Urinary signature of pig carcasses with boar taint by liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry

References

• Ampuero Kragten S, Verkuylen B, Dahlmans H, Hortos M, García-Regueiro JA, Dahl E, Andresen O, Feitsma H, Mathur PK, Harlizius B. 2011. Inter-laboratory comparison of methods to measure androstenone in pork fat. Animal. 5:1634–1642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonneau M, Chevillon P. 2012. Acceptability of entire male pork with various levels of androstenone and skatole by consumers according to their sensitivity to androstenone. Meat Sci. 90:330–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonneau M, Kempster AJ, Claus R, Claudi-Magnussen C, Diestre A, Tornberg E, Walstra P, Chevillon P, Weiler U, Cook GL. 2000a. An international study on the importance of androstenone and skatole for boar taint: I. Presentation of the programme and measurement of boar taint compounds with different analytical procedures. Meat Sci. 54:251–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonneau M, Squires EJ. 2000. Use of entires males for pig production. 1. International virtual conference on pork quality, Concordia, BRA (2000-12-12) Santa Catarina, BRA (2000-12-12). Available from: http://prodinra.inra.fr/record/69931
   Google Scholar
• Bonneau M, Walstra P, Claudi-Magnussen C, Kempster AJ, Tornberg E, Fischer K, Diestre A, Siret F, Chevillon P, Claus R, et al. 2000b. An international study on the importance of androstenone and skatole for boar taint: IV. Simulation studies on consumer dissatisfaction with entire male pork and the effect of sorting carcasses on the slaughter line, main conclusions and recommendations. Meat Sci. 54: 285–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brereton RG. 2000. Introduction to multivariate calibration in analytical chemistry. Analyst. 125:2125–2154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunius C, Vidanarachchi JK, Tomankova J, Lundstrom K, Andersson K, Zamaratskaia G. 2016. Skatole metabolites in urine as a biological marker of pigs with enhanced hepatic metabolism. Animal. 15:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Buttinger G, Karasek L, Verlinde P, Wenzl T. 2014. In house validation of a reference method for the determination of boar taint compounds by LC-MSMS. Publications Office of the European Union.Available from: http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC88197/jrc_val_meth_rep_boar%20taint%20lc%20fin.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Buttinger G, Wenzl T. 2014. Inter-laboratory validation of a reference method for the determination of boar taint compounds by GC-MS and LC-MSMS, EUR 26712 EN.
   Google Scholar
• Bylesjo M, Rantalainen M, Cloarec O, Nicholson JK, Holmes E, Trygg J. 2006. OPLS discriminant analysis: combining the strengths of PLS-DA and SIMCA classification. J Chemometr. 20:341–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courant F, Antignac J, Dervilly-Pinel G, Le Bizec B. 2014. Basics of mass spectrometry based metabolomics. Proteomics. 14:2369–2388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EFSA. 2004. Welfare aspects of the castration of piglets. EFSA J. 91:1–18.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2010. European Declaration on alternatives to surgical castration of pigs. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/food/sites/food/files/animals/docs/aw_prac_farm_pigs_cast-alt_declaration_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Haugen J-E, Brunius C, Zamaratskaia G. 2012. Review of analytical methods to measure boar taint compounds in porcine adipose tissue: the need for harmonised methods. Meat Sci. 90:9–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen MT, Cox RP, Jensen BB. 1995. Microbial-production of skatole in the hind gut of pigs given different diets and its relation to skatole deposition in backfat. J Animal Sci. 61:293–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu X, Zhao X, Bai C, Zhao C, Lu G, Xu G. 2008. LC-MS-based metabonomics analysis. J Chromatogr B. 866:64–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundström K, Bonneau M. 1996. Off flavour in meat with particular emphasis on boar taint. In: Taylor S, Raimundo A, Severini M, Smulders FJM, editors. Meat quality and meat packaging. ECCEAMST. Utrecht (The Netherlands): Wageningen Academic; p. 137–154.
   Google Scholar
• Lundström K, Matthews KR, Haugen J-E. 2009. Pig meat quality from entire males. Animal. 3:1497–1507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahadevan S, Shah SL, Marrie TJ, Slupsky CM. 2008. Analysis of Metabolomic Data Using Support Vector Machines. Anal Chem. 80:7562–7570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGlone JJ, Nicholson RI, Hellman JM, Herzog DN. 1993. The development of pain in young pigs associated with castration and attemps to prevent castration-induced behavioral changes. J Animal Sci. 71:1441–1446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier-Dinkel L, Sharifi AR, Tholen E, Frieden L, Bücking M, Wicke M, Mörlein D. 2013a. Sensory evaluation of boar loins: Trained assessors’ olfactory acuity affects the perception of boar taint compounds. Meat Sci. 94:19–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier-Dinkel L, Trautmann J, Frieden L, Tholen E, Knorr C, Sharifi AR, Bücking M, Wicke M, Mörlein D. 2013b. Consumer perception of boar meat as affected by labelling information, malodorous compounds and sensitivity to androstenone. Meat Sci. 93:248–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mörlein D, Meier-Dinkel L, Moritz J, Sharifi AR, Knorr C. 2013. Learning to smell: Repeated exposure increases sensitivity to androstenone, a major component of boar taint. Meat Sci. 94:425–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson RLS. 1968. 5-alpha-androst-16-ene-3-one: compound responsible for taint in boar fat. J Sci Food and Agric. 19:31–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauly C, Spring P, O’Doherty JV, Kragten SA, Bee G. 2008. Performances, meat quality and boar taint of castrates and entire male pigs fed a standard and a raw potato starch-enriched diet. Animal. 2:1707–1715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauly C, Spring-Staehli P, O’Doherty JV, Kragten SA, Dubois S, Messadène J, Bee G. 2010. The effects of method of castration, rearing condition and diet on sensory quality of pork assessed by a trained panel. Meat Sci. 86:498–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed HCB, Melrose DR, Patterson RLS. 1974. Androgen steroids as an aid to the detection of oestrus in pig artificial insemination. Brit Vet J. 130:61–67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rius MA, Hortós M, García-Regueiro JA. 2005. Influence of volatile compounds on the development of off-flavours in pig back fat samples classified with boar taint by a test panel. Meat Sci. 71:595–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rius Solé MA, García Regueiro JA. 2001. Role of 4-phenyl-3-buten-2-one in boar taint: identification of new compounds related to sensorial descriptors in pig fat. J Agric Food Chem. 49:5303–5309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salek RM, Steinbeck C, Viant MR, Goodacre R, Dunn WB. 2013. The role of reporting standards for metabolite annotation and identification in metabolomic studies. GigaScience. 2:1–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith CA, Want EJ, O’Maille G, Abagyan R, Siuzdak G. 2006. XCMS: Processing mass spectrometry data for metabolite profiling using nonlinear peak alignment, matching and identification. Anal Chem. 78:779–787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tautenhahn R, Bottcher C, Neumann S. 2008. Highly sensitive feature detection for high resolution LC/MS. BMC Bioinformatics. [updated 2008 Nov 28; cited 2028 Nov 2008];9:504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor AA, Weary DM, Lessard M, Braithwaite LA. 2001. Behavioural responses of piglets to castration: the effect of piglet age. App Animal Behav Sci. 73:35–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trautmann J, Meier-Dinkel L, Gertheiss J, Mörlein D. 2016. Boar taint detection: A comparison of three sensory protocols. Meat Sci. 111:92–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trygg J. 2002. O2-PLS for qualitative and quantitative analysis in multivariate calibration. J Chemometr. 16:283–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wauters J, Vanden Bussche J, Verplanken K, Bekaert KM, Aluwe M, Van den Broeke A, Cousse A, Buys N, Vanhaecke L. 2015. Development of a quantitative method for the simultaneous analysis of the boar taint compounds androstenone, skatole and indole in porcine serum and plasma by means of ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled to high resolution mass spectrometry. Food Chem. 187:120–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerhuis JA, Hoefsloot HCJ, Smit S, Vis DJ, Smilde AK, van Velzen EJJ, van Duijnhoven JPM, van Dorsten FA. 2008. Assessment of PLSDA cross validation. Metabolomics. 4:81–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiklund S, Johansson E, Sjöström L, Mellerowicz EJ, Edlund U, Shockcor JP, Gottfries J, Moritz T, Trygg J. 2008. Visualization of GC/TOF-MS-based metabolomics data for identification of biochemically interesting compounds using OPLS class models. Anal Chem. 80:115–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamaratskaia G, Rydhmer L, Chen G, Madej A, Andersson HK, Lundstrom K. 2005. Boar taint is related to endocrine and anatomical changes at puberty but not to aggressive behaviour in entire male pigs. Reprod Domestic Animals. 40:500–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar