Application of DNA barcoding and metabarcoding for species identification in salmon products

References

• Ballin NZ, Vogensen FK, Karlsson AH. 2009. Species determination - Can we detect and quantify meat adulteration? Meat Sci. 83:165–174. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.06.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbuto M, Galimberti A, Ferri E, Labra M, Malandra R, Galli P, Casiraghi M. 2010. DNA barcoding reveals fraudulent substitutions in shark seafood products: the Italian case of “palombo” (Mustelus spp.). Food Res Int. 43:376–381. doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2009.10.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertolini F, Ghionda MC, D’Alessandro E, Geraci C, Chiofalo V, Fontanesi L. 2015. A next generation semiconductor based sequencing approach for the identification of meat species in DNA mixtures. Plos One. 29:e0121701.
   Google Scholar
• Bokulich NA, Subramanian S, Faith JJ, Gevers D, Gordon JI, Knight R, Mills DA, Caporaso JG. 2013. Quality-filtering vastly improves diversity estimates from Illumina amplicon sequencing. Nat Methods. 10:57–59. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briski E, Cristescu M, Bailey S, MacIsaac H. 2011. Use of DNA bacoding to detect invertebrate invasive species from diapausing eggs. Biol Invasions. 13:1325–1340. doi:10.1007/s10530-010-9892-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, Fierer N, Pena AG, Goodrich JK, Gordon JI, et al. 2010. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods. 7:335–336. doi:10.1038/nmeth.f.303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Lozupone CA, Turnbaugh PJ, Fierer N, Knight R. 2011. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 108:4516–4522. doi:10.1073/pnas.1000080107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casiraghi M, Labra M, Ferri E, Galimberti A, De Mattia F. 2010. DNA barcoding: a six-question tour to improve users’ awareness about the method. Brief Bioinform. 11:440–453. doi:10.1093/bib/bbq003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cline E. 2012. Marketplace substitution of Atlantic salmon for Pacific salmon in Washington State detected by DNA barcoding. Food Res Int. 45:388–393. doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2011.10.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Amore R, Ijaz UZ, Schirmer M, Kenny JG, Gregory R, Darby AC, Shakya M, Podar M, Quince C, Hall N. 2016. A comprehensive benchmarking study of protocols and sequencing platforms for 16S rRNA community profiling. Bmc Genomics. 17:55. doi:10.1186/s12864-015-2194-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, Quince C, Knight R. 2011. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics. 27:2194–2200. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng J, Wu Z, Xie X, Dai Z, Liu S. 2017. A real-time polymerase chain reaction method for the identification of four commercially important salmon and trout species. Mitochondrial DNA Part A. 28:104–111. doi:10.3109/19401736.2015.1111346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng Y, Li Q, Kong L, Zheng X. 2011. DNA barcoding and phylogenetic analysis of Pectinidae (Mollusca: bivalvia) based on mitochondrial CO I and 16S rRNA genes. Mol Biol Rep. 38:291–299. doi:10.1007/s11033-010-0107-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes TJR, Amaral JS, Mafra I. 2020. DNA barcode markers applied to seafood authentication: an updated review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 1–32. doi:10.1080/10408398.2020.1811200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes TJR, Costa J, Oliveira MBPP, Mafra I. 2018. Exploiting 16S rRNA gene for the detection and quantification of fish as a potential allergenic food: A comparison of two real-time PCR approaches. Food Chem. 245:1034–1041. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.11.068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folmer O, Black M, Wr H, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial Cytochrome C oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 3:294–299.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldstein PZ, Desalle R. 2003. Calibrating phylogenetic species formation in a threatened insect using DNA from historical specimens. Mol Ecol. 12:1993–1998. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01860.x.
   Google Scholar
• Haas BJ, Gevers D, Earl AM, Feldgarden M, Ward DV, Giannoukos G, Ciulla D, Tabbaa D, Highlander SK, Sodergren E, et al. 2011. Chimeric 16S rRNA sequence formation and detection in Sanger and 454-pyrosequenced PCR amplicons. Genome Res. 21:494–504. doi:10.1101/gr.112730.110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head S, Komori H, Lamere S, Whisenant T, Nieuwerburgh F, Salomon D, Ordoukhanian P. 2014. Library construction for next-generation sequencing: overviews and challenges. BioTechniques. 56:61–77. doi:10.2144/000114133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellberg RS, Pollack SJ, Hanner RH. 2016. Chapter 6 - seafood species identification using DNA sequencing - Science Direct. In: Naaum AM, Hanner RH, editors. Seafood authenticity and traceability: A DNA perspective. London: Academic Press; p. 113–132.
   Google Scholar
• Horreo JL, Fitze PS, Jiménez-Valverde A, Noriega JA, Pelaez ML. 2019. Amplification of 16S rDNA reveals important fish mislabeling in Madrid restaurants. Food Control. 96:146–150. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.09.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamruzzaman M. 2016. Food adulteration and authenticity. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; p. 127–148.
   Google Scholar
• Kappel K, Haase I, Kaeppel C, Sotelo CG, Schroeder U. 2017. Species identification in mixed tuna samples with next-generation sequencing targeting two short cytochrome b gene fragments. Food Chem. 234:212–219. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.04.178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köppel R, Zimmerli F, Breitenmoser A. 2009. Heptaplex real-time PCR for the identification and quantification of DNA from beef, pork, chicken, turkey, horse meat, sheep (mutton) and goat. Eur Food Res Technol. 230:125–133. doi:10.1007/s00217-009-1154-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M. 2004. MEGA3: integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Brief Bioinform. 5:150–163. doi:10.1093/bib/5.2.150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakra WS, Goswami M, Gopalakrishnan A. 2009. Molecular identification and phylogenetic relationships of seven Indian Sciaenids (Pisces: perciformes, Sciaenidae) based on 16S rRNA and cytochrome c oxidase subunit I mitochondrial genes. Mol Biol Rep. 36:831–839. doi:10.1007/s11033-008-9252-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane D, Pace B, Olsen G, Stahl D, Sogin M, Pace N, Lane D, Pace B, Olsen G, Stahl D, et al. 1985. Rapid determination of 16S ribosomal sequences for phylogenetic analyses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 82:6955–6959. doi:10.1073/pnas.82.20.6955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laube I, Zagon J, Spiegelberg A, Butschke A, Kroh L, Broll H. 2007. Development and design of a ‘ready-to-use’ reaction plate for a PCR-based simultaneous detection of animal species in foods. Int J Food Sci Technol. 42:9–17. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.2006.01154.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li T, Su C. 2018. Authenticity identification and classification of Rhodiola species in traditional Tibetan medicine based on Fourier transform near-infrared spectroscopy and chemometrics analysis. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 204:131–140. doi:10.1016/j.saa.2018.06.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Zhang Q-H, Ma F, Zhang S-F, Zhou Q, Huang A-M. 2020. Three-step identification of infrared spectra of similar tree species to Pterocarpus santalinus covered with beeswax. J Mol Struct. 1218:128484. doi:10.1016/j.molstruc.2020.128484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magoc T, Salzberg SL. 2011. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 27:2957–2963. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minoudi S, Karaiskou N, Avgeris M, Gkagkavouzis K, Tarantili P, Triantafyllidou D, Palilis L, Avramopoulou V, Tsikliras A, Barmperis K, et al. 2020. Seafood mislabeling in Greek market using DNA barcoding. Food Control. 113:107213. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz-Colmenero M, Klett-Mingo M, Díaz E, Blanco O, Martínez JL, Garcia-Vazquez E. 2015. Evolution of hake mislabeling niches in commercial markets. Food Control. 54:267–274. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nour M, Aboud M, Ali N. 2016. Morphological identification, species composition and distribution of mosquitoes in Kosti region, White Nile State, Central Sudan. Malaysian J Med Biol Res. 3:131–142. doi:10.18034/mjmbr.v6i1.463.
   Google Scholar
• Pal T, Malhotra N, Chanumolu SK, Chauhan RS. 2015. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) transcriptomes reveal association of multiple genes and pathways contributing to secondary metabolites accumulation in tuberous roots of Aconitum heterophyllum Wall. Planta. 242:239–258. doi:10.1007/s00425-015-2304-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park J, Yong Lee S, An C M, Kang J-H, Kim J-H, Chai JC, Chen J, Seok Kang J, Ahn JJ, Seek Lee Y, et al. 2012. Comparative study between next generation sequencing technique and identification of microarray for species identification within blended food products. BioChip J. 6:354–361. doi:10.1007/s13206-012-6407-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawluczyk M, Weiss J, Links MG, Egana Aranguren M, Wilkinson MD, Egea-Cortines M. 2015. Quantitative evaluation of bias in PCR amplification and next-generation sequencing derived from metabarcoding samples. Anal Bioanal Chem. 407:1841–1848. doi:10.1007/s00216-014-8435-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pazartzi T, Siaperopoulou S, Gubili C, Maradidou S, Loukovitis D, Chatzispyrou A, Griffiths AM, Minos G, Imsiridou A. 2019. High levels of mislabeling in shark meat – investigating patterns of species utilization with DNA barcoding in Greek retailers. Food Control. 98:179–186. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.11.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinol J, Mir G, Gomez-Polo P, Agusti N. 2015. Universal and blocking primer mismatches limit the use of high-throughput DNA sequencing for the quantitative metabarcoding of arthropods. Mol Ecol Resour. 15:819–830. doi:10.1111/1755-0998.12355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto AJ, Raskin L. 2012. PCR biases distort bacterial and archaeal community structure in pyrosequencing datasets. PLoS One. 7:e43093. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0043093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polz MF, Cavanaugh CM. 1998. Bias in template-to-product ratios in multitemplate PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol. 64:3724–3730. doi:10.1128/AEM.64.10.3724-3730.1998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radulovici A, Archambault P, Dufresne F. 2010. DNA barcodes for marine biodiversity: moving fast forward? Diversity. 2:450–472. doi:10.3390/d2040450.
   Google Scholar
• Ren J, Deng T, Huang W, Chen Y, Ge Y. 2017. A digital PCR method for identifying and quantifying adulteration of meat species in raw and processed food. PLoS One. 12:e0173567. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0173567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribani A, Schiavo G, Utzeri VJ, Bertolini F, Geraci C, Bovo S, Fontanesi L. 2018a. Application of next generation semiconductor based sequencing for species identification and analysis of within-species mitotypes useful for authentication of meat derived products. Food Control. 91:58–67. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.03.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribani A, Schiavo G, Utzeri VJ, Bertolini F, Geraci C, Bovo S, Fontanesi L. 2018b. Application of next generation semiconductor based sequencing for species identification in dairy products. Food Chem. 246:90–98. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.11.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarri C, Stamatis C, Sarafidou T, Galara I, Godosopoulos V, Kolovos M, Liakou C, Tastsoglou S, Mamuris Z. 2014. A new set of 16S rRNA universal primers for identification of animal species. Food Control. 43:35–41. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.02.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen Q, Feng JL, Jin RY, Xue J, Zheng ZX, Dai ZY. 2017. Phospholipidomics profiling of salmon muscle by MALDI-TOF MS. J Chin Mass Spectrom Soc. 38:211–216. doi:10.7538/zpxb.youxian.2016.0071.
   Google Scholar
• Speranskaya AS, Khafizov K, Ayginin AA, Krinitsina AA, Omelchenko DO, Nilova MV, Severova EE, Samokhina EN, Shipulin GA, Logacheva MD. 2018. Comparative analysis of Illumina and Ion Torrent high-throughput sequencing platforms for identification of plant components in herbal teas. Food Control. 93:315–324. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.04.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staats M, Arulandhu AJ, Gravendeel B, Holst-jensen A, Scholtens I, Peelen T, Prins TW, Kok E. 2016. Advances in DNA metabarcoding for food and wildlife forensic species identification. Anal Bioanal Chem. 408:4615–4630. doi:10.1007/s00216-016-9595-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sultana S, Ali ME, Hossain MAM, Asing NN, Zaidul ISM. 2018. Universal mini COI barcode for the identification of fish species in processed products. Food Res Int. 105:19–28. doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2017.10.065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thongtam Na Ayudhaya P, Muangmai N, Banjongsat N, Singchat W, Janekitkarn S, Peyachoknagul S, Srikulnath K. 2017. Unveiling cryptic diversity of the anemonefish genera Amphiprion and Premnas (Perciformes: pomacentridae) in Thailand with mitochondrial DNA barcodes. Agri Nat Resour. 51:198–205. doi:10.1016/j.anres.2017.07.001.
   Google Scholar
• Tillmar AO, Dell’Amico B, Welander J, Holmlund G. 2013. A Universal Method for Species Identification of Mammals Utilizing Next Generation Sequencing for the Analysis of DNA Mixtures. Plos One. 8:e83761..doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083761.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ward RD, Zemlak TS, Innes BH, Last PR, Hebert PDN. 2005. DNA barcoding Australia’s fish species. Philos Trans R Soc Ser. B-Biol Sci. 360:1847–1857. doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing B, Zhang Z, Sun R, Wang Y, Lin M, Wang C. 2020a. Mini-DNA barcoding for the identification of commercial fish sold in the markets along the Taiwan Strait. Food Control. 112:107143. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing -R-R, Hu -R-R, Han J-X, Deng -T-T, Chen Y. 2020b. DNA barcoding and mini-barcoding in authenticating processed animal-derived food: A case study involving the Chinese market. Food Chem. 309:125653. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing R-R, Wang N, Hu R-R, Zhang J-K, Han J-X, Chen Y. 2019. Application of next generation sequencing for species identification in meat and poultry products: A DNA metabarcoding approach. Food Control. 101:173–179. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.02.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young JM, Weyrich LS, Cooper A. 2014. Forensic soil DNA analysis using high-throughput sequencing: A comparison of four molecular markers. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 13:176–184. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.07.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahn RJ, Silva AJ, Hellberg RS. 2020. Development of a DNA mini-barcoding protocol targeting COI for the identification of elasmobranch species in shark cartilage pills. Food Control. 109:106918. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.106918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng L, Wen J, Fan S, Chen Z, Xu Y, Sun Y, Chen D, Zhao J. 2018. Species identification of fish maw (Porcupinefish) products sold on the market using DNA sequencing of 16S rRNA and COI genes. Food Control. 86:159–162. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.11.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar