Heterogeneous treatment effects in conditional cash transfer programmes: assessing the impact of Progresa on agricultural households

References

• Banerjee , A. and Duflo , E. 2008 . The experimental approach to development economics , Mimeo : MIT .
   Google Scholar
• Behrman , J. and Hoddinott , J. 2005 . Programme evaluation with unobserved heterogeneity and selective implementation: the Mexican PROGRESA impact on child nutrition . Oxford bulletin of economics and statistics , 67 ( 4 ) : 547 – 569 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin , D. 1992 . Household composition, labor markets, and labor demand: testing for separation in agricultural household models . Econometrica , 60 ( 2 ) : 287 – 322 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz , J.J. and Handa , S. 2006 . An assessment of propensity score matching as a nonexperimental impact estimator: evidence from Mexico's PROGRESA program . Journal of human resources , 41 ( 2 ) : 319 – 345 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Janvry , A. , Fafchamps , M. and Sadoulet , E. 1991 . Peasant household behavior with missing markets: some paradoxes explained . Economic journal , 101 : 1400 – 1417 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eswaran , M. and Kotwal , A. 1985 . A theory of two-tier labor markets in agrarian economies . American economic review , 75 : 162 – 177 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, V., 2005. Quinto Informe de Gobierno. http://www.informe.presidencia.gob.mx/index.php (http://www.informe.presidencia.gob.mx/index.php) (Accessed: 5 August 2010 ).
   Google Scholar
• Gertler , P. 2004 . Do conditional cash transfers improve child health? Evidence from PROGRESA's control randomized experiment . American economic review , 94 ( 2 ) : 336 – 341 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez , M. 2007 . Evaluating the transition out of staples by PROCAMPO recipients , Washington, DC : American University .
   Google Scholar
• Heckman , J. and Smith , J. 1995 . Assessing the case for social experiments . Journal of economic perspectives , 9 ( 2 ) : 85 – 100 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoddinott , J. and Skoufias , E. 2004 . The impact of PROGRESA on food consumption . Economic development and cultural change , 53 ( 1 ) : 37 – 61 . and
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maluccio , J.A. and Flores , R. 2005 . Impact evaluation of the pilot phase of the Nicaraguan Red de Protección Social , Washington, DC : International Food Policy Research Institute, Research Report No. 141 .
   Google Scholar
• PROCAMPO, 2002. Resultados principales del 3er trimestre del ano fiscal 2002. October. www.procampo.gob.mx (http://www.procampo.gob.mx) (Accessed: 5 August 2010 ).
   Google Scholar
• PROGRESA . 1998 . Metodologia para la Identificacion de los Hogares Beneficiarios del PROGRESA , Mexico : PROGRESA .
   Google Scholar
• Sadoulet , E. and de Janvry , A. 1995 . Quantitative development policy analysis , Baltimore, MD : Johns Hopkins University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Sadoulet , E. , de Janvry , A. and Davis , B. 2001 . Cash transfer program with income multiplier: PROCAMPO in Mexico . World development , 29 ( 6 ) : 1043 – 1056 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAGAR, 1998. PROCAMPO, 1994–1998. Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Rural Development. Claridades Agropecuarias, 64. http://www.infoaserca.gob.mx/claridades/revistas/064/ca064.pdf (http://www.infoaserca.gob.mx/claridades/revistas/064/ca064.pdf) (Accessed: 5 August 2010 ).
   Google Scholar
• Schultz , T.P. 2004 . School subsidies for the poor: evaluating the Mexican Progresa program . Journal of development economics , 74 ( 1 ) : 199 – 250 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh , I. , Squire , L. and Strauss , J. 1986 . Agricultural household models – extensions, applications and policy , Baltimore, MD : Johns Hopkins University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Skoufias , E. and McClafferty , B. 2001 . Is PROGRESA working? Summary of the results of an evaluation by IFPRI , Washington, DC : International Food Policy Research Institute, FCND Discussion Paper No. 118 .
   Google Scholar
• Skoufias , E. and Parker , S. 2001 . Conditional cash transfers and their impact on child work and schooling . Economia , 2 ( 1 ) : 45 – 86 .
   Google Scholar
• Skoufias , E. , Davis , B. and de la Vega , S. 2001 . Targeting the poor in Mexico: an evaluation of the selection of households into PROGRESA . World development , 29 ( 10 ) : 1769 – 1784 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stampini , M. and Davis , B. 2009 . Does off-farm labor release farming credit constraints? Evidence from longitudinal data for Vietnam . Agricultural economics , 40 : 177 – 188 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor , J.E. and Adelman , I. 2003 . Agricultural household models: genesis, evolution and extensions . Review of economics of the household , 1 : 33 – 58 .
   Google Scholar
• Yúnez-Naude , A. 2007 . Evaluacion del Impacto PROCAMPO y Propuesta de Reformas al sistema de apoyos agropecuarios , Report submitted to the Inter-American Development Bank .
   Google Scholar