References
- Alford, C. 2017. “Two Approaches for Combining Theories of Change and System Maps.” In Too Deep (blog).Accessed 8 September, 2017. https://blog.kumu.io/two-approaches-for-combining-theories-of-change-and-system-maps-5b556091c880
- Attanasio, O., D. Blair, and S. Krutikova. 2018. Structural Modelling in Policy Making. CEDIL. accessed 27 March, 2018. https://cedilprogramme.org/structural-modelling-policy-making/.
- BigML. n.d. https://bigml.com/
- Borgatti, S. P., M. G. Everett, and J. C. Johnson. 2018. Analyzing Social Networks. Los Angeles, Calif.: Sage.
- Campbell, N., E. Schiffer, A. Buxbaum, E. McLean, C. Perry, and T. M. Sullivan. 2014. “Taking Knowledge for Health the Extra Mile: Participatory Evaluation of a Mobile Phone Intervention for Community Health Workers in Malawi.” Global Health: Science and Practice 2 (1): 23–34. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00141.
- Cartwright, N. 2017. Evidence for Policy Prediction: Intervention-Centred or Context-Centred? In: LSHTM. https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/newsevents/events/evidence-policy-prediction-intervention-centred-or-context-centred (accessed 23 March, 2018).
- Cartwright, N., and J. Hardie. 2012. Evidence-Based Policy: Doing It Better. A Practical Guide to Predicting if A Policy Will Work for You. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199841608.001.000.
- TOCO Software. n.d. TOCO Software | Theory of Change Community. accessed June 25, 2016, http://www.theoryofchange.org/TOCO-software/
- Changeroo. n.d. accessed 16 March, 2018, https://www.changeroo.com/
- Coleman, G. 1987. “The Logical Framework Approach to the Monitoring and Evaluation of Agricultural and Rural Development Projects.” Project Appraisal 2 (4): 251–259. doi:10.1080/02688867.1987.9726638.
- Compasss bibliography. accessed February 1, 2018, http://www.compasss.org/bibliography/allApp.htm
- Davies, R. 2004. “Scale, Complexity and the Representation of Theories of Change.” Evaluation 10 (1): 101–121. doi:10.1177/1356389004043124.
- Davies, R. 2005. “Scale, Complexity and the Representation of Theories of Change Part II.” Evaluation 11 (2): 133–149. doi:10.1177/1356389005055528.
- Davies, R. 2013. Planning Evaluability Assessments: A Synthesis of the Literature with Recommendations. Report of a Study Commissioned by the Department for International Development. DFID Working paper 48. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/248656/wp40-planning-eval-assessments.pdf
- Davies, R. 2016a. “And Then a Miracle Happens (Or Two or Three)” Rick on the Road blog. http://mandenews.blogspot.com.au/2016/10/and-then-miracle-happens-or-two-or-three.html
- Davies, R. 2016b. “Evaluating the Impact of Flexible Development Interventions Using a ‘Loose’ Theory of Change: Reflections on the Australia-Mekong Ngo Engagement Platform.” ODI Methods Lab. https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/resource-documents/10361.pdf.
- Davies, R. 2018. EvalC3. Cambridge, UK. (accessed 21 August 2018).. https://evalc3.net/
- Degrees of Change. 2014. Theory of Change. https://www.degreesofchange.org/approach/theory/
- DFID. 2011. Guidance on Using the Revised Logical Framework. London: DFID. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/253889/using-revised-logical-framework-external.pdf.
- DFID. 2017. Logical Framework 204019, South Sudan Humanitarian Programme (HARISS) 2014-2020 [GB-1-204019]. http://iati.dfid.gov.uk/iati_documents/5327724.xlsx.
- DFID. 2018. Global Learning for Adaptive Management (GLAM) [GB-1-205148]. https://devtracker.dfid.gov.uk/projects/GB-1-205148
- DFID. 2012. Roads in the East in the Democratic Republic of Congo Phase I. Business Case and Summary 203164. http://iati.dfid.gov.uk/iati_documents/3716982.odt
- Dhillon, L., and S. Vaca. 2018. “Refining Theories of Change.” Journal of Multi-Disciplinary Evaluation 14 (30): 64–87.
- DoView – Visualising Outcomes. n.d. accessed June 25, 2016. http://doview.com/
- Dunford, C. 2013, June 28. Building a Theory of Change Evidence Project. http://microfinanceandworldhunger.org/2013/06/wrap-up-of-the-evidence-project-building-a-theory-of-change/
- FCMappers! n.d. Available at: http://www.fcmappers.net/joomla/ (accessed 15 February 2018).
- Felix, G., G. Nápoles, R. Falcon, W. Froelich, K. Vanhoof, and R. Bello. 2017. “A Review on Methods and Software for Fuzzy Cognitive Maps.” Artificial Intelligence Review, August, 1–31. doi:10.1007/s10462-017-9575-1.
- Funnell, S. C., and P. J. Rogers. 2011. Purposeful Program Theory: Effective Use of Theories of Change and Logic Models. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
- Goertz, G., and J. Mahoney. 2012. A Tale of Two Cultures: Qualitative and Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences. Woodstock: Princeton University Press. http://www.amazon.co.uk/Tale-Two-Cultures-Qualitative-Quantitative/dp/0691149712/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1353850106&sr=8-1.
- Gonzalo N, Leon M, Grau I, et al. n.d. FCM Expert - Experimenting tool for fuzzy cognitive maps. Accessed 15 February 2018.http://www.fcmexpert.net/
- Gough, D. 2018. Causal Chain Analysis in Systematic Reviews of International Development Interventions. Draft paper presented at CEDIL Inception Paper Launch, London.
- Gray, S, Gray, S, Kok D, et al. 2015. “Using Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping as a Participatory Approach to Analyze Change, Preferred States, and Perceived Resilience of Social-Ecological Systems”. Ecology and Society. 20(2): doi:10.5751/ES-07396-200211. https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol20/iss2/art11/
- Green, D. 2011. From Poverty to Power blog postings (10) Search result. http://oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/?s=%22theory+of+change%22
- Green, D. 2012 May 14. Theories of Change = Logframes on Steroids? A Discussion with DFID | From Poverty to Power. http://www.oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/?p=10071
- Gregor, B. 2017. Using Fuzzy Cognitive Maps to Model Policy Issues in the Face of Uncertainty and Limited Data. Oregon Systems Analytics. Accessed 14 February 2018. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1114&context=trec_seminar.
- Haiku Analytics. 2018. Logic Models and Complex System Mapping for Evaluation, Performance Measurement and Planning. http://haikuanalytics.com/dynamic-system-mapping/
- Harloff, J., and A. P. M. Coxon. 2007. How to Sort; A Short Guide on Sorting Investigations. (accessed 24 October, 2012). http://methodofsorting.com/HowToSort1-1_english.pdf.
- Huang, S.-C., S.-L. Lo, and Y.-C. Lin. 2013. “Application of a Fuzzy Cognitive Map Based on a Structural Equation Model for the Identification of Limitations to the Development of Wind Power.” Energy Policy 63: 851–861. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.09.012.
- IMET. 2009. A Review of SISKES (Improvement of the District Health System in Nusa Tenggara Timur (NTT) and Nusa Tenggara Barat (NTB)). Unpublished
- Intelligence, S. 2018. Evaluation of DCLG’s ‘Our Place’ programme. https://sharedintelligence.net/our-work/locality/
- ITAD. 2016. Evaluation of Humanitarian Innovation Evidence Programme (HIEP). https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/590702/Evaluation-of-Humanitarian-Innovation-Evidence-Programme-HIEP.pdf
- James, C. 2011, September. Theory of Change Review. A Report Commissioned by Comic Relief. http://www.theoryofchange.org/pdf/James_Theory of Change.pdf
- JSI Research & Training Institute Inc. 2016. Theory of Change for the Supply Chain for Community Case Management Project. http://1rqxbs47ujl4rdy6q3nzf554.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Theory-of-Change-Model.pdf
- Kadushin, C. 2013. Understanding Social Networks. Theories, Concepts And Findings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Klein, M. 09 March, 2018. Personal communication reChangeroo.com.
- Kumu n.d. Available at: https://kumu.io/[ Accessed Date Accessed].
- Lee, S., and H. Ahn. 2009. “Fuzzy Cognitive Map Based on Structural Equation Modeling for the Design of Controls in Business-To-Consumer E-Commerce Web-Based Systems.” Expert Systems with Applications 36 (7): 10447–10460. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2009.01.070.
- Levinton, R. 2015. Using Theory of Change in Evaluating Community Coalitions and Collaboratives. http://aea365.org/blog/cp-tig-week-rachel-leventon-on-using-theory-of-change-in-evaluating-community-coalitions-and-collaboratives/
- Maio, C. De, A. Botti, G. Fenza, A. Tommasetti, O. Troisi, and M. Vesci. 2015.What-If Analysis Combining Fuzzy Cognitive Map and Structural Equation Modeling. In: 2015 Conference on Technologies and Applications of Artificial Intelligence (TAAI), 89–96. doi: 10.1109/TAAI.2015.7407094
- MandE NEWS. 2007–17. Responses to the Logical Framework: An Online Survey. Results: https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-LQG6XCM58/
- Marks, P. 2015. How Creative Computers Will Dream up Things We’d Never Imagine. New Scientist. Available at https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22730360-400-how-creative-computers-will-dream-up-things-wed-never-imagine/. Accessed 15 February, 2018.
- Mayne, J. 2015. “Useful Theory of Change Models.” Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation 30 (2): 119–142. doi:10.3138/cjpe.30.2.
- Modeler, M. n.d. What is Mental Modeler. http://www.mentalmodeler.org
- OECD. 2010. Glossary of Key Terms in Evaluation and Results Based Management. Accessed June 24, 2016, https://www.oecd.org/dac/evaluation/2754804.pdf
- Pabari, M. 2008. Logic beyond the Logical Framework? In: Managing for Impact. Available at: Accessed 21 August, 2018.https://mande4mfi.wordpress.com/2008/04/26/logic-beyond-the-logical-framework/
- Papageorgiou, E. n.d. FCM Wizard. Available at: http://epapageorgiou.com/fcm-wizard/accessed 15 February, 2018.
- Papageorgiou, E. I., and J. L. Salmeron. 2013. “Review Study on Fuzzy Cognitive Maps and Their Applications during the Last Decade.” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 21 (1): 66–79. doi:10.1109/TFUZZ.2012.2201727.
- Positive Deviance Initiative. n.d. https://positivedeviance.org/
- Rapid Miner Studio. n.d. https://rapidminer.com/products/studio/
- Rihoux, B., and C. C. Ragin, Eds. 2009. Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. Thousand Oaks, Calif. [u.a.]: Sage.
- RISE Theory of Change. 2008. Accessed June 24, 2016, http://cmap.cinted.ufrgs.br/servlet/SBReadResourceServlet?rid=1JB01RQKZ-4JMHT9-2L7&partName=htmltext
- Roche, C. J. R. 1999. Impact Assessment For Development Agencies: Learning To Value Change. Oxford: Oxfam.
- Roche, C. J. R., 2018. Personal communication, accessed 23 Auguest, 2018
- Rogers, P. 2014. Theory of Change. Methodological Briefs Impact Evaluation No. 2. UNICEF. http://devinfolive.info/impact_evaluation/img/downloads/Theory_of_Change_ENG.pdf.
- Rondinelli, D. A. 1993. Development Projects as Policy Experiments: An Adaptive Approach to Development Administration. London: Routledge.
- Scriven, M. 1991. “Prose and Cons about Goal-Free Evaluation.” American Journal of Evaluation 12 (1): 55–62. doi:10.1177/109821409101200108.
- Shaw, A. 2018. Personal communication. accessed 23 April, 2018
- Stein, D., and C. Valters. 2012. Understanding Theory in Change in International Development. London: Asia Foundation. http://www2.lse.ac.uk/internationalDevelopment/research/JSRP/downloads/JSRP1.SteinValters.pdf
- Sustainable Sanitation and Water Management 2018. Toolbox. http://www.sswm.info/sites/default/files/toolbox/EC%202004%202%20Example%20of%20a%20Objective%20Tree.jpg
- Theory Maker. n.d. accessed http://theorymaker.info/
- TOCO Software. n.d. Accessed 1 January 2018 http://TheoryofChangeo.actknowledge.org/aboutus.php
- Toulmin, S. 1953. An Introduction To The Philosophy Of Science. London.
- UNDG. 2017. Theory of Change - UNDAF Companion Guidance. New York: UNDG. https://undg.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Theory-of-Change-UNDAF-Companion-Pieces.pdf
- Valters, C. 2014. Theories of Change in International Development: Communication, Learning or Accountability? The Asia Foundation. http://www.lse.ac.uk/internationalDevelopment/research/JSRP/downloads/JSRP17.Valters.pdf
- Valters, C. 2015. “Theories of Change: Time for a Radical Approach to Learning in Development.” ODI. https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/9835.pdf.
- Van Es, M., I. Guijt, and I. Vogel. 2015. Theory of Change Thinking in Practice. New York: HIVOS. http://www.theoryofchange.nl/sites/default/files/resource/hivos_TheoryofChange_guidelines_final_nov_2015.pdf.
- Vogel, I. 2012. Review of the Use of ‘Theory of Change’ in International Development. Review Report. DFID. (accessed 11 July, 2012). http://www.dfid.gov.uk/r4d/pdf/outputs/mis_spc/DFID_TheoryofChange_Review_VogelV7.pdf.
- Vogel, I. 2012b. ESPA guide to working with Theory of Change for research projects. LTS/ITAD for ESPA. http://www.espa.ac.uk/files/espa/ESPA-Theory-of-Change-Manual-FINAL.pdf
- Wang, C.-H. 2011. “Using Fuzzy Cognitive Map and Structural Equation Model for Market-Oriented Hotel and Performance.” AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT 5: 28. doi:10.5897/AJBM11.197.
- Weiss, C. 1995. “Nothing as Practical as Good Theory: Exploring Theory-Based Evaluation for Comprehensive Community Initiatives for Children and Families” In New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives, edited by James P. Connell, 65–92. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute. http://www.seachangecop.org/sites/default/files/documents/1995%20Aspen%20New%20Approaches%20to%20Evaluating%20Community%20Initiatives.pdf
- Wiggins, S., and D. Shields. 1995. “Clarifying the ‘Logical Framework’ as a Tool for Planning and Managing Development Projects.” Project Appraisal 10 (1): 2–12. doi:10.1080/02688867.1995.9726968.
- Wikipedia. 2018. Minimum Spanning Tree. (accessed 21 August, 2018) https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Minimum_spanning_tree&oldid=845161708.
- Woolcock, M. 2009. Towards A Plurality of Methods in Project Evaluation: A Contextualised Approach to Understanding Impact Trajectories and Efficacy. SSRN Scholarly Paper, Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Accessed 28 June 2016. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1407981.
- yWorks, the diagramming company. n.d. Accessed 25 June 2016, http://www.yworks.com/yed