Encapsulated whey–native yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus as a feed additive for animal production

References

• Abdelaal MY, Sobahi TR, Al-Shareef HF. 2013. Modification of chitosan derivatives of environmental and biological interest: a green chemistry approach. Int J Biol Macromol. 55:231–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anadón A, Rosa Martínez-Larrañaga M, Aranzazu Martínez M. 2006. Probiotics for animal nutrition in the European Union. Regulation and safety assessment. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 45:91–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aranaz I, Mengíbar M, Harris R, Paños I, Miralles B, Acosta N, Galed G, Heras A. 2009. Functional characterization of chitin and chitosan. Curr Chem Biol. 3:203–230.
   Google Scholar
• Benhabiles MS, Salah R, Lounici H, Drouiche N, Goosen MFA, Mameri N. 2012. Antibacterial activity of chitin, chitosan and its oligomers prepared from shrimp shell waste. Food Hydrocoll. 29:48–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolla PA, Carasi P, Bolla MDLA, De Antoni GL, Serradell MDLA. 2013. Protective effect of a mixture of kefir-isolated lactic acid bacteria and yeasts in a hamster model of Clostridium difficile infection. Anaerobe. 21:28–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozzola JJ, Russell LD. 1999. Electron microscopy: principles and techniques for biologist. Sudbury: Jones and Bartlett. Jones and Bartlett Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Breunig K, Bolotin-Fukuhara M, Bianchi M, Bourgarel D, Falcone C, Ferrero I, Frontali L, Goffrini P, Krijger J, Mazzoni C, et al. 2000. Regulation of primary carbon metabolism in Kluyveromyces lactis. Enzyme Microb Technol. 26:771–780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collado MC, Meriluoto J, Salminen S. 2008. Adhesion and aggregation properties of probiotic and pathogen strains. Eur Food Res Technol. 226:1065–1073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compagno C, Tura A, Ranzi BM, Martegani E. 1993. Bioconversion of lactose/whey to fructose diphospathe with recombinant saccharomyces cerevisiae cells. Biotechnol Bioengieering. 42:398–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vos P, Faas MM, Spasojevic M, Sikkema J. 2010. Encapsulation for preservation of functionality and tageted delivery of bioactive food components. Int Dairy J. 20:292–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diosma G, Romanin DE, Rey-Burusco MF, Londero A, Garrote GL. 2014. Yeasts from kefir grains: isolation, identification, and probiotic characterization. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 30:43–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domingues L, Dantas MM, Lima N, Teixeira JA. 1999. Continuous ethanol fermentation of lactose by a recombinant flocculating Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. Biotechnol Bioeng. 64:692–697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [EFSA] European Food Safety Authority. 2005. QPS: qualified presumption of safety of micro-organisms in food and feed. EFSA Scientific Colloquium Summary Report.
   Google Scholar
• [EFSA] European Food Safety Authority. 2013. Scientific opinion on the maintenance of the list of QPS biological agents intentionally added to food and feed (2013 update). EFSA J. 11(11):3449  European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• FAO/WHO. 2002. Joint FAO/WHO Working Group Report on Drafting Guidelines for the Evaluation of Probiotics in Food; 2002 April 30 and May 1; London. Available from ftp://ftp.fao.org/es/esn/food/wgreport2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fleet GH, Balia R. 2006. The public health and probiotic significance of yeasts in foods and beverages. In: Querol A, Fleet G, editors. Yeasts Food Beverages. Berlin: Springer. p. 381–397.
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca GG, Heinzle E, Wittmann C, Gombert AK. 2008. The yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus and its biotechnological potential. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 79:339–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goy RC, de Britto D, Assis OBG. 2009. A review of the antimicrobial activity of chitosan. Polímeros Ciência e Tecnol. 19:241–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grba S, Stanzer D, Vahèiæ N, Škrlin A. 2002. Selection of yeast strain kluyveromyces marxianus for alcohol and biomass production on whey. Chem Biochem Eng Q. 16:13–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall T. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series N°41 95-98. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hensing M, Vrouwenvelder H, Hellinga C, Baartmans R, van Dijken H. 1994. Production of extracellular inulinase in high-cell-density fed-batch cultures of Kluyveromyces marxianus. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 42:516–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kos B, Šušković J, Vuković S, Sǐmpraga M, Frece J, Matošić S. 2003. Adhesion and aggregation ability of probiotic strain Lactobacillus acidophilus M92. J Appl Microbiol. 94:981–987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kourkoutas Y, Bekatorou A, Banat IM, Marchant R, Koutinas AA. 2004. Immobilization technologies and support materials suitable in alcohol beverages production: a review. Food Microbiol. 21:377–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumura H, Tanoue Y, Tsukahara M, Tanaka T, Shimazaki K. 2004. Screening of dairy yeast strains for probiotic applications. J Dairy Sci. 87:4050–4056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutzman CP, Fell JW, Boekhout T. 2011. The yeast: a taxonomic study. Amsterdam: Elservier. ed.
   Google Scholar
• Leslie J, Summerell B. 2006. The Fusarium laboratory manual. 1st ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Maccaferri S, Klinder A, Brigidi P, Costabile A, Cavina P, Costabile A. 2012. Potential probiotic Kluyveromyces marxianus B0399 modulates the immune response in Caco-2 cells and peripheral blood mononuclear cells and impacts the human gut microbiota in an in vitro colonic model system. Appl Environ Microbiol. 78:956–964.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massera A, Pirola MB, Páez R. 2013. Aislaiento de levaduras nativas a partir de sueros lácteos de empresas PyMES de la provincia de Santa Fe. In: Tecnointi edición 2013 11° Jornadas Abiertas de Desarrollo, Innovación y Transferencia Tecnológica / Patricia Marino ... [et.al.] ; compilado por Karina Vanesa Bertrand; coordinado por Patricia Marino ; Marina Pérez Zelaschi ; Jorge Domingo Bengolea ; con prólogo de Ricardo Horacio Del Valle. - 1a ed. - San Martín: Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Industrial - INTI.
   Google Scholar
• Morelli L. 2000. In vitro selection of probiotic lactobacilli : a critical appraisal. Curr Issues Intest Microbiol. 1:59–67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Panesar PS, Kennedy JF, Gandhi DN, Bunko K. 2007. Bioutilisation of whey for lactic acid production. Food Chem. 105:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadimitriou K, Zoumpopoulou G, Foligné B, Alexandraki V, Kazou M, Pot B, Tsakalidou E. 2015. Discovering probiotic microorganisms: in vitro, in vivo, genetic and omics approaches. Front Microbiol. 6:1–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paphitou NI. 2013. Antimicrobial resistance: action to combat the rising microbial challenges. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 42:S25–S28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psomas E, Andrighetto C, Litopoulou-Tzanetaki E, Lombardi A, Tzanetakis N. 2001. Some probiotic properties of yeast isolates from infant faeces and Feta cheese. Int J Food Microbiol. 69:125–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn G, Keough JM. 2002. Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saad N, Delattre C, Urdaci M, Schmitter JM, Bressollier P. 2013. An overview of the last advances in probiotic and prebiotic field. LWT Food Sci Technol. 50:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon O. 2005. Micro-organisms as feed additives-probiotics. Adv Pork Prod. 16:161–167.
   Google Scholar
• Singla AK, Chawla M. 2001. Chitosan: some pharmaceutical and biological aspects–an update. J Pharm Pharmacol. 53:1047–1067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer JFT, Spencer DM. 1997. Yeasts in natural and artificial habitats. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Spreer E, Mixa A. 1998. Milk and dairy product technology. Series: Food Science and Technology. Routledge: CRC Press/Taylor and Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Surawicz CM, McFarland LV, Greenberg RN, Rubin M, Fekety R, Mulligan ME, Garcia RJ, Brandmarker S, Bowen K, Borjal D, Elmer GW. 2000. The search for a better treatment for recurrent Clostridium difficile disease: use of high-dose vancomycin combined with Saccharomyces boulardii. Clin Infect Dis. 31:1012–1017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swiatkiewicz S, Swiatkiewicz M, Arczewska-Wlosek A, Jozefiak D. 2015. Chitosan and its oligosaccharide derivatives (chito-oligosaccharides) as feed supplements in poultry and swine nutrition. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 99:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. 1994. Clustal W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673–4680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Aa Kühle A, Skovgaard K, Jespersen L. 2005. In vitro screening of probiotic properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. boulardii and food-borne Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Int J Food Microbiol. 101:29–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar