Dietary risk assessment methodology: how to deal with changes through life

References

• [AFSSET] Agence Française de Sécurité Sanitaire de l’Environnement et du Travail. 2006. Document de référence pour la construction d’une valeur toxicologique de référence fondée sur des effets reprotoxiques. Maisons-Alfort.
   Google Scholar
• Agogo GO, van der Voet H, Van’t Veer P, van Eeuwijk FA, Boshuizen HC. 2016. Evaluation of a two-part regression calibration to adjust for dietary exposure measurement error in the cox proportional hazards model: A simulation study. Biom J. 58:766–782.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agoston DV. 2017. How to translate time? The temporal aspect of human and rodent biology. Front Neurol. 8:92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcock RE, Sweetman AJ, Juan CY, Jones KC. 2000. A generic model of human lifetime exposure to persistent organic contaminants: development and application to PCB-101. Environ Pollut(Barking, Essex: 1987). 110:253–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [ANSES] Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire, de l’Alimentation, de l’Environnement et du Travail. 2015. Valeurs toxicologiques de référence: guide d’élaboration de vtr. France:Maisons-Alfort.
   Google Scholar
• [ANSES] Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire, de l’Alimentation, de l’Environnement et du Travail. 2016. Infant total diet study (ITDS): summary and conclusions. https://www.anses.fr/en/system/files/ERCA2010SA0317RaEN.pdf.  [accessed 2020 Feb].
   Google Scholar
• [ANSES] Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire, de l’Alimentation, de l’Environnement et du Travail. 2017. Valeurs toxicologiques de référence: guide d’élaboration de l’anses. France:Maisons-Alfort.
   Google Scholar
• Ashauer R, Agatz A, Albert C, Ducrot V, Galic N, Hendriks J, Jager T, Kretschmann A, O’Connor I, Rubach MN, et al. 2011a. Toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic modeling of quantal and graded sublethal endpoints: A brief discussion of concepts. Environ Toxicol Chem. 30:2519–2524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashauer R, Boxall A, Brown C. 2006. Predicting effects on aquatic organisms from fluctuating or pulsed exposure to pesticides. Environ Toxicol Chem. 25:1899–1912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashauer R, Brown CD. 2013. Highly time-variable exposure to chemicals – toward an assessment strategy. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 9:e27–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashauer R, Escher BI. 2010. Advantages of toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic modelling in aquatic ecotoxicology and risk assessment. J Environ Monit. 12:2056–2061.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ashauer R, Escher BI. 2013. Highly time-variable exposure to chemicals – toward an assessment strategy. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 9:e27–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashauer R, Wittmer I, Stamm C, Escher BI. 2011b. Environmental risk assessment of fluctuating diazinon concentrations in an urban and agricultural catchment using toxicokinetic–toxicodynamic modeling. Environ Sci Technol. 45:9783–9792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [ATSDR] Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 1999. Toxicological profile for mercury. Atlanta (GA):Department of Health and Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• [ATSDR] Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 2017. Minimal risk levels (MRLs). [accessed Jan 2018]. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/mrls/index.asp.
   Google Scholar
• Batke M, Escher S, Hoffmann-Doerr S, Melber C, Messinger H, Mangelsdorf I. 2011. Evaluation of time extrapolation factors based on the database repdose. Toxicol Lett. 205:122–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boon PE, Bonthuis M, van der Voet H, van Klaveren JD. 2011. Comparison of different exposure assessment methods to estimate the long-term dietary exposure to dioxins and ochratoxin a. Food Chem Toxicol. 49:1979–1988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boon PE, van der Voet H, Ruprich J, Turrini A, Sand S, van Klaveren JD. 2014. Computational tool for usual intake modelling workable at the European level. Food Chem Toxicol. 74:279–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breivik K, Czub G, McLachlan MS, Wania F. 2010. Towards an understanding of the link between environmental emissions and human body burdens of PCBs using cozmoman. Environ Int. 36:85–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell J, Clewell R A, Gentry P, Andersen M, Clewell H. 2012. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic/toxicokinetic modeling. Molecular Biology. 929:439–499.
   Google Scholar
• Ciffroy P, Alfonso B, Altenpohl A, Banjac Z, Bierkens J, Brochot C, Critto A, De Wilde T, Fait G, Fierens T, et al. 2016. Modelling the exposure to chemicals for risk assessment: a comprehensive library of multimedia and pbpk models for integration, prediction, uncertainty and sensitivity analysis – the Merlin-expo tool. Sci Total Environ. 568:770–784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commission of the European communities. 2006. Commission regulation (EC) no 1881/2006 of 19 december 2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs. Off J Eur Union. 364:324–365.
   Google Scholar
• Connell DW, Yu QJ, Verma V. 2016. Influence of exposure time on toxicity – an overview. Toxicology. 355–356:49–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czub G, McLachlan MS. 2004. A food chain model to predict the levels of lipophilic organic contaminants in humans. Environ Toxicol Chem. 23:2356–2366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [CCOHS] Canadian Center for Occupational Health and Safety. 1988. The material safety data sheet – an explanation of common terms. [accessed 2018 Jan 11].
   Google Scholar
• Ding LJ, Liu RH, Ji XK, Yuan ZS, Zhang T, Xue FZ. 2017. Lifespan risk exposure measurement instrument: a feasible and effective tool for life course epidemiology research. Biomed Environ Sci. 30:59–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd KW, Guenther PM, Freedman LS, Subar AF, Kipnis V, Midthune D, Tooze JA, Krebs-Smith SM. 2006. Statistical methods for estimating usual intake of nutrients and foods: A review of the theory. J Am Diet Assoc. 106:1640–1650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ducrot V, Ashauer R, Bednarska AJ, Hinarejos S, Thorbek P, Weyman G. 2016. Using toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic modeling as an acute risk assessment refinement approach in vertebrate ecological risk assessment. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 12:32–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta S, Sengupta P. 2016. Men and mice: relating their ages. Life Sci. 152:244–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [EFSA] European Food Safety Authority. 2005a. Opinion of the scientific panel on contaminants in the food chain on a request from the commission related to the presence of non dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) in feed and food. EFSA Journal. 284:1–137.
   Google Scholar
• [EFSA] European Food Safety Authority. 2005b. Opinion of the scientific committee on a request from efsa related to a harmonised approach for risk assessment of substances which are both genotoxic and carcinogenic. EFSA Journal. 282:1–31.
   Google Scholar
• [EFSA] European Food Safety Authority. 2008. Guidance document for the use of the concise european food consumption database in exposure assessment. EFSA J.
   Google Scholar
• [EFSA] European Food Safety Authority. 2009a. Meta-analysis of dose-effect relationship of cadmium for benchmark dose evaluation: technical report of EFSA. EFSA Sci Rep. 254:1–62.
   Google Scholar
• [EFSA] European Food Safety Authority. 2009b. Cadmium in food: scientific opinion of the panel on contaminants in food chain. EFSA J. 980:1–139.
   Google Scholar
• [EFSA] European Food Safety Authority. 2011. Use of the EFSA comprehensive European food consumption database in exposure assessment. EFSA J. 9:1–34.
   Google Scholar
• [EFSA] European Food Safety Authority. 2017. Guidance on the risk assessment of substances present in food intended for infants below 16 weeks of age. EFSA J. 15:1–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [EFSA] European Food Safety Authority. 2018a. Glossary. [accessed Jan 2018]. https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/glossary-taxonomy-terms
   Google Scholar
• [EFSA] European Food Safety Authority. 2018b. Scientific opinion on the state of the art of toxicokinetic/toxicodynamic (TKTD) effect models for regulatory risk assessment of pesticides for aquatic organisms. EFSA J. 16:1–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [EFSA] European Food Safety Authority. 2019. The four steps of risk assessment. [accessed Apr 2019]. https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/interactive_pages/riskassessment/RiskAssessment
   Google Scholar
• [EFSA/FAO/WHO] Joint European Food Safety Authority, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization. 2011. Towards a harmonised total diet study approach: A guidance document. EFSA J. 9:1–66.
   Google Scholar
• [FAO] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2001. Food balance sheets - a handbook. Rome (Italy).
   Google Scholar
• [FAO/WHO] Joint Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization. 1997. Food consumption and exposure assessment of chemicals. 1–69.
   Google Scholar
• [FAO/WHO] Joint Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization. 2005. Dietary exposure assessment of chemicals in food. Annapolis (Maryland, USA).
   Google Scholar
• [FAO/WHO] Joint Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization. 2009a. Risk assessment and its role in risk analysis. In: WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data, editor. Principles and methods for the risk assessment of chemicals in food. Vol. 240. Geneva, Switzerland: Environmental Health Criteria.
   Google Scholar
• [FAO/WHO] Joint Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization. 2009b. Dietary exposure assessment of chemicals in food. In: WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data, editor. Principles and methods for the risk assessment of chemicals in food, Vol. 240. Geneva, Switzerland: Environmental Health Criteria.
   Google Scholar
• [FAO/WHO] Joint Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization. 2009c. Dose-response assessment and derivation of health-based guidance values. In: WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data, editor. Principles and methods for the risk assessment of chemicals in food, Vol. 240. Geneva, Switzerland: Environmental Health Criteria.
   Google Scholar
• [FAO/WHO] Joint Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization. 2009d. Infosan information note no. 1/2009 - monitoring for chemicals in food.
   Google Scholar
• Geraets L, Nijkamp MM, Ter Burg W. 2016. Critical elements for human health risk assessment of less than lifetime exposures. Regul Toxicol Pharm. 81:362–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goedhart PW, van der Voet H, Knüppel S, Dekkers ALM, Dodd KW, Boeing H, van Klaveren J. 2012. A comparison by simulation of different methods to estimate the usual intake distribution for episodically consumed foods. EFSA Supporting Publ. 9(6):299E.
   Google Scholar
• LifeLine Group. 2003. Construction of a comprehensive chemical exposure framework using person oriented modeling.
   Google Scholar
• Haber F. 1924. Zur geschichte des gaskrieges. In: Haber F, editor. Fünf vorträge aus den jahren 1920–1923. Berlin (Germany): Springer Berlin Heidelberg; p. 76–92.
   Google Scholar
• Haber LT, Sandhu R, Li-Muller A, Mohapatra A, Petrovic S, Meek ME. 2016. Framework for human health risk assessment of non-cancer effects resulting from short-duration and intermittent exposures to chemicals. J Appl Toxicol. 36:1077–1089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann K, Boeing H, Dufour A, Volatier JL, Telman J, Virtanen M, Becker W, De Henauw S, EFCOSUM Group. 2002. Estimating the distribution of usual dietary intake by short-term measurements. Eur J Clin Nutr. 56(Suppl 2):S53–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy MC. 2010. Bayesian modelling of long-term dietary intakes from multiple sources. Food Chem Toxicol. 48:250–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudsen I. 1999. Temporal equivalence between test species and humans: general toxicity issues. Regul Toxicol Pharm. 30:S42–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen JC, Richold M. 1999. Report of workshop on the significance of excursions of intake above the adi. Regul Toxicol Pharm. 30:S2–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leclercq C, Allemand P, Balcerzak A, Branca F, Sousa R, Lartey A, Lipp M, Quadros VP, Verger P. 2019. FAO/WHO GIFT (global individual food consumption data tool): A global repository for harmonised individual quantitative food consumption studies. Proc Nut Soc. 78:1–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li N, Friedrich R, Maesano CN, Medda E, Brescianini S, Stazi MA, Sabel CE, Sarigiannis D, Annesi-Maesano I. 2019. Lifelong exposure to multiple stressors through different environmental pathways for european populations. Environ Res. 179:108744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancini FR, Sirot V, Busani L, Volatier JL, Hulin M. 2015. Use and impact of usual intake models on dietary exposure estimate and risk assessment of chemical substances: A practical example for cadmium, acrylamide and sulphites. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 32:1065–1074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moy GG, Vannoort RW. 2013. Total diet studies.
   Google Scholar
• Mural RJ, Adams MD, Myers EW, Smith HO, Miklos GL, Wides R, Halpern A, Li PW, Sutton GG, Nadeau J, et al. 2002. A comparison of whole-genome shotgun-derived mouse chromosome 16 and the human genome. Science. 296:1661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [NRC] National Research Council. 2009. Science and decisions: advancing risk assessment. In: The National Academies Press, editor. Science and decisions: advancing risk assessment. Washington (DC):The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• [NRC] National Research Council. 2014. Derivation of toxicity values. In: The National Academies Press, editor. Review of EPA's integrated risk information system (iris) process. Washington (DC, USA):The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paulo MJ, van der Voet H, Jansen MJ, Braak CJ ter, van Klaveren JD. 2005. Risk assessment of dietary exposure to pesticides using a bayesian method. Pest Manag Sci. 61:759–766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohl HR, Chou CHSJ, Ruiz P, Holler JS. 2010. Chemical risk assessment and uncertainty associated with extrapolation across exposure duration. Regul Toxicol Pharm. 57:18–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price PS, Curry CL, Goodrum PE, Gray MN, McCrodden JI, Harrington NW, Carlson-Lynch H, Keenan RE. 1996. Monte-carlo modeling of time-dependent exposures using a microexposure event approach. Risk Anal. 16:339–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn CL, Wania F, Czub G, Breivik K. 2011. Investigating intergenerational differences in human PCB exposure due to variable emissions and reproductive behaviors. Environ Health Perspect. 119:641–646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renwick AG. 1999. Duration of intake above the adi/TDI in relation to toxicodynamics and toxicokinetics. Regul Toxicol Pharm. 30:S69–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [RIVM] Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu. 2001. Re-evaluation of human-toxicological maximum permissible risk levels. https://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/711701025.pdf. [accessed Feb 2020]
   Google Scholar
• Sengupta P. 2013. The laboratory rat: relating its age with human’s. Int J Prev Med. 4:624–630.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Slob W. 1993. Modeling long-term exposure of the whole population to chemicals in food. Risk Anal. 13:525–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souverein OW, Dekkers AL, Geelen A, Haubrock J, de Vries JH, Ocke MC, Harttig U, Boeing H, van ‘T Veer P. 2011. Comparing four methods to estimate usual intake distributions. Eur J Clin Nutr. 65(Suppl 1):S92–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennekes HA. 2016. A critical appraisal of the threshold of toxicity model for non-carcinogens. J Environ Anal Toxicol. 6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teorell T. 1937a. Kinetics of distribution of substances administered to the body. Ii - the intravascular modes of administration. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Et Ther. 57:226–240.
   Google Scholar
• Teorell T. 1937b. Kinetics of distribution of substances administered to the body. I - the extravascular modes of administration. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Et Ther. 57:205–225.
   Google Scholar
• Thiel C, Hofmann U, Ghallab A, Gebhardt R, Hengstler JG, Kuepfer L. 2016. Towards knowledge-driven cross-species extrapolation. Drug Discovery Today. 22:21–26.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson FE, Subar AF. 2017. Dietary assessment methodology. In: AM C, CJ B, MG F, LM D, editors. Nutrition in the prevention and treatment of disease (fourth edition). Cambridge, USA: Academic Press; p. 5–48.
   Google Scholar
• [US EPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2005. Guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment. EPA/630/P-03/001F. Washington (DC).
   Google Scholar
• [US EPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2006. Approaches for the application of physiologically based pharmacokinetic (pbpk) models and supporting data risk assessment. National Center for Environmental Assessment. EPA/600/R-05/043F.
   Google Scholar
• [US EPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2011. Vocabulary catalog. [accessed Jan 2018].
   Google Scholar
• [US EPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2017. Conducting a human health risk assessment. [accessed Apr 2019]. https://www.epa.gov/risk/conducting-human-health-risk-assessment#tab-2
   Google Scholar
• Vin K, Papadopoulos A, Cubadda F, Aureli F, Oktay Basegmez HI, D’Amato M, De Coster S, D’Evoli L, López Esteban MT, Jurkovic M, et al. 2014. Tds exposure project: relevance of the total diet study approach for different groups of substances. Food Chem Toxicol. 73:21–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waijers PMCM, Dekkers ALM, Boer JMA, Boshuizen HC, Van Rossum CTM. 2006. The potential of age mode, an age-dependent model, to estimate usual intakes and prevalences of inadequate intakes in a population. J Nutr. 136:2916–2920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker R. 1999. The significance of excursions above the adi: duration in relation to pivotal studies. Regul Toxicol Pharm. 30:S114–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [WHO] World Health Organization. 2003. Gems/food regional diets: regional per capita consumption of raw and semi-processed agricultural commodities/prepared by the global environment monitoring system/food contamination monitoring and assessment programme (gems/food). 9241591080. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• [WHO] World Health Organization. 2010. Characterization and application of physiologically based pharmacokinetic models in risk assessment. IPCS harmonization project document; no 9.
   Google Scholar
• Zarn JA, O’Brien CD. 2018. Current pesticide dietary risk assessment in light of comparable animal study NOAELs after chronic and short-termed exposure durations. Arch Toxicol. 92:157–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zukowska J, Biziuk M. 2008. Methodological evaluation of method for dietary heavy metal intake. J Food Sci. 73:R21–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar