpeace.
   Google Scholar
• PearsonA. 2010. The carbon rich list: the companies profiting from the EU Emissions Trading Scheme. London (UK): Sandbag Climate Campaign.
   Google Scholar
• PhilibertC. 2011. Mar. Interactions of policies for renewable energy and climate. IEA Energy Paper. Available from: http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/oecieaaaa/2011_2f6-en.htmParis: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• PontoglioS. 2010. An early assessment of the influence on eco-innovation of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme – evidence from the Italian paper industry. In: MazzantiM, MontiniA, editors. Environmental efficiency, innovation and economic performance. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• RoggeK, SchneiderM, HoffmannV. 2011. The innovation impact of the EU Emission Trading System - findings of company case studies in the German power sector. Ecol Econ.70:513–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchmidtTS, SchneiderM, RoggeKS, SchuetzMJA, HoffmannVH. 2012. The effects of climate policy on the rate and direction of innovation: a survey of the EU ETS and the electricity sector. Environ Innov Soc Trans.2:23–48.
   Google Scholar
• SorrellS, HarrisonD, RadovD, KlevnasP, FossA. 2009. White certificate schemes: economic analysis and interactions with the EU ETS. Energy Policy.37:29–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ThemaJ, SuerkemperF, GraveK, AmelungA. 2013. The impact of electricity demand reduction policies on the EU-ETS: modelling electricity and carbon prices and the effect on industrial competitiveness. Energy Policy.60:656–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VarhoV, TapioP. 2013. Combining the qualitative and the quantitavive with the Q2 scenario technique – The case of transport and climate. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 80(4):611–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZubaryevaA, ThielC, BarboneE, MercierA. 2012. Assessing factors for the identification of potential lead markets for electrified vehicles in Europe: expert opinion elicitation. Technol Forecast Soc Change.79:1622–1637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar