Recent advances in analytical techniques for the detection of adulteration and authenticity of bee products – A review

References

• Andrea G, Fabrizio DM, Ilaria B, Daniela S, Anna S, Michela B, Maurizio C, Massimo L. 2014. A DNA barcoding approach to characterize pollen collected by honeybees. Plos One. 9(10):e109363. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0109363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annuar F, Adam Q, Fahami NAM. 2018. Antiulcer effect of honey in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs induced gastric ulcer model in rats: a systematic review. Evid-Based Compl Alt. (1):1–12. doi:10.1155/2018/7515692.
   Google Scholar
• Ballabio D, Robotti E, Grisoni F, Quasso F, Bobba M, Vercelli S, Gosetti F, Calabrese G, Sangiorgi E, Orlandi M. 2018. Chemical profiling and multivariate data fusion methods for the identification of the botanical origin of honey. Food Chem. 266:79–89. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.05.084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell KL, Burgess KS, Botsch JC. 2019. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of pollen DNA metabarcoding using constructed species mixtures. Mol Ecol. 28(2):431–455. doi:10.1111/mec.14840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertelli D, Lolli M, Papotti G. 2010. Detection of honey adulteration by sugar syrups using one-dimensional and two-dimensional high-resolution nuclear magnetic resonance. J Agric Food Chem. 58(15):8495–8501. doi:10.1021/jf101460t.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boffo EF, Tavares LA, Tobias ACT, Ferreira MMC, Ferreira AG. 2012. Identification of components of Brazilian honey by 1 H NMR and classification of its botanical origin by chemometric methods. LWT-Food Sci. 49(1):55–63. doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2012.04.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bougrini M, Tahri K, Saidi T, Hassani NEAE, Bouchikhi B, Bari NE. 2016. Classification of honey according to geographical and botanical origins and detection of its adulteration using voltammetric electronic tongue. Food Anal Methods. 9(8):2161–2173. doi:10.1007/s12161-015-0393-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdock GA. 1998. Review of the biological properties and toxicity of bee propolis (propolis). Food Chem Toxicol. 36(4):347–363. doi:10.1016/S0278-6915(97)00145-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çinar SB, Ekşi A, Coşkun İ. 2014. Carbon isotope ratio (13 C/12 C) of pine honey and detection of HFCS adulteration. Food Chem. 157:10–13. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.02.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacic F, Primorac L, Kenjeric D, Benedetti S, Mandic ML. 2009. Application of electronic nose in honey geographical origin characterisation. J Cent Eur Agr. 10(1):19–26. doi:10.5513/jcea.v10i1.745.
   Google Scholar
• Campos MGR, Bogdanov S, Almeida-Muradian LBD, Szczesna T, Mancebo Y, Frigerio C, Ferreira F. 2008. Pollen composition and standardisation of analytical methods. J Apic Res. 47(2):154–161. doi:10.1080/00218839.2008.11101443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavia MM, Fernández-Muiño MA, Gömez-Alonso E, Montes-Pérez MJ, Huidobro JF, Sancho MT. 2002. Evolution of fructose and glucose in honey over one year: influence of induced granulation. Food Chem. 78(2):157–161. doi:10.1016/S0308-8146(01)00393-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen YF, Wang K, Zhang YZ, Zheng YF, Hu FL. 2016. In vitro anti-inflammatory effects of three fatty acids from royal jelly. Mediat Inflamm. 2016(2):1–11. doi:10.1155/2016/3583684.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng H, Qin ZH, Guo XF, Hu XS, Wu JH. 2013. Geographical origin identification of propolis using GC-MS and electronic nose combined with principal component analysis. Food Res Int. 51(2):813–822. doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2013.01.053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• China Chamber of Commerce for Food NPaLIaE. 2020. China’s main bee products exports in 2019. J Bee. 40(3):61–62.
   Google Scholar
• Ciappini MC, Stoppani FS. 2014. Determination of antioxidant capacity, flavonoids, and total phenolic content in eucalyptus and clover honeys. J Apic Sci. 58(1):103–111. doi:10.2478/jas-2014-0010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [CN] Standardization Administration. 2008. GB 9697–2008 Royal jelly.
   Google Scholar
• [CN] Ministry of Public Health. 2011. GB 14963–2011 Honey.
   Google Scholar
• [CN] Standardization Administration. 2013. GB/T 30359–2013 Bee pollen.
   Google Scholar
• [CN] State Administration for Market Regulation. 2018. GB/T 24283–2018 Propolis.
   Google Scholar
• Codex Alimentarius Commission. 1981. Revised Codex stantard for honey codex stan 12–1981, Rev. 1 (1987), Rev. 2 (2001). Codex Standard. 12: 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Consonni R, Cagliani LR. 2008. Geographical characterization of polyfloral and acacia honeys by nuclear magnetic resonance and chemometrics. J Agric Food Chem. 56(16):6873–6880. doi:10.1021/jf801332r.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conte LS, Miorini M, Giomo A, Bertacco G, Zironi R. 1998. Evaluation of some fixed components for unifloral honey characterization. J Agric Food Chem. 46(5):1844–1849. doi:10.1021/jf970837m.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correa AR, Cuenca MM, Zuluaga CM, Scampicchio MM, Quicazán MC. 2017. Validation of honey-bee smelling profile by using a commercial electronic nose. Ing Invest. 37(3):45–51. doi:10.15446/ing.investig.v37n3.59656.
   Google Scholar
• Dekebo A, Kwon SY, Kim DH, Jung C. 2018. Volatiles Analysis of honey by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS): comparison of SPME volatiles extraction methods. J Apic. 33(2):117–128. doi:10.17519/apiculture.2018.06.33.2.117.
   Google Scholar
• Doner LW, White JW, Phillips JG. 1979. Gas-liquid chromatographic test for honey adulteration by high fructose corn sirup. J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 62(1):186–189. doi:10.1093/jaoac/62.1.186.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Downey G, Fouratier V, Kelly J. 2003. Detection of honey adulteration by addition of fructose and glucose using near infrared transfectants spectroscopy. J Near Infrared Spec. 11(1):447–456. doi:10.1255/jnirs.395.
   Google Scholar
• Elisabetta S, Elisa M, Chiara F, Stefano M. 2013. Characterization of markers of botanical origin and other compounds extracted from unifloral honeys. J Agric Food Chem. 61(8):1747–1755. doi:10.1021/jf302798d.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmasry G, Morsy N, Al-Rejaie S. 2019. Real‐time quality authentication of honey using atmospheric pressure chemical ionisation mass spectrometry (APCI‐MS). Int J Food Sci Tech. 54(11):2983–2997. doi:10.1111/ijfs.14210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eteraf-Oskouei T, Najafi M. 2013. Traditional and modern uses of natural honey in human diseases: a review. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 16(6):731–742. doi:10.1136/ejhpharm-2011-000159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fei XQ, Shen CY, Wu B, Zhang R, Chen L. 2014. Detection of royal jelly adulteration using elemental analyzer-carbon isotope ratio mass spectrometry. J Chin Mass Spectrom Soc. 35(2):144–148. doi:10.7538/zpxb.2014.35.02.0144.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreiro-González M, Espada-Bellido E, Guillén-Cueto L, Palma M, Barroso CG, Barbero GF. 2018. Rapid quantification of honey adulteration by visible-near infrared spectroscopy combined with chemometrics. Talanta. 188:288–292. doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2018.05.095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fly LB. 1952. A preliminary pollen analysis of the Miami, Florida, area. J Allergy. 23(1):48–57. doi:10.1016/0021-8707(52)90073-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garcia Amoedo LH, Almeida Muradian LBD. 2007. Physicochemical composition of pure and adulterated royal jelly. Quím Nova. 30(2):257–259. doi:10.1590/S0100-404220070002000002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez MM, De Lorenzo C, Perez RA. 2010. Development of a structured sensory honey analysis: application to artisanal Madrid honeys. Food Sci Technol Int. 16(1):19–29. doi:10.1177/1082013209351869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gresley AL, Kenny J, Cassar C, Kelly A, Sinclair A, Fielder MD. 2012. The application of high resolution diffusion NMR to the analysis of manuka honey. Food Chem. 135(4):2879–2886. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.07.072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins J, Vere ND, Griffith A, Ford CR, Allainguillaume J, Hegarty MJ, Baillie L, Adams-Groom B. 2015. Using DNA metabarcoding to identify the floral composition of honey: a new tool for investigating honey bee foraging preferences. Plos One. 10(8):e0134735. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0134735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He Y, Bai XL, Xiao GL, Liu F, Zhou L, Zhang C. 2020. Detection of adulteration in food based on nondestructive analysis techniques: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci. 12:1–21. doi:10.1080/10408398.2020.1777526.
   Google Scholar
• Hu Y. 2011. Reflections after CCTV’s exposure of “fake honey and fake propolis” incident. J Bee. 31(1):12–13.
   Google Scholar
• Huang FR, Song H, Guo L, Yang XH, Li LQ, Zhao HX, Yang MX. 2019. Determination of chinese honey adulterated with syrups by near infrared spectroscopy combined with chemometrics. Spectrosc Spect Anal. 39(11):3560–3565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang S, Zhang CP, Li GQ, Sun YY, Wang K. 2014. Identification of catechol as a new marker for detecting propolis adulteration. Molecules. 19(7):10208–10217. doi:10.3390/molecules190710208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javier H, Goycoolea FM, Jael Q, Ana A, Marco CE, Zaira D, Refugio R, Luz VM, Velazquez EF, Humberto A. 2007. Sonoran propolis: chemical composition and antiproliferative activity on cancer cell lines. Planta Med. 73(14):1469–1474. doi:10.1055/s-2007-990244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamo T, Kusumoto Y, Tokuoka Y, Okubo S, Hayakawa H, Yoshiyama M, Kimura K, Konuma A. 2018. A DNA barcoding method for identifying and quantifying the composition of pollen species collected by European honeybees, Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: apidae). Appl Entomol Zool. 53(3):353–361. doi:10.1007/s13355-018-0565-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kropf U, Korošec M, Bertoncelj J, Ogrinc N, Nečemer M, Kump P, Golob T. 2010. Determination of the geographical origin of Slovenian black locust, lime and chestnut honey. Food Chem. 121(3):839–846. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.12.094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumaravelu C, Gopal A. 2015. Detection and quantification of adulteration in honey through near infrared spectroscopy. Int J Food Prop. 18(9):1930–1935. doi:10.1080/10942912.2014.919320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Q, Zeng J, Lin L, Zhang J, Wu Z. 2020. Low risk of category misdiagnosis of rice syrup adulteration in three botanical origin honey by ATR-FTIR and general model. Food Chem. 332:127356. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao J, Li C, Huang J, Liu W, Chen H, Liao S, Chen H, Rui W. 2018. Structure characterization of honey-processed astragalus polysaccharides and its anti-inflammatory activity in vitro. Molecules. 23(1):168. doi:10.3390/molecules23010168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louveaux J, Maurizio A, Vorwohl G. 1978. Methods of melissopalynology. Bee World. 59(4):139–157. doi:10.1080/0005772X.1978.11097714.
   Google Scholar
• Luo D, Luo H, Hao D, Xian Y, Guo X, Wu Y. 2016. Hydrogen (2H/1H) combined with carbon (13C/12C) isotope ratios analysis to determine the adulteration of commercial honey. Food Anal Methods. 9(1):255–262. doi:10.1007/s12161-015-0202-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magdalena K, Dorota G, Rafał Z. 2015. The fortification of biscuits with bee pollen and its effect on physicochemical and antioxidant properties in biscuits. LWT-Food Sci Techonol. 63(1):640–646. doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2015.03.075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcdonald CM, Keeling SE, Brewer MJ, Hathaway SC. 2018. Using chemical and DNA marker analysis to authenticate a high-value food, manuka honey. NPJ Sci Food. 2(1):1–14. doi:10.1038/s41538-018-0016-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mofid B, Rezaeizadeh H, Termos A, Rakhsha A, Mafi AR, Taheripanah T, Ardakani MM, Taghavi SME, Moravveji SA, Kashi ASY. 2016. Effect of processed honey and royal jelly on cancer-related fatigue: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. Electron Physician. 8(6):2475–2482. doi:10.19082/2475.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oliveira KCLS, Moriya M, Azedo RAB, Almeida-Muradian LBD, Teixeira EW. 2009. Relationship between botanical origin and antioxidants vitamins of bee-collected pollen. Quím Nova. 32:1099–1102. doi:10.1590/S0100-40422009000500003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozcan M, Unver A, Ceylan DA, Yetişir R. 2004. Inhibitory effect of pollen and propolis extracts. Nahrung. 48(3):188. doi:10.1002/food.200300296.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Puscas A, Hosu A, Cimpoiu C. 2013. Application of a newly developed and validated high-performance thin-layer chromatographic method to control honey adulteration. J Chromatogr A. 1272(1):132–135. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2012.11.064.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Qi D, Ma C, Wang W, Zhang L, Li J. 2020. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis reveals the differences in volatile components of royal jelly from different honeybee stocks. LWT-Food Sci. 124:109143. doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu ZC, Guan YY. 2017. Identification of adulterated honey by precolumn derivatization-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Food Saf Qual. 2:609–613. doi:10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.2017.02.046.
   Google Scholar
• Ralitsa B. 2018. Sugar Composition of royal jelly adulterated with drone brood and bee honey. J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 7(2):1876–1881. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.
   Google Scholar
• Rebours A, Lees M, Rogers KM, Rutledge DN, Spiteri M, Jamin E, Thomas F. 2015. Fast and global authenticity screening of honey using 1H-NMR profiling. Food Chem. 189:60–66. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.11.099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro RDOR, Mársico ET, Carneiro CDS, Monteiro MLG, Júnior CC, Jesus EFOD. 2014. Detection of honey adulteration of high fructose corn syrup by Low Field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (LF 1 H NMR). J Food Eng. 135:39–43. doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2014.03.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodopoulou M, Tananaki C, Dimou M, Liolios V, Kanelis D. 2018. The determination of the botanical origin in honeys with over‐represented pollen: combination of melissopalynological, sensory and physicochemical analysis. J Sci Food Agric. 98(7):2705–2712. doi:10.1002/jsfa.8764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubert J, Zachariasova M, Hajslova J. 2015. Advances in high-resolution mass spectrometry based on metabolomics studies for food - a review. Food Addit Contam. 32(10):1685–1708. doi:10.1080/19440049.2015.1084539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Matute AI, Soria AC, Martínez-Castro I, Sanz ML. 2007. A new methodology based on GC-MS to detect honey adulteration with commercial syrups. J Agric Food Chem. 55(18):7264–7269. doi:10.1021/jf070559j.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Matute AI, Weiss M, Sammataro D. 2010. Carbohydrate composition of high-fructose corn syrups (HFCS) used for bee feeding: effect on honey composition. J Agric Food Chem. 58(12):7317–7322. doi:10.1021/jf100758x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo A, Cardile V, Sanchez F, Troncoso N, Vanella A, Garbarino JA. 2004. Chilean propolis: antioxidant activity and antiproliferative action in human tumor cell lines. Life Sci. 76(5):545–558. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2004.07.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saito K, Tomita F. 2000. Difructose anhydrides: their mass-production and physiological functions. Biosci Biotech Biochem. 64(7):1321–1327. doi:10.1271/bbb.64.1321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saravanan M, Mohanapriya G, Laha R. 2019. DNA barcoding detects floral origin of Indian honey samples. Genome. 62(5):341–348. doi:10.1139/gen-2018-0058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• She S, Chen LZ, Song HB, Lin GH, Li Y, Zhou JH, Liu CL. 2019. Discrimination of geographical origins of Chinese acacia honey using complex 13C/12C, oligosaccharides and polyphenols. Food Chem. 272(7):580–585. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.07.227.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sousa MEBC, Dias LG, Veloso ACA, Estevinho L, Peres AM, Machado AASC. 2014. Practical procedure for discriminating monofloral honey with a broad pollen profile variability using an electronic tongue. Talanta. 128:284–292. doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2014.05.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiteri M, Rogers KM, Jamin E, Thomas F, Guyader S, Lees M, Rutledge DN. 2017. Combination of 1H-NMR and chemometrics to discriminate manuka honey from other floral honey types from Oceania. Food Chem. 217:766–772. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.09.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stocker A, Rossmann A, Kettrup A, Bengsch E. 2010. Detection of royal jelly adulteration using carbon and nitrogen stable isotope ratio analysis. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 20(2):181–184. doi:10.1002/rcm.2287.
   Google Scholar
• Sun L, Song C, Yang Y, Zhou LD. 2017. A research on the inexistence of fraudpropolin a in natural propolis. J Tradi Chin Med. 19(2):300–305. doi:10.11842/wst.2017.02.018.
   Google Scholar
• Tian H, Shen Y, Yu H, Chen C. 2016. Aroma features of honey measured by sensory evaluation, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and electronic nose. Int J Food Prop. 25(1):1755–1768. doi:10.1080/10942912.2016.1213744.
   Google Scholar
• Tosun M. 2013. Detection of adulteration in honey samples added various sugar syrups with 13C/12C isotope ratio analysis method. Food Chem. 138(2):1629–1632. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.11.068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner K, Nielsen BD, Connor CI. 2006. Bee pollen product supplementation to horses in training seems to improve feed intake: a pilot study. J Anim Physiol Ani Nutr. 90(9):414–420. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0396.2006.00621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velazquez C, Navarro M, Acosta A, Angulo A, Hernandez J. 2010. Antibacterial and free-radical scavenging activities of Sonoran propolis. J Appl Microbiol. 103(5):1747–1756. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03409.x.
   Google Scholar
• Wu YW, Sun SQ, Zhao J, Li Y, Zhou Q. 2008. Rapid discrimination of extracts of Chinese propolis and poplar buds by FT-IR and 2D IR correlation spectroscopy. J Mol Struc. 883:48–54. doi:10.1016/j.molstruc.2007.12.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang G, Jiang H. 2018. Discussion on quality and safety control of honey industry chain. J Honey Prod. 9(1):58–61.
   Google Scholar
• Xu J, Liu X, Wu B, Zhong YC. 2020. A comprehensive analysis of 13C isotope ratios data of authentic honey types produced in China using the EA-IRMS and LC-IRMS. J Food Sci Technol. 57(4):1216–1232. doi:10.1007/s13197-019-04153-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakubu A, Abbas Z, Muhammed A. 2019. Determination of adulteration of honey syrup using open ended coaxial probe sensor at microwave frequency. Open Access Library J. 6(7):1–11. doi:10.4236/oalib.1105448.
   Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Battesti MJ, Djabou N, Muselli A, Paolini J, Tomi P, Costa J. 2012. Melissopalynological origin determination and volatile composition analysis of Corsican “chestnut grove” honeys. Food Chem. 132(4):2144–2154. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.07.075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz MT, Tatlisu NB, Toker OS, Karaman S, Dertli E, Sagdic O, Arici M. 2014. Steady, dynamic and creep rheological analysis as a novel approach to detect honey adulteration by fructose and saccharose syrups: correlations with HPLC-RID results. Food Res Int. 64:634–646. doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2014.07.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Zhang S, Qing X, Lu Z. 2019b. A new strategy for rapid classification of honeys by simple cluster analysis method based on combination of various physicochemical parameters. Chem Res Chin Univ. 35(3):390–394. doi:10.1007/s40242-019-8321-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao FY, Dong X, Li JJ. 2007. Study and application of melissopalynology. J Yunnan Agri Univ. 2:270–274. doi:10.16211/j.1004-390x(n).2007.02.023.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng X, Zhao Y, Wu H, Dong J, Feng J. 2016. Origin identification and quantitative analysis of honeys by nuclear magnetic resonance and chemometric techniques. Food Anal Methods. 9(6):1470–1479. doi:10.1007/s12161-015-0325-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar