Screening of stereoisomeric chloramphenicol residues in honey by ELISA and CHARM ® II test – the potential risk of systematically false-compliant (false negative) results

References

• Bargańska Ż, Ślebioda M, Namieśnik J. 2011. Determination of antibiotic residues in honey. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. 30:1035–1041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barreto F, Ribeiro C, Hoff RB, Dalla Costa T. 2012. Determination and confirmation of chloramphenicol in honey, fish and prawns by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry with minimum sample preparation: validation according to 2002/657/EC directive. Food Addit Contam A. 29:550–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berendsen BJA, Essers ML, Stolker LAM, Nielen MWF. 2011a. Quantitative trace analysis of eight chloramphenicol isomers in urine by chiral liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A. 14:7331–7340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berendsen BJA, Zuidema T, de Jong J, Stolker LAM, Nielen MWF. 2011b. Discrimination of eight chloramphenicol isomers by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry in order to investigate the natural occurrence of chloramphenicol. Anal Chim Acta. 700:78–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biernacki B. 2015. ELISA validation and determination of cut-off level for chloramphenicol residues in honey. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy. 59:353–356.
   Google Scholar
• Controulis J, Rebstock MC, Crooks HM Jr. 1949. Chloramphenicol (chloromycetin). V. Synthesis. J Am Chem Soc. 71:2463–2468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronly M, Behan P, Foley B, Malone E, Martin S, Doyle M, Regan L. 2010. Rapid multi-class multi-residue method for the confirmation of chloramphenicol and eleven nitroimidazoles in milk and honey by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Food Addit Contam A. 27:1233–1246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douny C, Widart J, De Pauw E, Maghuin-Rogister G, Scippo ML. 2013. Determination of chloramphenicol in honey, shrimp, and poultry meat with liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry: validation of the method according to Commission Decision 2002/657/EC. Food Anal Methods. 6:1458–1465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Food Safety Authority Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain. 2014. Scientific opinion on chloramphenicol in food and feed. EFSA J. 12:3907.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrlich J, Bartz QR, Smith RM, Joslyn DA, Burkholder PR. 1947. Chloromycetin, a new antibiotic from a soil actinomycete. Science. 106:417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forti AF, Campana G, Simonella A, Multari M, Scortichini G. 2005. Determination of chloramphenicol in honey by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta. 529:257–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gal J, Meyer-Lehnert S. 1988. Reversed-phase liquid chromatographic separation of enantiomeric and diastereomeric bases related to chloramphenicol and thiamphenicol. J Pharm Sci. 77:1062–1065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn FE, Wisseman CL Jr, Hopps HE. 1954. Mode of action of chloramphenicol II. Inhibition of bacterial D-polypeptide formation by an L-stereoisomer of chloramphenicol. J Bacteriol. 67:674–679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajra S, Karmakar A, Maji T, Medda AK. 2006. Stereoselective syntheses of (L)-chloramphenicol and (D)-thiamphenicol. Tetrahedron. 62:8959–8965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammel YA, Mohamed R, Gremaud E, LeBreton MH, Guy PA. 2008. Multi-screening approach to monitor and quantify 42 antibiotic residues in honey by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A. 1177:58–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hormazabal V, Yndestad M. 2001. Simultaneous determination of chloramphenicol and ketoprofen in meat and milk and chloramphenicol in egg, honey, and urine using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Liq Chromatogr Relat Technol. 24:2477–2486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [IARC] International Agency for Research on Cancer. 1990. Chloramphenicol. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. 50:169–193.
   Google Scholar
• Jakšić SM, Mihaljev ŽA, Kartalović BD, Babić JB, Vidaković SL, Baloš-Živkov MM. 2018. Evaluation of ELISA tests as screening methods for determination of antibiotics and sulfonamides in honey. Food Feed Res. 45:11–17.
   Google Scholar
• Kallenborn R, Hühnerfuss H. 2001. Chiral environmental pollutants: trace analysis and ecotoxicology. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN: 3-540-66423-8.
   Google Scholar
• Kivrak I, Kivrak Ş, Harmandar M. 2016. Development of a rapid method for the determination of antibiotic residues in honey using UPLC-ESI-MS/MS. Food Sci Technol. 36:90–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez MI, Pettis JS, Smith IB, Chu PS. 2008. Multiclass determination and confirmation of antibiotic residues in honey using LC-MS/MS. J Agric Food Chem. 56:1553–1559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynas L, Currie D, Elliott CT, McEvoy JDG, Hewitt SA. 1998. Screening for chloramphenicol residues in the tissues and fluids of treated cattle by the four plate test, charm II radioimmunoassay and Ridascreen CAP-Glucuronid enzyme immunoassay. Analyst. 123:2773–2777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell RE, Nickel VS. 1954. The antibacterial activity of the isomers of chloramphenicol. Antibiot Chemother. 4:289–295.
   Google Scholar
• McMullen SE, Lansden JA, Schenck FJ. 2004. Modifications and adaptations of the Charm II rapid antibody assay for chloramphenicol in honey. J Food Prot. 67:1533–1536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortelli D, Edder P, Corvi C. 2004. Analysis of chloramphenicol residues in honey by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Chromatographia. 59:61–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintana-Rizzo J, Salter RS, Saul SJ. 2005. Solid phase extraction procedures for validation of charm II sulfonamide, streptomycin and chloramphenicol positives and detection of tylosin in honey. Apiacta. 40:55–62.
   Google Scholar
• Quon D, Carson MC, Nochetto C, Heller DN, Butterworth F. 2006. Peer validation of a method to confirm chloramphenicol in honey by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J AOAC Int. 89:586–593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahimi Z, Shahbazi Y, Ahmadi F. 2018. Comparative screening of chloramphenicol residue in chicken tissues using four plate test and Premi® test methods. Pharm Sci. 24:157–162.
   Google Scholar
• Reybroeck W. 2018. Residues of antibiotics and chemotherapeutics in honey. J Apic Res. 57:97–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimkus GG, Hoffmann D. 2017. Enantioselective analysis of chloramphenicol residues in honey samples by chiral LC-MS/MS and results of a honey survey. Food Addit Contam A. 34:950–961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rønning HT, Einarsen K, Asp TN. 2006. Determination of chloramphenicol residues in meat, seafood, egg, honey, milk, plasma and urine with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, and the validation of the method based on 2002/657/EC. J Chromatogr A. 1118:226–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter R. 2003. Charm II system-comprehensive residue analysis system for honey. Apiacta. 38:198–206.
   Google Scholar
• Samsonova JV, Cannavan A, Elliott CT. 2012. A critical review of screening methods for the detection of chloramphenicol, thiamphenicol, and florfenicol residues in foodstuffs. Crit Rev Anal Chem. 42:50–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scortichini G, Annunziata L, Haouet MN, Benedetti F, Krusteva I, Galarini R. 2005. ELISA qualitative screening of chloramphenicol in muscle, eggs, honey and milk: method validation according to the Commission Decision 2002/657/EC criteria. Anal Chim Acta. 535:43–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen HY, Jiang HL. 2005. Screening, determination and confirmation of chloramphenicol in seafood, meat and honey using ELISA, HPLC–UVD, GC–ECD, GC–MS–EI–SIM and GCMS–NCI–SIM methods. Anal Chim Acta. 535:33–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan R, Policastro B, Thomas S, Rice D. 2008. Analysis and occurrence of 14 sulfonamide antibacterials and chloramphenicol in honey by solid-phase extraction followed by LC/MS/MS analysis. J Agric Food Chem. 56:3509–3516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staub Spörri A, Jan P, Cognard E, Ortelli D, Edder P. 2014. Comprehensive screening of veterinary drugs in honey by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. Food Addit Contam A. 31:806–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sykes M, Czymai T, Hektor T, Sharman M, Knaggs M. 2017. Chloramphenicol stereoisomers need to be distinguished: consequences observed from a proficiency test. Food Addit Contam A. 34:536–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajik H, Malekinejad H, Razavi-Rouhani SM, Pajouhi MR, Mahmoudi R, Haghnazari A. 2010. Chloramphenicol residues in chicken liver, kidney and muscle: a comparison among the antibacterial residues monitoring methods of four plate test, ELISA and HPLC. Food Chem Toxicol. 48:2464–2468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taka T, Baras MC, Chaudhry Bet ZF. 2012. Validation of a rapid and sensitive routine method for determination of chloramphenicol in honey by LC–MS/MS. Food Addit Contam A. 29:596–601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao X, Jiang H, Zhu J, Wang X, Wang Z, Niu L, Wu X, Shi W, Shen J. 2014. An ultrasensitive chemiluminescent ELISA for determination of chloramphenicol in milk, milk powder, honey, eggs and chicken muscle. Food Agric Immunol. 25:137–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veach BT, Anglin R, Mudalige TK, Barnes PJ. 2018. Quantitation and confirmation of chloramphenicol, florfenicol, and nitrofuran metabolites in honey using LC-MS/MS. J AOAC Int. 101:897–904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venable R, Haynes C, Cook JM. 2014. Reported prevalence and quantitative LC-MS methods for the analysis of veterinary drug residues in honey: a review. Food Addit Contam A. 31:621–640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verzegnassi L, Royer D, Mottier P, Stadler RH. 2003. Analysis of chloramphenicol in honeys of different geographical origin by liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Food Addit Contam. 20:335–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von der Ohe W, Persano Oddo L, Piana ML, Morlot M, Martin P. 2004. Harmonized methods of melissopalynology. Apidologie. 35:S18–S25.
   Google Scholar
• Yanovych D, Berendsen B, Zasadna Z, Rydchuk M, Czymai T. 2018. A study of the origin of chloramphenicol isomers in honey. Drug Test Anal. 10:416–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Li XQ, Li HM, Zhang QH, Gao Y, Li XJ. 2018. Antibiotic residues in honey: a review on analytical methods by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. 110:344–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar