References
- Abadie, A., S. Athey, G. W. Imbens, and J. Wooldridge. 2017. “When Should You Adjust Standard Errors for Clustering?.” NBER Working Paper 24003, November.
- Alvarez, C., F. Devoto, and P. Winters. 2008. “Why Do Beneficiaries Leave the Safety Net in Mexico? A Study of the Effects of Conditionality on Dropouts.” World Development 36 (4): 641–658. April. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.04.014.
- Araujo, M. C., M. Bosch, and N. Schady. 2018. “Can Cash Transfers Help Households Escape an Inter-Generational Poverty Trap?” Chapter 10 In The Economics of Poverty Traps, edited by C. B. Barrett, M. R. Carter and J. P. Chavas. University of Chicago Press.
- Attanasio, O., and S. Espinosa. 2010. “Informe sobre Impactos de la Estimación de Modelos Estructurales.” Unpublished manuscript, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública and Centro de Investigación en Evaluación y Encuestas, México.
- Baird, S., C. McIntosh, and B. Ozler. 2011. “Cash or Condition? Evidence from a Cash Transfer Experiment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 126 (4): 1709–1753. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr032.
- Bassi, M., M. Busso, and J. S. Muñoz. 2013. “Is the Glass Half Empty or Half Full? School Enrollment, Graduation, and Dropout Rates in Latin America.” IDB Working Paper Series No. IDB-WP-462: 1–35. October.
- Behrman, J. R., S. W. Parker, and P. E. Todd. 2009. “Schooling Impacts of Conditional Cash Transfers on Young Children: Evidence from Mexico.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 57 (3): 439–477. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/596614.
- Behrman, J. R., S. W. Parker, and P. E. Todd. 2011. “Do Conditional Cash Transfers for Schooling Generate Lasting Benefits? Five-year Follow-up of Progresa/Oportunidades.” Journal of Human Resources 46 (1): 93–122. doi:https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.46.1.93.
- Cox, D. R. 1972. “Regression Models and Life-Tables.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 34 (2): 187–220.
- Dávila-Lárraga, L. 2016. “How Does Prospera Work? Best Practices in the Implementation of Conditional Cash Transfer Programs in Latin America and the Caribbean.” IDB Technical Note IDB-TN-971: 1–99. April.
- De Hoyos, R., O. Attanasio, and C. Meghir. 2019. “Targeting High School Scholarships to the Poor: The Impact of a Program in Mexico.” NBER Working Paper 26023.
- De Janvry, A., and E. Sadoulet. 2006. “Making Conditional Cash Transfer Programs More Efficient: Designing for Maximum Effect of the Conditionality.” The World Bank Economic Review 20 (1): 1–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhj002.
- Dustan, A. 2020. “Can Large, Untargeted Conditional Cash Transfers Increase Urban High School Graduation Rates? Eviddence from Mexico City’s Prepa Si.” Journal of Development Economics 143: 102392. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2019.102392.
- Espinosa, S. 2014. “Intended and Unintended Incentives in Social Protection Programmes: Evidence from Colombia and Mexico.” Doctoral thesis, University College London.
- Ferreyra, M., C. Avitabile, J. Botero Álvarez, F. Haimovich Paz, and S. Urzúa. 2017. At a Crossroads: Higher Education in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, Dc: World Bank.
- Filmer, D., and N. Schady. 2008. “Getting Girls into School: Evidence from a Scholarship Program in Cambodia.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 56: 581–617. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/533548.
- Filmer, D., and N. Schady. 2011. “Does More Cash in Conditional Cash Transfer Programs Always Lead to Larger Impacts on School Attendance?” Journal of Development Economics 96 (1): 150–157. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2010.05.006.
- Garcia, S., and J. Saavedra. 2017. “Educational Impacts of Cost-effectiveness of Cash Transfer Programs in Developing Countries: A Meta-analysis.” Review of Educational Research 87 (5): 921–965. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317723008.
- González-Flores, M., M. Heracleous, and P. Winters. 2012. “Leaving the Safety Net: An Analysis of Dropouts in an Urban Conditional Cash Transfer Program.” World Development 40 (12): 2505–2521. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.05.020.
- Hungerford, T., and G. Solon. 1987. “Sheepskin Effects in the Returns to Education.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 69 (1): 175–177. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1937919.
- INEE (Instituto Nacional para la Evaluación de la Educación (México)). 2014. “Panorama Educativo de México Indicadores del Sistema Educativo Nacional 2009 Educación Media Superior.” http://publicaciones.inee.edu.mx/buscadorPub/P1/B/112/P1B112.pdf
- INEE (Instituto Nacional para la Evaluación de la Educación (México)). 2016. “La educación obligatoria en México. Informe 2016.” http://publicaciones.inee.edu.mx/buscadorPub/P1/I/241/P1I241.pdf
- Jaeger, D., and M. Page. 1996. “Degrees Matter: New Evidence on Sheepskin Effects in the Returns to Education.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 78 (5): 733–740. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2109960.
- Masino, S., and M. Niño-Zarazúa. 2018. “Improving Financial Inclusion through the Delivery of Cash Transfer Programmes: The Case of Mexico’s Progresa-Oportunidades-Prospera Programme.” The Journal of Development Studies. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2018.1546845.
- Molina-Millan, T., K. Macours, J. Maluccio, and L. Tejerina. 2020. “Experimental Long-term Effects of Early-childhood and School-age Exposure to a Conditional Cash Transfer Program.” Journal of Development Economics 143: 102385. March. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2019.102385.
- Molina-Millan, T., T. Barham, K. Macours, J. A. Maluccio, and M. Stampini. 2019. “Long-Term Impacts of Conditional Cash Transfers in Latin America: Review of the Evidence.” The World Bank Research Observer 34 (1): 119–159. February. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lky005.
- Mora Rodríguez, J. J., and J. Muro. 2015. “On the Size of Sheepskin Effects: A Meta-analysis.” Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal 9 (37): 1–18.
- Oportunidades. 2009. “Lineamientos del Modelo Alternativo de Gestión y Atención del Programa Oportunidades en Zonas Urbanas para el ejercicio fiscal 2010.” Approved during the 8th Extraordinary Session of the National Coordination Technical Committee, February 11, Mexico D.F.
- Todd, P. E., and K. Wolpin. 2006. “Assessing the Impact of a School Subsidy Program in Mexico: Using a Social Experiment to Validate a Dynamic Behavioral Model of Child Schooling and Fertility.” American Economic Review 96 (5): 1384–1417. doi:https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.96.5.1384.
- World Bank. 2021a. “Primary completion rate, total (% of relevant age group) - Latin America & Caribbean”. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.PRM.CMPT.ZS?locations=ZJ. Accessed March 1, 2021.
- World Bank. 2021b. “Lower secondary completion rate, total (% of relevant age group) - Latin America & Caribbean” https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.SEC.CMPT.LO.ZS?locations=ZJ. Accessed March 1, 2021.