Rapid detection of neutralising acid adulterants in raw milk using a milk component analyser and chemometrics

References

• Aiello A, Pizzolongo F, Manzo N, Romano R. 2019. A new method to distinguish the milk adulteration with neutralizers by detection of lactic acid. Food Anal Methods. 12(11):2555–2561. doi:10.1007/s12161-019-01594-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billard H, Simon L, Desnots E, Sochard A, Boscher C, Riaublanc A, Alexandre-Gouabau M-C, Boquien C-Y. 2016. Calibration adjustment of the mid-infrared analyzer for an accurate determination of the macronutrient composition of human milk. J Hum Lact. 32(3):NP19–NP27. doi:10.1177/0890334415588513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman L. 1996. Bagging predictors. Mach Learn. 24(2):123–140. doi:10.1007/BF00058655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman L. 2001. Random forests. Mach Learn. 45(1):5–32. doi:10.1023/A:1010933404324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Codex Alimentarius Commission 1991. Guidelines for the preservation of raw milk by use of the lactoperoxidase system.
   Google Scholar
• Coimbra PT, Bathazar CF, Guimarães JT, Coutinho NM, Pimentel TC, Neto RPC, Esmerino EA, Freitas MQ, Silva MC, Tavares MIB, et al. 2020. Detection of formaldehyde in raw milk by time domain nuclear magnetic resonance and chemometrics. Food Control. 110:107006. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.107006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coitinho TB, Cassoli LD, Cerqueira PHR, da Silva HK, Coitinho JB, Machado PF. 2017. Adulteration identification in raw milk using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. J Food Sci Technol. 54(8):2394–2402. doi:10.1007/s13197-017-2680-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler DR, Edwards TC, Jr Beard KH, Cutler A, Hess KT, Gibson J, Lawler JJ. 2007. Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology. 88(11):2783–2792. doi:10.1890/07-0539.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Santana FB, Neto WB, Poppi RJ. 2019. Random forest as one-class classifier and infrared spectroscopy for food adulteration detection. Food Chem. 293:323–332. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.04.073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Souza Gondim C, Junqueira RG, de Souza SVC, Ruisánchez I, Callao MP. 2017. Detection of several common adulterants in raw milk by MID-infrared spectroscopy and one-class and multi-class multivariate strategies. Food Chem. 230:68–75. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.03.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdem H, Okuyucu IC. 2019. Influence of hygiene status of cows on somatic cell count and milk components during summer season. Large Anim Rev. 25(1):7–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gondim C, Paulo Borges dos Santos P, Penna e Palhares M, Cesar de Sousa R. 2021. Detection of acid neutralizers in fraudulent milk: full validation of a classical qualitative method. Quim Nova. 44:625–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo WC, Zhu DK, Zhang Q, et al. 2020. Detection on adulterated oil-tea camellia seed oil based on near-infrared spectroscopy. Trans Chin Soc Agric Mach. 51(09):350–357.
   Google Scholar
• Hao X, Fu L, Shao L, Chen Q, Dorus B, Cao X, Fang F. 2022. Quantification of major milk proteins using ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem triple quadrupole mass spectrometry and its application in milk authenticity analysis. Food Control. 131:108455. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hua JJ, Wang HJ, Wang JJ, Li J, Jiang YW, Wang YL, Yuan HB. 2020. Influences of first-drying methods on the quality of Congou black tea using partialleast squares-discrimination analysis. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng. 36(8):260–270.
   Google Scholar
• Kasapidou E, Basdagianni Z, Papadopoulos V, Karaiskou C, Kesidis A, Tsiotsias A. 2021. Effects of intensive and semi-intensive production on sheep milk chemical composition, physicochemical characteristics, fatty acid profile, and nutritional indices. Animals. 11(9):2578. doi:10.3390/ani11092578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Ren J, Liu ZM, Guo BH. 2015. A new comprehensive index for discriminating adulteration in bovine raw milk. Food Chem. 172:251–256. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.09.063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melo WO, Monteiro BM, Chaves LCS, Santos ERD, Souza DC, Amorim BS, Junior SPF, Filho JDR, Faturi C, Viana RB. 2018. Ultrasound spectroscopy as an alternative method to measure the physical-chemical constituents of buffalo milk. Cienc Rural. 48(2):e20170447. doi:10.1590/0103-8478cr20170447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melucci D, Bendini A, Tesini F, Barbieri S, Zappi A, Vichi S, Conte L, Toschi TG. 2016. Rapid direct analysis to discriminate geographic origin of extra virgin olive oils by flash gas chromatography electronic nose and chemometrics. Food Chem. 204:263–273. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.02.131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Agriculture of the People's Republic of China. 2015. Technical specification for quality and safety control of pollution-free agricultural products part 9 Raw Milk.
   Google Scholar
• National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People's Republic of China 2015. National food safety standard Food additive Sodium bicarbonate.
   Google Scholar
• Pintus MC, Lussu M, Dessì A, Pintus R, Noto A, Masile V, Marcialis MA, Puddu M, Fanos V, Atzori L. 2018. Urinary 1H-NMR metabolomics in the first week of life can anticipate bpd diagnosis. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2018:7620671. 2018. doi:10.1155/2018/7620671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rico DE, Marshall ER, Choi J, Kaylegian KE, Dechow CD, Harvatine KJ. 2014. Within-milking variation in milk composition and fatty acid profile of Holstein dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 97(7):4259–4268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Galiano VF, Ghimire B, Rogan J, Chica-Olmo M, Rigol-Sanchez JP. 2012. An assessment of the effectiveness of a random forest classifier for land-cover classification. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 67:93–104. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2011.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh P, Gandhi N. 2015. Milk preservatives and adulterants: processing, regulatory and safety issues. Food Rev Int. 31(3):236–261. doi:10.1080/87559129.2014.994818
   Google Scholar
• Swaisgood H. 1985. Characteristics of edible fluids of animal origin: milk. Food Chem. 2:796.
   Google Scholar
• Tian HX, Liu H, He Y, Chen B, Xiao L, Fei Y, Wang G, Yu H, Chen C. 2020. Combined application of electronic nose analysis and back-propagation neural network and random forest models for assessing yogurt flavor acceptability. Food Measure. 14(1):573–583. doi:10.1007/s11694-019-00335-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripathy S, Ghole AR, Deep K, Vanjari SRK, Singh SG. 2017. A comprehensive approach for milk adulteration detection using inherent bio-physical properties as ‘Universal Markers’: towards a miniaturized adulteration detection platform. Food Chem. 217:756–765. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.09.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang HT, Luo XL, Chen MX, Xiong Q, Wan PM, Hu XZ, Zhang SJ. 2021. Common detection methods of five adulterants in milk and prospects of spectral detection technology. China Dairy Cattle. 4(01):46–51.
   Google Scholar
• Wang YB, Liu DH, Ye XQ, Shen J. 2005. Study on the effect of ultrasonic milk analyser for detecting composition of milk adulterated with hydrolyzed animal protein powder and urea. J Chin Inst Food Sci Technol. 2005(02):98–102.
   Google Scholar
• Wang YR, Bo S, Luo RM, Wang SL. 2021. Identification of adulteration of roast mutton based on electronic nose, GC-MS combined with chemometric methods. Food Sci. 43(4):291–298. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2206.TS.20210531.1355.018.html.
   Google Scholar
• Wei L, Ji YF. 2012. Test on the determination of alkali substances in raw milk. Xinjiang Ani Husbandry. (04):28.
   Google Scholar
• Xu CH, Wang YX. 2020. Discrimination of three famous teas in Jiangxi using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry combined with chemometrics. Food Sci. 41(20):141–150.
   Google Scholar
• Xu M, Wang J, Zhu L. 2019. The qualitative and quantitative assessment of tea quality based on E-nose, E-tongue and E-eye combined with chemometrics. Food Chem. 289:482–489. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.03.080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Wang LF, Yao YP, Yin YF. 2017. Toxic effects of sodium thiocyanate in raw milk and its mechanism. Anim Husbandry Feed Sci. 38(09):44–47.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Zuo Z, Xu F, Wang Y. 2020. Origin identification of Panax notoginseng by multi-sensor information fusion strategy of infrared spectra combined with random forest. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 226:117619. doi:10.1016/j.saa.2019.117619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zong LL, Ying Y, Tang SX. 2020. Determination of thiocyanate in milk by ion chromatography. Modern Food. 000(005)P.:167–169.
   Google Scholar
• Zou GY, Wang WZ, Wang MM, Xiao YZ, Zhang HM. 2019. Quality detection of Xinyang Maojian tea using electronic nose and electronic tongue. Food Sci. 40(10):279–284.
   Google Scholar