Advanced search
Publication Cover
Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A Volume 33, 2016 - Issue 7
Submit an article Journal homepage
568
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Risk-based approach to developing a national residue sampling plan for testing under European Union regulation for veterinary medicinal products and coccidiostat feed additives in domestic animal production

Martin DanaherFood Safety Department, Teagasc Food Research Centre, Dublin, Ireland
,
Conor ShanahanUCD School of Biosystems and Food Engineering, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
,
Francis ButlerUCD School of Biosystems and Food Engineering, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
,
Rhodri EvansFood Science and Standards Division, Food Safety Authority of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
,
Dan O’SullivanDepartment of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Celbridge, Ireland
,
Denise GlynnMarine Environment and Food Safety Services, Marine Institute, Oranmore, Ireland
,
Tim CamonFood Science and Standards Division, Food Safety Authority of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
,
Peadar LawlorTeagasc, Pig Development Department, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Fermoy, Ireland
&
Michael O’KeeffeFood Science and Standards Division, Food Safety Authority of Ireland, Dublin, IrelandCorrespondence[email protected]
 show all
Pages 1155-1165 | Received 23 Mar 2016, Accepted 09 May 2016, Published online: 07 Jun 2016

References

  • Clare G, Price S, 2012, Matrix ranking for prioritising testing of veterinary medicine residues, Veterinary Residues Committee, VRC. Poster presented at the British Toxicology Society Annual Congress, March 2012.
  • Council of the European Union. 1996. Council directive 96/23/EC of 29 April 1996 to monitor certain substances and residues thereof in live animals and animal products and repealing Directives 85/358/EEC and 86/469/EEC and Decisions 89/187/EEC and 91/664/EEC. Off J Eur Union. L 125, 23.5.1996:10–32.
  • Council of the European Union. 2003. Regulation (EC) No. 1831/2003 of the European Parliament and of the council of 22 September 2003 on additives for use in animal nutrition. Off J Eur Union. L 268, 18.10.2003:29–43.
  • Danaher M. 2011. National food residue database – technology update. Teagasc; [cited 2016 Feb 21]. Available from: www.teagasc.ie/publications/2009/1226/National-food-residue-database_5640.pdf
  • Danaher M, Jordan K. 2014. Safe and healthy foods – technology update, Teagasc; [cited 2016 Feb 21]. Available from: www.teagasc.ie/publications/…/5856_Safety_and_Healthy_Foods.pdf
  • EFSA. 2011. EFSA panels on biological hazards (BIOHAZ), on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM), and on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW); Scientific Opinion on the public health hazards to be covered by inspection of meat (swine). EFSA J 2011. 9:2351, 198 pp.
  • EFSA. 2012. EFSA panels on biological hazards (BIOHAZ), on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM), and on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW); Scientific Opinion on the public health hazards to be covered by inspection of meat (poultry). EFSA J 2012. 10:2741, 179 pp.
  • EFSA. 2013a. EFSA BIOHAZ Panel (EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards). Scientific opinion on the public health hazards to be covered by inspection of meat (solipeds). EFSA J 2013. 11:3263, 161 pp.
  • EFSA. 2013b. EFSA BIOHAZ Panel (EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards). Scientific opinion on the public health hazards to be covered by inspection of meat from farmed game. EFSA J 2013. 11:3264, 181 pp.
  • EFSA. 2013c. EFSA BIOHAZ Panel (EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards). Scientific opinion on the public health hazards to be covered by inspection of meat from sheep and goats. EFSA J 2013. 11:3265, 186 pp.
  • EFSA. 2013d. EFSA BIOHAZ Panel (EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards). Scientific opinion on the public health hazards to be covered by inspection of meat (bovine animals). EFSA J 2013. 11:3266, 261 pp.
  • European Commission. 2003. Enterprise Directorate-General/Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General, Reflection Paper on Residues in foodstuffs of animal origin. Brussels: DG Health and Food Safety; 20 pp. Available from: ec.europa.eu/health/veterinary-use/maximum-residue-limits/reflection-paper_en.htm
  • European Commission. 2004. Enterprise Directorate-General/Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General, Reflection Paper on Residues in foodstuffs of animal origin – Summary of comments. Brussels: DG Health and Food Safety; 8 pp. Available from: ec.europa.eu/health/veterinary-use/maximum-residue-limits/reflection-paper_en.htm
  • European Commission. 2012a. Commission Implementing regulation (EU) No. 201/2012 of 8 March 2012 amending the annex to regulation (EU) No. 37/2010 on pharmacologically active substances and their classification regarding maximum residue limits in foodstuffs of animal origin, as regards the substance nitroxinil. Off J Eur Union. L71, 09.03.2012:37–39.
  • European Commission. 2012b. Commission Implementing regulation (EU) No. 221/2012 of 14 March 2012 amending the annex to regulation (EU) No. 37/2010 on pharmacologically active substances and their classification regarding maximum residue limits in foodstuffs of animal origin, as regards the substance closantel. Off J Eur Union. L75, 15.03.2012:7–9.
  • European Commission. 2010. Commission Regulation no 37/2010 of 22 December 2009 on pharmacologically active substances and their classification regarding maximum residue limits in foodstuffs of animal origin. Off J Eur Union. L 15, 20.1.2010:1–72.
  • Food Safety and Inspection Service, USDA. 2011. United States National Residue Program - 2011 Scheduled Sampling Plans. Washington (DC): USDA FSIS Office of Public Health Service; p. 18–45.
  • Food Safety Authority of Ireland. 2011. Report on a Total Diet Study carried out by the Food Safety Authority of Ireland in the period 2001 – 2005. Dublin: Food Safety Authority of Ireland; 120 pp.
  • Hanlon PR, Hlywka JJ, And Scimeca JA. 2015. A risk-based strategy for controlling chemical contaminants as relevant hazards in food ingredients. Food Protect Trend. 35:89–100.
  • Veterinary Residues Committee. 2011. Annual Report on Surveillance for Veterinary Residues in Food in the UK 2010. Surrey: Veterinary Residues Committee; p. 42–44, 50.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.